Telehealth use has had widespread expansion and adoption over the past two years. This study aims to evaluate access to telehealth essentials (TE) using a novel metric.
Methods
This single institute study surveyed outpatient surgical patients to determine their access to TE. Generalized linear mixed models were used to determine the relationship of demographic and county-level variables on access to four TE.
Results
138 patients were surveyed. Sixty-six (47.8%) were from Appalachian Kentucky. In the survey cohort, 122 (88.4%) had smart phones, 109 (80.7%) had devices with video messaging capabilities, 106 (80.9%) had cellular reception, and 112 (82.4%) had access to WiFi. Increasing age and Medicare insurance were the most consistent predictors of lack of access to TE.
Conclusion
Rural Appalachian Kentucky has access to TE. Telehealth has the potential to decrease the healthcare inequity in rural populations, but incompletely address this inequity for the aging population.
SmithACThomasESnoswellCL, et al.Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare. 2020; 26(5): 309–313. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20916567
2.
PortnoyJWallerMElliottT. Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020; 8(5): 1489–1491.
3.
MannDMChenJChunaraRTestaPANovO. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: Evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 27(7): 1132–1135.
4.
World Health Organization. Global diffusion of eHealth: Making universal health coverage achievable. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.
ChenXOromHHayJL, et al.Differences in rural and urban health information access and use. J Rural Health. 2019; 35(3): 405–417.
7.
CoughlinSSClaryCJohnsonJA, et al.Continuing challenges in rural health in the United States. J Environ Health Sci. 2019; 5(2): 90–92.
8.
DouthitNKivSDwolatzkyTBiswasS. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Publ Health. 2015; 129(6): 611–620.
9.
FindlingMGBlendonRJBensonJMSaydeJMMillerCE. Views of rural US adults about health and economic concerns. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(1): e1918745.
10.
GarciaMCRossenLMBastianB, et al.Potentially excess deaths from the five leading causes of death in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties-United States, 2010–2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019; 68(10): 1–11.
11.
LongASHanlonALPellegrinKL. Socioeconomic variables explain rural disparities in US mortality rates: Implications for rural health research and policy. SSM Popul Health. 2018; 6: 72–74.
DenhamSAMeyerMGToborgMAMandeMJ. Providing health education to Appalachia populations. Holist Nurs Pract. 2004; 18(6): 293–301.
16.
BodenheimerTChenEBennettHD. Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: Can the U.S. health care workforce do the job?Health Aff. 2009; 28(1): 64–74.
17.
AgborsangayaCBLauDLahtinenMCookeTJohnsonJA. Multimorbidity prevalence and patterns across socioeconomic determinants: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Publ Health. 2012; 12: 201.
18.
GoodinATalbertJFreemanPRHahnEJFallin-BennettA. Appalachian disparities in tobacco cessation treatment utilization in Medicaid. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Pol. 2020; 15(1): 5.
19.
PaskettEDFisherJLLengerichEJ, et al.Disparities in underserved white populations: The case of cancer-related disparities in Appalachia. Oncol. 2011; 16(8): 1072–1081.
20.
RodriguezSDVanderfordNLHuangBVanderpoolRC. A social-ecological review of cancer disparities in Kentucky. South Med J. 2018; 111(4): 213–219.
21.
SchoenbergNEHowellBMFieldsN. Community strategies to address cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky. Fam Community Health. 2012; 35(1): 31–43.
22.
McGarveyELLeon-VerdinMKillosLFGuterbockTCohnWF. Health disparities between Appalachian and non-Appalachian counties in Virginia USA. J Community Health. 2011; 36(3): 348–356.
23.
HouserANWendyFGUjvariK. Across the States: Profiles of long-term services and supports. AARP Public Policy Institute; 2012.
24.
BureauUSC. In: DP02T, ed. American community survey, 2018–5-year data profile; 2018.
25.
PollardKLindaAJ. The Appalachian region: A data overview from the 2014–2018 American community survey. Appalachian Regional Commission; 2020.
26.
GuoYAlbrightD. The effectiveness of telehealth on self-management for older adults with a chronic condition: A comprehensive narrative review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24(6): 392–403.
27.
Sakaguchi-TangDKBosoldALChoiYKTurnerAM. Patient portal use and experience among older adults: Systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2017; 5(4): e38.
28.
SabesanSSimcoxKMarrI. Medical oncology clinics through videoconferencing: an acceptable telehealth model for rural patients and health workers. Intern Med J. 2012; 42(7): 780–785.
29.
KruseCSKrowskiNRodriguezBTranLVelaJBrooksM. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(8): e016242.
30.
OrlandoJFBeardMKumarS. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS One. 2019; 14(8): e0221848.
31.
DillmanDASmythJDChristianLM. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2014.
32.
MehrotraAJenaABBuschABSouzaJUscher-PinesLLandonBE. Utilization of telemedicine among rural medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2016; 315(18): 2015–2016.
33.
IncP. Health disparities in Appalachia: Appalachian regional commission. Washington, DC: Press Release; 2017.
34.
SchoenbergNEBardachSHManchikantiKNGoodenowAC. Appalachian residents’ experiences with and management of multiple morbidity. Qual Health Res. 2011; 21(5): 601–611.
35.
SyedSTGerberBSSharpLK. Traveling towards disease: Transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health. 2013; 38(5): 976–993.
36.
ArcuryTAPreisserJSGeslerWMPowersJM. Access to transportation and health care utilization in a rural region. J Rural Health. 2005; 21(1): 31–38.
37.
DrakeCZhangYChaiyachatiKHPolskyD. The limitations of poor broadband internet access for telemedicine use in rural America: An observational study. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171(5): 382–384.
