Viscoelastic tests including thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are being used in patients with severe hemorrhage at trauma centers to guide resuscitation. Several recent studies demonstrated hypercoagulability in female trauma patients that was associated with a survival advantage. The objective of our study was to elucidate the effects of gender differences in TEG/ROTEM values on survival in trauma patients with severe hemorrhage.
Methods
A retrospective review of consecutive adult patients receiving massive transfusion protocol (MTP) at 7 Level I trauma centers was performed from 2013 to 2018. Data were stratified by gender and then further examined by TEG or ROTEM parameters. Results were analyzed using univariate and multi-variate analyses.
Results
A total of 1565 patients were included with 70.9% male gender (n = 1110/1565). Female trauma patients were older than male patients (43.5 ± .9 vs 41.1 ± .6 years, P = .01). On TEG, females had longer reaction times (6.1 ± .9 min vs 4.8 ± .2 min, P = .03), increased alpha angle (68.6 ± .8 vs 65.7 ± .4, P < .001), and higher maximum amplitude (59.8 ± .8 vs 56.3 ± .4, P < .001). On ROTEM, females had significantly longer clot time (99.2 ± 13.7 vs 75.1 ± 2.6 sec, P = .09) and clot formation time (153.6 ± 10.6 sec vs 106.9 ± 3.8 sec, P < .001). When comparing by gender, no difference for in-hospital mortality was found for patients in the TEG or ROTEM group (P > .05). Multivariate analysis showed no survival difference for female patients (OR 1.11, 95% CI .83-1.50, P = .48).
Conclusions
Although a difference between male and females was found on TEG/ROTEM for certain clotting parameters, no difference in mortality was observed. Prospective multi-institutional studies are needed.
UnruhMReyesJHelmerSDHaanJM. An evaluation of blood product utilization rates with massive transfusion protocol: before and after thromboelastography (TEG) use in trauma. Am J Surg. 2019;218(6):1175-1180.
2.
WhitingDDiNardoJA. TEG and ROTEM: technology and clinical applications. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(2):228-232.
3.
Baksaas-AasenKVan DierenSBalversK, et al.Data-driven development of ROTEM and TEG algorithms for the management of trauma hemorrhage: a prospective observational multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1178-1185.
4.
SubramanianMKaplanLJCannonJW. Thromboelastography-guided resuscitation of the trauma patient. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(12):1152-1153.
5.
GortonHJWarrenERSimpsonNALyonsGRColumbMO. Thromboelastography identifies sex-related differences in coagulation. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(5):1279-1281.
6.
RemmersDECioffiWGBlandKIWangPAngeleMKChaudryIH. Testosterone: the crucial hormone responsible for depressing myocardial function in males after trauma-hemorrhage. Ann Surg. 1998;227(6):790-799.
7.
KahlkeVAngeleMKAyalaA, et al.Immune dysfunction following trauma-haemorrhage: influence of gender and age. Cytokine. 2000;12(1):69-77.
8.
AngeleMKSchwachaMGAyalaAChaudryIH. Effect of gender and sex hormones on immune responses following shock. Shock. 2000;14(2):81-90.
9.
KnöferlMWJarrarDAngeleMK, et al.17 beta-Estradiol normalizes immune responses in ovariectomized females after trauma-hemorrhage. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281(4):C1131-C1138.
10.
ColemanJRMooreEESamuelsJM, et al.Trauma resuscitation consideration: sex matters. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(5):760-768.e1.
11.
HaiderAHCromptonJGChangDC, et al.Evidence of hormonal basis for improved survival among females with trauma-associated shock: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma. 2010;69(3):537-540.
12.
DeitchEALivingstonDHLaveryRFMonaghanSFBonguAMachiedoGW. Hormonally active women tolerate shock-trauma better than do men: a prospective study of over 4000 trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):447-453.
13.
SperryJLNathensABFrankelHL, et al.Characterization of the gender dimorphism after injury and hemorrhagic shock: are hormonal differences responsible?Crit Care Med. 2008;36(6):1838-1845.
14.
TaghaviSTatumDRezaT, et al.Sex differences in the massively transfused trauma patient. Shock. 2021;55(5):607-612.
15.
BrownJBCohenMJMineiJP, et al.Characterization of acute coagulopathy and sexual dimorphism after injury: females and coagulopathy just do not mix. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1395-1400.
16.
LopezMCEfronPAOzrazgat-BaslantiT, et al.Sex-based differences in the genomic response, innate immunity, organ dysfunction, and clinical outcomes after severe blunt traumatic injury and hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):478-485.
17.
NapolitanoLMGrecoMERodriguezAKuferaJAWestRSScaleaTM. Gender differences in adverse outcomes after blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2001;50(2):274-80.
18.
MagnottiLJFischerPEZarzaurBLFabianTCCroceMA. Impact of gender on outcomes after blunt injury: a definitive analysis of more than 36,000 trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):984-991.
19.
CroceMAFabianTCMalhotraAKBeeTKMillerPR. Does gender difference influence outcome?J Trauma. 2002;53(5):889-894.
20.
RoeloffzenWWKluin-NelemansHCMulderABVeegerNJBosmanLde WolfJT. In normal controls, both age and gender affect coagulability as measured by thrombelastography. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(4):987-994.
21.
ScarpeliniSRhindSGNascimentoB, et al.Normal range values for thromboelastography in healthy adult volunteers. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2009;42(12):1210-1217.
22.
SchreiberMADifferdingJThorborgPMayberryJCMullinsRJ. Hypercoagulability is most prevalent early after injury and in female patients. J Trauma. 2005;58(3):475-480.
23.
HuntHStanworthSCurryN, et al.Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(2):CD010438.
24.
Da LuzLTNascimentoBShankarakuttyAKRizoliSAdhikariNK. Effect of thromboelastography (TEG®) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) on diagnosis of coagulopathy, transfusion guidance and mortality in trauma: descriptive systematic review. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):518.
25.
GonzalezEMooreEEMooreHB, et al.Goal-directed hemostatic resuscitation of trauma-induced coagulopathy: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing a viscoelastic assay to conventional coagulation assays. Ann Surg. 2016;263(6):1051-1059.
26.
Baksaas-AasenKGallLSStensballeJ, et al.Viscoelastic haemostatic assay augmented protocols for major trauma haemorrhage (ITACTIC): a randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(1):49-59.
27.
VasudevaMMathewJKFitzgeraldMCCheungZMitraB. Hypocalcaemia and traumatic coagulopathy: an observational analysis. Vox Sang. 2020;115(2):189-195.
28.
MacKayEJStubnaMDHolenaDN, et al.Abnormal calcium levels during trauma resuscitation are associated with increased mortality, increased blood product use, and greater hospital resource consumption: a pilot investigation. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(3):895-901.
29.
KyleTGreavesIBeynonAWhittakerVBrewerMSmithJ. Ionised calcium levels in major trauma patients who received blood en route to a military medical treatment facility. Emerg Med J. 2018;35(3):176-179.
30.
ChanthimaPYuwapattanawongKThamjamrassriT, et al.Association between ionized calcium concentrations during hemostatic transfusion and calcium treatment with mortality in major trauma. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(6):1684-1691.
31.
WebsterSToddSRedheadJWrightC. Ionised calcium levels in major trauma patients who received blood in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(8):569-572.
32.
MooreHBTessmerMTMooreEE, et al.Forgot calcium? Admission ionized-calcium in two civilian randomized controlled trials of prehospital plasma for traumatic hemorrhagic shock. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(5):588-596.
33.
MatthayZAFieldsATNunez-GarciaB, et al.Dynamic effects of calcium on in vivo and ex vivo platelet behavior after trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(5):871-879.
34.
VerniCCDavilaAJrBalianSSimsCADiamondSL. Platelet dysfunction during trauma involves diverse signaling pathways and an inhibitory activity in patient-derived plasma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86(2):250-259.
35.
RowellSEBarbosaRRAllisonCE, et al.Gender-based differences in mortality in response to high product ratio massive transfusion. J Trauma. 2011;71(2 Suppl 3):S375-S379.
36.
McCrumMLLerouxBFangT, et al.Sex-based differences in transfusion need after severe injury: findings of the PROPPR study. Surgery. 2019;165(6):1122-1127.
37.
McGinityACZhuCSGreebonL, et al.Prehospital low-titer cold-stored whole blood: philosophy for ubiquitous utilization of O-positive product for emergency use in hemorrhage due to injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(6 Ssuppl 1):S115-S119.
38.
YazerMTriulziDSperryJCorcosASeheultJ. Rate of RhD-alloimmunization after the transfusion of RhD-positive red blood cell containing products among injured patients of childbearing age: single center experience and narrative literature review. Hematology. 2021;26(1):321-327.
39.
WilliamsLA3rdSikoraJAldreesRPhamHPMarquesMB. Anti-Rh alloimmunization after trauma resuscitation. Transfus Apher Sci. 2019;58(6):102652.
