HellerCBalls-BerryJENeryJDErwinPJLittletonDKimM, et al.Strategies addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment of underrepresented populations: A systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;39(2):169-182.
WilliamsDRLawrenceJADavisBA. Racism and health: Evidence and needed research. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2019;40:105-125.
4.
Nature. Henrietta Lacks: Science must right a historical wrong. Nature. 2020;585(7823):7.
5.
PrendergastBJOnishiKGZuckerI. Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;40:1-5.
6.
YoonDYMansukhaniNAStubbsVCHelenowskiIBWoodruffTKKibbeMR. Sex bias exists in basic science and translational surgical research. Surgery. 2014;156(3):508-516. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.07.001
7.
SugimotoCRAhnY-YSmithEMacalusoBLarivièreV. Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: A cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis. Lancet. 2019;393(10171):550-559.
8.
PrakashVSMansukhaniNAHelenowskiIBWoodruffTKKibbeMR. Sex bias in interventional clinical trials. J Wom Health. 2018;27(11):1342-1348. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6873
9.
MansukhaniNAYoonDYTeterKAStubbsVCHelenowskiIBWoodruffTK, et al.Determining if sex bias exists in human surgical clinical research. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):1022-1030.
10.
RochonPAMashariACohenAMisraALaxerDStreinerDL, et al.The inclusion of minority groups in clinical trials: Problems of under representation and under reporting of data. Account Res. 2004;11(3-4):215-223.
11.
GellerSEKochAPellettieriBCarnesM. Inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials: Have we made progress?J Wom Health. 2011;20(3):315-320.
12.
MassieJPChoDYKneibCJBurnsJRCroweCSLaneM, et al.Patient representation in medical literature: Are we appropriately depicting diversity?Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(12):e2563.
13.
ChoDYKneibCJShakirABurnsJRLaneMMassieJP, et al.Underrepresentation of racial minorities in breast surgery literature: A call for increased diversity and inclusion. Ann Surg. 2021;273(2):202-207.
JenaABKhullarDHoOOlenskiARBlumenthalDM. Sex differences in academic rank in US medical schools in 2014. J Am Med Assoc. 2015;314(11):1149-1158.
16.
GrinnellMHigginsSYostKOchubaOLoblMGrimesP, et al.The proportion of male and female editors in women's health journals: A critical analysis and review of the sex gap. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2020;6(1):7-12.
17.
AmreinKLangmannAFahrleitner-PammerAPieberTRZollner-SchwetzI. Women underrepresented on editorial boards of 60 major medical journals. Gend Med. 2011;8(6):378-387.
18.
ErrenTCGroßJVShawDMSelleB. Representation of women as authors, reviewers, editors in chief, and editorial board members at 6 general medical journals in 2010 and 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(4):633-635.
19.
JagsiRGuancialEAWorobeyCCHenaultLEChangYStarrR, et al.The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—A 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3);281-287.
20.
Anonymous. Nature’s under-representation of women. Nature. 2018;558(7710):344.
21.
McGintyGB. Building diversity one citation at a time. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(7):937-938.
22.
WestJDJacquetJKingMMCorrellSJBergstromCT. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e66212.
23.
ShahSSShaughnessyEESpectorND. Leading by example: How medical journals can improve representation in academic medicine. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(7):393.
24.
ElstonDM. Medical journals, diversity, and cultural sensitivity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(3):607-608.
MacKayKQuigleyM. Exacerbating inequalities? Health policy and the behavioural sciences. Health Care Anal. 2018;26(4):380-397.
27.
SmitsPADenisJL. How research funding agencies support science integration into policy and practice: An international overview. Implement Sci. 2014;9:28.
28.
KneippSMSchwartzTADrevdahlDJCanalesMKSantacroceSSantosHP, et al.Trends in health disparities, health inequity, and social determinants of health research: A 17-year analysis of NINR, NCI, NHLBI, and NIMHD funding. Nurs Res. 2018;67(3):231-241.
29.
Mesquita-NetoJWDaileyWMacedoFIMerchantNBPatterns of national institutes of health grant funding to surgical research and scholarly productivity in the United States. Ann Surg. 2020;272(4):539-546.
30.
NikajSRoychowdhuryDLundPKMatthewsMPearsonK. Examining trends in the diversity of the U.S. national institutes of health participating and funded workforce. FASEB J. 2018;fj201800639.
31.
KaatzAMaguaWZimmermanDRCarnesM. A quantitative linguistic analysis of national institutes of health r01 application critiques from investigators at one institution. Acad Med. 2015;90(1):69-75.
32.
ChenMSJr.Rectifying disparities in funding of Asian American, native Hawaiian, and pacific islander research by the US national institutes of health. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(7):e197561.
33.
DurantRWWenzelJAScarinciICPaternitiDAFouadMNHurdTC, et al.Perspectives on barriers and facilitators to minority recruitment for clinical trials among cancer center leaders, investigators, research staff, and referring clinicians: Enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT). Cancer. 2014;120(Suppl 7):1097-1105.
34.
RobinsonJMTrochimWM. An examination of community members’, researcher’ and health professionals’ perceptions of barriers to minority participation in medical research: An application of concept mapping. Ethn Health. 2007;12(5):521-539.
35.
AmorrortuRPArevaloMVernonSWMainousAGDiazVMcKeeMD, et al.Recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities to clinical trials conducted within specialty clinics: An intervention mapping approach. Trials. 2018;19(1):115.
36.
NiranjanSJMartinMYFouadMNVickersSMWenzelJACookED, et al.Bias and stereotyping among research and clinical professionals: Perspectives on minority recruitment for oncology clinical trials. Cancer. 2020;126(9):1958-1968.
37.
TilleyBCMainousIII AGSmithDWMcKeeMDAmorrortuRPAlvidrezJ, et al.Design of a cluster-randomized minority recruitment trial: RECRUIT. Clin Trials. 2017;14(3):286-298.
38.
MehtaAMorris-WisemanLRomero ArenasMANwariakuF. Beyond recognition: practical steps to inclusion in academic surgery. Am J Surg. 2021:S0002-9610(21)00156-2.
39.
KibbeMRFreischlagJ. Call to action to all surgery journal editors for diversity in the editorial and peer review process. JAMA Surgery. 2020;155(11):1015-1016. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4549.
40.
ChenHFerradaPKennedyGLindemanBNewmanESolorzanoC, et al.Editorial: From the editors of AJS. Am J Surg2020;220:507.
41.
WhiteEMadukaRBallouzD, et al.Surgical research journals - under review. an assessment of diversity among editorial boards and outcomes of peer review. Am J Surg (in press).
42.
CottonJLO’NeillBSGriffinA. The “name game”: Affective and hiring reactions to first names. J Manag Psychol. 2008;23(1):18-39.
43.
ConawayWBethuneS. Implicit bias and first name stereotypes: What are the implications for online instruction?Online Learn. 2015;19(3):162-178.
44.
MacNellLDriscollAHuntAN. What’s in a name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innovat High Educ. 2015;40:291–303.