Emergency Medical Service Transport Time and Trauma Outcomes at an Urban Level 1 Trauma Center: Evaluation of Prehospital Emergency Medical Service Response

Abstract

Background

The use of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) for trauma patients has been debated since its introduction. We aim to compare outcomes for trauma patients transported by ground EMS (GEMS) vs. HEMS using raw and adjusted mortality in a level 1 trauma center.

Methods

A 6-year retrospective cohort study utilizing our level 1 trauma center registry for patients transferred by GEMS or HEMS was performed. Demographics and outcome measures were compared. Raw and adjusted mortality was evaluated. Adjusted mortality was determined incorporating confounders, including patient demographics, comorbid conditions, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale score, and EMS transport time. Chi-square, multivariable logistic regression, and independent sample T-test were utilized with significance, defined as P < .05.

Results

Of 12 633 patients, 10 656 were transported via GEMS and 1977 with HEMS. Mean age was 55 for GEMS and 40 for HEMS (P < .001). Mean ISS was 9.29 and 11.73 for GEMS and HEMS (P < .001). Mean Revised Trauma Score was higher (less severe) for GEMS vs. HEMS (7.6 vs. 7.12, P < .001). Mean transport times for GEMS and HEMS was 39.45 vs. 47.29 minutes (P = .02). Raw mortality was 2.55% (307/10 656) for GEMS and 6.78% (134/1977) for HEMS. Adjusted mortality revealed a 16.6% increased mortality for GEMS compared to HEMS (adjusted odds ratio = 1.166, 95% CI: .815-1.668).

Conclusions

Air-lifted trauma patients were younger, more severely injured, and more hemodynamically unstable and required longer transport time but experienced lower adjusted mortality. Future research is needed to investigate whether reducing transport times and augmenting the advanced care already implemented by HEMS crews can improve outcomes.

Keywords

emergency medical services pre hospital trauma case observed/expected mortality trauma outcomes trauma systems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tsuchiya

Tsutsumi

Yasunaga

. Outcomes after helicopter versus ground emergency medical services for major trauma--propensity score and instrumental variable analyses: A retrospective nationwide cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resuscitation Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):140.

McVey

Petrie

Tallon

. Air versus ground transport of the major trauma patient: A natural experiment. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(1):45-50.

Andruszkow

Schweigkofler

Lefering

, et al.

Impact of helicopter emergency medical service in traumatized patients: Which patient benefits most?

PloS One. 2016;11(1):e0146897.

Brown

Gestring

Guyette

, et al. Helicopter transport improves survival following injury in the absence of a time-saving advantage. Surgery. 2016;159(3):947-959.

Miamidade . Miami-Dade fire rescue medical operations manual. Protocol 5-Trauma Alert Criteria. https://mdsceh.miamidade.gov/mobi/moms/protocol%2005.pdfRevised 07/31/2020. (Accessed October 25, 2020).

Uniform trauma transport protocols-broward county. https://www.broward.org/BrowardEMS/Documents/TransportProtocols.pdf Revised November. (Accessed October 25, 2020).

Galvagno

Jr Sikorski

Hirshon

, et al. Helicopter emergency medical services for adults with major trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD009228.

Agha

Abdall-Razak

Crossley

, et al. The STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2019;72:156-165.

Sperry

Martin

Moore

, et al. Prehospital resuscitation in adult patients following injury: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(5):1228-1231.

10.

Galvagno

Jr Haut

Zafar

, et al. Association between helicopter vs ground emergency medical services and survival for adults with major trauma. J Am Med Assoc. 2012;307(15):1602-1610.

11.

Michaels

Pham

Puckett

Dissanaike

. Helicopter versus ground ambulance: Review of national database for outcomes in survival in transferred trauma patients in the USA. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):e000211.

12.

Buchanan

Coates

Sne

. Does mode of transport confer a mortality benefit in trauma patients? Characteristics and outcomes at an Ontario lead trauma hospital. CJEM. 2016;18(5):363-369.

13.

Chen

Gestring

Rosengart

, et al. Speed is not everything: Identifying patients who may benefit from helicopter transport despite faster ground transport. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(4):549-557.

14.

Malekpour

Younus

Jaap

, et al. Mode of transport and clinical outcome in rural trauma: A helicopter versus ambulance comparison. Am Surg. 2017;83(12):1413-1417.

15.

Farach

Walford

Bendure

Amankwah

Danielson

Chandler

. Helicopter transport from the scene of injury: Are there improved outcomes for pediatric trauma patients? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34(5):344-348.

16.

Englum

Rialon

Kim

, et al. Current use and outcomes of helicopter transport in pediatric trauma: A review of 18,291 transports. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(1):140-144.

17.

Colnaric

Bachir

El Sayed

. Association between mode of transportation and outcomes of adult trauma patients with blunt injury across different prehospital time intervals in the United States: A matched cohort study. J Emerg Med. 2020;59(6):884-893.

18.

Harmsen

Giannakopoulos

Moerbeek

Jansma

Bonjer

Bloemers

. The influence of prehospital time on trauma patients outcome: A systematic review. Injury. 2015;46(4):602-609.

19.

Brown

Gestring

Guyette

, et al. Development and validation of the air medical prehospital triage score for helicopter transport of trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2016;264(2):378-385.

20.

Gauss

Ageron

Devaud

, et al. Association of prehospital time to in-hospital trauma mortality in a physician-staffed emergency medicine system. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(12):1117-1124.