Patient physiology and crash characteristics are essential components of field triage for motor vehicle crashes. We aimed to identify prehospital information that predicted high injury severity or critical patient condition on hospital arrival. The association of demographics, shock index (SI), Glasgow Coma Scale, and 10 crash characteristics of trauma activations for motor vehicle crashes with injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 16 and a composite of hypotension, need for blood transfusions, or immediate operation was determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 133 of 498 patients (27%) had ISS ≥ 16; SI ≥ 0.9, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤, 8, speed ≥ 55 mph, seatbelt use, airbag deployment, ambulatory patient, severe vehicle damage, ejection, and extrication were associated with ISS ≥ 16. Only abnormal SI and high speed remained independent predictors for ISS ≥ 16 with Odds Ratio (OR) = 10.76 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-101, P = 0.04) and OR = 10.37 (95% CI, 1.48–72.93, P = 0.02), respectively. SI ≥ 0.9 predicted the composite outcome with OR = 5.92 (95% CI, 2.32–15.08, P < 0.01). Many commonly reported crash characteristics did not predict clinically important outcomes. Improvements in road and vehicle safety may be resulting in lower injury severity despite major crash mechanisms.
SasserS.M., HuntR.C., FaulM.Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the national expert panel on field triage, 2011.MMWR Recomm Rep2012; 61: 1–20. Accessed September 12, 2018.
BoyleM.J.Is mechanism of injury alone in the prehospital setting a predictor of major trauma - a review of the literature.J Trauma Manag Outcomes2007; 1: 4.
5.
BrownJ.B., StassenN.A., BankeyP.E.Mechanism of injury and special consideration criteria still matter: an evaluation of the National Trauma Triage Protocol.J Trauma2011; 70: 38–44.
6.
ChampionH.R., LombardoL.V., ShairE.K.The importance of vehicle rollover as a field triage criterion.J Trauma2009; 67: 350–7.
7.
JonesI.S., ChampionH.R.Trauma triage: vehicle damage as an estimate of injury severity.J Trauma1989; 29: 646–53.
8.
BakerS.P., O'NeillB., HaddonW.The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.J Trauma1974; 14: 187–96.
9.
BoydC.R., TolsonM.A., CopesW.S.Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma score and the injury severity score.J Trauma1987; 27: 370–8.
10.
PalmerC.Major trauma and the injury severity score–where should we set the bar?Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med2007; 51: 13–29.
11.
RozenfeldM., RadomislenskyI., FreedmanL.ISS groups: are we speaking the same language?Inj Prev2014; 20: 330–5.
12.
VandrommeM.J., GriffinR.L., KerbyJ.D.Identifying risk for massive transfusion in the relatively normotensive patient: utility of the prehospital shock index.J Trauma2011; 70: 384–8.
13.
SchrollR., SwiftD., TatumD.Accuracy of shock index versus ABC score to predict need for massive transfusion in trauma patients.Injury2018; 49: 15–9.
14.
MutschlerM., NienaberU., MuenzbergM.The Shock Index revisited-a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU.Crit Care2013; 17: R172.
