PhillipsM.S., MarksJ.M., RobertsK.Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc2012; 26: 1296–303.
2.
EdwardsC., BradshawA., AhearneP.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible: initial experience with 80 cases.Surg Endosc2010; 24: 2241–7.
3.
RagupathiM., NietoJ., HaasE.M.Pearls and pitfalls in SILS colectomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2012; 22: 183–8.
4.
MarksJ.M., PhillipsM.S., TacchinoR.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.J Am Coll Surg2013; 216: 1037–47, discussion 47–8.
5.
CheahW.K., LenziJ.E., SoJ.B.Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg2001; 88: 45–7.
6.
SajidM.S., KhanM.A., RayK.Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.ANZ J Surg2009; 79: 437–42.
7.
SchwenkW., NeudeckerJ., MallJ.Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs. microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc2000; 14: 345–8.
8.
BisgaardT., KlarskovB., TrapR.Pain after micro-laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind controlled study.Surg Endosc2000; 14: 340–4.
9.
FranklinM.E.Jr., JaramilloE.J., GlassJ.L.Needlescopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned in 10 years of experience.JSLS2006; 10: 43–6.
10.
MamazzaJ., SchlachtaC.M., SeshadriP.A.Needlescopic surgery. A logical evolution from conventional laparoscopic surgery.Surg Endosc2001; 15: 1208–12.
11.
TagayaN., KubotaK.Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery.Surg Endosc2012; 26: 137–43.
12.
WadaH., KimuraT., KawabeA.Laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients.Surg Endosc2012; 26: 1898–902.
13.
GagnerM., Garcia-RuizA.Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments.Surg Laparosc Endosc1998; 8: 171–9.
SajidM.S., KhanM.A., CheekE.Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review.Can J Surg2009; 52: 129–34.
16.
CarvalhoG.L., SilvaF.W., SilvaJ.S.Needlescopic clipless cholecystectomy as an efficient, safe, and cost-effective alternative with diminutive scars: the first 1000 cases.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2009; 19: 368–72.
17.
LeeP.C., LaiI.R., YuS.C.Minilaparoscopic (needlescopic) cholecystectomy: a study of 1,011 cases.Surg Endosc2004; 18: 1480–4.
18.
LauD.H., YauK.K., ChungC.C.Comparison of needlescopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech2005; 15: 75–9.
19.
NovitskyY.W., KercherK.W., CzerniachD.R.Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.Arch Surg2005; 140: 117883.
20.
AinslieW.G., CattonJ.A., DavidesD.Micropuncture cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc2003; 17: 766–72.
GhezziF., CromiA., SiestoG.Needlescopic hysterectomy: incorporation of 3-mm instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.Surg Endosc2008; 22: 2153–7.
23.
BensonA.D., JulianoT.M., ViprakasitD.P.Micro-laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy in transperitoneal pyeloplasty.J Endourol2014; 28: 1404–8.
