It is commonly believed that the electronic medical record (EMR) will improve patient outcomes. However, there is scant published literature to support this claim and no studies in any surgical population. Our hypothesis was that the EMR would not improve objective outcome measures in patients with traumatic injury. Prospectively collected data from our university-based Level I trauma center was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, injury severity as well as outcomes and complications data were compared for all patients admitted over a 20-month period before introduction of the EMR and a 20-month period after full, hospital-wide use of the EMR. Implementation of the EMR was associated with a decreased hospital length of stay, P = 0.02; intensive care unit length of stay, P = 0.001; ventilator days, P = 0.002; acute respiratory distress syndrome, P = 0.006, pneumonia, P = 0.008; myocardial infarction, P = 0.001; line infection, P = 0.03; septicemia, P = 0.000; renal failure, P = 0.000; drug complication, P = 0.001; and delay in diagnosis, P = 0.04. There was no difference in mortality, unexpected cardiac arrest, missed injury, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, or late urinary tract infection. This is the first study to investigate the impact of the EMR in surgical patients. Although there was an improvement in some complications, the overall impact was inconsistent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WaltonR.T.HarveyE.DoveyS.FreemantleN.Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2001; 1: CD002894.
2.
HuntD.L.HaynesR.B.HannaS.E.SmithK.Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.JAMA1998; 280: 1339–46.
3.
ShiffmanR.N.LiawY.BrandtC.A.CorbG.J.Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.J Am Med Inform Assoc1999; 6: 104–14.
4.
EmbiP.J.YackelT.R.LoganJ.R.Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians.J Am Med Inform Assoc2004; 11: 300–9.
5.
United States Statutes at Large.American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. February, 7, 2009.
6.
MillerD.W.Jr.Using an electronic medical record to improve communication within a prenatal care network.Obstet Gynecol2005; 105: 1488–9.
7.
JhaA.K.DesRochesC.M.CampbellE.G.Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals.N Engl J Med2009; 360: 1628–38.
8.
BrotzmanG.L.GuseC.E.FayD.L.Implementing an electronic medical record at a residency site: physicians’ perceived effects on quality of care, documentation, and productivity.WMJ2009; 108: 99–103.
9.
BloomM.V.HuntingtonM.K.Faculty, resident, and clinic staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation.Fam Med2010; 42: 562–6.
10.
ChaudhryB.WangJ.WuS.Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.Ann Intern Med2006; 144: 742–52.
11.
DemakisJ.G.BeauchampC.CullW.L.Improving residents’ compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders.JAMA2000; 284: 1411–6.
12.
CallenJ.McIntoshJ.LiJ.Accuracy of medication documentation in hospital discharge summaries: a retrospective analysis of medication transcription errors in manual and electronic discharge summaries.Int J Med Inform2010; 79: 58–64.
13.
SutterM.B.MageeS.R.Resident education through electronic medical record counseling prompts.Med Educ2010; 44: 513–4.
14.
HanY.Y.CarcilloJ.A.VenkataramanS.T.Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.Pediatrics2005; 116: 1506–12.
15.
HartzbandP.GroopmanJ.Off the record—avoiding the pitfalls of going electronic.N Engl J Med2008; 358: 1656–8.
16.
LinderJ.A.MaJ.BatesD.W.Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States.Arch Intern Med2007; 167: 1400–5.
17.
SchenartsP.BowenJ.BardM.The effect of a rotating night-float coverage scheme on preventable and potentially preventable morbidity at a level 1 trauma center.Am J Surg2005; 190: 147–52.
18.
SimborgD.W.Promoting electronic health record adoption.Is it the correct focus? J Am Med Inform Assoc2008; 15: 127–9.
19.
GreenhalghT.PottsH.W.WongG.Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method.Milbank Q2009; 87: 729–88.
20.
KarshB.T.WeingerM.B.AbbottP.A.WearsR.L.Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities.J Am Med Inform Assoc2010; 17: 617–23.
21.
ShortliffeE.H.Biomedical informatics in the education of physicians.JAMA2010; 304: 1227–8.
22.
TsaiT.L.FridsmaD.B.GattiG.Computer decision support as a source of interpretation error: the case of electrocardiograms.J Am Med Inform Assoc2003; 10: 478–83.
23.
ShiralkarU.Smart Surgeons, Sharp Decisions, Cognitive Skills to Avoid Errors and Achieve Results.Shewsbury, UK; TFM Publishing Limited; 2011: 38–45.
24.
O'DonnellH.C.KaushalR.BarrónY.Physicians’ attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing.J Gen Intern Med2009; 24: 63–8.
25.
HammondK.W.HelbigS.T.BensonC.C.Brathwaite-SketoeB.M.Are electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplication.AMIA Annu Symp Proc2003: 269–73.
26.
ThielkeS.HammondK.HelbigS.Copying and pasting of examinations within the electronic medical record.Int J Med Inform2007; 76(suppl 1): S122–8.
27.
WrennJ.O.SteinD.M.BakkenS.StetsonP.D.Quantifying clinical narrative redundancy in an electronic health record.J Am Med Inform Assoc2010; 17: 49–53.
28.
DollJ.A.AroraV.Time spent on clinical documentation: is technology a help or a hindrance?Arch Intern Med2010; 170: 1276.
29.
MorrisA.C.HayA.W.SwannD.G.Reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care: impact of implementing a care bundle.Crit Care Med2011; 39: 2218–24.
30.
LawrenceP.FulbrookP.The ventilator care bundle and its impact on ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review of the evidence.Nurs Crit Care2011; 16: 222–34.
31.
KucherN.KooS.QuirozR.Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.N Engl J Med2005; 352: 969–77.
32.
RindD.M.SafranC.PhillipsR.S.Effect of computer-based alerts on the treatment and outcomes of hospitalized patients.Arch Intern Med1994; 154: 1511–7.
33.
BennettK.J.SteenC.Electronic medical record customization and the impact upon chart completion rates.Fam Med2010; 42: 338–42.
