KassirerJ.P.On The Take: How America's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health.New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
2.
MartinJ.B.The pervasive influence of conflicts of interest.Neurology2010; 74: 2016–21.
3.
WazanaA.Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift?JAMA2000; 283: 373–80.
4.
BirkhahnR.H., JauchE., KramerD.A.SAEM Industry Relations Committee, 2008–2009. A review of the federal guidelines that inform and influence relationships between physicians and industry.Acad Emerg Med2009; 16: 776–81.
MontagueP.R.The perspective from neuroscience. In: KornD., EhringhausS., eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2007: 9–12. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
7.
ArielyD.The psychological perspective. In: KornD., EhringhausS., eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC.Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2007: 13–8. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
8.
LoewensteinG.The behavioral economics perspective. In: KornD., EhringhausS., eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC.Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2007: 19–24. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
9.
BazermanM.The public policy perspective. In: KornD., EhringhausS., eds. The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium; June 12, 2007; Washington, DC.Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2007: 25–8. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications.
10.
MontagueP.R., King-CasasB., CohenJ.D.Imaging valuation models in human choice.Annu Rev Neurosci2006; 29: 417–48.
11.
DittoP.H., LopezD.F.Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions.J Pers Soc Psychol1992; 63: 568–84.
12.
MooreD., LoewensteinG.Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest.Soc Justice Res2004; 17: 189–202.
13.
AlexanderR.D.The Biology of Moral Systems.New York: Aldine De Gruyter A Division of Walter de Gruyter, Inc; 1987.
14.
WakefieldA.J., MurchS.H., AnthonyA.Ileal–lymphoid–nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children.Lancet1998; 351: 637–41.
15.
DeerB.Secrets of the MMR scare. How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed.BMJ2011; 342: c5347.
16.
DeerB.Secrets of the MMR scare. How the vaccine crisis was meant to make money.BMJ2011; 342: c5258.
17.
DeerB.Secrets of the MMR scare. The Lancet's two days to bury bad news.BMJ2011; 342: c7001.
18.
BionJ.Financial and intellectual conflicts of interest: confusion and clarity.Curr Opin Crit Care2009; 15: 583–90.
19.
MazarN., ArielyD.Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications.American Marketing Association2006; 25: 117–26.
20.
LauH.C., PassinghamR.E.Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal cortex.J Neurosci2007; 27: 5805–11.
21.
KatzD., CaplanA.L., MerzJ.F.All gifts large and small: toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving.Am J Bioeth2010; 10: 11–7.
22.
ChughD., BazermanM.H., BanajiM.R.Bounded ethically as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In: MooreD.A., CainD.M., LoewensteinG., BasermanM.H. (ed.). Conflicts of Interest.New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005: 74–95.
23.
ChanA.W., HróbjartssonA., HaahrM.T.Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.JAMA2004; 291: 2457–65.
24.
IoannidisJ.P.Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research.JAMA2005; 294: 218–28.
25.
GelbermanR.H., SamsonD., MirzaS.K.Orthopaedic surgeons and the medical device industry: the threat to scientific integrity and the public trust.J Bone Joint Surg Am2010; 92: 765–77.
26.
LuginbuhlR.D., KodnerI.J., KeuneJ.D.Conflicts of interest concerning the use of implants in the operating room.Surgery2010; 147: 738–41.
27.
LutyJ., ArokiadassS.M., EasowJ.M., AnapreddyJ.R.Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.J Med Ethics2009; 35: 200–2.
28.
RothmanD.J.Medical professionalism—focusing on the real issues.N Engl J Med2000; 342: 1284–6.
29.
EhringhausS.H., WeissmanJ.S., GooldS.D.Responses of medical schools to institutional conflicts of interest.JAMA2008; 299: 665–71.