Computed Tomography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of the Cervical Spine: How Many Slices do you Need?

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the correlation between CT and MRI for evaluation of the cervical spine. We hypothesize that newer-generation CT scanners will improve diagnostic accuracy and may obviate the need for MRI in patients with a normal CT. We compared the missed injury rate of four-slice CT and 64-slice CT performed to evaluate the cervical spine. We conducted a retrospective study from January 2004 to June 2008 of all blunt trauma patients who underwent both a CT and MRI to evaluate the cervical spine. One hundred six blunt trauma patients underwent both CT and MRI, including 43 with four-slice and 63 with 64-slice CT. CT missed three injuries (3%), all of which were clinically significant ligamentous injuries seen only on MRI. The 64-slice CT missed no injuries (0%), whereas the four-slice CT missed all three (7%) of the ligamentous injuries (P = 0.03). Older-generation CT scanners miss clinically significant injuries in blunt trauma patients and should not be independently relied on to evaluate the cervical spine. The newer 64-slice CT scan does not appear to miss clinically significant cervical spine injuries and may allow clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients without the addition of an MRI.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hoffman

J.R.

, Schriger

D.L.

, Mower

Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study.

Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 1454–60.

Stiell

I.G.

, Wells

G.A.

, Vandemheen

The Canadian C-Spine Rule for radiography for alert and stable trauma patients.

JAMA 2001; 286: 1841–8.

Brown

C.V.R.

, Antevil

J.L.

, Sise

M.J.

, Sack

D.I.

Spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine fractures: its time has come.

J Trauma 2005; 58: 890–6.

Insko

, Gracias

, Gupta

Utility of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine in the acute evaluation of blunt trauma.

J Trauma 2002; 53: 426–9.

Schuster

, Waxman

, Sanchez

Magnetic resonance imaging is not need to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computed tomography results and no motor deficits.

Arch Surg 2005; 140: 762–6.

Stelfox

H.T.

, Velmahos

G.C.

, Gettings

Computed tomography for early and safe discontinuation of cervical spine immobilization in obtunded multiply injured patients.

J Trauma 2007; 63: 630–6.

Padayachee

, Cooper

D.J.

, Irons

Cervical spine clearance in unconscious traumatic brain injury patients: dynamic flexion–extension fluoroscopy versus computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstruction.

J Trauma 2006; 60: 341–5.

Bolinger

, Shartz

, Marion

Bedside fluoroscopic flexion and extension cervical spine radiographs for clearance of the cervical spine in comatose trauma patients.

J Trauma 2004; 56: 132–6.

Holmes

J.F.

, Mirvis

S.E.

, Panacek

E.A.

Variability in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spine injuries.

J Trauma 2002; 53: 524–30.

10.

Horn

E.M.

, Lekovic

G.P.

, Feiz-Erfan

, Sonntag

V.K.H.

, Theodore

Cervical magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities not predictive of cervical spine instability in traumatically injured patients.

J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2004; 1: 39–42.

11.

Steigelman

, Lopez

, Dent

Screening cervical spine MRI after normal cervical spine CT scans in patients in whom cervical spine injury cannot be excluded by physical examination.

Am J Surg 2008; 196: 857–63.

12.

Como

J.J.

, Thompson

M.A.

, Anderson

J.S.

Is magnetic resonance imaging essential in clearing the cervical spine in obtunded patients with blunt trauma?

J Trauma 2007; 63: 544–9.

13.

Menaker

, Philp

, Boswell

, Scalea

T.M.

Computed tomography alone for cervical spine clearance in the unreliable patient—are we there yet?

J Trauma 2008; 64: 898–904.

14.

Sarani

, Waring

, Sonnad

, Schwab

C.W.

Magnetic resonance imaging is a useful adjunct in the evaluation of the cervical spine of injured patients.

J Trauma 2007; 63: 637–40.

15.

Hogan

G.J.

, Mirvis

S.E.

, Shanmuganathan

, Scalea

T.M.

Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: Is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal?

Radiology 2005; 237: 106–13.