As a consequence of the development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the late 1980s, diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy has now become an integral part of the average general surgeon's practice. Many conventional operations have been successfully adapted for the laparoscopic approach. A laparoscopic operation is unquestionably the surgical procedure of choice for gastroesophageal reflux disease and removal of the gallbladder, spleen, or adrenal gland unless specific contraindications are present. However, the value of laparoscopic techniques for other operations remains controversial within the surgical community. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy (LIH) is a case in point. Frequent reanalysis of the controversial procedures such as laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is especially important because videoscopic operations remain in their developmental stages and thus continue to evolve. With this in mind, the purpose of this review was to examine the current state of the art of laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in relationship to its conventional counterparts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RutkowI.M.Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003.Surg Clin North Am2003; 83: 1045–51.
2.
OwingsM.F., KozakL.J.Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. National Center for Health Statistics.Vital Health Stat1998; 13(139).
3.
SantryH.P., GillenD.L., LauderdaleD.S.Trends in bariatric surgical procedures.JAMA2005; 294: 1909–17.
4.
HoreyseckG., RolandF., RolfesN.“Tension-free” repair of inguinal hernia: laparoscopic (TAPP) versus open (Lichtenstein) repair.Chirurg1996; 67: 1036–40.
5.
ZierenJ., ZierenH.U., WengerF.A., MullerJ.M.Laparoscopic or conventional repair of inguinal hernia with synthetic mesh?Langenbecks Arch Chir1996; 381: 289–94.
6.
SarliL., PietraN., ChouaO.Prospective randomized comparative study of laparoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty.Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense1997; 68: 5–10.
KhouryN.A randomized prospective controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair and mesh-plug hernioplasty: a study of 315 cases.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A1998; 8: 367–72.
9.
PaganiniA.M., LezocheE., CarleF.A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair.Surg Endosc1998; 12: 979–86.
10.
AitolaP., AiroI., MatikainenM.Laparoscopic versus open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomised trial.Ann Chir Gynaecol1998; 87: 22–5.
11.
PicchioM., LombardiA., ZolovkinsA.Tension-free laparoscopic and open hernia repair: randomized controlled trial of early results.World J Surg1999; 23: 1004–7.
12.
KumarS., NixonS.J., MacIntyreI.M.Laparoscopic or Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: one unit's experience.J R Coll Surg Edinb1999; 44: 301–2.
13.
JohanssonB., HallerbackB., GliseH.Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study).Ann Surg1999; 230: 225–31.
14.
MRC group.Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group.Lancet1999; 354: 185–90.
15.
BeetsG.L., DirksenC.D., GoP.M.Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial.Surg Endosc1999; 13: 323–7.
16.
SarliL., IuscoD.R., SansebastianoG., CostiR.Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open, tension-free versus laparoscopic approach.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol2001; 11: 262–7.
17.
WrightD., PatersonC., ScottN.Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.Ann Surg2002; 235: 333–7.
18.
PikoulisE., TsigrisC., DiamantisT.Laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair or tension-free mesh plug technique? A prospective study of 471 patients with 543 inguinal hernias.Eur J Surg2002; 168: 587–91.
19.
MahonD., DecadtB., RhodesM.Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia.Surg Endosc2003; 17: 1386–90.
20.
AnderssonB., HallenM., LeveauP.Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Surgery2003; 133: 464–72.
21.
DouekM., SmithG., OshowoA.Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up.Br Med J2003; 326: 1012–3.
22.
BringmanS., RamelS., HeikkinenT.J.Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Ann Surg2003; 237: 142–7.
23.
LalP., KajlaR.K., ChanderJ.Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.Surg Endosc2003; 17: 850–3.
24.
HeikkinenT., BringmanS., OhtonenP.Five-year out-come of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties.Surg Endosc2004; 18: 518–22.
25.
NeumayerL., Giobbie-HurderA., JonassonO.Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.N Engl J Med2004; 350: 1819–27.
26.
GrantA.M.EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data.Hernia2002; 6: 2–10.
27.
MemonM.A., CooperN.J., MemonB.Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Br J Surg2003; 90: 1479–92.
28.
LawrenceK., McWhinnieD., GoodwinA.Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results.BMJ1995; 311: 981–5.
29.
VogtD.M., CuretM.J., PitcherD.E.Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy.Am J Surg1995; 169: 84–9.
30.
LiemM.S., van der GraafY., van SteenselC.J.Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair.N Engl J Med1997; 336: 1541–7.
31.
DirksenC.D., BeetsG.L., GoP.M.Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Surg1998; 164: 439–47.
32.
TanphiphatC., TanprayoonT., SangsubhanC., ChatamraK.Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial.Surg Endosc1998; 12: 846–51.
33.
ZierenJ., ZierenH.U., JacobiC.A.Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice's operation.Am J Surg1998; 175: 330–3.
34.
JuulP., ChristensenK.Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair.Br J Surg1999; 86: 316–9.
35.
LeiblB.J., DaublerP., SchmedtC.G.Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and shouldice repair.Br J Surg2000; 87: 780–3.
36.
TschudiJ.F., WagnerM., KlaiberC.Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice repair.Surg Endosc2001; 15: 1263–6.
37.
WennstromI., BerggrenP., AkerudL., JarhultJ.Equal results with laparoscopic and Shouldice repairs of primary inguinal hernia in men. Report from a prospective randomised study.Scand J Surg2004; 93: 34–6.
38.
VoylesC.R., HamiltonB.J., JohnsonW.D., KanoN.Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh prosthesis.Am J Surg2002; 184: 6–10.
39.
CollaborationE.H.Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Br J Surg2000; 87: 860–7.
40.
McCormackK., ScottN.W., GoP.M.EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2003; 1: CD001785.
41.
ValeL., GrantA., McCormackK., ScottN.W.EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of surgical repair of inguinal hernia.Int J Technol Assess Health Care2004; 20: 192–200.
42.
SwanstromL.L.Laparoscopic hernia repairs. The importance of cost as an outcome measurement at the century's end.Surg Clin North Am2000; 80: 1341–51.
43.
GoldM.R., SiegelJ.E., RussellL.B., WeinsteinM.C.Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
44.
McCormackK., WakeB., PerezJ.Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess2005; 9: 1–203.
45.
Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group.Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.Br J Surg2001; 88: 653–61.
46.
StylopoulosN., GazelleG.S., RattnerD.W.A cost-utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patients.Surg Endosc2003; 17: 180–9.
47.
ErdogruT., TeberD., FredeT.The effect of previous transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy on transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Urol2005; 173: 769–72.
48.
StolzenburgJ.U., HoK.M., DoM.Impact of previous surgery on endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.Urology2005; 65: 325–31.
BittnerR., SchmedtC.G., SchwarzJ.Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia.Br J Surg2002; 89: 1062–6.
55.
LowhamA.S., FilipiC.J., FitzgibbonsR.J.Jr.Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair. Traditional and laparoscopic.Ann Surg1997; 225: 422–31.
56.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence.Guidance on the Use of Laparoscopic Surgery for Inguinal Hernia.London: NICE, 2001.
57.
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. Available at www.nice.org.uk/TA083guidance. Accessed Nov. 23, 2005.
58.
GerR., MonroeK., DuvivierR., MishrickA.Management of indirect inguinal hernias by laparoscopic closure of the neck of the sac.Am J Surg1990; 159: 370–3.
59.
AvisseC., DelattreJ.F., FlamentJ.B.The inguinofemoral area from a laparoscopic standpoint. History, anatomy, and surgical applications.Surg Clin North Am2000; 80: 35–48.
60.
KingsnorthA.N., SkandalakisP.N., ColbornG.L.Embryology, anatomy, and surgical applications of the preperitoneal space.Surg Clin North Am2000; 80: 1–24.
