Are Resident Work-Hour Limitations Beneficial to the Trauma Profession?

Abstract

In July 2003, work-hour restrictions were implemented by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to limit resident duty hours. Attending surgeon work-hours have not been similarly reduced, and many trauma services have added emergency general surgery responsibilities. We hypothesized that trauma attending/resident work-hour disparity may disincentivize residents from selecting trauma careers and that trauma directors would view ACGME regulations negatively. We conducted a 6-month study of resident and in-house trauma attending self-reported hours at a level I trauma center and sent a questionnaire to 172 national level I trauma directors (TDs) regarding work-hours restrictions. TD survey response rate was 48 per cent; 100 per cent of 15 residents and 6 trauma faculty completed work-hour logs. Attending mean hours (87.1/ wk), monthly calls (5), and shifts >30 hours exceeded that of all resident groups. Case volume was similar. Residents viewed their lifestyle more favorably than the lifestyle of the trauma attending (Likert score 3.6 ± 0.5 vs Likert score 2.5 ± 0.8, P = 0.0003). Seventy-one per cent cited attending work hours and lifestyle as a reason not to pursue a trauma career. Nationally, 80 per cent of trauma surgeons cover emergency general surgery; 40 per cent work greater than 80 hours weekly, compared with <1 per cent of surgical trainees (P < 0.0001). Most TDs feel that residents do not spend more time reading (89%) or operating (96%); 68 per cent feel patient care has suffered as a result of duty-hours restrictions. Seventy-one per cent feel residents will not select trauma surgery as a career as a result of changes in duty hours. Perceived trauma attending/resident work-hour disparity may disincentive trainees from trauma career selection. TDs view resident duty-hour restrictions negatively.