Correlation between Perceptual,Visuo-spatial,and Psychomotor Aptitude to Duration of Training Required to Reach Performance Goals on the MIST-VR Surgical Simulator
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2005
Correlation between Perceptual,Visuo-spatial,and Psychomotor Aptitude to Duration of Training Required to Reach Performance Goals on the MIST-VR Surgical Simulator
Given the dynamic nature of modern surgical education, determining factors that may improve the efficiency of laparoscopic training is warranted. The objective of this study was to analyze whether perceptual, visuo-spatial, or psychomotor aptitude are related to the amount of training required to reach specific performance-based goals on a virtual reality surgical simulator. Sixteen MS4 medical students participated in an elective skills course intended to train laparoscopic skills. All were tested for perceptual, visuo-spatial, and psychomotor aptitude using previously validated psychological tests. Training involved as many instructor-guided 1-hour sessions as needed to reach performance goals on a custom designed MIST-VR manipulation-diathermy task (Mentice AB, Gothenberg, Sweden). Thirteen subjects reached performance goals by the end of the course. Two were excluded from analysis due to previous experience with the MIST-VR (total n = 11). Perceptual ability (r = -0.76, P = 0.007) and psychomotor skills (r = 0.62, P = 0.04) significantly correlated with the number of trials required. Visuo-spatial ability did not significantly correlate with training duration. The number of trials required to train subjects to performance goals on the MIST-VR manipulation diathermy task is significantly related to perceptual and psychomotor aptitude.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JordanJ-A, GallagherA.G., McGuiganJ.A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition.Am J Surg2000; 180: 208–11.
2.
GallagherA.G., McClureN., McGuiganJ.An ergonomic analysis of the ‘fulcrum effect' in endoscopic skill acquisition.Endoscopy1998; 30: 617–20.
3.
KohnL.T., CorriganJ.M., DonaldsonM.To err is human: building a safer health system.Washington, DC, Institute of Medicine, 1999.
4.
GiddingsT., GrayG., MaranA.Response to the general medical council determination on the Bristol Case.London: The Senate of Surgery, 1998.
5.
HytlanderA., LiljegrenE., RhodinP.H., LonrothH.The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room.Surg Endosc2002; 15: 1071–5.
6.
TorkingtonJ., SmithS.G.T., ReesB., DarziA.The role of basic surgical skills course in the acquistion and retention of laparoscopic skill.Surg Endosc2001; 15: 1076–9.
7.
HamiltonE.C., ScottD.J., FlemingJ.B.Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills.Surg Endosc2001; 16: 406–11.
AhlbergG., HeikkinenT., IseliusL.Does training in a virtual reality simulator improved surgical performance.Surg Endosc2002; 16: 126–9.
10.
TorkingtonJ., SmithS.G.T., ReesB.I., DarziA.Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task.Surg Endosc2001; 15: 1076–9.
11.
DunningtonG., DaRosaD.Changing surgical education strategies in an environment of changing health care delivery systems.World J Surg1994; 18: 734–7.
12.
CrothersI., GallagherA., McClureN.Experienced surgeons are automated to the ‘fulcrum effect': an ergonomic demonstration.Endoscopy1999; 31: 365–9.
13.
GallagherA., SatavaR.Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills.Surg Endosc2002; 16: 1746–52.
14.
EkstromR.B., FrenchJ.W., HarmanH.H.Manual for Kit of Factor—Referenced Cognitive Tests.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1976.
15.
CowieR.Measurement and modelling of perceived slant in surfaces represented by freely viewed line drawings.Perception1998; 27: 505–40.
16.
GallagherA., CowieR., CrothersL.PicSOr: An objective test of perceptual skill that predicts laparoscopic techinical skill in three initial studies of laparoscopic performance.Surg Endosc2003; 17: 1468–71.
MacmillanA., CuschieriA.Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the advanced Dundee endoscopic psychomotor tester: predictive and concurrent validity.Am J Surg1995; 177: 274–7.
19.
GallagherA., RitchieK., McClureN., McGuiganJ.Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality.World J Surg2001; 25: 1478–83.
TaffinderN., SuttonC., FishwickR.Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomized controlled studies using the MIST-VR laparoscopic simulator. In: WestwoodH., HoffmanH., StredneyD., WeghorstS., eds. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality.Washington DC: IOS Press, 1998, pp. 124–6.
22.
SatavaR., FriedM.A methodology for objective assessment of errors: an example using an endoscopic sinus surgery simulator.Otolaryngol Clin North Am2002; 35: 1289–301.
RisucciD., GeissA., GellmanL., PinardB., RosserJ.Surgeon-specific factors in the acquisition of lapaproscopic surgical skills.Am J Surg2001; 181: 289–93.
25.
FrancisN., HannaG., CresswellA.The performance of master surgeons on standard aptitude testing.Am J Surg2001; 182: 30–3.
26.
WanzelK.R., HamstraS.J., AnastakisD.J.Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills.Lancet2002; 359: 230–1.
27.
SchuenemanA., PickelmanJ., HessleinR., FreearkR.Neuropsychologic predictors of operative skill among general surgery residents.Surgery1984; 96: 288–95.
28.
SteeleR., WalderC., HerbertM.Psychomotor testing and the ability to perform an anastomosis in junior surgical trainees.Br J Surg1992; 79: 1065–7.
