MischakoffAnne, “Strings: The Golden Age of String Pedagogy,”Instrumentalist, 50, no. 1 (August 1995): 51.
3.
RohnerTraugott“For the Good of the Order,”Music Educators Journal, 44, no. 36 (November-December 1957): 36, as cited in Robert Ritsema, A History of the American String Teachers Association: The First Twenty-Five Years (American String Teachers Association, 1972), p. 27.
4.
Letter from Howard Van Sickle to Gerald Doty and Harry King, August 29, 1958, as cited in Ritsema, p. 28.
5.
AST, 14, no. 4 (Fall 1964): 1, 24–26.
6.
AST, 15, no. 3 (Summer 1965): 23.
7.
Ritsema, p. 35.
8.
Interview with Robert Klotman, December 1995.
9.
Ibid.
10.
Ibid.
11.
Interview with Jacquelyn Dillon-Krass, January 1996.
12.
The public debate surrounding the creation of the National Endowment for the Arts is well documented in Dick Netzer's Subsidized Muse, A Twentieth-Century Fund Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), in Michael Straight's Twigs for an Eagle's Nest: Government and the Arts 1965–78 (New York: Devon Press, 1979), and in Edward C. Banfield, Democratic Muse: Visual Arts and the Public Interest, a Twentieth-Century Fund Study (New York: Basic Books, Inc. 1984).
13.
Interview with Robert Klotman, December 1995.
14.
DillonJacquelyn A., and KriechbaumCasimer B.Jr., How To Design and Teach a Successful School String and Orchestra Program (San Diego: Kjos West/Neil A. Kjos, Jr., Publishers, 1978), p. 278.
15.
Ibid., p. 279.
16.
Mischakoff, p. 55.
17.
AraziIshaq, “Relax and Be Dynamic: The Approach Has, At Long Last, Arrived — Kato Havas,”AST, 19, no. 1 (Winter 1969): 16–19.