I extend the theoretical domain of sociology into an area of social psychology that heretofore has been the exclusive domain of psychologists. Specifically, I develop a social structural perspective on the choice shifts that individuals make within groups. During interpersonal discussions of issues, choice shifts occur when there is a difference between group members’ mean final opinion and their mean initial opinion. Explanations of choice shifts have emphasized group-level conditions (e.g., a norm, a decision rule, a pool of persuasive arguments, a distribution of initial opinions). I argue that choice shifts are a ubiquitous product of the inequalities of interpersonal influence that emerge during discussions of issues. Hence, I bring choice shifts squarely into the domain of a structural social psychology that attends to the composition of networks of interpersonal influence and into broader sociological perspectives concerned with the formation of status structures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportFloyd H.1924. Social Psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
AndersonNorman H.1996. A Functional Theory of Cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
AndersonNorman H. and GraesserCheryl C.. 1976. “An Information Integration Analysis of Attitude Change in Group Discussion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology34: 210–22.
4.
AschSolomon E.1951. “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgement.” Pp. 117–90 in Groups, Leadership and Men, edited by GuetzkowM. H.. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
5.
BaronRobert S., HoppeSieg I., KaoChaun Feng, BrunsmanBethany, LinnewehBarbara, and RogersDiane. 1996. “Social Corroboration and Opinion Extremity.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology32: 537–60.
6.
BergerJoseph, ConnerThomas L., and Hamit FisekM.. 1974. “Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program.”Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
7.
BergerJoseph, Hamit FisekM., NormanRobert Z., and ZelditchMorrisJr. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. New York: Elsevier.
8.
BergerJoseph, RidgewayCecilia L., Hamit FisekM., and NormanRobert Z.. 1998. “The Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power and Prestige Orders.” American Sociological Review63: 379–405.
9.
BurnsteinEugene. 1982. “Persuasion as Argument Processing.” Pp. 103–24 in Contemporary Problems in Group Decision-Making, edited by DavisJ. H. and Stocher-KreichgauerG.. New York: Academic Press.
10.
BurnsteinEugene and VinokurAmiram. 1973. “Testing Two Classes of Theories about Group-Induced Shifts in Individual Choice.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology9: 123–37.
11.
BurnsteinEugene and VinokurAmiram. 1977. “Persuasive Argumentation and Social Comparison as Determinants of Attitude Polarization.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology13: 315–32.
12.
BurtRonald S.1982. Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press.
13.
CartwrightDorwin. 1971. “Risk Taking by Individuals and Groups: An Assessment of Research Employing Choice Dilemmas.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology20: 361–78.
14.
CartwrightDorwin. 1973. “Determinants of Scientific Progress: The Case of Research on the Risky Shift.” American Psychologist22: 222–31.
15.
CartwrightDorwin and ZanderAlvin. 1968. “Group Dynamics.”New York: Harper and Row.
CookKaren S., FineGary Alan, and HouseJames S., eds. 1995. Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
DavisJames H.1973. “Group Decision and Social Interaction: A Theory of Social Decision Schemes.” Psychological Review80: 97–125.
19.
DeGrootMorris H.1974. “Reaching a Consensus.” Journal of the American Statistical Association69: 118–21.
20.
DionKenneth L., BaronRobert S., and MillerNorman. 1970. “Why Do Groups Make Riskier Decisions than Individuals?” Pp. 305–77 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by BerkowitzL.. San Diego, CA: Academic.
21.
DoreianPatrick. 1981. “Estimating Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data.” Pp. 359–88 in Sociological Methodology, edited by LeinhardtS.. San Fransico, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
ErbringLutz and YoungAlice A.. 1979. “Individuals and Social Structure: Contextual Effects as Endogenous Feedback.” Sociological Methods and Research7: 396–430.
23.
FestingerLeon. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations7: 117–40.
24.
FestingerLeon, SchachterStanley, and BackKurt. 1950. Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. New York: Harper.
25.
FrenchJohn R. P.Jr. 1956. “A Formal Theory of Social Power.” The Psychological Review63: 181–94.
26.
FrenchJohn R. P.Jr. and RavenBertram. 1959. “The Bases of Social Power.” Pp. 150–67 in Studies of Social Power, edited by CartwrightD.. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
27.
FriedkinNoah E.1990. “Social Networks in Structural Equation Models.” Social Psychology Quarterly53: 316–28.
28.
FriedkinNoah E.1991. “Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures.” American Journal of Sociology96: 1478–1504.
29.
FriedkinNoah E.1993. “Structural Bases of Interpersonal Influence in Groups: A Longitudinal Case Study.” American Sociological Review58: 861–72.
30.
FriedkinNoah E.1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
FriedkinNoah E. and JohnsenEugene C.. 1990. “Social Influence and Opinions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology15: 193–206.
32.
FriedkinNoah E. and JohnsenEugene C.. 1997. “Social Positions in Influence Networks.” Social Networks19: 209–22.
33.
FriedkinNoah E. and JohnsenEugene C.. 1999. “Social Influence Networks and Opinion Change.” Advances in Group Processes16: 1–29.
34.
GoethalsGeorge R. and ZannaMark P.. 1979. “The Role of Social Comparison in Choice Shifts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37: 1469–76.
35.
GraesserCheryl C.1991. “A Social Averaging Theorem for Group Decision Making.” Pp. 1–40 in Contributiions to Information Integration Theory, vol. 2, edited by AndersonN. H.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
HararyFrank. 1959. “A Criterion for Unanimity in French's Theory of Social Power.” Pp. 168–82 in Studies in Social Power, edited by CartwrightD.. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
37.
HunterFloyd. 1953. Community Power Structure. Durham, NC: University of North Carolina.
38.
IsenbergDaniel J.1986. “Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50: 1141–51.
39.
KerrNorbert L.1981. “Social Transition Schemes: Charting the Group's Road to Agreement.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41: 684–702.
40.
KerrNorbert L.1992. “Group Decision Making at a Multialternative Task: Extremity, Interfaction Distance, Pluralities, and Issue Importance.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes52: 64–95.
41.
LammHelmut and MyersDavid G.. 1978. “Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology11: 145–95.
42.
LataneBibb. 1981. “The Psychology of Social Impact.” American Psychologist36: 343–56.
43.
LaughlinPatrick R.1980. “Social Combination Processes of Cooperative Problem-Solving Groups on Verbal Intellective Tasks.” Pp. 127–55 in Progress in Social Psychology, edited by FishbeinM.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44.
LaumannEdward O. and PappiFranz U.. 1976. Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.
45.
LawlerEdward J., RidgewayCecilia, and MarkovskyBarry. 1993. “Structural Social Psychology and the Micro-macro Problem.” Sociological Theory11: 268–90.
46.
MackieDiane M.1986. “Social Identification Effects in Group Polarization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50: 720–28.
47.
MarsdenPeter V. and FriedkinNoah E.. 1994. “Network Studies of Social Influence.” Pp. 3–25 in Advances in Social Network Analysis, vol. 22, edited by WassermanS. and GalaskiewiczJ.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
McGartyCraig, TurnerJohn C., HoggMichael A., DavidBarbara, and WetherellMargaret S.. 1992. “Group Polarization as Conformity to the Prototypical Group Member.” Bristish Journal of Social Psychology31: 1–20.
49.
MertonRobert K.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
50.
MyersDavid G.1996. Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51.
NewcombTheodore M.1961. The Acqaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
52.
PruittDean G.1971. “Choice Shifts in Group Discussion: An Introductory Review.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology20: 339–60.
53.
RidgewayCecilia L., BoyleElizabeth Heger, KuipersKathy J., and RobinsonDawn T.. 1998. “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interactional Experience.” American Sociological Review63: 331–50.
54.
RidgewayCecilia L. and WalkerHenry A.. 1995. “Status Structures.” Pp. 281–310 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psycholgy, edited by CookK. S., FineG. A., and HouseJ. S.. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
55.
SandersGlenn S. and BaronRobert S.. 1977. “Is Social Comparision Irrelevant for Producing Choice Shifts?”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology13: 303–14.
56.
SherifMuzafer. 1936. The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper.
57.
StasserGarold, KerrNorbert L., and DavisJames H.. 1989. “Influence Processes and Consensus Models in Decision-Making Groups.” Pp. 279–326 in Psychology of Group Influence, edited by PaulusP. B.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
StonerJames A.1961. “A Comparison of Individual and Group Decisions Involving Risk.” M.A. Thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
59.
TannenbaumArnold S.1974. Hierarchy in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
TurnerJohn C.1985. “Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior.” Pp. 77–122 in Advances in Group Processes, vol. 2, edited by LawlerE. J.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
61.
TurnerJohn C.1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
62.
TurnerJohn C. and OakesPenelope J.. 1989. “Self-Categorization Theory and Social Influence.” Pp. 233–75 in Psychology of Group Influence, edited by PaulusP. B.. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
VinokurAmiram. 1971. “Review and Theoretical Analysis of the Effects of Group Processes upon Individual and Group Decisions Involving Risk.” Psychological Bulletin76: 231–50.
64.
ZuberJohannes, CrottHelmut, and WernerJoachim. 1992. “Choice Shift and Group Polarization: An Analysis of the Status of Arguments and Social Decision Schemes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology62: 50–61.
