Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The relationship between the work an organization actually performs backstage and the image it presents to external parties has received continuing research attention but is as yet unresolved. Various organizational scholars have held that these two facets of organizations should remain disconnected from one another as they are fundamentally different and any link between them could contaminate one or the other. Other scholars have held that the two facets are indeed connected in a complex interrelationship. We examine this relationship through a qualitative field study of the U.S. General Accounting Office's (GAO) audit reporting process. We find that the GAO's internal work and the image it presents to such parties as the Congress, the press, and the federal agencies it audits are indeed complexly interconnected. We also find that the strength of these connections is influenced by the relative power of the various types of external parties with which the GAO interacts. We conclude by exploring implications for current theory and future research in various types of organizations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Andrew

. 1988. The System of Professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1997. Codification of Statements of Auditing Standards. Chicago, IL: Commerce Clearing House.

Barley

Stephen R.

1986. “Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Sociology of Radiology Departments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 78–108.

Berg

Bruce L.

1989. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Blumer

Herbert

. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bourdieu

Pierre

and Wacquant

Loic

. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Oxford, England: Polity Press.

Carpenter

Brian W.

and Dirsmith

Mark W.

. 1993. “Sampling and the Abstraction of Knowledge in the Auditing Profession: An Extended Institutional Theory Perspective.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 18: 41–63.

Carpenter

Brian W.

, Dirsmith

Mark W.

, and Gupta

Parveen

. 1994. “Materialability Judgment and Audit Firm Culture: Social-Behavioral and Political Perspectives.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 19: 355–80.

Covaleski

Mark A.

, Dirsmith

Mark W.

, Heian

James

, and Samuel

Sajay

. 1998. “The Calculated and the Avowed: Techniques of Discipline and Struggles over Identity in Big 6 Public Accounting Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 298–327.

10.

Covaleski

Mark A.

and Dirsmith

Mark W.

. 1988. “An Institutional Perspective on the Rise, Social Transformation and Fall of a University Budget Category.” Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 562–87.

11.

DiMaggio

Paul J.

1988. “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” Pp. 13–19 in Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, edited by Zucker

. Cambridge, MA: Bolinger.

12.

DiMaggio

Paul J.

and Powell

Walter W.

. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.

13.

Feldman

Martha S.

1989. Order without Design. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Feldman

Martha S.

and March

James G.

. 1981. “Information Organizations or Signal and Symbol.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 171–86.

15.

Fine

Gary A.

1984. “Negotiated Orders and Organizational Cultures.” Annual Review of Sociology 10: 239–62.

16.

Fischer

Michael J.

1996. “Real-izing the Benefits of New Technologies as a Source of Audit Evidence: An Interpretive Field Study.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 21: 219–42.

17.

General Accounting Office (GAO). 1989. Communications Manual. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office Press.

18.

General Accounting Office (GAO). 1991. General Policy Manual. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office Press.

19.

General Accounting Office (GAO). 1994. Standards for the Audit of Government Organizations. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office Press.

20.

General Accounting Office (GAO). 1996. Comptroller General's 1996 Annual Report. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office Press.

21.

General Accounting Office (GAO). 1997. The United States Government Manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

22.

Goldstein

Jerry D.

1994. “Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work Family Issues.” Academy of Management Journal 37: 350–82.

23.

Gupta

Parveen P.

, Dirsmith

Mark W.

, and Fogarty

Timothy

. 1994. “Coordination and Control in a Governmental Agency: Contingency and Institutional Perspectives on GAO Audits.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 264–84.

24.

Hall

Peter M.

1972. “A Symbolic Interactionist Analysis of Politics.” Sociological Inquiry 42: 35–75.

25.

Hall

Peter M.

1985. “Asymmetric Relationships and Processes of Power.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 8: 309–44.

26.

Hall

Peter M.

1997. “Meta-Power, Societal Organization, and the Shaping of Social Action.” Symbolic Interaction 20: 397–418.

27.

Herman

Edward S.

and Chomsky

Noam

. 1988. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.

28.

Hopwood

Anthony G.

1983. “On Trying to Study Accounting in the Contexts in Which It Operates.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 8: 287–305.

29.

Kaufman

Herbert

. 1960. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

30.

Kuntz

Paul

. 1991. “Embattled GAO Fights Back: Bowsher Denies any Bias.” Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 49: 2046–50.

31.

Lincoln

Yvonna S.

and Guba

Egon

. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

32.

MacKenzie

Donald A.

1990. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

33.

Maines

David R.

1982. “In Search of Mesostructure.” Urban Life 7: 217–77.

34.

Maines

David R.

1984. “Suggestions for Symbolic Interactionist Conception of Culture.” Communication and Cognition 17: 205–17.

35.

Maines

David R.

and Charlton

James C.

. 1985. “The Negotiated Order Approach to the Analysis of Social Organization.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 8: 217–308.

36.

Maines

David R.

and Palenski

Joseph

. 1986. “Reconstructive Legitimacy in Final Reports of Contract Research.” Sociological Review 34: 573–89.

37.

Manning

Peter K.

1982. “Producing Drama: Symbolic Communication and the Police.” Symbolic Interaction 5: 223–41.

38.

Manning

Peter K.

1987. Semiotic of Fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

39.

Manning

Peter K.

1988. Symbolic Communication, Signifying Calls and the Police Response. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

40.

Meyer

John

. 1983. “On the Celebration of Rationality.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 8: 235–40.

41.

Meyer

John

and Rowan

Brian

. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 2: 340–63.

42.

Meyer

John

and Richard Scott

. 1983. Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

43.

Meyer

John

, Boli

John

, Thomas

George M.

, and Ramirez

Francisco O.

. 1997. “World Society and the Nation State.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–81.

44.

Mintzberg

Henry

. 1988. Mintzberg on Management: Inside the Strange World of Organizations. New York: Free Press.

45.

Mizruchi

Mark S.

and Fein

Lisa C.

. Forthcoming. “Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism: A Study of the Social Construction of ‘Sociological Knowledge.”’ Administrative Science Quarterly.

46.

National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). 1994. “The Roles, Mission and Operations of the U.S. General Accounting Office: Report Prepared for the U.S. Committee on Government Affairs, United States Senate.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

47.

Oliver

Christine

. 1991. “Strategic Resources to Institutional Processes.” Academy of Management Review, 16: 145–79.

48.

Orton

J. Douglas

and Weick

Karl E.

. 1990. “Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization.” Academy of Management Review, 15: 203–23.

49.

Perrow

Charles

. 1985. “Overboard with Myth and Symbols.” Review essay. American Journal of Sociology 91: 151–55.

50.

Pfeffer

Jeffrey

. 1981a. “Management as Symbolic Action: The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms.” Research in Organizational Behavior 3: 1–52.

51.

Pfeffer

Jeffrey

. 1981b. Power in Organizations. Boston, MA: Pitman.

52.

Pfeffer

Jeffrey

and Salancik

Gerald R.

. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

53.

Powell

Walter W.

1985. “The Institutionalization of Rational Organizations.” Contemporary Sociology 14: 564–66.

54.

Powell

Walter W.

and DiMaggio

Paul J.

, eds. 1991. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–40 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

55.

Rubin

Irene S.

1979. “Retrenchment, Loose Structure and Adaptability in the University.” Sociology of Education 52: 211–22.

56.

Sackmann

Sonya A.

1991. Cultural Knowledge in Organizations: Exploring the Collective Mind. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

57.

Scott

W. Richard

. 1987. “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory.” Administration Science Quarterly 32: 493–511.

58.

Scott

W. Richard

. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

59.

Scott

W. Richard

. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

60.

Strauss

Anselm

. 1959. Mirrors and Masks: The Search for Identity. Glencove, IL: Free Press.

61.

Strauss

Anselm

. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes and Social Order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

62.

Strauss

Anselm

. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York: DeGruyter.

63.

Thomas

Jim

. 1983. “Justice as Interaction: Loose Coupling and Mediations in the Advisory Process.” Symbolic Interaction 6: 243–60.

64.

Thomas

Jim

. 1984. “Some Aspects of Negotiated Order, Loose Coupling and Mesostructure in Maximum Security Prisons.” Symbolic Interaction 7: 213–31.

65.

Thomas

Robert J.

1994. What Machines Can't Do: Politics and Technology in the Industrial Enterprise. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

66.

Thompson

James D.

1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.

67.

Tolbert

Pamela

. 1988. “Institutional Sources of Organizational Culture.” Pp. 101–13 in Major Law Firms in Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

68.

Van Maanen

John

. 1988. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

69.

Weick

Karl E.

1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

70.

Wilson

James Q.

1978. The Investigators: Managing the FBI and Narcotics Agents. New York: Basic Books.

The Coupling of the Symbolic and the Technical in an Institutionalized Context: The Negotiated Order of the Gao's Audit Reporting Process *

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References