Sociological studies of poverty governance investigate how state actors manage marginalized populations, regulate their participation in social institutions, and reform their behavior through systems of punishment and rewards. Research in this area considers a range of institutions involved in managing poverty, but it has largely ignored an institution omnipresent in the lives of the poor—public housing agencies (PHAs). Focusing on the Housing Choice Voucher program, the largest rental assistance program in the country, I examine discretionary choices made by PHAs that affect who gets access to rental assistance, how long clients have to wait, and what they must do to maintain their benefits. I ask how these administrative decisions create successive opportunities for state agencies to govern the poor. Drawing on interviews with agency officials, I describe a tripartite process of selecting market-ready households, engaging them in rituals of market formation, and utilizing market nudges to remind them of their responsibilities as market actors. This framework deepens sociological understandings of how local state agencies utilize discretionary choices in a resource-scarce, highly decentralized policy environment to evaluate, reform, and discipline the poor.
BartramRobin. 2019. “Going Easy and Going After: Building Inspections and the Selective Allocation of Code Violations.” City & Community18(2):594–617.
2.
BergmanPeterChettyRajDeLucaStefanieHendrenNathanielKatzLawrence F.PalmerChristopher. 2019. “Creating Moves to Opportunity: Experimental Evidence on Barriers to Neighborhood Choice.” Working Paper 26164, National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
BruchSarah K.FerreeMyra MarxSossJoe. 2010. “From Policy to Polity: Democracy, Paternalism, and the Incorporation of Disadvantaged Citizens.” American Sociological Review75(2):205–26.
4.
Brydolf-HorwitzMarcoBeckettKatherine. 2021. “Welfare, Punishment, and Social Marginality: Understanding the Connections.” Pp. 91–111 in The Politics of Inequality, Vol. 28, Research in Political Sociology, edited by PettinicchioD.Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
5.
ChristinAngéle. 2020. Metrics at Work: Journalism and the Contested Meaning of Algorithms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
CohenDaniel Aldana. 2019. “A Green New Deal for Housing.” Jacobin, February8.
7.
Congressional Research Services. 2012. “The Use of Discretionary Authority in the Housing Choice Voucher Program: A CRS Study.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Services.
8.
CunninghamMary K.GalvezMartha M.ArandaClaudiaSantosRobertWissokerDouglas A.OnetoAlyse D.PitingoloRobCrawfordJames. 2018. “A Pilot Study of Landlord Acceptance of Housing Choice Vouchers.” Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
9.
DayMeagan. 2019. “The Green New Deal for Public Housing Has Arrived.” Jacobin, November14.
10.
DeLucaStefanieGarbodenPhilip M. E.RosenblattPeter. 2013. “Segregating Shelter: How Housing Policies Shape the Residential Locations of Low-Income Minority Families.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science647(1):268–99.
11.
DeLucaStefanieRosenEva. 2022. “Housing Insecurity among the Poor Today.” Annual Review of Sociology48(1):343–71.
12.
DesmondMatthew. 2018. “Heavy Is the House: Rent Burden among the American Urban Poor.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research42(1):160–70.
13.
DesmondMatthewGershensonCarlKiviatBarbara. 2015. “Forced Relocation and Residential Instability among Urban Renters.” Social Service Review89(2):227–62.
14.
DeVerteuilGeoffrey. 2003. “Homeless Mobility, Institutional Settings, and the New Poverty Management.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space35(2):361–79.
15.
DeVerteuilGeoffreyMayJonvon MahsJürgen. 2009. “Complexity Not Collapse: Recasting the Geographies of Homelessness in a ‘Punitive’ Age.” Progress in Human Geography33(5):646–66.
EllenIngrid GouldO’ReganKatherineHouseSophiaBrennerRyan. 2021. “Do Lawyers Matter? Early Evidence on Eviction Patterns After the Rollout of Universal Access to Counsel in New York City.” Housing Policy Debate31(3–5):540–61.
18.
FeldmanGuy. 2019. “Neoliberalism and Poverty: An Unbreakable Relationship.” Pp. 340–50 in Routledge International Handbook of Poverty, edited by GreveB.New York: Routledge.
19.
FinkelMerylBuronLarry. 2001. “Study on Section 8 Voucher Success Rates: Quantitative Study of Success Rates in Metropolitan Areas.” Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, Department of Housing and Urban Development.
20.
FongKelley. 2020. “Getting Eyes in the Home: Child Protective Services Investigations and State Surveillance of Family Life.” American Sociological Review85(4):610–38.
21.
FreemanLance. 2012. “The Impact of Source of Income Laws on Voucher Utilization.” Housing Policy Debate22(2):297–318.
22.
FreemanLanceLiYunjing. 2014. “Do Source of Income Anti-Discrimination Laws Facilitate Access to Less Disadvantaged Neighborhoods?” Housing Studies29(1):88–107.
23.
GalvezMartha. 2010. “What Do We Know about Housing Choice Voucher Program Location Outcomes?” Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
24.
GarbodenPhilip M. E.RosenEvaDeLucaStefanieEdinKathryn. 2018. “Taking Stock: What Drives Landlord Participation in the Housing Choice Voucher Program.” Housing Policy Debate28(6):979–1003.
25.
GlazermanStevenDotterDallas. 2017. “Market Signals: Evidence on the Determinants and Consequences of School Choice from a Citywide Lottery.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis39(4):593–619.
26.
GongNeil. 2019. “Between Tolerant Containment and Concerted Constraint: Managing Madness for the City and the Privileged Family.” American Sociological Review84(4):664–89.
27.
GowanTeresaWhetstoneSarah. 2012. “Making the Criminal Addict: Subjectivity and Social Control in a Strong-Arm Rehab.” Punishment & Society14(1):69–93.
28.
GreenleeAndrew J.LeeHan BumMcNamaraPaul E.2018. “Performance of Small Public Housing Authorities: Opportunities and Barriers.” Cityscape20(3):257–76.
29.
GreifMeredith. 2018. “Regulating Landlords: Unintended Consequences for Poor Tenants.” City & Community17(3):658–74.
30.
GurusamiSusilaKurwaRahim. 2021. “From Broken Windows to Broken Homes: Homebreaking as Racialized and Gendered Poverty Governance.” Feminist Formations33(1):1–32.
31.
HackerJacob S.2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HackworthJason. 2007. The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
HalushkaJohn M.2020. “The Runaround: Punishment, Welfare, and Poverty Survival after Prison.” Social Problems67(2):233–50.
34.
HamlinMadeleinePurserGretchen. 2021. “‘A Program, Not the Projects’: Reentry in the Post-Public Housing Era.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography50(6):806–34.
35.
HasenfeldYeheskel. 2000. “Organizational Forms as Moral Practices: The Case of Welfare Departments.” Social Service Review74(3):329–51.
HerdPamelaMoynihanDonald P.2019. Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
38.
HerringChris. 2019. “Complaint-Oriented Policing: Regulating Homelessness in Public Space.” American Sociological Review84(5):769–800.
39.
HerringChris. 2021. “Complaint-Oriented ‘Services’: Shelters as Tools for Criminalizing Homelessness.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science693(1):264–83.
40.
HowellJuniaKorver-GlennElizabeth. 2018. “Neighborhoods, Race, and the Twenty-First-Century Housing Appraisal Industry.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity4(4):473–90.
41.
HowellJuniaKorver-GlennElizabeth. 2021. “The Increasing Effect of Neighborhood Racial Composition on Housing Values, 1980–2015.” Social Problems68(4):1051–71.
42.
HughesCayce C.2021. “A House but Not a Home: How Surveillance in Subsidized Housing Exacerbates Poverty and Reinforces Marginalization.” Social Forces100(1):293–315.
43.
Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. 2019. “The State of the Nation’s Housing: 2019.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
44.
KatzMichael B.2008. The Price of Citizenship: Redefining the American Welfare State. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
45.
KatzensteinMary FainsodWallerMaureen R.2015. “Taxing the Poor: Incarceration, Poverty Governance, and the Seizure of Family Resources.” Perspectives on Politics13(3):638–56.
46.
KimHuiyun. 2022. “Failing the Least Advantaged: An Unintended Consequence of Local Implementation of the Housing Choice Voucher Program.” Housing Policy Debate32(2):369–85.
47.
KingsleyG. Thomas. 2017. “Trends in Housing Problems and Federal Housing Assistance.” Washington, DC: Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center, Urban Institute.
48.
KirkGabriela. 2021. “The Limits of Expectations and the Minimization of Collateral Consequences: The Experience of Electronic Home Monitoring.” Social Problems68(3):642–57.
49.
Kohler-HausmannIssa. 2013. “Misdemeanor Justice: Control without Conviction.” American Journal of Sociology119(2):351–93.
50.
Korver-GlennElizabeth. 2018. “Compounding Inequalities: How Racial Stereotypes and Discrimination Accumulate across the Stages of Housing Exchange.” American Sociological Review83(4):627–56.
51.
Lara-MillánArmando. 2021. Redistributing the Poor: Jails, Hospitals, and the Crisis of Law and Fiscal Austerity. New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
LipskyMichael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
53.
MaskovskyJeff. 2000. “‘Managing’ the Poor: Neoliberalism, Medicaid HMOs and the Triumph of Consumerism among the Poor.” Medical Anthropology19(2):121–46.
McCabeBrian J.2016. No Place Like Home: Wealth, Community and the Politics of Homeownership. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
McCabeBrianMooreM. Kathleen. 2021. “Absorption Disruptions and Serial Billing: Managing Portability Practices in the Housing Choice Voucher Program.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research23(1):197–220.
57.
McClureKirk. 2008. “Deconcentrating Poverty with Housing Programs.” Journal of the American Planning Association74(1):90–99.
MeadLawrence M., ed. 1997. The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
60.
MillerReuben Jonathan. 2014. “Devolving the Carceral State: Race, Prisoner Reentry, and the Micro-Politics of Urban Poverty Management.” Punishment & Society16(3):305–35.
61.
MilwardH. BrintonProvanKeith G.2000. “Governing the Hollow State.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(2):359–80.
62.
MilwardH. BrintonProvanKeith. 2003. “Managing the Hollow State: Collaboration and Contracting.” Public Management Review5(1):1–18.
63.
MooreM. Kathleen. 2016. “Lists and Lotteries: Rationing in the Housing Choice Voucher Program.” Housing Policy Debate26(3):474–87.
NelsonKyle. 2021. “The Microfoundations of Bureaucratic Outcomes: Causes and Consequences of Interpretive Disjuncture in Eviction Cases.” Social Problems68(1):152–67.
66.
PagerDevahShepherdHana. 2008. “The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology34:181–209.
67.
PattilloMaryKirkGabriela. 2021. “Layaway Freedom: Coercive Financialization in the Criminal Legal System.” American Journal of Sociology126(4):889–830.
68.
PeckJamie. 2002. “Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations, and Neoliberal Workfare.” Economic Geography78(3):331–60.
69.
PeckJamie. 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
70.
PetreCaitlin. 2021. All the News That’s Fit to Click: How Metrics Are Transforming the Work of Journalists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71.
PhillipsDavid C.2017. “Landlords Avoid Tenants Who Pay with Vouchers.” Economics Letters151:48–52.
72.
PivenFrances FoxClowardRichard. 1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage.
73.
PowerEmma R.GillonCharles. 2022. “Performing the ‘Good Tenant.’” Housing Studies37(3):459–82.
74.
ReinaVincentAikenClaudiaEpsteinJenna. 2021. “Exploring a Universal Housing Voucher.” The Housing Initiative at Penn, University of Pennsylvania.
75.
ReinaVincent J.WinterBen. 2019. “Safety Net? The Use of Vouchers When a Place-Based Rental Subsidy Ends.” Urban Studies56(10):2092–111.
RosenEva. 2014. “Rigging the Rules of the Game: How Landlords Geographically Sort Low-Income Renters.” City & Community13(4):310–40.
78.
RosenEva. 2020. The Voucher Promise: “Section 8” and the Fate of an American Neighborhood. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
RosenEvaGarbodenPhilip. 2022. “Landlord Paternalism: Housing the Poor with a Velvet Glove.” Social Problems69(2):470–491.
80.
RosenEvaGarbodenPhilipCossyleonJennifer E.2021. “Racial Discrimination in Housing: HowLandlords Use Algorithms and Home Visits to Screen Tenants.” American Sociological Review86(5):787–822.
81.
SchramSanford F.SossJoeHouserLindaFordingRichard C.2010. “The Third Level of US Welfare Reform: Governmentality under Neoliberal Paternalism.” Citizenship Studies14(6):739–54.
82.
SchwartzAlex F.2014. Housing Policy in the United States. New York: Routledge.
83.
SeimJosh. 2017. “The Ambulance: Toward a Labor Theory of Poverty Governance.” American Sociological Review82(3):451–75.
84.
SeimJosh. 2020. Bandage, Sort, and Hustle: Ambulance Crews on the Front Lines of Urban Suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
85.
SeronCarrollFrankelMartinVan RyzinGreggKovathJean. 2001. “The Impact of Legal Counsel on Outcomes for Poor Tenants in New York City’s Housing Court: Results of a Randomized Experiment.” Law & Society Review35(2):419–34.
86.
SossJoeFordingRichard C.SchramSanford F.2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
87.
SparksTony. 2012. “Governing the Homeless in an Age of Compassion: Homelessness, Citizenship, and the 10-Year Plan to End Homelessness in King County Washington.” Antipode44(4):1510–31.
88.
StuartForrest. 2014. “From ‘Rabble Management’ to ‘Recovery Management’: Policing Homelessness in Marginal Urban Space.” Urban Studies51(9):1909–25.
89.
TaylorKeeanga-Yamahtta. 2019. Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
90.
ThompsonAley. 2018. “The Housing Opportunity Program: Analysis & Possible Program Changes.” Tacoma, WA: Tacoma Housing Authority.
91.
TigheJ. RosieHatchMegan E.MeadJoseph. 2017. “Source of Income Discrimination and Fair Housing Policy.” Journal of Planning Literature32(1):3–15.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. 2015. “Housing Choice Voucher Program Administrative Fee Study.” Washington, DC.
94.
ValeLawrence J.FreemarkYonah. 2012. “From Public Housing to Public-Private Housing.” Journal of the American Planning Association78(4):379–402.
95.
WacquantLoïc. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
96.
WacquantLoïc. 2010. “Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity.” Sociological Forum25(2):197–220.
97.
WalterRebecca J.ColburnGreggYerenaAnaidPedersonMelonyFyallRachelCrowderKyle. 2020. “Constraints and Opportunities for Innovation in the Moving to Work Demonstration Program.” Housing and Society47(1):1–21.
98.
Watkins-HayesCeleste. 2009. The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
99.
YingerJohn. 1997. Closed Doors, Opportunities Lost: The Continuing Costs of Housing Discrimination. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
100.
ZackaBernardo. 2017. When the State Meets the Street. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
