Criminal organizations, like legitimate organizations, adapt to shifts in markets, competition, regulations, and enforcement. Exogenous shocks can be consequential moments of power consolidation, resource hoarding, and inequality amplification in legitimate organizations, but especially in criminal organizations. This research examines how the exogenous shock of the U.S. prohibition of the production, transportation, and sale of alcohol in 1920 restructured power and inequality in Chicago organized crime. I analyze a unique relational database on organized crime from the early 1900s via a criminal network that tripled in size and centralized during Prohibition. Before Prohibition, Chicago organized crime was small, decentralized, and somewhat inclusive of women at the margins. However, during Prohibition, the organized crime network grew, consolidated the organizational elites, and left out the most vulnerable participants from the most profitable opportunities. This historical case illuminates how profits and organizational restructuring outside of (or in response to) regulatory environments can displace people at the margins.
AckerJoan. 2006. “Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations.” Gender & Society20(4):441–64.
2.
AlbaneseJay S.1989. Organized Crime in America, 2nd ed.Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.
3.
AnWeihuaLiuYu-Hsin. 2016. “keyplayer: An R Package for Locating Key Players in Social Networks.” The R Journal8(1):257–68.
4.
AndersonBrigham S.ButtsCarter T.CarleyKathleen M. 1999. “The Interaction of Size and Density with Graph-Level Indices.” Social Networks21(3):239–67.
5.
AndreasPeter. 2013. Smuggler Nation: How Illicit Trade Made America. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
AndreasPeterWallmanJoel. 2009. “Illicit Markets and Violence: What Is the Relationship?”Crime, Law & Social Change52(3):225–29.
7.
AsburyHerbert. 1940. Gem of the Prairie: An Informal History of the Chicago Underworld. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
8.
Avent-HoltDustin. 2012. “The Political Dynamics of Market Organization: Cultural Framing, Neoliberalism, and the Case of Airline Deregulation.” Sociological Theory30(4):283–302.
9.
Avent-HoltDustinTomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 2010. “The Relational Basis of Inequality: Generic and Contingent Wage Distribution Processes.” Work and Occupations37(2):162–93.
10.
BarabásiAlbert-LászlóAlbertRéka. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science286(5439):509–12.
11.
JensBeckertDeweyMatías, eds. 2017. The Architecture of Illegal Markets: Towards an Economic Sociology of Illegality in the Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
BienenLeigh B.RottinghausBrandon. 2002. “Learning from the Past, Living in the Present: Understanding Homicide in Chicago, 1870–1930.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology92(3–4):437–554.
13.
BlairCynthia M.2010. I’ve Got to Make My Livin’: Black Women’s Sex Work in Turn-of-the-Century Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
BojanowskiMichałCortenRense. 2014. “Measuring Segregation in Social Networks.” Social Networks39(1):14–32.
15.
BonacichPhillip. 1987. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.” American Journal of Sociology92(5):1170–82.
16.
BorgattiStephen P.2006. “Identifying Sets of Key Players in a Social Network.” Computational, Mathematical and Organizational Theory12(1):21–34.
17.
BouchardMartin. 2007. “On the Resilience of Illegal Drug Markets.” Global Crime8(4):325–44.
18.
BourdieuPierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241–58 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by RichardsonJ. G. New York: Greenwood.
19.
BrassDaniel J.GalaskiewiczJosephHenrichR. GreveTsaiWenpin. 2004. “Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective.” The Academy of Management Journal47(6):795–817.
20.
BrowningNorma Lee. 1949a. “Oldest Vice Queen Finds Reform at 70.” Chicago Daily Tribune, March14, pp. 1, 6.
21.
BrowningNorma Lee. 1949b. “Grandeur Turns to Squalor for Ex-Levee Queen: Vic Shaw Recalls Days of Fancy Living.” Chicago Daily Tribune, March15, p. 4.
22.
BrowningNorma Lee. 1949c. “Dope and Death Doomed Levee, ‘Queen’ Recalls: Headlines Stir City to Cleanup of Vice.” Chicago Daily Tribune, March16, p. 12.
23.
BurgessErnest W. [1929] 1968. “Summary and Recommendations.” Pp. 1091–100 in Organized Crime in Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
BurtRonald S.1998. “The Gender of Social Capital.” Rationality and Society10(1):5–46.
25.
BurtRonald S.2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
ButtsCarter T.2008. “Social Network Analysis with sna.” Journal of Statistical Software24(6):1–51.
27.
CatinoMaurizio. 2019. Mafia Organizations: The Visible Hand of Criminal Enterprises. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1911. “Brolaski’s Story Imperils Police in the ‘Vice Trust’: Fate of McWeeny and Minor Officials Depends on Corroborative Proof.” November19, p. 1.
29.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1914a. “Inside Story of Vice’s Grip on Chicago: City’s Badlands in Grip of Three Men—‘Hink,’ ‘Bath,’ Ryan.” July18, pp. 1, 3.
30.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1914b. “Vice Trust Tactics Bared by Insider: Disgusted Police Head Outlines Levee Rule.” July20, pp. 1–2.
31.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1914c. “Colosimo Gives Realty to Wife: Transfers Said to Be Intended as a Move to Escape Possible City Judgments.” August27, p. 13.
32.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1917a. “Hoyne Arrests Healey: Chief Called Bribe Taker in League with Vice Ring.” January9, p. 1.
33.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1917b. “$13,900 Chief’s Share in Graft, Costello Says: Inside Story Told of How Healey Was Paid.” December19, pp. 1, 10.
34.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1918. “Drinks for Soldiers and Sailors: Chicago Cabarets Serve Intoxicants to Uniformed Men without Pretense of Secrecy.” September2, p. 13.
35.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1919. “Tilting of Lid Brings Big Jim Second Arrest: Cigaret Girl Beaten by Colosimo Aids, She Charges.” May21, p. 14.
36.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1920. “Divorced Wife’s Brother Tells of Family Rows: Riches Brought Woes, He Tells Police.” May12, p. 3.
37.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1924. “O’Banion Quiz Leads Way to Cicero Dives.” November20, pp. 1, 3.
38.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1928. “‘Vic Shaw,’ 60, Fined $500 for Possessing Liquor.” January28, p. 1.
39.
Chicago Daily Tribune. 1930. “Giant Brewery of Capone Gang Seized by U.S.: Supply Plant for Loop Saloons Raided.”June13, p. 5.
40.
CollinsCharles. 1954. “Who Killed Big Jim Colosimo?”Chicago Daily Tribune, February7, pp. C
19, C38.
41.
CollinsRandall. 2011. “Patrimonial Alliances and Failures of State Penetration: A Historical Dynamic of Crime, Corruption, Gangs, and Mafias.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science636(1):16–31.
42.
CsárdiGáborNepuszTamás. 2006. “The igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.” InterJournal Complex Systems1695(5):1–9.
43.
DavisGerald F.YooMinaBakerWayne E. 2003. “The Small World of the American Corporate Elite, 1982–2001.” Strategic Organization1(3):301–26.
44.
DellaPostaDaniel J.2017. “Network Closure and Integration in the Mid-20th Century American Mafia.” Social Networks51:148–57.
45.
DenckerJohn C.2008. “Corporate Restructuring and Sex Differences in Managerial Promotion.” American Sociological Review73(3):455–76.
46.
DiMaggioPaulGaripFiliz. 2011. “How Network Externalities Can Exacerbate Intergroup Inequality.” American Journal of Sociology116(6):1887–933.
47.
DiMaggioPaulGaripFiliz. 2012. “Network Effects and Social Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology38:93–118.
48.
DiPreteThomas A.EirichGregory M. 2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology32:271–97.
49.
Drake, St.ClairCaytonHorace R. [1945] 1962. Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in a Northern City. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
50.
FligsteinNeil. 1996. “Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions.” American Sociological Review61(4):656–73.
51.
FligsteinNeil. 2002. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
FreemanLinton C.1979. “Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks1(3):215–39.
53.
GoldinClaudiaOlivettiClaudia. 2013. “Shocking Labor Supply: A Reassessment of the Role of World War II on Women’s Labor Supply.” American Economic Review103(3):257–62.
54.
HallerMark H.1971. “Organized Crime in Urban History: Chicago in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Social History5(2):210–34.
55.
HallerMark H.1990. “Illegal Enterprise: A Theoretical and Historical Interpretation.” Criminology28(2):207–35.
56.
HandcockMark S.HunterDavid R.ButtsCarter T.GoodreauSteven M.MorrisMartina. 2008. “statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data.” Journal of Statistical Software24(1):1–11.
57.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn H. 1977. “The Population Ecology of Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology82(5):929–64.
58.
HansonSusanPrattGeraldine. 1991. “Job Search and the Occupational Segregation of Women.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers81(2):229–53.
59.
HartnettAlexandraDawdyShannon Lee. 2013. “The Archaeology of Illegal and Illicit Economies.” Annual Review of Anthropology42:37–51.
60.
HavemanHeather A.1992. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Organizational Change and Performance under Conditions of Fundamental Environmental Transformation.” Administrative Science Quarterly37(1):48–75.
61.
KalevAlexandra. 2009. “Cracking the Glass Cages? Restructuring and Ascriptive Inequality at Work.” American Journal of Sociology114(6):1591–643.
62.
KalevAlexandraDobbinFrankKellyErin. 2006. “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies.” American Sociological Review71(4):589–617.
63.
KanterRosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
64.
LandescoJohn. [1929] 1968. Organized Crime in Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
65.
LernerMichael A.2007. Dry Manhattan: Prohibition in New York City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
LinNan. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
LutterMark. 2015. “Do Women Suffer from Network Closure? The Moderating Effect of Social Capital on Gender Inequality in a Project-Based Labor Market, 1929 to 2010.” American Sociological Review80(2):329–58.
68.
McDonaldSteve. 2011. “What’s in the ‘Old Boys’ Network? Accessing Social Capital in Gendered and Racialized Networks.” Social Networks33(4):317–30.
69.
McDonaldSteveBentonRichard A. 2017. “The Structure of Internal Job Mobility and Organizational Wage Inequality.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility47:21–31.
70.
McGirrLisa. 2016. The War on Alcohol: Prohibition and the Rise of the American State. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
71.
McIllwainJeffrey Scott. 1999. “Organized Crime: A Social Network Approach.” Crime, Law & Social Change32(4):301–23.
72.
MillerWilbur R.1991. Revenuers and Moonshiners: Enforcing Federal Liquor Law in the Mountain South, 1865–1900. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
73.
MitraniSam. 2013. The Rise of the Chicago Police Department: Class and Conflict, 1850–1894. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
74.
MizruchiMark S.StearnsLinda Brewster. 1988. “A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates.” Administrative Science Quarterly33(2):194–210.
75.
NewmanMark E. J.2003. “Mixing Patterns in Networks.” Physical Review E67(2):1–13.
76.
PadgettJohn F.AnsellChristopher K. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology98(6):1259–319.
77.
PaoliLetizia. 2002. “The Paradoxes of Organized Crime.” Crime, Law & Social Change37(1):51–97.
78.
Pizzini-GambettaValeria. 2014. “Organised Crime: The Gender Constraints of Illegal Markets.” Pp. 448–67 in The Oxford Handbook of Sex, Gender and Crime, edited by GartnerR.McCarthyB. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
79.
RayVictor. 2019. “A Theory of Racialized Organizations.” American Sociological Review84(1):26–53.
80.
RecklessWalter C.1933. Vice in Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
81.
ReuterPeter. 1983. Disorganized Crime: The Economics of the Visible Hand. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
82.
RosenfeldRichard. 2018. “Studying Crime Trends: Normal Science and Exogenous Shocks.” Criminology56(1):5–26.
83.
RuthDavid E.1996. Inventing the Public Enemy: The Gangster in American Culture, 1918–1934. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
84.
SalzingerLeslie. 2003. Genders in Production: Making Workers in Mexico’s Global Factories. Berkeley: University of California Press.
85.
SmithAnnaCalderCatherine A.BrowningChristopher R. 2016. “Empirical Reference Distributions for Networks of Different Size.” Social Networks47(1):24–37.
86.
SmithChris M.2019. Syndicate Women: Gender and Networks in Chicago Organized Crime. Oakland: University of California Press.
87.
SmithChris M.PapachristosAndrew V. 2016. “Trust Thy Crooked Neighbor: Multiplexity in Chicago Organized Crime Networks.” American Sociological Review81(4):644–67.
88.
SmithSandra S.2000. “Mobilizing Social Resources: Race, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Social Capital and Persisting Wage Inequalities.” The Sociological Quarterly41(4):509–37.
89.
Smith-DoerrLaurel. 2004. Women’s Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
90.
SpilermanSeymourStecklovGuy. 2009. “Societal Responses to Terrorist Attacks.” Annual Review of Sociology35:167–89.
91.
StainbackKevinTomaskovic-DeveyDonaldSkaggsSheryl. 2010. “Organizational Approaches to Inequality: Inertia, Relative Power, and Environments.” Annual Review of Sociology36:225–47.
92.
StovelKatherineShawLynette. 2012. “Brokerage.” Annual Review of Sociology38:139–58.
93.
TillyCharles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
94.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonaldAvent-HoltDustin. 2019. Relational Inequalities: An Organizational Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
95.
UzziBrian. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performances of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review16(4):674–98.
96.
VenkateshSudhir Alladi. 2006. Off the Books: The Underground Economy of the Urban Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
97.
von LampeKlaus. 2016. Organized Crime: Analyzing Illegal Activities, Criminal Structures, and Extra-Legal Governance. Los Angeles: Sage.
98.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99.
XenakisSapphoCheliotisLeonidas K. 2013. “Crime and Economic Downturn: The Complexity of Crime and Crime Politics in Greece since 2009.” The British Journal of Criminology53(5):719–45.
100.
YoungKathryne M.2014. “Everyone Knows the Game: Legal Consciousness in the Hawaiian Cockfight.” Law & Society Review48(3):499–530.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
