Why did France influence the geopolitical system of eighteenth-century Europe more effectively than did Britain? Explanations pointing to states’ military and economic power are unable to explain this outcome. I argue that durable geopolitical influence depends on states’ symbolic capacities to secure recognition from competitor states, in addition to their coercive and economic capacities. And I show that states are liable to secure recognition to the extent that their agents embody social dispositions congruent with those of competitor agents. France converted military and economic power into durable influence in eighteenth-century Europe because French agents and most of their European counterparts shared courtly standards of competence, and they were invested in the common stakes of patrimonial sovereignty. By contrast, Britain failed to convert its greater material power into similar influence because British agents tended to lack courtly manners and they were uninterested in patrimonial stakes.
AdamsJulia. 2005. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
AdlerEmanuelPouliotVincent. 2011. “International Practices.” International Theory3(1):1–36.
3.
Adler-NissenRebeccaPouliotVincent. 2014. “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.” European Journal of International Relations20(4):889–911.
4.
AllenRobert C.1999. “Tracking the Agricultural Revolution in England.” Economic History Review52(2):209–235.
5.
AllenRobert C.2000. “Economic Structure and Agricultural Productivity in Europe, 1300–1800.” European Review of Economic History4(1):1–26.
6.
AllenRobert C.2001. “The Great Divergence in European Wages and Prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War.” Explorations in Economic History38(4):411–47.
7.
AndersonPerry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London, UK: New Left Books.
8.
Anonymous. 1806. General Remarks on Our Commerce with the Continent. London, UK: R. McDonald.
9.
Archives du ministère des Affaires étrangères (AAE); Correspondance politique (CP) Autriche; Hollande.
10.
ArrighiGiovanni. 1990. “The Three Hegemonies of Historical Capitalism.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center)13(3):365–408.
11.
ArrighiGiovanni. 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London, UK: Verso.
12.
ArrighiGiovanniSilverBethany J.1999. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–36 in Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System, edited by ArrighiG.SilverB. J.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
AshleyRichard K.1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” International Organization38(2):225–86.
14.
BaillouJean. 1984. Les Affaires étrangères et le corps diplomatique français. Paris: Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
15.
BaughDaniel A.1988. “Great Britain’s ‘Blue-Water’ Policy, 1689–1815.” International History Review10(1):33–58.
16.
BaughDaniel A.1998. “Withdrawing from Europe: Anglo-French Maritime Geopolitics, 1750–1800.” International History Review20(1):1–32.
17.
BéchuClaire. 1998. “Les ambassadeurs français au XVIIIe siècle: formation et carrière.” Pp. 333–46 in L’invention de la diplomatie: Moyen Age–Temps modernes, edited by BélyL.Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
18.
BeikWilliam. 1985. Absolutism and Society in Seventeenth-Century France: State Power and Provincial Aristocracy in Languedoc. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
BellGary M.1990. A Handlist of British Diplomatic Representatives, 1509–1688. London, UK: Royal Historical Society.
20.
BélyLucien. 1990. Espions et ambassadeurs au temps de Louis XIV. Paris: Fayard.
21.
BélyLucien. 1999. La société des princes: XVIe–XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Fayard.
22.
BlackJeremy. 1986. Natural and Necessary Enemies: Anglo-French Relations in the Eighteenth Century. London, UK: Duckworth.
23.
BlackJeremy. 1988. “Britain’s Foreign Alliances in the Eighteenth Century.” Albion20(4):573–602.
24.
BlackJeremy. 2001. British Diplomats and Diplomacy, 1688–1800. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press.
25.
BlackJeremy. 2010. A History of Diplomacy. London, UK: Reaktion.
26.
BorgattiStephen P.2005. “Centrality and Network Flow.” Social Networks27(1):55–71.
27.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by NiceR.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
BourdieuPierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Translated by RaymondG.AdamsonM.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
BourdieuPierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Translated by NiceR.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
BrennerRobert. 1985. “The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism.” Pp. 213–327 in The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-industrial Europe, edited by AstonT. H.PhilpinC. H. E.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
BrennerRobert. 1993. Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550–1653. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
BrewerJohn. 1989. The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688–1783. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
33.
British Library (BL); Stowe MS 247; Additional MS 51393.
34.
BucholzR. O.1993. The Augustan Court: Queen Anne and the Decline of Court Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
CarruthersBruce G.1996. City of Capital: Politics and Markets in the English Financial Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
CarterAlice Clare. 1975. Neutrality or Commitment: The Evolution of Dutch Foreign Policy 1667–1795. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
37.
CesaMarco. 2010. Allies Yet Rivals: International Politics in 18th Century Europe. Translated by BarrP. J.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
ColemanD. C.1977. The Economy of England, 1450–1750. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
CoxRobert W.1983. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies12(2):162–75.
40.
CoxRobert W.1987. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
CrouzetFrançois. 1990. Britain Ascendant: Comparative Studies in Franco-British Economic History. Translated by ThomM.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
De VriesJanvan der WoudeAd. 1997. The First Modern Economy: Success, Failure, and Perseverance of the Dutch Economy, 1500–1815. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
DhondtFrederik. 2015. Balance of Power and Norm Hierarchy: Franco-British Diplomacy after the Peace of Utrecht. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48(2):147–60.
46.
DoyleMichael. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs12(3):205–235.
47.
DuindamJeroen. 2003. Vienna and Versailles: The Courts of Europe’s Dynastic Rivals, 1550–1780. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
EliasNorbert. 2000. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Translated by JephcottE.Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
49.
EmighRebecca Jean. 1997. “The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory.” Theory and Society26(5):649–84.
50.
EmighRebecca Jean. 2009. The Undevelopment of Capitalism: Sectors and Markets in Fifteenth-Century Tuscany. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
51.
ErtmanThomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
FishmanRobert M.LizardoOmar. 2013. “How Macro-Historical Change Shapes Cultural Taste: Legacies of Democratization in Spain and Portugal.” American Sociological Review78(2):213–39.
53.
FligsteinNeil. 2001. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields.” Sociological Theory19(2):105–125.
54.
FrankAndre Gunder. 1969. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.
55.
FreemanLinton C.1979. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks1(3):215–39.
56.
GilpinRobert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
GilpinRobert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
JulianGoLawsonGeorge, eds. 2017. Global Historical Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
GorskiPhilip S.2003. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
GorskiPhilip S.SharmaVivek Swaroop. 2017. “Beyond the Tilly Thesis: ‘Family Values’ and State Formation in Latin Christendom.” Pp. 98–124 in Does War Make States? Investigations of Charles Tilly’s Historical Sociology, edited by KaspersenL. B.StrandsbjergJ.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
HobdenStephenJohnM. Hobson, eds. 2002. Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
HornD. B.1932. British Diplomatic Representatives, 1689–1789. London, UK: Royal Historical Society.
63.
KeeneEdward. 2012. “The Treaty-Making Revolution of the Nineteenth Century.” International History Review34(3):475–500.
64.
EdwardKeene. 2014. “The Standard of ‘Civilisation,’ the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-Century International Social Space.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies42(3):651–73.
65.
KennedyPaul M.1988. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.
66.
KeohaneRobert O.1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
KindlebergerCharles P.1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68.
KugelerHeidrun. 2006. “‘Le Parfait Ambassadeur’: The Theory and Practice of Diplomacy in the Century Following the Peace of Westphalia.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
69.
KwonRoy. 2011. “Hegemonies in the World-System: An Empirical Assessment of Hegemonic Sequences from the 16th to the 20th Century.” Sociological Perspectives54(4):593–617.
70.
LacherHannesGermannJulian. 2012. “Before Hegemony: Britain, Free Trade, and Nineteenth-Century World Order Revisited.” International Studies Review14(1):99–124.
71.
LachmannRichard. 2000. Capitalists in Spite of Themselves: Elite Conflict and Economic Transitions in Early Modern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
72.
LachmannRichard. 2009. “Greed and Contingency: State Fiscal Crises and Imperial Failure in Early Modern Europe.” American Journal of Sociology115(1):39–73.
73.
LachmannRichard. 2011. “Coda: American Patrimonialism: The Return of the Repressed.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science636(1):204–230.
74.
LachmannRichard. 2014. “Hegemons, Empires, and their Elites.” Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas75:9–38.
75.
LachmannRichard. 2017. “The US Military: Without Rival and Without Victory.” Catalyst1(3).
76.
LachsPhyllis S.1965. The Diplomatic Corps under Charles II and James II. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
77.
Le Roy LadurieEmmanuel. 1975. “De la crise ultime à la vraie croissance (1660–1789).” Pp. 343–596 in Histoire de la France rurale, Vol. 2, edited by DubyG.WallonA.Paris: Seuil.
78.
López-CordónCortezoVictoriaMaría. 2003. “Pacte de famille ou intérêts d’État? La monarchie française et la diplomatie espagnole du XVIIIe siècle.” Pp. 185–205 in La présence des Bourbons en Europe, edited by BélyL.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
79.
LovemanMara. 2005. “The Modern State and the Primitive Accumulation of Symbolic Power.” American Journal of Sociology110(6):1651–83.
80.
MannMichael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power, Vol. I, A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
McClureEllen M.2006. Sunspots and the Sun King: Sovereignty and Mediation in Seventeenth-Century France. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
82.
McKayDerekScottH. M.1983. The Rise of the Great Powers, 1648–1815. London, UK: Longman.
83.
MeyerJohn W.BoliJohnThomasGeorge M.RamirezFrancisco O.1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology103(1):144–81.
84.
ModelskiGeorge. 1978. “The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State.” Comparative Studies in Society and History20(2):214–35.
85.
ModelskiGeorgeThompsonWilliam R.1988. Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
86.
MoriJennifer. 2010. The Culture of Diplomacy: Britain in Europe, c. 1750–1830. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
87.
National Archives (NA) of the United Kingdom; Public Record Office: Gifts, Deposits, Notes and Transcripts (PRO) 31/3 (Transcripts from French Archives); State Papers (SP) 8 (King William’s Chest); 78 (France); 84 (Holland); 105 (Archives of British Legations).
88.
NeumannIver B.PouliotVincent. 2011. “Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian-Western Relations over the Past Millennium.” Security Studies20(1):105–137.
89.
NyeJoseph S.2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
90.
OsianderAndreas. 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
91.
ParryClive, ed. 1979–1986. Index-Guide to Treaties: Based on the Consolidated Treaty Series. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.
92.
PincusSteven. 2009. 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
93.
PincusSteven. 2012. “Rethinking Mercantilism: Political Economy, the British Empire, and the Atlantic World in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” William and Mary Quarterly69(1):3–34.
94.
PouliotVincent. 2010. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95.
PouliotVincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
RileyDylan. 2003. “Privilege and Property: The Political Foundations of Failed Class Formation in Eighteenth-Century Austrian Lombardy.” Comparative Studies in Society and History45(1):190–213.
98.
RileyDylanFernándezJuan J.2014. “Beyond Strong and Weak: Rethinking Postdictatorship Civil Societies.” American Journal of Sociology120(2):432–503.
99.
RobertsMichael.1970. Splendid Isolation, 1763–1780: The Stenton Lecture, 1969. Reading, UK: University of Reading.
100.
RoosenWilliam J.1970. “The Functioning of Ambassadors under Louis XIV.” French Historical Studies6(3):311–32.
101.
RoosenWilliam J.1973. “The True Ambassador: Occupational and Personal Characteristics of French Ambassadors under Louis XIV.” European History Quarterly3(2):121–39.
102.
RoosenWilliam J.1976. The Age of Louis XIV: The Rise of Modern Diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
103.
RowenHerbert H.1961. “‘L’Etat c’est à moi’: Louis XIV and the State.” French Historical Studies2(1):83–98.
104.
RowenHerbert H.1980. The King’s State: Proprietary Dynasticism in Early Modern France. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
105.
RupertMark. 1995. Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
106.
HansSchlitter, ed. 1899. Correspondance secrète entre le comte A. W. Kaunitz-Rietberg, ambassadeur impérial à Paris et baron Ignaz de Koch, secrétaire de l’impératrice Marie-Thérèse, 1750–1752. Paris: E. Plon.
107.
ScottHamish M.2003. “Choiseul et le Troisième Pacte de Famille.” Pp. 207–220 in La présence des Bourbons en Europe, edited by BélyL.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
108.
ScottHamish M.2007. “Diplomatic Culture in Old Regime Europe.” Pp. 58–85 in Cultures of Power in Europe during the Long Eighteenth Century, edited by ScottH. M.SimmsB.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
109.
SewellWilliam H.Jr.1996. “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille.” Theory and Society25(6):841–81.
110.
SheehanMichael. 1989. “The Place of the Balancer in Balance of Power Theory.” Review of International Studies15(2):123–34.
111.
SimmsBrendan. 2009. Three Victories and a Defeat: The Rise and Fall of the First British Empire, 1714–1783. New York: Basic Books.
112.
SnyderDavidKickEdward L.1979. “Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955–1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions.” American Journal of Sociology84(5):1096–1126.
113.
SpillmanLyn. 2014. “Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference.” Qualitative Sociology37(2):189–205.
114.
SpruytHendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
115.
GeorgeSteinmetz, ed. 1999. State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
116.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2004. “Odious Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and ‘Small N’s’ in Sociology.” Sociological Theory22(3):371–400.
117.
SuchmanMark C.1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review20(3):571–610.
118.
TeschkeBenno.2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London, UK: Verso.
119.
ThompsonE. P.1965. “The Peculiarities of the English.” Socialist Register2:311–62.
120.
ThompsonWilliam R.1988. On Global War: Historical-Structural Approaches to World Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
121.
TillyCharles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
122.
ToozeAdam. 2014. The Deluge: The Great War and the Remaking of Global Order, 1916–1931. London, UK: Allen Lane.
123.
TorcyJean-Baptiste Colbertmarquis de. 1903. Journal inédit. Paris: P. Ollendorf.
124.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1984. “The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy.” Pp. 37–46 in The Politics of the World Economy: The States, the Movements, and the Civilizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
125.
WilliamsBasil. 1962. The Whig Supremacy, 1714–1760. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
126.
WilliamsMichael C.2007. Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the Politics of International Security. London, UK: Routledge.
127.
WilliamsMichael C.2013. “Culture: Elements toward an Understanding of Charisma in International Relations.” Pp. 131–47 in Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, edited by Adler-NissenR.London, UK: Routledge.
128.
WilsonNicholas Hoover. 2011. “From Reflection to Refraction: State Administration in British India, circa 1770–1855.” American Journal of Sociology116(5):1437–77.
