We propose a measure of gender segregation over the life course that includes differences between women and men in occupational allocation, degree of time involvement in paid work, and their participation in different forms of economic activity and inactivity, such as paid work, homemaking, and retirement. We pool 21 Labour Force Surveys for the United Kingdom to measure, compare, and add up these various forms of segregation—occupational, time-related, and economic—from 1993 to 2013 (n = 1,815,482). The analysis relies on the Strong Group Decomposability property of the Mutual Information index. There are four main findings. First, the marketplace is the major contributor to gender segregation. Second, over the life course, the evolution of gender segregation parallels the inverted U-shaped pattern of the employment rate. Third, a tradeoff between occupational and non-occupational sources of segregation defines three distinct stages in the life course: the prime childbearing years, the years when children are school age, and the retirement years. Fourth, to a large extent, women’s heterogeneity drives age patterns in segregation.
AckerJoan. 1988. “Class, Gender, and the Relations of Distribution.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society13(3):473–97.
2.
AlwinDuane F.2012. “Integrating Varieties of Life Course Concepts.”Journal of Gerontology: Series B67B(2):206–220.
3.
AnxoDominiqueFaganColetteCebrianInmaculadaMorenoGloria. 2007. “Patterns of Labour Market Integration in Europe—A Life Course Perspective on Time Policies.”Socio-Economic Review5(2):233–60.
4.
ArberSaraGinnJay. 1991. Gender and Later Life: A Sociological Analysis of Resources and Constraints. London, UK: Sage.
5.
AzmatGhazalaGüellMaiaManningAlan. 2006. “Gender Gaps in Unemployment Rates in OECD Countries.”Journal of Labor Economics24(1):1–37.
6.
BenardStephenCorrellShelley J.2010. “Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty.”Gender & Society24(5):616–46.
7.
BianchiSuzanne M.RobinsonJohn P.MilkieMelissa A.2007. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
8.
BlackwellLouisa. 2001. “Occupational Sex Segregation and Part-Time Work in Modern Britain.”Gender, Work and Organisation8(2):146–63.
9.
BlackwellLouisa. 2003. “Gender and Ethnicity at Work: Occupational Segregation and Disadvantage in the 1991 British Census.”Sociology37(4):713–31.
10.
BlackwellLouisaGuinea-MartinDaniel. 2005. “Occupational Segregation by Sex and Ethnicity in England and Wales, 1991 to 2001.”Labour Market Trends113(12):501–516.
11.
Blair-LoyMary. 2003. Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BlauFrancine D.BrummundPeterLiuAlbert Yung-Hsu. 2013. “Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System.”Demography50(2):471–92.
13.
BlossfeldHans-Peter. 1987. “Labor-Market Entry and the Sexual Segregation of Careers in the Federal Republic of Germany.”American Journal of Sociology93(1):89–118.
14.
BlundellRichardJohnsonPaul. 1998. “Pensions and Labor-Market Participation in the United Kingdom.”American Economic Review88(2):168–72.
15.
BlundellRichardMeghirCostasSmithSarah. 2002. “Pension Incentives and the Pattern of Early Retirement.”The Economic Journal112(478):C153–C170.
16.
BrücknerHannah. 2004. Gender Inequality in the Life Course: Social Structure and Stability in West Germany 1975–1995. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
17.
BrücknerHannahMayerKarl Ulrich. 2005. “De-standardization of the Life Course: What It Might Mean? And If It Means Anything, Whether It Actually Took Place?”Advances in Life Course Research9:27–53.
18.
CarterSusan B.2006. “Labor Force.” Pp. 13–35 in Historical Statistics of the United States, Millennial ed., Vol. 2, edited by CarterS. B.GartnerS. S.HainesM.OlmsteadA.SutchR.WrightG.New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
CechErin A.2013. “The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation.”American Journal of Sociology119(3):747–89.
20.
ChaYoungjoo. 2013. “Overwork and the Persistence of Gender Segregation in Occupations.”Gender & Society27(2):158–84.
21.
ChafetzJanet Saltzman. 1988. “The Gender Division of Labor and the Reproduction of Female Disadvantage: Toward an Integrated Theory.”Journal of Family Issues9(1):108–131.
22.
CharlesMariaBradleyKaren. 2009. “Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries.”American Journal of Sociology114(4):924–76.
23.
CharlesMaryGruskyDavid B.2004. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
CohenPhilip N.2004. “The Gender Division of Labor: ‘Keeping House’ and Occupational Segregation in the United States.”Gender & Society18(2):239–52.
25.
ConnellR.W.1987. Gender and Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
ConnollySaraGregoryMary. 2008. “Moving Down: Women’s Part-Time Work and Occupational Change in Britain 1991–2001.”The Economic Journal118(526):F52–F76.
27.
CookeLynn Prince. 2011. Gender-Class Equality in Political Economies. New York: Routledge.
28.
CortesPatriciaPanJessica. 2018. “Occupation and Gender.” In The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy, edited by AverettS. L.ArgysL. M.HoffmanS. D.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
CromptonRosemary. 2006. Employment and the Family: The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
DahlSvenn-ÅgeNilsenØivind AntiVaageKjell. 2003. “Gender Differences in Early Retirement Behaviour.”European Sociological Review19(2):179–98.
31.
DamaskeSarah. 2011. For the Family? How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
DoladoJuan J.FelguerosoFlorentino. 2004. “Where Do Women Work? Analysing Patterns in Occupational Segregation by Gender.”Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 71/72:293–315.
ElderGlen H.1992. “The Life Course.” Pp. 1120–30 in The Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by BorgattaE. F.BorgattaM. L.New York: MacMillan.
35.
ElliottJane. 2005. “Comparing Occupational Segregation in Great Britain and the United States.”Work, Employment & Society19(1):153–74.
36.
ElmingWilliamJoyceRobertDiasMonica Costa. 2016. The Gender Wage Gap. London, UK: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
37.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
38.
EvertssonMarieEnglandPaulaMooi-ReciIrmaHermsenJoande BruijnJeanneCotterDavid. 2009. “Is Gender Inequality Greater at Lower or Higher Educational Levels? Common Patterns in the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United States.”Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society16(2):210–41.
39.
FaganColetteRuberyJill. 1996. “The Salience of the Part-Time Divide in the European Union.”European Sociological Review12(3):227–50.
40.
FlückigerYvesSilberJacques. 1999. The Measurement of Segregation in the Labor Force. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag HD.
41.
FrankelDavid M.VolijOscar. 2011. “Measuring School Segregation.”Journal of Economic Theory146(1):1–38.
42.
GersonKathleen. 1985. Hard Choices: How Women Decide about Work, Career, and Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
GinnJayStreetDebraArberSara, eds. 2001. Women, Work and Pensions: International Issues and Prospects. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
44.
GlucksmannMiriam A.1995. “Why ‘Work’? Gender and the ‘Total Social Organisation of Labour.’”Gender, Work and Organisation2(2):63–75.
45.
GoldinClaudia. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
GornickJanet C.MeyersMarcia K.2003. Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
GregoryMaryConnollySara. 2008. “Feature: The Price of Reconciliation: Part-Time Work, Families and Women’s Satisfaction.”The Economic Journal118(526):F1–F7.
48.
GrossEdward. 1968. “Plus Ça Change…? The Sexual Structure of Occupations over Time.”Social Problems16(1):198–208.
49.
GruberJonathanWiseDavid A., eds. 2004. Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: Micro-estimation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
50.
Guinea-MartinDanielBlackwellLouisaElliottJane. 2010. “Occupational Segregation and Concentration: An Analysis by Sex, Employment Status and Ethnic Group in England and Wales.” Pp. 99–111 in Spatial and Social Disparities, edited by StillwellJ.London, UK: Springer.
51.
Guinea-MartinDanielMoraRicardoRuiz-CastilloJavier. 2015. “The Joint Effect of Ethnicity and Gender on Occupational Segregation: An Approach Based on the Mutual Information Index.”Social Science Research49:167–78.
52.
HakimCatherine. 1991. “Grateful Slaves and Self-Made Women: Fact and Fantasy in Women’s Work Orientations.”European Sociological Review7(2):101–121.
53.
HakimCatherine. 2004. Key Issues in Women’s Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women’s Employment. London, UK: The GlassHouse Press.
54.
HallBronwyn H.MairesseJacquesTurnerLaure. 2007. “Identifying Age, Cohort, and Period Effects in Scientific Research Productivity: Discussion and Illustration Using Simulated and Actual Data on French Physicists.”Economics of Innovation and New Technology16(2):159–77.
55.
HankKarsten. 2004. “Effects of Early Life Family Events on Women’s Late Life Labour Market Behaviour: An Analysis of the Relationship between Childbearing and Retirement in Western Germany.”European Sociological Review20(3):189–98.
56.
HeckmanJames J.WillisRobert J.1977. “A Beta-logistic Model for the Analysis of Sequential Labor Force Participation by Married Women.”Journal of Political Economy85(1):27–58.
57.
HodsonRandySullivanTheresa A.2008. The Social Organization of Work. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
58.
HoldenKaren C.HansenW. Lee. 1987. “Part-Time Work, Full-Time Work, and Occupational Segregation.” Pp. 217–38 in Gender in the Workplace, edited by BrownC.PechmanJ. A.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
59.
HookJennifer L.PettitBecky. 2016. “Occupational Inequality: Motherhood and Occupational Segregation.”Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society23(3):329–62.
60.
JacobsJerry A.1989. Revolving Doors: Sex Segregation and Women’s Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen. 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
JacobsSheila C.1995. “Changing Patterns of Sex Segregated Occupations throughout the Life-Course.”European Sociological Review11(2):157–71.
63.
KlevenHenrikLandaisCamilleSøgaardJakob Egholt. 2018. “Children and Gender Inequality: Evidence from Denmark.” Working Paper 24,219. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
64.
KohliMartin. 2007. “The Institutionalization of the Life Course: Looking Back to Look Ahead.”Research in Human Development4(3–4):253–71.
65.
KullbackSolomon. 1959. Information Theory and Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
66.
LainDavid. 2012. “Working Past 65 in the UK and the USA: Segregation into ‘Lopaq’ Occupations?”Work, Employment & Society26(1):78–94.
67.
LevanonAsafGruskyDavid B.2016. “The Persistence of Extreme Gender Segregation in the Twenty-first Century.”American Journal of Sociology122(2):573–619.
68.
LewisJane. 2008. “Work-Family Balance Policies: Issues and Development in the UK 1997–2005 in Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 268–86 in Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges, edited by ScottJ.DexS.JoshiH.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
69.
LewisJaneCampbellMaryHuertaCarmen. 2008. “Patterns of Paid and Unpaid Work in Western Europe: Gender, Commodification, Preferences and the Implications for Policy.”Journal of European Social Policy18(1):21–37.
70.
LorberJudith. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71.
MartinPatricia Yancey. 2004. “Gender as Social Institution.”Social Forces82(4):1249–73.
72.
McMunnAnneLaceyRebeccaWortsDianaMcDonoughPeggyStaffordMaiBookerCaraKumariMeenaSackerAmanda. 2015. “De-standardization and Gender Convergence in Work–Family Life Courses in Great Britain: A Multi-channel Sequence Analysis.”Advances in Life Course Research26:60–75.
73.
McPhersonJ. MillerSmith-LovinLynn. 1986. “Sex Segregation in Voluntary Associations.”American Sociological Review51(1):61–79.
74.
MeyerMadonna HarringtonHerdPamela. 2007. Market Friendly or Family Friendly? The State and Gender Inequality in Old Age. New York: Russell Sage.
75.
MoenPhyllis. 2003. “Midcourse: Navigating Retirement and a New Life Stage.” Pp. 269–91 in Handbook of the Life Course, edited by MortimerJ. T.ShanahanM. J.New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
76.
MoenPhyllis. 2005. “Beyond the Career Mystique: ‘Time In,’‘Time Out,’ and ‘Second Acts.’”Sociological Forum20(2):189–208.
77.
MoenPhyllisHuangQinleiPlassmannVandanaDentingerEmma. 2006. “Deciding the Future: Do Dual-Earner Couples Plan Together for Retirement?”American Behavioral Scientist49(10):1422–43.
78.
MoenPhyllisSweetStephen. 2004. “From ‘Work-Family’ to ‘Flexible Careers.’”Community, Work & Family7(2):209–226.
79.
MoraRicardoRuiz-CastilloJavier. 2003. “Additively Decomposable Segregation Indexes: The Case of Gender Segregation by Occupations and Human Capital Levels in Spain.”Journal of Economic Inequality1(2):147–79.
MyrdalAlvaKleinViola. 1956. Women’s Two Roles: Home and Work. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.
82.
Ní BhrolcháinMáire. 2005. “The Age Difference at Marriage in England and Wales: A Century of Patterns and Trends.”Population Trends120:7–14.
83.
Ní BhrolcháinMáireBeaujouanÉva. 2012. “Fertility Postponement Is Largely Due to Rising Educational Enrolment.”Population Studies66(3):311–27.
84.
NitscheNatalieGrunowDaniela. 2016. “Housework over the Course of Relationships: Gender Ideology, Resources, and the Division of Housework from a Growth Curve Perspective.”Advances in Life Course Research29:80–94.
85.
O’RandAngelaHenrettaJohn C.2000. Age and Inequality: Diverse Pathways through Later Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
86.
PedullaDavid S.ThébaudSarah. 2015. “Can We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-Family Ideals, and Institutional Constraint.”American Sociological Review80(1):116–39.
87.
PettitBeckyHookJennifer L.2009. Gendered Tradeoffs: Family, Social Policy, and Economic Inequality in Twenty-One Countries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
88.
Pfau-EffingerBirgit. 2004. Development of Culture, Welfare States and Women’s Employment in Europe. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
89.
PlattLucindaPolaviejaJavier. 2016. “Saying and Doing Gender: Intergenerational Transmission of Attitudes towards the Sexual Division of Labour.”European Sociological Review32(6):820–34.
90.
RadlJonas. 2012. “Too Old to Work, or Too Young to Retire? The Pervasiveness of Age Norms in Western Europe.”Work, Employment & Society26(5):755–71.
91.
ReardonSean F.FirebaughGlenn. 2002. “Measures of Multigroup Segregation.”Sociological Methodology32(1):33–67.
92.
ReardonSean F.YunJohn T.EitleTamela Mcnulty. 2000. “The Changing Structure of School Segregation: Measurement and Evidence of Multiracial Metropolitan-Area School Segregation, 1989–1995.”Demography37(3):351–64.
93.
RidgewayCecilia L.2014. “Why Status Matters for Inequality: 2013 Presidential Address.”American Sociological Review79(1):1–16.
94.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.”Gender & Society18(4):510–31.
95.
RismanBarbara J.1998. Gender Vertigo: American Families in Transition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
96.
RoosPatricia A.1985. Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Societies. Albany: SUNY Press.
97.
SainsburyDiane. 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
98.
ScottJacqueline. 2008. “Changing Gender Role Attitudes.” Pp. 156–76 in Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges, edited by ScottJ.DexS.JoshiH.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
99.
SetterstenRichard A.2003. “Age Structuring and the Rhythm of the Life Course.” Pp. 81–98 in Handbook of the Life Course, edited by MortimerJ. T.ShanahanM. J.New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
100.
SnyderKarrie Ann. 2005. “Gender Segregation in the Hidden Labor Force: Looking at the Relationship between the Formal and Informal Economies.” Pp. 1–27 in Gender Realities: Local and Global, edited by SegalM. T.DemosV.Bingley, UK: Emerald.
101.
SparreboomTheo. 2014. “Gender Equality, Part-time Work and Segregation in Europe.”International Labour Review153(2):245–68.
102.
SteinmetzStephanie. 2012. The Contextual Challenges of Occupational Sex Segregation: Deciphering Cross-National Differences in Europe. Berlin: VS Verlag.
103.
StonePamela. 2008. Opting Out? Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
104.
TheilHenri. 1970. “On the Estimation of Relationships Involving Qualitative Variables.”American Journal of Sociology76(1):103–154.
105.
TheilHenriFinizzaAnthony J.1971. “A Note on the Measurement of Racial Integration of Schools by Means of Informational Concepts.”Journal of Mathematical Sociology1(2):187–93.
106.
TomlinsonJenniferOlsenWendyPurdamKingsley. 2009. “Women Returners and Potential Returners: Employment Profiles and Labour Market Opportunities—A Case Study of the United Kingdom.”European Sociological Review25(3):349–63.
107.
VanekJoannAlter ChenMarthaCarréFrançoiseHeintzJamesHussmannsRalf. 2014. “Statistics on the Informal Economy: Definitions, Regional Estimates & Challenges.” Working Paper 2. Cambridge, MA: Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO).
108.
WattsMartinRichJudith. 1992. “Occupational Sex Segregation in the UK 1979–89: The Role of Part-Time Employment.”International Review of Applied Economics6(3):286–308.
109.
WesternBruceBeckettKatherine. 1999. “How Unregulated is the US Labor Market? The Penal System as a Labor Market Institution.”American Journal of Sociology104(4):1030–60.
110.
Yale Law Journal. 1973. “The Sexual Segregation of American Prisons.”Yale Law Journal82(6):1229–73.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
