Even with widespread interest, public perceptions of science remain understudied and poorly theorized by social scientists. A central issue has been the persistent assumption that publics require a base of scientific knowledge for science to have broad cultural meaning. Yet, recent advances in cultural and cognitive sociology point to alternative research programs seeking to identify how publics come to understand complex and uncertain issues, when information is incomplete and asymmetric. We use this approach to analyze data on public perceptions of how scientific different fields are from the 2006 and 2012 National Science Foundation’s Science and Technology Survey. Our multivariate analyses allow us to approximate how mass publics map the social space of scientific professions, while accounting for individuals’ social location and cultural identity (e.g., race, class, gender, age, scientific sophistication, and political ideology). We then focus our attention on public perceptions of sociology and economics. Overall, we find that public perceptions, rather than being disorganized, map onto recognizable dimensions indicating how publics distinguish between scientific professions.
AbbottAndrew. 2010. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbbottAndrew. 2014. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AdutAri. 2012. “A Theory of the Public Sphere.” Sociological Theory30(4):238–62.
4.
AllisonPaul D.2012. “Handling Missing Data by Maximum Likelihood.” SAS Global Forum 2012, Statistics and Data Analysis pp. 1–21.
5.
American Academy of Arts & Sciences. 2016. “Trust and Perception.” American Academy of Arts & Sciences. Retrieved November21, 2016 (https://www.amacad.org/contentu.aspx?i=22120).
ArcherMargaret Scotford. 1996. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
AsparouhovTihomirMuthénBengt O.2010. “Weighted Least Squares Estimation with Missing Data.” MplusTechnical Appendix pp. 1–10.
9.
BauerMartin W.2009. “The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science–Discourse and Comparative Evidence.” Science, Technology and Society14(2):221–40.
10.
BauerMartin W.AllumNickMillerSteve. 2007. “What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda.” Public Understanding of Science16(1):79–95.
11.
BauerMartin W.PetkovaKristinaBoyadjievaPepka. 2000. “Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the ‘Science War.’”Science, Technology, & Human Values25(1):30–51.
12.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
13.
BensonRodney. 1999. “Review: Field Theory in Comparative Context: A New Paradigm for Media Studies.” Theory and Society28(3):463–98.
14.
BermanElizabeth Popp. 2014. “Not Just Neoliberalism: Economization in US Science and Technology Policy.” Science, Technology & Human Values39(3):397–431.
BoomsmaAnneHoyleRick H.PanterA. T.2012. “The Structural Equation Modeling Research Report.” Pp. 341–58 in Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, edited by HoyleR. H.New York: The Guilford Press.
17.
BourdieuPierre. 1983. “The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed.” Poetics12(4–5):311–56.
18.
BourdieuPierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
BourdieuPierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
BoutylineAndrei. 2017. “Improving the Measurement of Shared Cultural Schemas with Correlational Class Analysis: Theory and Method.” Sociological Science4:353–93.
22.
BrooksClemManzaJeff. 2013. “A Broken Public? Americans’ Responses to the Great Recession.” American Sociological Review78(5):727–48.
23.
BurawoyMichael. 2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review70(1):4–28.
24.
BursteinPaul. 2014. American Public Opinion, Advocacy, and Policy in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
CalhounCraig, ed. 2011. Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
CalhounCraigVanAntwerpenJonathan. 2008. “Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and Hierarchy: Mainstream Sociology and Its Challengers.” Pp. 367–410 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounC.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
CamicCharles. 2008. “On Edge: Sociology during the Great Depression and the New Deal.” Pp. 225–80 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounC.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.1976. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
CarrollJ. DouglasGreenPaul E., eds. 1997. Mathematical Tools for Applied Multivariate Analysis, 2nd ed.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2010. “The New Politics of Community.” American Sociological Review75(1):7–30.
31.
CollinsRandall. 1979. The Credential Society: A Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
32.
CollinsRandall. 1988. Theoretical Sociology. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33.
ConversePhilip E.2006. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964).” Critical Review18(1–3):1–74.
34.
DiMaggioPaul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology23(1):263–87.
35.
DiMaggioPaulSotoudehRaminaGoldbergAmirShepherdHana. Forthcoming. “Culture Out of Attitudes: Relationality, Population Heterogeneity and Attitudes toward Science and Religion in the US.” Poetics.
36.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1961. “A Socioecoomic Index for All Occupations.” Pp. 109–38 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by ReissA. J.New York: The Free Press.
37.
EmirbayerMustafaGoodwinJeff. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency.” Amercian Journal of Sociology99(6):1411–54.
38.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDoug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
FourcadeMarion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
FourcadeMarionOllionEtienneAlganYann. 2015. “The Superiority of Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives29(1):89–114.
41.
FreelandRobert E.HoeyJesse. 2018. “The Structure of Deference: Modeling Occupational Status Using Affect Control Theory.” American Sociological Review83(2):243–77.
42.
FreemanRichard B.1999. “It’s Better Being an Economist (But Don’t Tell Anyone).” Journal of Economic Perspectives13(3):139–46.
GansHerbert. 1989. “Sociology in America: The Discipline and the Public, American Sociological Association, 1988 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review54(1):1–16.
45.
GauchatGordon. 2011. “The Cultural Authority of Science: Public Trust and Acceptance of Organized Science.” Public Understanding of Science20(6):751–70.
46.
GauchatGordon. 2012. “Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010.” American Sociological Review77(2):167–87.
47.
GauchatGordon. 2015. “The Political Context of Science in the United States: Public Acceptance of Evidence-Based Policy and Science Funding.” Social Forces94(2):723–46.
48.
GierynThomas F.1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review48(6):781–95.
49.
GierynThomas F.1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
GierynThomas F.2010. “Paradigm for the Sociology of Science.” P. 320 in Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science, edited by CalhounC.New York: Columbia University Press.
51.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
GoldbergAmir. 2011. “Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case of the Cultural Omnivore Reexamined.” American Journal of Sociology116(5):1397–1436.
53.
GouldnerAlvin Ward. 1971. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
54.
GrossNeilSimmonsSolon. 2007. “The Social and Political Views of American Professors.” Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
55.
Van GuntenTodMartinJohnTeplitskiyMisha. 2016. “Consensus, Polarization, and Alignment in the Economics Profession.” Sociological Science3:1028–52.
56.
HabermasJürgen. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.
57.
HilgartnerStephen. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science20(3):519–39.
58.
HoyleRick H.2012. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
JoreskogKarl G.GoldbergerArthur S.1975. “Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes for a Single Latent Variable.” Journal of the American Statistical Assocation70(351):631–39.
61.
KahanDan M.2015. “Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem.” Political Psychology 36(S1):1–43.
62.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167–95.
63.
LizardoOmar. 2004. “The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour34(4):375–401.
64.
LongJ. ScottFreeseJeremy. 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 3rd ed.Collage Station, TX: Stata Press.
65.
LynnFreda B.EllerbachGeorge. 2017. “A Position with a View: Educational Status and the Construction of the Occupational Hierarchy.” American Sociological Review82(1):32–58.
66.
MartinJohn Levi. 2002. “Power, Authority, and the Constraint of Belief Systems.” American Journal of Sociology107(4):861–904.
67.
MartinJohn Levi. 2003. “What Is Field Theory?”American Journal of Sociology109(1):1–49.
68.
MartinJohn Levi. 2011. The Explanation of Social Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
69.
MartinJohn LeviDesmondMatthew. 2010. “Political Position and Social Knowledge.” Sociological Forum25(1):1–26.
70.
McAdamDoug. 2008. “From Relevance to Irrelevance: The Curious Impact of the Sixties on Public Sociology.” Pp. 411–26 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounC.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
MertonRobert K.1968a. “Science and Democratic Social Structure.” Pp. 604–614 in Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
72.
MertonRobert K.1968b. “Science and the Social Order.” Pp. 591–603 in Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
73.
MillerJon D.1998. “The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy.” Public Understanding of Science7(3):203–223.
74.
MillerJon D.2004. “Public Understanding Of, and Attitudes Toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know.” Public Understanding of Science13(3):273–94.
75.
MuthénBengt O. 1983. “Latent Variable Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.” Journal of Econometrics22(1–2):43–65.
76.
MuthénBengt O.KaoChih-FenBursteinLeigh. 1991. “Instructionally Sensitive Psychometrics: Application of a New IRT-Based Detection Technique to Mathematics Achievement Test Items.” Journal of Educational Measurement28(1):1–22.
77.
MuthénBengt O.du ToitStephen H. C.SpisicDamir. 1997. “Robust Inference Using Weighted Least Squares and Quadratic Estimating Equations in Latent Variable Modeling with Categorical and Continuous Outcomes.” Psychometrika49.
78.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences, edited by SnowC. E.DibnerK. A.Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
79.
National Academy of Medicine. 2016. “Considerations for a New Definition of Health Literacy: Discussion Paper.” Bethesda, Maryland: National Academy of Medicine.
80.
National Research Council. 2012. Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
O’BrienTimothy L.2013. “Scientific Authority in Policy Contexts: Public Attitudes about Environmental Scientists, Medical Researchers, and Economists.” Public Understanding of Science22(7):799–816.
83.
PattersonOrlando. 2014. “Making Sense of Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology40(1):1–30.
84.
PivenFrances Fox. 2008. “Can Power from Below Change the World?”American Sociological Review73(1):1–14.
85.
RoosJ. Micah. 2014. “Measuring Science or Religion? A Measurement Analysis of the National Science Foundation Sponsored Science Literacy Scale 2006–2010.” Public Understanding of Science23(7):797–813.
86.
De SantosMartin. 2009. “Fact-Totems and the Statistical Imagination: The Public Life of a Statistic in Argentina 2001.” Sociological Theory27(4):466–89.
87.
SewellWilliam H.Jr1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology98(1):1–29.
88.
SteenslandBrianParkJerry Z.RegnerusMark D.RobinsonLynn D.2000. “The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art.” Social Forces79(1):291–318.
89.
SteinmetzGeorge. 2008. “American Sociology Before and After World War II: The (Temporary) Settling of a Disciplinary Field.” Pp. 314–66 in Sociology in America: A History, edited by CalhounC.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90.
StrandMichaelLizardoOmar. 2015. “Beyond World Images: Belief as Embodied Action in the World.” Sociological Theory33(1):44–70.
91.
SturgisPatrickAllumNick. 2004. “Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes.” Public Understanding of Science13(1):55–74.
TverskyBarbara. 1981. “Distortions in Memory for Maps.” Cognitive Psychology13(3):407–433.
94.
TverskyBarbara. 1992. “Distortions in Cognitive Maps.” Geoforum23(2):131–38.
95.
TverskyBarbaraSchianoDiane J.1989. “Perceptual and Conceptual Factors in Distortions in Memory for Graphs and Maps.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118(4):387–98.
96.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology114(6):1675–1715.
97.
VaiseyStephenLizardoOmar. 2010. “Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition?”Social Forces88(4):1595–1618.
98.
WeberMax. 1946. “Science as a Vocation.” Pp. 129–56 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by MillsC. W.GerthH.New York: Oxford University Press.
99.
WittgensteinLudwig. 2009. Philosophical Investigations, 4th ed., edited by AnscombeG. E. M.HackerP. M. S.SchulteJ.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
100.
World Values Survey Association. 2015. World Values Survey 1981–2014 Longitudinal Aggragate, 2015. Madrid, Spain: World Values Survey Association.
101.
WynneBrian. 1992. “Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science.” Public Understanding of Science1(3):281–304.
102.
WynneBrian. 1995. “Public Understanding of Science.” Pp. 361–88 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by JasanoffS.GeraldG. E.PetersenJ. C.PinchT.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
103.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
104.
ZhouXueguang. 2005. “The Institutional Logic of Occupational Prestige Ranking: Reconceptualization and Reanalyses.” American Journal of Sociology111(1):90–140.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
