One of the puzzles about the financial crisis of 2008 is why regulators, particularly the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), were so slow to recognize the impending collapse of the financial system and its broader consequences for the economy. We use theory from the literature on culture, cognition, and framing to explain this puzzle. Consistent with recent work on “positive asymmetry,” we show how the FOMC generally interpreted discomforting facts in a positive light, marginalizing and normalizing anomalous information. We argue that all frames limit what can be understood, but the content of frames matters for how facts are identified and explained. We provide evidence that the Federal Reserve’s primary frame for making sense of the economy was macroeconomic theory. The content of macroeconomics made it difficult for the FOMC to connect events into a narrative reflecting the links between foreclosures in the housing market, the financial instruments used to package the mortgages into securities, and the threats to the larger economy. We conclude with implications for the sociological literatures on framing and cognition and for decision-making in future crises.
AbolafiaMitchel Y.2004. “Framing Moves: Interpretive Politics at the Federal Reserve.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory14(3):349–70.
2.
AbolafiaMitchel Y.2010. “Narrative Construction as Sense-Making: How a Central Bank Thinks.”Organization Studies31(3):349–67.
3.
AbolafiaMitchel Y.2012. “Central Banking and the Triumph of Technical Rationality.” Pp. 94–112 in The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance, edited by CetinaK. KnorrPredaA.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
AsuncionArthurWellingMaxSmythPadhraicTehYee Whye. 2009. “On Smoothing and Inference for Topic Models.” Pp. 27–34 in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press.
5.
BaezBienAbolafiaMitchel Y.2002. “Bureaucratic Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change: A Sense-Making Approach.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory12(4):525–52.
6.
BailChristopher A.2014. “The Cultural Environment: Measuring Culture with Big Data.”Theory and Society43(3–4):465–82.
7.
BakhtinMikhail. 1982. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
8.
BernankeBen S.1983. “Nonmonetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the Great Depression.”American Economic Review73(3):257–76.
9.
BernankeBen S.GertlerMarkGilchristSimon. 1999. “The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework.” Pp. 1341–93 in Handbook of Macroeconomics, edited by TaylorJ. B.WoodfordM.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
10.
BleiDavid M.2012. “Probabilistic Topic Models.”Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery55(4):77–84.
11.
BleiDavid M.LaffertyJohn D.2007. “A Correlated Topic Model ofScience.” Annals of Applied Statistics1(1):17–35.
BlinderAlan S.1998. Central Banking in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
BorioClaudio. 2011. “Rediscovering the Macroeconomic Roots of Financial Stability Policy: Journey, Challenges, and a Way Forward.”Annual Review of Financial Economics3:87–117.
15.
BorioClaudio. 2014. “The Financial Cycle and Macroeconomics: What Have We Learnt?”Journal of Banking & Finance45:182–98.
16.
BourdieuPierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
BraytonFlintLevinAndrewTryonRalphWilliamsJohn C.1997. “The Evolution of Macro Models at the Federal Reserve Board.”Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy47:43–81.
18.
CeruloKaren A.2006. Never Saw It Coming: Cultural Challenges to Envisioning the Worst. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
CeruloKaren A.2010. “Mining the Intersections of Cognitive Sociology and Neurosciences.”Poetics38(2):115–32.
20.
ChariV. V.KehoePatrick J.2006. “Modern Macroeconomics in Practice: How Theory is Shaping Policy.”Journal of Economic Perspectives20(4):3–28.
21.
DavisGerald F.2009. Managed By the Markets: How Finance Reshaped America. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
DiehlDavidMcFarlandDaniel. 2010. “Toward a Historical Sociology of Social Situations.”American Journal of Sociology115(6):1713–52.
23.
DiMaggioPaul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.”Annual Review of Sociology23:263–87.
24.
DiMaggioPaulNagManishBleiDavid M.2013. “Exploiting Affinities between Topic Modeling and the Sociological Perspective on Culture: Application to Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Government Arts Funding.”Poetics41(6):570–606.
25.
EichengreenBarry J.2015. Hall of Mirrors: The Great Depression, the Great Recession, and the Uses—and Misuses—of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2005. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on June 29–30, 2005.”Washington, DC.
27.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2006a. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on March 27–28, 2006.”Washington, DC.
28.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2006b. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on September 20, 2006.”Washington, DC.
29.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2006c. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on December 12, 2006.”Washington, DC.
30.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2007. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on September 18, 2007.”Washington, DC.
31.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2008a. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on March 18, 2008.”Washington, DC.
32.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2008b. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on April 29–30, 2008.”Washington, DC.
33.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2008c. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on August 5, 2008.”Washington, DC.
34.
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). 2008d. “Meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on September 16, 2008.”Washington, DC.
35.
FligsteinNeilGoldsteinAdam. 2010. “The Anatomy of the Mortgage Securitization Crisis.” Pp. 29–70 in Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis, edited by LounsburyM.HirschP.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
36.
FligsteinNeilGoldsteinAdam. 2015. “The Emergence of a Finance Culture in American Households, 1989–2007.” Socio-Economic Review13(3):575–601.
37.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDoug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
FourcadeMarion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
GoodfriendMarvin. 2007. “How the World Achieved Consensus on Monetary Policy.”Journal of Economic Perspectives21(4):47–68.
41.
GoodfriendMarvinKingRobert G.1997. “The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of Monetary Policy.” Pp. 231–83 in NBER Macroeconomics Annual: 1997, edited by BernankeB. S.RotenbergJ. J.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
GormanElizabeth H.Sandefur.Rebecca L.2011. “Golden Age, Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work.”Work and Occupations38(3):275–302.
43.
GortonGaryWintonAndrew. 2002. “Financial Intermediation.”National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8928, Cambridge, MA.
44.
GrimmerJustin. 2010. “A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press Releases.”Political Analysis18(1):1–35.
45.
HirschmanDanielPopp BermanElizabeth. 2014. “Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economics.”Socio-Economic Review12(4):779–811.
46.
HolmesDouglas R.2014. Economy of Words: Communicative Imperatives in Central Banks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Independent Evaluation Office. 2010. IMF Performance in the Run-Up to the Financial and Economic Crisis. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund Press.
48.
Knorr CetinaKarinBrueggerUrs. 2002. “Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets.”American Journal of Sociology107(4):905–950.
49.
Knorr CetinaKarinPredaAlan. 2014. The Sociology of Financial Markets. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
KrippnerGreta R.2005. “The Financialization of the American Economy.”Socio-Economic Review3(2):173–208.
51.
KrippnerGreta R.2011. Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
LevineRoss. 1997. “Financial Development and Economic Development: A Review and Agenda.”Journal of Economic Literature35:688–726.
53.
LinKen-HouTomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 2013. “Financialization and U.S. Income Inequality, 1970–2008.”American Journal of Sociology118(5):1284–1329.
54.
LizardoOmarStrandMichael. 2010. “Skills, Toolkits, Contexts, and Institutions: Clarifying the Relationship between Different Approaches to Cognition in Cultural Sociology.”Poetics38(2):204–227.
55.
LucasRobert E.1976. “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” Pp. 19–46 in Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 1. North-Holland.
56.
MacKenzieDonald. 2011. “The Credit Crisis as a Problem in the Sociology of Knowledge.”American Journal of Sociology116(5):1778–1841.
57.
MartinJohn Levi. 2010. “Life’s a Beach, but You’re an Ant, and Other Unwelcome News for the Sociology of Culture.”Poetics38(2):228–43.
58.
MillerIan Matthew.2013. “Rebellion, Crime and Violence in Qing China, 1722–1911: A Topic Modeling Approach.”Poetics41(6):626–49.
59.
MohrJohn W.BogdanovPetko. 2013. “Introduction—Topic Models: What They Are and Why They Matter.”Poetics41(6):545–69.
60.
MohrJohn W.Wagner-PacificiRobinBreigerRonald L.BogdanovPetko. 2013. “Graphing the Grammar of Motives in National Security Strategies: Cultural Interpretation, Automated Text Analysis and the Drama of Global Politics.”Poetics41(6):670–700.
61.
MuniesaFabianMilloYuvalCallonMichel. 2007. “An Introduction to Market Devices.”Sociological Review55(2):1–12.
PlosserCharles I.1989. “Understanding Real Business Cycles.”Journal of Economic Perspectives3(3):51–77.
64.
PrescottEdward C.1986. “Theory Ahead of Business-Cycle Measurement.”Carnegie-Rochester Conference Policy Series on Public Policy25:11–44.
65.
ScottJames C.1998. Seeing Like a State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66.
SolowRobert M.2008. “The State of Macroeconomics.”Journal of Economic Perspectives22(1):243–46.
67.
SpillmanLyn. 2014. “Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference.”Qualitative Sociology37(2):189–205.
68.
SteyversMarkGriffithsTom. 2007. “Probabilistic Topic Models.”Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis427(7):424–40.
69.
SwedbergRichard. 2010. “The Structure of Confidence and the Collapse of Lehman Brothers.” Pp. 371–414 in Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis, edited by LounsburyM.HirschP.Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
70.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.”American Journal of Sociology114(6):1675–1715.
71.
Van der SwanNatasha. 2014. “Making Sense of Financialization.”Socio-Economic Review12(1):99–129.
72.
VaughanDiane. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
VaughanDiane. 2005. “NASA Revisited: Theory, Analogy, and Public Sociology.”American Journal of Sociology112(2):353–73.
74.
WeickKarl. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.
75.
WoodfordMichael. 2003. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
WoodfordMichael. 2009. “Convergence in Macroeconomics: Elements of the New Synthesis.”American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics1(1):267–79.
77.
ZerubavelEviatar. 2015. Hidden in Plain Sight: The Social Structure of Irrelevance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
