Motherhood reduces women’s wages. But does the size of this penalty differ between more and less advantaged women? To answer this, we use unconditional quantile regression models with person-fixed effects, and panel data from the 1979 to 2010 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79). We find that among white women, the most privileged—women with high skills and high wages—experience the highest total penalties, estimated to include effects mediated through lost experience. Although highly skilled, highly paid women have fairly continuous experience, their high returns to experience make even the small amounts of time some of them take out of employment for childrearing costly. By contrast, penalties net of experience, which may represent employer discrimination or effects of motherhood on job performance, are not distinctive for highly skilled women with high wages.
AckerJoan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society4(2):139–58.
2.
AllisonPaul D.2005. Fixed-Effects Regression Models Using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3.
Amuedo-DorantesCatalinaKimmelJean. 2005. “The Motherhood Wage Gap for Women in the United States: The Importance of College and Fertility Delay.” Review of Economics of the Household3(1):17–48.
4.
AndersonDeborah J.BinderMelissaKrauseKate. 2002. “The Motherhood Penalty: Which Mothers Pay and Why?”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings92(2):354–58.
5.
AndersonDeborah J.BinderMelissaKrauseKate. 2003. “The Motherhood Wage Penalty Revisited: Experience, Heterogeneity, Work Effort, and Work-Schedule Flexibility.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review56(2):273–94.
6.
AvellarSarahSmockPamela J.2003. “Has the Price of Motherhood Declined over Time? A Cross-Cohort Comparison of the Motherhood Wage Penalty.” Journal of Marriage and the Family65(3):597–607.
7.
AzmatGhazalaFerrerRosa. Forthcoming. “Gender Gaps in Performance: Evidence from Young Lawyers.” Journal of Political Economy.
8.
BakerMichaelMilliganKevin. 2008. “How Does Job-Protected Maternity Leave Affect Mother’s Employment.” Journal of Labor Economic26(4):655–91.
9.
BeckerGary. 1985. “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor.” Journal of Labor Economics3(1):S33–S58.
10.
BeckerGary. 1993. A Treatise on the Family, Expanded Version. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BittmanMichaelEnglandPaulaSayerLianaFolbreNancyMathesonGeorge. 2003. “When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work.” American Journal of Sociology109(1):186–214.
12.
BlauFrancineKahnLawrence. 2007. “Changes in the Labor Supply Behavior of Married Women: 1980–2000.” Journal of Labor Economics25(3):393–438.
13.
BuchmannClaudiaMcDanielAnne. 2016. “Motherhood and the Wages of Women in Professional Occupations.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4):128–50.
14.
BudigMichelleEnglandPaula. 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review66(2):204–225.
15.
BudigMichelleHodgesMelissa. 2010. “Differences in Disadvantage: How the Wage Penalty for Motherhood Varies across Women’s Earnings Distribution.” American Sociological Review75(5):705–728.
16.
BudigMichelleHodgesMelissa. 2014. “Statistical Models and Empirical Evidence for Differences in the Motherhood Penalty across the Earnings Distribution: A Reply to Killewald and Bearak.” American Sociological Review79(2):358–64.
17.
BykerTanya. 2016. “The Opt-Out Continuation: Education, Work and Motherhood from 1984 to 2008.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4):34–70.
18.
ChaYoungjooWeedenKim A.2014. “Overwork and the Slow Convergence in the Gender Gap in Wages.” American Sociological Review79(3):457–84.
19.
CorrellShelleyBenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1297–1338.
20.
DoeringerPeterPioreMichael J.1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Adjustment. New York: D.C. Heath and Company.
EnglandPaula. 2005. “Emerging Theories of Care Work.” Annual Review of Sociology31:381–99.
23.
EnglandPaulaChristopherKarenReidLori L.1999. “Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Wages.” Pp. 139–82 in Latinas and African American Women at Work: Race, Gender, and Economic Inequality, edited by BrowneI.New York: Russell Sage.
24.
EnglandPaulaGarcia-BeaulieuCarmenRossMary. 2004. “Women’s Employment among Blacks, Whites, and Three Groups of Latinas: Do More Privileged Women Have Higher Employment?”Gender & Society18(4):494–509.
25.
EnglandPaulaGornickJanetShaferEmily. 2012. “How Women’s Employment and the Gender Earnings Gap Vary by Education in Seventeen Countries.” Monthly Labor ReviewApril:20–29.
26.
FarkasGeorgeEnglandPaulaVicknairKevenKilbourneBarbara Stanek. 1997. “Cognitive Skill, Skill Demands of Jobs, and Earnings among Young European-American, African-American, and Mexican-American Workers.” Social Forces75(3):913–38.
GanglMarkusZiefleAndrea. 2009. “Motherhood, Labor Force Behavior, and Women’s Careers: An Empirical Assessment of the Wage Penalty for Motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States.” Demography46(2):341–69.
30.
GlassJennifer. 2004. “Blessing or Curse? Work-Family Policies and Mothers’ Wage Growth Over Time.” Work and Occupations31(3):367–94.
31.
GlauberRebecca. 2007. “Marriage and the Motherhood Wage Penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites.” Journal of Marriage and the Family69(4):951–61.
32.
GlauberRebecca. 2013. “Shifting Inequalities: Trends in the Motherhood Wage Penalty for Married, Unmarried, White, and African American Women, 1980–2010.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, New York, New York.
33.
GoldinClaudia. 2014. “A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter.” American Economic Review104(4):1091–1119.
HerrJane LeberWolframCatherine D.2012. “Work Environment and Opt-Out Rates at Motherhood across High-Education Career Paths.” Industrial & Labor Relations Review65(4):928–50.
36.
HillMartha S.1979. “Wage Effects of Marital Status and Children.” Journal of Human Resources14(4):579–94.
37.
KillewaldAlexandraBearakJonathan. 2014. “Is the Motherhood Penalty Larger for Low-Wage Women? A Comment on Quantile Regression.” American Sociological Review79(2):350–57.
38.
KillewaldAlexandraGoughMargaret. 2013. “Does Specialization Explain Marriage Penalties and Premiums?”American Sociological Review78(3):477–502.
39.
KoenkerRoger. 2005. Quantile Regression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
KorenmanSandersNeumarkDavid. 1992. “Marriage, Motherhood and Wages.” Journal of Human Resources27(2):233–55.
42.
LoughranDavid S.ZissimopoulosJulie M.2009. “Why Wait? The Effect of Marriage and Childbearing on the Wages of Men and Women.” Journal of Human Resources44(2):326–349.
43.
MillerAmalia R.2011. “The Effect of Motherhood Timing on Career Path.” Journal of Population Economics24(3):1071–1100.
44.
NealDerek A.JohnsonWilliam R.1996. “The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage Differences.” Journal of Political Economy104(5):869–95.
45.
PalIpshitaWaldfogelJane. 2016. “The Family Gap in Pay: New Evidence for 1993 to 2013.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(4):104–127.
46.
RodgersWilliam M.IIISpriggsWilliam E.1996. “What Does the AFQT Really Measure: Race, Wages, Schooling and the AFQT Score.” Review of Black Political Economy24(4):13–46.
47.
StaffJeremyMortimerJeylan T.2012. “Explaining the Motherhood Wage Penalty during the Early Occupational Career.” Demography49(1):1–21.
48.
TaniguchiHiromi. 1999. “The Timing of Childbearing and Women’s Wages.” Journal of Marriage and the Family61(4):1008–19.
49.
TolbertCharles M.HoranPatrick M.BeckElwood M.1980. “The Structure of Economic Segmentation: A Dual Economy Approach.” American Journal of Sociology85(5):1095–1116.
50.
WaldfogelJane. 1997. “The Effect of Children on Women’s Wages.” American Sociological Review62(2):209–217.
51.
WaldfogelJane. 1998. “Understanding the Family Gap in Pay for Women with Children.” Journal of Economic Perspectives12(1):137–56.
52.
WildeElizabeth TyBatchelderLilyEllwoodDavid T.2010. “The Mommy Track Divides: The Impact of Childbearing on Wages of Women of Differing Skill Levels.” NBERWorking Paper 16582.
53.
WilliamsJoan C.2004. “Hitting the Maternal Wall.” Academe90(6):16–20.
54.
WilliamsJoan C.BornsteinStephanie. 2008. “The Evolution of ‘FReD’: Family Responsibilities Discrimination and Developments in the Law of Stereotyping and Implicit Bias.” Hastings Law Journal59:1311–58.
55.
WinshipChristopherRadbillLarry. 1994. “Sampling Weights and Regression.” Sociological Methods & Research23(2):230–57.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
