Recent years have seen great interest in the relationship between relative earnings and marital outcomes. Using data from the 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, I examine the effect of relative earnings on infidelity, a marital outcome that has received little attention. Theories of social exchange predict that the greater one’s relative income, the more likely one will be to engage in infidelity. Yet, emerging literature raises questions about the utility of gender-neutral exchange approaches, particularly when men are economically dependent and women are breadwinners. I find that, for men, breadwinning increases infidelity. For women, breadwinning decreases infidelity. I argue that by remaining faithful, breadwinning women neutralize their gender deviance and keep potentially strained relationships intact. I also find that, for both men and women, economic dependency is associated with a higher likelihood of engaging in infidelity; but, the influence of dependency on men’s infidelity is greater than the influence of dependency on women’s infidelity. For economically dependent persons, infidelity may be an attempt to restore relationship equity; however, for men, dependence may be particularly threatening. Infidelity may allow economically dependent men to engage in compensatory behavior while simultaneously distancing themselves from breadwinning spouses.
AdamsJohn S.1965. “Inequity in Social Exchange.” Pp. 267–99 in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2, edited by BerkowitzL.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AllisonPaul D.2002. Missing Data Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
AmatoPaul R.PrevitiDenise. 2003. “People’s Reasons for Divorcing Gender, Social Class, the Life Course, and Adjustment.” Journal of Family Issues24(5):602–626.
4.
AmatoPaul R.RogersStacy J.1997. “A Longitudinal Study of Marital Problems and Subsequent Divorce.” Journal of Marriage and the Family59(3):612–24.
5.
AtkinsDavid C.BaucomDonald H.JacobsonNeil S.2001. “Understanding Infidelity: Correlates in a National Random Sample.” Journal of Family Psychology15(4):735–49.
6.
AtkinsDavid C.KesselDeborah E.2008. “Religiousness and Infidelity: Attendance, but Not Faith and Prayer, Predict Marital Fidelity.” Journal of Marriage and Family70(2):407–418.
7.
AtkinsonMaxine P.GreensteinTheodore N.LangMolly M.2005. “For Women, Breadwinning can be Dangerous: Gendered Resource Theory and Wife Abuse.” Journal of Marriage and Family67(5):1137–48.
8.
BaronReuben M.KennyDavid A.1986. “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6):1173–82.
9.
BeckerGary S.1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BetzigLaura. 1989. “Causes of Conjugal Dissolution: A Cross-Cultural Study.” Current Anthropology30(5):654–76.
11.
BianchiSuzanne M.MilkieMelissa A.SayerLiana C.RobinsonJohn P.2000. “Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor.” Social Forces79(1):191–228.
12.
BillingsleyAndrew. 1994. Climbing Jacob’s Ladder: The Enduring Legacies of African-American Families. New York: Simon & Schuster.
13.
BittmanMichaelEnglandPaulaSayerLianaFolbreNancyMathesonGeorge. 2003. “When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work.” American Journal of Sociology109(1):186–214.
14.
BlauPeter M.1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
15.
BlossfeldHans-Peter. 2009. “Educational Assortative Marriage in Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology35(1):513–30.
16.
BranscombeNyla R.EllemersNaomiSpearsRussellDoosjeBertjan. 1999. “The Context and Content of Social Identity Threat.” Pp. 35–58 in Social Identity: Context, Commitment, Content, edited by SpearsR.Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17.
BrinesJulie. 1994. “Economic Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home.” American Journal of Sociology100(3):652–88.
18.
BurdetteAmy M.EllisonChristopher G.SherkatDarren E.GoreKurt A.2007. “Are There Religious Variations in Marital Infidelity?”Journal of Family Issues28(12):1553–81.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. 2014b. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 Cohort, 1997–2011 (rounds 1–15) [computer file]. Produced by the National Opinion Research Center, The University of Chicago and distributed by the Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
21.
BurkePeter J.1991. “Identity Processes and Social Stress.” American Sociological Review56(6):836–49.
22.
BurkePeter J.StetsJan E.2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
BurkePeter J.TullyJudy C.1977. “The Measurement of Role Identity.” Social Forces55(4):881–97.
24.
BuunkBram P.1995. “Sex, Self-Esteem, Dependency and Extradyadic Sexual Experience as Related to Jealousy Responses.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships12(1):147–53.
25.
CanoAnnmarieO’LearyK. Daniel. 2000. “Infidelity and Separations Precipitate Major Depressive Episodes and Symptoms of Nonspecific Depression and Anxiety.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology68(5):774–81.
26.
CarriganTimConnellBobLeeJohn. 1985. “Toward a New Sociology of Masculinity.” Theory and Society14(5):551–604.
27.
ChaYoungjoo. 2010. “Reinforcing Separate Spheres: The Effect of Spousal Overwork on Men’s and Women’s Employment in Dual-Earner Households.” American Sociological Review75(2):303–329.
28.
CialdiniRobert B.BordenRichard J.ThorneAvrilWalkerMarcus R.FreemanStephenSloanLloyd R.1976. “Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology34(3):366–75.
29.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
30.
ConnellRobert W.2005. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
CookKaren S.EmersonRichard M.1978. “Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks.” American Sociological Review43(5):721–39.
33.
CornwellBenjaminLaumannEdward O.2011. “Network Position and Sexual Dysfunction: Implications of Partner Betweenness for Men.” American Journal of Sociology117(1):172–208.
34.
DalyMartinWilsonMargo. 1988. Homicide. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
35.
DavisShannon N.GreensteinTheodore N.MarksJennifer P. Gerteisen. 2007. “Effects of Union Type on Division of Household Labor: Do Cohabiting Men Really Perform More Housework?”Journal of Family Issues28(9):1246–72.
36.
DeutschFrancine M.SaxonSusan E.1998. “Traditional Ideologies, Nontraditional Lives.” Sex Roles38(5–6):331–62.
37.
EmersonRichard M.1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review27(1):31–41.
38.
EnglandPaula. 2010. “The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled.” Gender & Society24(2):149–66.
39.
EnglandPaulaShaferEmily F.FogartyAlison C.2008. “Hooking Up and Forming Romantic Relationships on Today’s College Campuses.” Pp. 531–93 in The Gendered Society Reader, 3rd ed., edited by KimmelM.AronsonA.New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
EvertssonMarieNermoMagnus. 2004. “Dependence within Families and the Division of Labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States.” Journal of Marriage and Family66(5):1272–86.
41.
FisherKimberlyEgertonMurielGershunyJonathan I.RobinsonJohn P.2007. “Gender Convergence in the American Heritage Time Use Study (AHTUS).” Social Indicators Research82(1):1–33.
42.
ForsteRenataTanferKoray. 1996. “Sexual Exclusivity among Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Women.” Journal of Marriage and the Family58(1):33–47.
43.
GersonKathleen. 2002. “Moral Dilemmas, Moral Strategies, and the Transformation of Gender Lessons from Two Generations of Work and Family Change.” Gender & Society16(1):8–28.
44.
GersonKathleen. 2010. The Unfinished Revolution: How a New Generation Is Reshaping Family, Work, and Gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
GreensteinTheodore N.2000. “Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the Home: A Replication and Extension.” Journal of Marriage and Family62(2):322–35.
46.
GuptaSanjiv. 2007. “Autonomy, Dependence, or Display? The Relationship between Married Women’s Earnings and Housework.” Journal of Marriage and Family69(2):399–417.
47.
GutmanHerbert G.1976. The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750–1925. New York: Random House.
48.
HamiltonLauraArmstrongElizabeth A.2009. “Gendered Sexuality in Young Adulthood: Double Binds and Flawed Options.” Gender & Society23(5):589–616.
49.
HatfieldElaineTraupmanJaneWalsterG. William. 1979. “Equity and Extramarital Sex.” Pp. 323–34 in Love and Attraction, edited by CookM.WilsonG.Oxford, UK: Pergamom Press.
50.
HeckertD. A.NowakThomas C.SnyderKay A.1998. “The Impact of Husbands’ and Wives’ Relative Earnings on Marital Disruption.” Journal of Marriage and the Family60(3):690–703.
51.
HeiseDavid R.2007. Expressive Order. New York: Springer.
52.
HilbigBenjamin E.MoshagenMortenZettlerIngo. 2015. “Truth Will Out: Linking Personality, Morality, and Honesty through Indirect Questioning.” Social Psychological and Personality Science6(2):140–147.
53.
HillRobert Bernard. 1972. The Strengths of Black Families. New York: Emerson Hall Publishers.
54.
HomansGeorge C.1958. “Social Behavior as Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology63(6):597–606.
55.
hooksbell. 1981. Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
56.
JalovaaraMarika. 2003. “The Joint Effects of Marriage Partners’ Socioeconomic Positions on the Risk of Divorce.” Demography40(1):67–81.
57.
KalmijnMatthijs. 1991. “Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy.” American Sociological Review56(6):786–800.
58.
KalmijnMatthijs. 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology24(1):395–421.
59.
KalmijnMatthijsLoeveAnnekeMantingDorien. 2007. “Income Dynamics in Couples and the Dissolution of Marriage and Cohabitation.” Demography44(1):159–79.
60.
KennedySheelaBumpassLarry. 2008. “Cohabitation and Children’s Living Arrangements: New Estimates from the United States.” Demographic Research19(1):1663–92.
61.
KimmelMichael S.1994. “Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity.” Pp. 119–41 in Theorizing Masculinities, edited by BroadH.KaufmanM.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
KimmelMichael S.2008. Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men. New York: Harper.
63.
KingGaryZengLangche. 2001. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Political Analysis9(2):137–63.
64.
KornrichSabinoBrinesJulieLeuppKatrina. 2013. “Egalitarianism, Housework, and Sexual Frequency in Marriage.” American Sociological Review78(1):26–50.
65.
LandryBart. 2000. Black Working Wives: Pioneers of the American Family Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
66.
LaumannEdward O.GagnonJohn H.MichaelRobert T.MichaelsStuart. 1994. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
LiuChien. 2000. “A Theory of Marital Sexual Life.” Journal of Marriage and Family62(2):363–74.
68.
MaassAnneCadinuMaraGuarnieriGaiaGrasselliAnnalisa. 2003. “Sexual Harassment under Social Identity Threat: The Computer Harassment Paradigm.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85(5):853–70.
MareRobert D.1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review56(1):15–32.
71.
McDonaldGerald W.1981. “Structural Exchange and Marital Interaction.” Journal of Marriage and the Family43(4):825–39.
72.
MeersSharonStroberJoanna. 2013. Getting to 50/50: How Working Parents Can Have It All. New York: Cleis Press.
73.
MeisenbachRebecca J.2010. “The Female Breadwinner: Phenomenological Experience and Gendered Identity in Work/Family Spaces.” Sex Roles62(1–2):2–19.
74.
MooreKristin A.WaiteLinda J.1981. “Marital Dissolution, Early Motherhood and Early Marriage.” Social Forces60(1):20–40.
75.
MunschChristin L.WillerRobb. 2012. “The Role of Gender Identity Threat in Perceptions of Date Rape and Sexual Coercion.” Violence Against Women18(10):1125–46.
OppenheimerValerie K.1988. “A Theory of Marriage Timing.” American Journal of Sociology94(3):563–91.
78.
PascoeC. J.2007. Dude, You’re a Fag. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79.
PetersenJennifer L.HydeJanet S.2010. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Research on Gender Differences in Sexuality, 1993–2007.” Psychological Bulletin136(1):21–38.
80.
PierceLamarDahlMichael S.NielsenJimmi. 2013. “In Sickness and in Wealth: Psychological and Sexual Costs of Income Comparison in Marriage.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin39(3):359–74.
81.
PotuchekJean L.1997. Who Supports the Family? Gender and Breadwinning in Dual-Earner Marriages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
82.
PrevitiDeniseAmatoPaul R.2004. “Is Infidelity a Cause or a Consequence of Poor Marital Quality?”Journal of Social and Personal Relationships21(2):217–30.
83.
PrinsKarin S.BuunkBram P.VanYperenNico W.1993. “Equity, Normative Disapproval and Extramarital Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships10(1):39–53.
84.
QuillianLincoln. 1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review60(4):586–611.
85.
RaleySaraBianchiSuzanne M.WangWendy. 2012. “When Do Fathers Care? Mothers’ Economic Contribution and Fathers’ Involvement in Child Care.” American Journal of Sociology117(5):1422–59.
86.
RaleySara B.MattinglyMarybeth J.BianchiSuzanne M.2006. “How Dual are Dual-Income Couples? Documenting Change from 1970 to 2001.” Journal of Marriage and Family68(1):11–28.
87.
RidgewayCecilia L.2001. “Gender, Status, and Leadership.” Journal of Social Issues57(4):637–55.
88.
RidgewayCecilia L.CorrellShelley J.2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society18(4):510–31.
89.
RidgewayCecilia L.Smith-LovinLynn. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology25(1):191–216.
90.
RogersStacy J.2004. “Dollars, Dependency, and Divorce: Four Perspectives on the Role of Wives’ Income.” Journal of Marriage and Family66(1):59–74.
91.
RossHeather L.SawhillIsabel V.1975. The Time of Transition: The Growth of Families Headed by Women. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
92.
Safilios-RothschildConstantina. 1976. “A Macro-and Micro-Examination of Family Power and Love: An Exchange Model.” Journal of Marriage and the Family38(2):355–62.
93.
SayerLiana C.EnglandPaulaAllisonPaul D.KangasNicole. 2011. “She Left, He Left: How Employment and Satisfaction Affect Men’s and Women’s Decisions to Leave Marriages.” American Journal of Sociology116(6):1982–2018.
94.
SchneiderDaniel. 2012. “Gender Deviance and Household Work: The Role of Occupation.” American Journal of Sociology117(4):1029–72.
95.
SchrockDouglasSchwalbeMichael. 2009. “Men, Masculinity, and Manhood Acts.” Annual Review of Sociology35(1):277–95.
96.
SchwartzChristine R.2010. “Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association between Spouses’ Earnings.” American Journal of Sociology115(5):1524–57.
97.
SchwartzChristine R.2013. “Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating: Causes and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology39(1):451–70.
98.
SchwartzChristine R.HanHongyun. 2014. “The Reversal of the Gender Gap in Education and Trends in Marital Dissolution.” American Sociological Review79(4):605–629.
99.
SorensenAnnemetteMcLanahanSara. 1987. “Married Women’s Economic Dependency, 1940–1980.” American Journal of Sociology93(3):659–87.
100.
SprecherSusan. 1998. “Social Exchange Theories and Sexuality.” Journal of Sex Research35(1):32–43.
101.
SpringerKristen W.2010. “Economic Dependence in Marriage and Husbands’ Midlife Health: Testing Three Possible Mechanisms.” Gender & Society24(3):378–401.
102.
SweeneyMegan M.CancianMaria. 2004. “The Changing Importance of White Women’s Economic Prospects for Assortative Mating.” Journal of Marriage and Family66(4):1015–28.
103.
TajfelHenri. 1970. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American223(5):96–102.
104.
TajfelHenri. 1982. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
105.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C.1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Pp. 33–47 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by AustinW. G.WorchelS.Monterey, CA: Brooks.
106.
TalleyAmelia E.BettencourtB. Ann. 2008. “Evaluations and Aggression Directed at a Gay Male Target: The Role of Threat and Antigay Prejudice.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology38(3):647–83.
107.
TaylorPatricia A.GlennNorval D.1976. “The Utility of Education and Attractiveness for Females’ Status Attainment through Marriage.” American Sociological Review41(3):484–98.
108.
TeachmanJay. 2010. “Wives’ Economic Resources and Risk of Divorce.” Journal of Family Issues31(10):1305–1323.
109.
ThébaudSarah. 2010. “Masculinity, Bargaining, and Breadwinning: Understanding Men’s Housework in the Cultural Context of Paid Work.” Gender & Society24(3):330–54.
110.
ThibautJohn W.KelleyHarold H.1959. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.
111.
TichenorVeronica. 2005. “Maintaining Men’s Dominance: Negotiating Identity and Power When She Earns More.” Sex Roles53(3–4):191–205.
TownsendNicholas W.2002. The Package Deal: Marriage, Work and Fatherhood in Men’s Lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
114.
TreasJudithGiesenDeirdre. 2000. “Sexual Infidelity among Married and Cohabiting Americans.” Journal of Marriage and Family62(1):48–60.
115.
TuminDmitryQianZhenchao. 2012. “Incidence, Predictors, and Resolution of Marital Separations.” Presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
116.
UdryJ. RichardEcklandBruce K.1984. “Benefits of Being Attractive: Differential Payoffs for Men and Women.” Psychological Reports54(1):47–56.
117.
VandelloJoseph A.BossonJennifer K.CohenDovBurnafordRochelle M.WeaverJonathan R.2008. “Precarious Manhood.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(6):1325–39.
118.
WallerWillard. 1937. “The Rating and Dating Complex.” American Sociological Review2(5):727–34.
119.
WallerWillardHillReuben. 1951. The Family: A Dynamic Interpretation. New York: Dryden.
120.
WangWendyParkerKimTaylorPaul. 2013. “Breadwinner Moms: Mothers Are the Sole or Primary Provider in Four-in-Ten Households with Children; Public Conflicted about the Growing Trend.” Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends, May29. Retrieved July21, 2014 (http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/29/breadwinner-moms/).
121.
WhismanMark A.SnyderDouglas K.2007. “Sexual Infidelity in a National Survey of American Women: Differences in Prevalence and Correlates as a Function of Method of Assessment.” Journal of Family Psychology21(2):147–54.
122.
WiedermanMichael W.1997. “Extramarital Sex: Prevalence and Correlates in a National Survey.” Journal of Sex Research34(2):167–74.
123.
WillerRobbRogalinChristabel L.ConlonBridgetWojnowiczMichael T.2013. “Overdoing Gender: A Test of the Masculine Overcompensation Thesis.” American Journal of Sociology118(4):980–1022.
124.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
125.
WinklerAnne E.McBrideTimothy D.AndrewsCourtney. 2005. “Wives Who Outearn Their Husbands: A Transitory Or Persistent Phenomenon for Couples?”Demography42(3):523–35.
126.
Winslow-BoweSarah. 2006. “The Persistence of Wives’ Income Advantage.” Journal of Marriage and Family68(4):824–42.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
