Patrilineality, the organization of kinship, inheritance, and other key social processes based on patrilineal male descent, has been a salient feature of social organization in China and many other societies for centuries. Because patrilineage continuity or growth was the central focus of reproductive strategies in such societies, we introduce the number of patrilineal male descendants generations later as a stratification outcome. By reconstructing and analyzing 20,000 patrilineages in two prospective, multi-generational population databases from eighteenth- and nineteenth-century China, we show that patrilineages founded by high-status males had higher growth rates for the next 150 years. The elevated growth rate of these patrilineages was due more to their having a lower probability of extinction at each point in time than to surviving patrilineal male descendants having larger numbers of sons on average. As a result, male descendants of high-status males account for a disproportionately large share of the male population in later generations. In China and elsewhere, patrilineal kin network characteristics influence individuals’ life chances; effects of a male founder’s characteristics on patrilineage size many generations later thus represent an indirect channel of status transmission that has not been considered previously.
AgreeEmily M.BiddlecomAnn E.ValenteThomas W.2005. “Intergenerational Transfers of Resources between Older Persons and Extended Kin in Taiwan and the Philippines.” Population Studies59(2):181–95.
2.
AllisonPaul D.LongJ. ScottKrauzeTad K.1982. “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review47(5):615–25.
3.
BeanLeeMineauGeraldineAndertonDoug. 1990. Fertility Change on the American Frontier: Adaptation and Innovation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
BeckerGary S.1991. A Treatise on the Family, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BetzigLaura L.1986. Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Pub.
6.
BlauPeter M.DuncanOtis Dudley. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.
7.
BongaartsJohnBurchThomas K.WachterKenneth W.1987. Family Demography: Methods and Their Application. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
8.
BodmerWalter F.1965. “Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models.” Genetics51(3):411–24.
9.
BooneJamesKesslerKaren L.1999. “More Status or More Children? Social Status, Fertility Reduction, and Long-Term Fitness.” Evolution and Human Behavior20(4):257–77.
10.
Borgerhoff MulderMonique. 2000. “Optimizing Offspring: The Quantity-Quality Tradeoff in Agropastoral Kipsigis.” Evolution and Human Behavior21(6):391–410.
11.
Borgerhoff MulderMoniqueBowlesSamuelHertzTomBellAdrianBeiseJanClarkGregFazzioIlaGurvenMichaelHillKimHooperPaul L.IronsWilliamKaplanHillardLeonettiDonnaLowBobbiMarloweFrankMcElreathRichardNaiduSureshNolinDavidPirainoPatrizioQuinlanRobSchniterEricSearRebeccaShenkMarySmithEric Aldenvon RuedenChristopherWiessnerPolly. 2009. “Intergenerational Wealth Transmission and the Dynamics of Inequality in Small-Scale Societies.” Science326(5953):682–88.
12.
BrownGillian R.DickinsThomas E.SearRebeccaLalandKevin N.2011. “Evolutionary Accounts of Human Behavioural Diversity.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences366(1563):313–24.
13.
CamEmmanuelleLinkWilliam A.CoochEvan G.MonnatJean-YvesDanchinEtienne. 2002. “Individual Covariation in Life-History Traits: Seeing the Trees Despite the Forest.” American Naturalist159(1):96–105.
14.
CampbellCameronLeeJames Z.2001. “Free and Unfree Labor in Qing China: Emigration and Escape among the Bannermen of Northeast China, 1789–1909.” The History of the Family: An International Quarterly6(4):455–76.
15.
CampbellCameronLeeJames Z.2008a. “Kin Networks, Marriage, and Social Mobility in Late Imperial China.” Social Science History32(2):175–214.
16.
CampbellCameronLeeJames Z.2008b. “Villages, Descent Groups, Households and Individual Outcomes in Rural Liaoning, 1789–1909.” Pp. 73–104 in Kinship and Demographic Behavior in the Past, edited by BengtssonT.MineauG.New York: Springer.
17.
CampbellCameronLeeJames Z.2010a. “Fertility Control in Historical China Revisited: New Methods for an Old Debate.” History of the Family15(4):370–85.
18.
CampbellCameronLeeJames Z.2010b. “Social, Economic, and Demographic Determinants of Descent Line Growth and Extinction over the Long Term in Historical China.” CCPR Working Paper.
19.
CampbellCameronLeeJames Z.2011. “Kinship and the Long-Term Persistence of Inequality in Liaoning, China, 1749–2005.” Chinese Sociological Review44(1):71–104.
20.
Cavalli-SforzaL. LucaFeldmanMarcus W.1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Cavalli-SforzaL. LucaMenozziPaoloPiazzaAlberto. 1994. The History and Geography of Human Genes. New York: Princeton University Press.
22.
ChangJoseph T.1999. “Recent Common Ancestors of All Present-Day Individuals.” Advances in Applied Probability31(4):1027–38.
23.
ClarkGregory. 2007. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
CohenMyron L.1990. “Lineage Organization in North China.” Journal of Asian Studies49(3):509–534.
25.
ColantonioSonia E.LaskerGabriel W.KaplanBernice A.FusterVicente. 2003. “Use of Surname Models in Human Population Biology: A Review of Recent Developments.” Human Biology75(6):785–807.
26.
CourtiolAlexandrePettayJenni E.JokelaMarkusRotkirchAnnaLummaaVirpi. 2012. “Natural and Sexual Selection in a Monogamous Historical Human Population.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109(21):8044–49.
27.
Dherbécourt, Clément. 2013. “La Fortune des Héritiers. Essais sur la transmission du capital en France du Second Empire à la Seconde Guerre mondiale.” PhD dissertation in Economics, École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France.
28.
DiPreteThomas A.EirichGregory M.2006. “Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments.” Annual Review of Sociology32:271–97.
29.
DuRuofuYidaYuanHwangJulianaMountainJoannaCavalli-SforzaL. Luca. 1992. “Chinese Surnames and the Genetic Differences between North and South China.” Working paper series, Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, no. 27.
30.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1966. “Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Social Mobility.” Pp. 51–97 in Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, edited by SmelserN. J.LipsetS. M.Chicago: Aldine.
31.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
32.
FalconerDouglas S.1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. New York: Ronald Press.
33.
FeathermanDavid L.HauserRobert M.1978. Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
34.
FiederMartinHuberSusanne. 2007. “The Effects of Sex and Childlessness on the Association between Status and Reproductive Output in Modern Society.” Evolution and Human Behavior28(6):392–98.
35.
FisherRonald A.1922. “On the Dominance Ratio.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh42:321–41.
36.
FreedmanMaurice. 1966. Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung. London: Athlone Press.
37.
GaltonFrancisWatsonHenry W.1874. “On the Probability of the Extinction of Families.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute6:138–44.
38.
GillespieDuncan O. S.RussellAndrew F.LummaaVirpi. 2008. “When Fecundity Does Not Equal Fitness: Evidence of An Offspring Quantity Versus Quality Trade-off in Pre-industrial Humans.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences275(1635):713–22.
39.
GoodmanAnnaKoupilIlona. 2009. “Social and Biological Determinants of Reproductive Success in Swedish Males and Females Born 1915–1929.” Evolution and Human Behavior30(5):329–41.
40.
GoodmanAnnaKoupilIlona. 2010. “The Effect of School Performance upon Marriage and Long-Term Reproductive Success in 10,000 Swedish Males and Females Born 1915–1929.” Evolution and Human Behavior31(6):425–35.
41.
GoodmanAnnaKoupilIlonaLawsonDavid W.2012. “Low Fertility Increases Descendant Socioeconomic Position but Reduces Long-Term Fitness in a Modern Post-Industrial Society.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences279(1746):4342–51.
42.
GuoGuang. 1998. “The Timing of the Influences of Cumulative Poverty on Children’s Cognitive Ability and Achievement.” Social Forces77(1):257–87.
43.
GustafssonLars. 1986. “Lifetime Reproductive Success and Heritability: Empirical Support for Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem.” American Naturalist128(5):761–64.
44.
HarrellStevan J.1985. “The Rich Get Children: Segmentation, Stratification, and Population in Three Chekiang Genealogies.” Pp. 81–109 in Family and Population in East Asian History, edited by HanleyS. B.WolfA. P.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
HermalinAlbert I.OfstedalMary BethChiLi. 1992. “Kin Availability of the Elderly in Taiwan: Who Is Available and Where Are They?” Elderly in Asia Research Report No. 92–18. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
46.
HillJack. 1984. “Prestige and Reproductive Success in Man.” Ethology and Sociobiology5(2):77–95.
47.
HillKimKaplanHillard. 1999. “Life History Traits in Humans: Theory and Empirical Studies.” Annual Review of Anthropology28:397–430.
48.
HoPing-ti. 1964. The Ladder of Success in Imperial China: Aspects of Social Mobility, 1368–1911. New York: Science Editions.
49.
HopcroftRosemary L.2006. “Sex, Status, and Reproductive Success in the Contemporary United States.” Evolution and Human Behavior27(2):104–120.
50.
HsuFrancis Lang-Kwang. 1943. “The Myth of Chinese Family Size.” American Journal of Sociology48(5):555–62.
51.
HuberSusanneBooksteinFred L.FiederMartin. 2010. “Socioeconomic Status, Education, and Reproduction in Modern Women: An Evolutionary Perspective.” American Journal of Human Biology22(5):578–87.
52.
JægerMads Meier. 2012. “The Extended Family and Children’s Educational Success.” American Sociological Review77(6):903–922.
LachanceJoseph. 2009. “Inbreeding, Pedigree Size, and the Most Recent Common Ancestor of Humanity.” Journal of Theoretical Biology261(21):238–47.
55.
LamDavid. 1986. “The Dynamics of Population Growth, Differential Fertility, and Inequality.” American Economic Review76(5):1103–16.
56.
LavelyWilliamWongR. Bin. 1998. “Revising the Malthusian Narrative: The Comparative Study of Population Dynamics in Late Imperial China.” Journal of Asian Studies57(3):714–48.
57.
LeeJames Z.CampbellCameron. 1997. Fate and Fortune in Rural China: Social Organization and Population Behavior in Liaoning, 1774–1873. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
LeeJames Z.CampbellCameronChenShuang. 2010. China Multi-Generational Panel Dataset, Liaoning (CMGPD-LN) 1749–1909, User Guide. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
59.
LeeJames Z.CampbellCameronWangFeng. 1993. “An Introduction to the Demography of the Qing Imperial Lineage, 1644–1911.” Pp. 361–82 in Old and New Methods in Historical Demography, edited by SchofieldR.ReherD.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
LeeJames Z.WangFeng. 1999. One Quarter of Humanity: Malthusian Mythology and Chinese Realities, 1700–2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
LiuJianghuaLummaaVirpi. 2011. “Age at First Reproduction and Probability of Reproductive Failure in Women.” Evolution and Human Behavior32(6):433–43.
62.
LiuJianghuaRotkirchAnnaLummaaVirpi. 2012. “Maternal Risk of Breeding Failure Remained Low throughout the Demographic Transitions in Fertility and Age at First Reproduction in Finland.” PLoS ONE7(4):e34898.
63.
LongJasonFerrieJoseph. 2013. “Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850.” American Economic Review103(4):1109–37.
64.
LotkaAlfred J.1929. “The Spread of Generations.” Human Biology1(3):305–320.
65.
LotkaAlfred J.1931. “The Extinction of Families.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences21:377–453.
66.
LotkaAlfred J.1941. “The Progeny of an Entire Population.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics13(2):115–26.
67.
MaceRuth. 2000. “Evolutionary Ecology of Human Life History.” Animal Behaviour59(1):1–10.
68.
MannSusan. 2002. “Women, Families, and Gender Relations.” Pp. 428–72 in The Cambridge History of China. Vol.9, The Ch’ing Dynasty, Part 1: To 1800, edited by PetersonW. J.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
MaralaniVida. 2013. “The Demography of Social Mobility: Black-White Differences in the Process of Educational Reproduction.” American Journal of Sociology118(6):1509–58.
70.
MareRobert D.1997. “Differential Fertility, Intergenerational Educational Mobility, and Racial Inequality.” Social Science Research26(3):263–91.
71.
MareRobert D.2011. “A Multigenerational View of Inequality.” Demography48(1):1–23.
72.
MareRobert D.MaralaniVida. 2006. “The Intergenerational Effects of Changes in Women’s Educational Attainments.” American Sociological Review71(4):542–64.
73.
MatrasJudah. 1961. “Differential Fertility, Intergenerational Occupational Mobility, and Change in Occupational Distribution: Some Elementary Interrelationships.” Population Studies15(2):187–97.
74.
MatrasJudah. 1967. “Social Mobility and Social Structure: Some Insights from the Linear Model.” American Sociological Review32(4):608–614.
75.
MatsenFrederick A.EvansSteven N.2008. “To What Extent Does Genealogical Ancestry Imply Genetic Ancestry?” Journal of Theoretical Biology74(2):182–90.
76.
MertonRobert K.1968 “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science159(3810):56–63.
77.
MertonRobert K.1988. “The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property.” Isis79(4):606–623.
78.
MurphyMichael. 2004. “Tracing Very Long-Term Kinship Networks Using SOCSIM.” Demographic Research10(7):171–96.
79.
NettleDanielPolletThomas V.2008. “Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans.” American Naturalist172(5):658–66.
80.
PampelFred C.RogersRichard G.2004. “Socioeconomic Status, Smoking, and Health: A Test of Competing Theories of Cumulative Advantage.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior45(3):306–321.
81.
PiazzaAlbertoRendineSabinaZeiGiannaMoroniAntonioCavalli-SforzaL. Luca. 1987. “Migration Rates of Human Populations from Surname Distributions.” Nature329(6141):714–16.
82.
PrestonSamuel H.1974. “Differential Fertility, Unwanted Fertility, and Racial Trends in Occupational Achievement.” American Sociological Review39(4):492–506.
83.
PrestonSamuel H.CampbellCameron. 1993. “Differential Fertility and the Distribution of Traits: The Case of IQ.” American Journal of Sociology98(5):997–1019.
84.
PrestonSamuel H.HeuvelinePatrickGuillotMichel. 2001. Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
85.
RobinsonGene E.FernaldRussell D.ClaytonDavid F.2008. “Genes and Social Behavior.” Science322(5903):896–900.
86.
RohdeDouglas L. T.OlsonSteveChangJoseph T.2004. “Modelling the Recent Common Ancestry of All Living Humans.” Nature431(7008):562–66.
87.
SaiflG. MustafaChandraH. Sharat. 1999. “An Apparent Excess of Sex- and Reproduction-Related Genes on the Human X Chromosome.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences266(1415):203–209.
88.
SearRebeccaMaceRuthMcGregorIan A.2003. “The Effects of Kin on Female Fertility in Rural Gambia.” Evolution and Human Behavior24(1):24–42.
89.
SearRebeccaSteeleFionaMcGregorIan A.MaceRuth. 2002. “The Effects of Kin on Child Mortality in Rural Gambia.” Demography39(1):43–63.
90.
SeminoOrnellaPassarinoGiuseppeOefnerPeter J.LinAlice A.ArbuzovaSvetlanaBeckmanLars E.De BenedictisGiovannaFrancalacciPaoloKouvatsiAnastasiaLimborskaSvetlanaMarcikiæMlladenMikaAnnaMikaBarbaraPrimoracDraganSantachiara-BenerecettiA. SilvanaCavalli-SforzaL. LucaUnderhillPeter A.2000. “The Genetic Legacy of Paleolithic Homo Sapiens in Extant Europeans: A Y Chromosome Perspective.” Science290(5494):1155–59.
91.
TremblayMarcVèzinaHélèneDesjardinsBertrandHoudeLouis. 2008. “Distant Kinship and Founder Effects in the Quebec Population.” Pp. 259–77 in Kinship and Demographic Behavior in the Past, edited by BengtssonT.MineauG. P.New York: Springer.
92.
TuljapurkarShripadSteinerUlrich K.OrzackSteven Hecht. 2009. “Dynamic Heterogeneity in Life Histories.” Ecology Letters12(1):93–106.
93.
TurkePaul W.1989. “Evolution and the Demand for Children.” Population and Development Review15(1):61–90.
94.
UnzRon. 2013. “How Social Darwinism Made Modern China.” The American ConservativeMarch/April:16–27.
95.
VuongQuang H.1989. “Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses.” Econometrica57(2):307–333.
96.
Kenneth W.WachterHammelEugene A.LaslettPeter, eds. 1978. Statistical Studies of Historical Social Structure. London: Academic Press.
97.
WachterKenneth W.LaslettPeter. 1978. “Measuring Patriline Extinction for Modeling Social Mobility in the Past.” Pp. 113–35 in Statistical Studies of Historical Social Structure, edited by WachterK. W.HammelE. A.LaslettP.London: Academic Press.
98.
WangFengCampbellCameronLeeJames Z.2010. “Agency, Hierarchies, and Reproduction in Northeastern China, 1789 to 1840.” Pp. 287–316 in Prudence and Pressure: Reproduction and Human Agency in Europe and Asia, 1700–1900, edited by TsuyaN.FengW.AlterG.LeeJ. Z.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99.
WangFengLeeJames Z.CampbellCameron. 1995. “Marital Fertility Control among the Qing Nobility: Implications for Two Types of Preventive Check.” Population Studies49(3):383–400.
100.
WolfArthur P.1995. Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association: A Chinese Brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
101.
WolfArthur P.2001. “Is There Evidence of Birth Control in Late Imperial China?” Population and Development Review27(1):133–54.
102.
WolfArthur P.HuangChieh-shan. 1980. Marriage and Adoption in China: 1845–1945. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
103.
YasudaN.Cavalli-SforzaL. L.SkolnickM.MoroniA.1974. “The Evolution of Surnames: An Analysis of Their Distribution and Extinction.” Theoretical Population Biology5(1):123–42.
104.
ZimmermanDavid J.1992. “Regression toward Mediocrity in Economic Stature.” American Economic Review82(3):409–429.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
