This article examines how different repertoires of women’s activism influence gender earnings equality across countries. We develop a typology of three forms of mobilization—professionalized women’s activism, labor women’s activism, and women’s activism in popular movements—emphasizing distinct actors, patterns of claims-making, and inter-organizational ties among women’s organizations and other civil society groups in multi-organizational fields. Based on data on membership and co-membership ties built using World Values Surveys, we test the effects of different repertoires of women’s activism on earnings equality between women and men in 51 countries. We also consider a gendered development model and the role of welfare states as main explanatory variables in accounting for the gap in earnings. Our findings suggest that even in the presence of these alternative explanations, women’s activism matters. Furthermore, women’s organizations with access to institutional politics, through either direct advocacy or ties to unions or professional associations, have had the most success in promoting gender earnings equality. Our research contributes to prior work on social movement outcomes by conceptualizing women’s mobilization in the context of fields and further testing its effects on distributional outcomes in a comparative perspective.
AlvarezSonia E.1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women’s Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
AlvarezSonia E.1994. “The (Trans)formation of Feminism(s) and Gender Politics in Democratizing Brazil.” Pp. 13–63 in The Women’s Movement in Latin America: Participation and Democracy, edited by JaquetteJ. S.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6.
AmentaEdwin. 2006. When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
AmentaEdwinCarenNealOlaskySheera Joy. 2005. “Age for Leisure? Political Mediation and the Impact of the Pension Movement on U.S. Old-Age Policy.” American Sociological Review70:516–38.
8.
AmentaEdwinYoungMichael P.1999. “Making an Impact: Conceptual and Methodological Implications of the Collective Goods Criterion.” Pp. 22–41 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by GiugniM.McAdamD.TillyC.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
AndrewsKenneth T.2001. “Social Movements and Policy Implementation: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and the War on Poverty, 1965 to 1971.” American Sociological Review66:71–95.
10.
BanaszakLee Ann. 2010. The Women’s Movement Inside and Outside the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BayesJane H.TohidiNayereh. 2001. Globalization, Gender, and Religion: The Politics of Women’s Rights in Catholic and Muslim Contexts. New York: Palgrave.
12.
BelsleyDavid A.KuhEdwinWelschRoy E.1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
BennerMatsBundgaard VadTorben. 2000. “Sweden and Denmark: Defending the Welfare State.” Pp. 399–466 in Welfare and Work in the Open Economy. Vol. II, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, edited by ScharpfF. W.SchmidtV.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
BennettVivienne. 1995. “Gender, Class, and Water: Women and the Politics of Water Service in Monterrey, Mexico.” Latin American Perspectives22:76–99.
15.
BerkovitchNitza. 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women’s Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M.2003. “Understanding International Differences in the Gender Pay Gap.” Journal of Labor Economics21:106–144.
17.
BorgattiStephen P.EverettMartin G.1997. “Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data.” Social Networks19:243–69.
18.
BosiLorenzoUbaKatrin. 2009. “The Outcomes of Social Movements.” Mobilization14:409–415.
19.
BrainerdElizabeth. 2000. “Women in Transition: Changes in Gender Wage Differentials in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review54:138–62.
20.
BreigerRonald L.1974. “The Duality of Persons and Groups.” Social Forces53:181–90.
21.
BudigMichelle J.EnglandPaula. 2001. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review66:204–225.
22.
BursteinPaul. 1991. “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology96:1201–1225.
23.
CampoEsther del. 2005. “Women and Politics in Latin America: Perspectives and Limits of the Institutional Aspects of Women’s Political Representation.” Social Forces83:1697–1725.
24.
CharlesMariaGruskyDavid B.2004. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
CichowskiRachel A.2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
ClemensElisabeth S.1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology98:755–98.
27.
ClemensElisabeth S.1997. The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
CohenPhilip N.HuffmanMatt L.2003. “Occupational Segregation and the Devaluation of Women’s Work across U.S. Labor Markets.” Social Forces81:881–908.
29.
ColganFionaLedwithSue. 2002. “Gender, Diversity, and Mobilisation in UK Trade Unions.” Pp. 154–85 in Gender, Diversity and Trade Unions: International Perspectives, edited by ColganF.LedwithS.New York: Routledge.
30.
CurtinJennifer. 1999. Women and Trade Unions: A Comparative Perspective. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
31.
CurtisRussell L.Jr.ZurcherLouis A.Jr.1973. “Stable Resources of Protest Movements: The Multi-Organizational Field.” Social Forces52:53–61.
32.
DahlerupDrudeGulliBrita. 1985. “Women’s Organizations in the Nordic Countries: Lack of Force or Counterforce?” Pp. 6–36 in Unfinished Democracy: Women in Nordic Politics, edited by Haavio-MannilaE.DahlerupD.EduardsM.Oxford: Pergamon Press.
33.
EdwardsBobMcCarthyJohn D.2004. “Resources and Social Movement Mobilization.” Pp. 116–52 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Haavio-MannilaE.DahlerupD.EduardsM.GudmundsdottirE.HalsaaB.HernesH. M.Hänninen-SalmeljriE.SigmundsdóttirB.SinkonnenS.SkardT.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
EinhornBarbara. 1993. Cinderella Goes to Market: Citizenship, Gender, and Women’s Movements in East Central Europe. London: Verso.
35.
EnglandPaula. 1992. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
36.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39.
FantasiaRickVossKim. 2004. Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
FaustKatherine. 1997. “Centrality in Affiliation Networks.” Social Networks19:157–91.
41.
FeijooMaria del Carmen. 1998. “Democratic Participation and Women in Argentina.” Pp. 29–46 in Women and Democracy: Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe, edited by JaquetteJ. S.WolchikS. L.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
FerreeMyra MarxTrippAili Mari. 2006. Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights. New York: New York University Press.
43.
FligsteinNeilMcAdamDoug. 2011. “Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields.” Sociological Theory29:1–26.
44.
FonowMary Margaret. 2003. Union Women: Forging Feminism in the United Steelworkers of America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
Freedom House. 1999. “Freedom in the World 1999.” Washington, DC: Freedom House.
46.
Freedom House. 2000. “Freedom in the World 2000.” Washington, DC: Freedom House.
47.
Freedom House. 2001. “Freedom in the World 2001.” Washington, DC: Freedom House.
48.
GanzMarshall. 2000. “Resources and Resourcefulness: Strategic Capacity in the Unionization of California Agriculture: 1959–1966.” American Journal of Sociology105:1003–1062.
49.
GiugniMarco G.2004. “Personal and Biographical Consequences.” Pp. 489–507 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.Malden, MA: Blackwell.
50.
HausmannRicardoTysonLaura D.ZahidiSaadia. 2010. The Global Gender Gap Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
51.
HobsonBarbara. 1993. “Feminist Strategies and Gendered Discourses in Welfare States: Married Women’s Right to Work in the United States and Sweden.” Pp. 396–430 in Mothers of a New World, edited by KovenS.MichelS.New York: Routledge.
52.
HuberEvelyneStephensJohn D.2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
HuntGerald. 2002. “Organised Labour, Sexual Diversity, and Union Activism in Canada.” Pp. 257–74 in Gender, Diversity and Trade Unions: International Perspectives, edited by ColganF.LedwithS.New York: Routledge.
54.
International Labor Organization. 2010. World Social Security Report 2010/11: Providing Coverage in Times of Crisis and Beyond. Geneva: International Labour Office.
55.
JaquetteJane, ed. 1994. The Women’s Movement in Latin America: Participation and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
56.
KarlssonGunnel. 1998. “Social Democratic Women’s Coup in the Swedish Parliament.” Pp. 44–69 in Is There a Nordic Feminism? Nordic Feminist Thought on Culture and Society, edited by FehrD. v. d.JónasdóttirA. G.RosenbeckB.London: UCL Press.
57.
KatzensteinMary F.1987. “Comparing the Feminist Movements of the U.S. and Western Europe: An Overview.” Pp. 3–22 in The Women’s Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy, edited by KatzensteinM.MuellerC. McClurg. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
58.
KenworthyLaneMalamiMelissa. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces78:235–68.
59.
KingBraydenCornwallMarieDahlinEric. 2005. “Winning Women Suffrage One Step at a Time: Social Movements and the Logic of the Legislative Process.” Social Forces83:1211–34.
60.
KingBraydenPearceNicholas. 2010. “The Contentiousness of Markets: Politics, Social Movements, and Institutional Change in Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology36:249–67.
61.
KlandermansBert. 1992. “The Social Construction of Protest and Multiorganizational Fields.” Pp. 77–103 in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by MorrisA. D.MuellerC. M.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
KorpiWalter. 2000. “Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society7:127–91.
63.
KrizkovaAlenaPennerAndrew M.PetersenTrond. 2010. “The Legacy of Equality and the Weakness of Law: Within-Job Gender Wage Inequality in the Czech Republic.” European Sociological Review26:83–95.
64.
KunovichSheriPaxtonPamela. 2005. “Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women’s National Political Representation.” American Journal of Sociology111:505–552.
65.
KuznetsSimon. 1955. “Economic Growth and Income Inequality.” American Economic Review45:1–28.
66.
LapidusGail Warshofsky. 1982. Women, Work, and Family in the Soviet Union. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
67.
LongJ. ScottErvinLaurie H.2000. “Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model.” American Statistician54:217–24.
68.
MandelHadasSemyonovMoshe. 2005. “Family Policies, Wage Structures, and Gender Gaps: Sources of Earnings Inequality in 20 Countries.” American Sociological Review70:949–67.
69.
MazurAmy. 2001. State Feminism, Women’s Movements, and Job Training. New York: Routledge.
70.
McCammonHolly J.CampbellKarenGranbergEllenMoweryChristine. 2001. “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structures and U.S. Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866 to 1919.” American Sociological Review66:49–70.
71.
McCammonHolly J.ChaudhuriSomaHewittLyndiMuseCourtney SandersNewmanHarmonySmithCarrie LeeTerrellTeresa. 2008. “Becoming Full Citizens: The U.S. Women’s Jury Rights Campaigns, the Pace of Reform, and Strategic Adaptation.” American Journal of Sociology113:1104–1147.
72.
McCannMichael W.1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
McCarthyJohn D.WalkerEdward T.2004. “Alternative Organizational Repertoires of Poor People’s Social Movement Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33:97S–119S.
74.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer. 1987. Social Movements in an Organizational Society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
75.
MeyerMary K.PruglElisabeth. 1999. Gender Politics in Global Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
76.
MilkmanRuth. 1985. “Women Workers, Feminism, and the Labor Movement since the 1960s.” Pp. 300–322 in Women, Work, and Protest: A Century of U.S. Women’s Labor History, edited by MilkmanR.Boston: Routledge.
77.
MinkoffDebra C.1999. “Bending with the Wind: Strategic Change and Adaptation by Women’s and Racial Minority Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology104:1666–1703.
78.
MinkoffDebra C.McCarthyJohn D.2005. “Reinvigorating the Study of Organizational Processes in Social Movements.” Mobilization10:289–308.
79.
MolyneuxMaxine. 1985. “Mobilization without Emancipation? Women’s Interests, the State, and Revolution in Nicaragua.” Feminist Studies11:227–54.
80.
O’ConnorKaren. 1980. Women’s Organizations’ Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
81.
OrloffAnn Shola. 1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review58:303–328.
82.
PascallGillianManningNick. 2000. “Gender and Social Policy: Comparing Welfare States in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Journal of European Social Policy10:240–66.
83.
PatemanCarole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
84.
PaxtonPamela. 1997. “Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis.” Social Science Research26:442–64.
85.
PaxtonPamelaHughesMelanie M.GreenJennifer L.2006. “The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review71:898–920.
86.
PetersenTrondMorganLaurie A.1995. “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” American Journal of Sociology101:329–65.
87.
PivenFrances FoxClowardRichard A.1977. Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.
88.
RamirezFrancisco O.SoysalYaseminShanahanSuzanne. 1997. “The Changing Logic of Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women’s Suffrage Rights, 1890 to 1990.” American Sociological Review62:735–45.
89.
RatnerRonnie Steinberg. 1980. “Equal Employment for Women.” Pp. 419–40 in Equal Employment Policy for Women: Strategies for Implementation in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe, edited by RatnerR. S.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
90.
ReskinBarbara F.1988. “Bringing the Men Back In: Sex Differentiation and the Devaluation of Women’s Work.” Gender and Society2:58–81.
91.
SafaHelen Icken. 1990. “Women’s Social Movements in Latin America.” Gender & Society4:354–69.
92.
SainsburyDiane. 1999. Gender and Welfare State Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93.
SchlozmanKay Lehman. 1990. “Representing Women in Washington: Sisterhood and Pressure Politics.” Pp. 339–82 in Women, Politics and Change, edited by TillyL. A.GurinP.New York: Russell Sage.
94.
SkocpolTheda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
95.
SmithSelma Moidel. 1999. “A Century of Achievement: The Centennial of the National Association of Women Lawyers.” The Women Lawyers Journal85:1–18.
96.
SouleSarahKingBrayden. 2006. “The Stages of the Policy Process and the Equal Rights Amendment, 1972–1982.” American Journal of Sociology111:1871–1909.
97.
Spalter-RothRobertaSchreiberRonnie. 1995. “Outsider Issues and Insider Tactics: Strategic Tensions in the Women’s Policy Network during the 1980s.” Pp. 105–127 in Feminist Organizations, edited by FerreeM. M.MartinP. Y.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
98.
StephenLynn. 1997. Women and Social Movements in Latin America: Power from Below. Austin: University of Texas Press.
99.
StetsonDorothy E. McBrideMazurAmy. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
100.
StierHayaLewin-EpsteinNoahBraunMichael. 2001. “Welfare Regimes, Family-Supportive Policies, and Women’s Employment along the Life-Course.” American Journal of Sociology106:1731–60.
101.
StitesRichard. 1978. The Women’s Liberation Movement in Russia: Feminism, Nihilism, and Bolshevism, 1860–1930. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
102.
Tomaskovic-DeveyDonald. 1993. Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: The Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
103.
Van DykeNellaMcCammonHolly J., eds. 2010. Strategic Alliances: Coalition Building and Social Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
104.
WhitehouseGillian. 1992. “Legislation and Labour Market Gender Inequality: An Analysis of OECD Countries.” Work, Employment & Society6:65–86.
105.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
106.
World Bank. 2011. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
107.
WotipkaChristine MinRamirezFrancisco O.2008. “World Society and Human Rights: An Event History Analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.” Pp. 303–343 in The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, edited by SimmonsB. A.DobbinF.GarrettG.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
108.
ZaldMayer N.McCarthyJohn D.1979. The Dynamics of Social Movements. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
109.
ZaldMayer N.McCarthyJohn D.1987. Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
