Why did the transition from socialism to capitalism result in improved growth in some countries and significant economic decline in others? Scholars have advanced three main arguments: (1) successful countries rapidly implemented neoliberal policies; (2) failures were not due to policies but to poor institutional environments; and (3) policies were counterproductive because they damaged the state. We present a state-centered theory and empirically demonstrate for the first time one of several possible mechanisms linking neoliberal policies to poor economic performance: mass privatization programs, where implemented, created a massive fiscal shock for post-communist governments, thereby undermining the development of private-sector governance institutions and severely exacerbating the transformational recession. We performed cross-national panel regressions for a sample of 25 post-communist countries between 1990 and 2000 and found that mass privatization programs negatively affected economic growth, state capacity, and property rights protection. We further tested these findings with firm-level data from a representative survey of managers in 3,550 companies operating in 24 post-communist countries. Within countries that implemented mass-privatized programs, newly privatized firms were substantially less likely to engage in industrial restructuring but considerably more likely to use barter and accumulate tax arrears than their state-owned counterparts.
ArakelyanVazgen. 2005. “Privatization as a Means to Property Distribution in the Republic of Armenia and in the Russian Federation.” PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Tampere, Finland.
2.
ÅslundAnders. 1999. “Why Has Russia’s Economic Transformation Been So Arduous?” Presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, April1999.
3.
ÅslundAnders. 2002. Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BauerTamás P.1983. “The Hungarian Alternative to Soviet-Type Planning.” Journal of Comparative Economics7:304–316.
5.
BellStuart. 1997. “Country Studies: Georgia.” Pp. 197–200 in Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, edited by LiebermanI. W.NestorS. S.DesaiR. M.Washington, DC: World Bank.
6.
BennettJohnEstrinSaulMawJamesUrgaGiovanni. 2004. “Privatization Methods and Economic Growth in Transition Economies.” Discussion Paper 4291. Center for Economic and Policy Research.
7.
BennettJohnEstrinSaulUrgaGiovanni. 2007. “Methods of Privatization and Economic Growth in Transition Economies.” Economics of Transition15:661–83.
8.
BlanchardOlivierBoyckoMaximDabrowskiMarekDornbuschRudigerLayardRichardShleiferAndrei. 1993. Post-communist Reform: Pain and Progress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BlanchardOlivierDornbuschRudigerKrugmanPaulLayardRichardSummersLawrence. 1991. Reform in Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
BlockFred. 1994. “The Role of State in the Economy.” Pp. 691–711 in Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by SwedbergR.SmelserN.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
BlockFredEvansPeter. 2005. “The State and the Economy.” Pp. 505–526 in Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd ed., edited by SwedbergR.SmelserN.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BurawoyMichael. 1996. “The State and Economic Involution: Russia through a China Lens.” World Development24:1105–1122.
13.
BurawoyMichaelKrotovPavel. 1992. “The Soviet Transition from Socialism to Capitalism: Worker Control and Economic Bargaining.” American Sociological Review57:16–38.
14.
CarlinWendyvan ReenenJohnWolfeToby. 1994. “Enterprise Restructuring in the Transition: An Analytical Survey of the Case Study Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe.” Working Paper No. 14. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
15.
ClemensElisabeth S.2007. “Toward a Historicized Sociology: Theorizing Events, Processes, and Emergence.” Annual Review of Sociology33:527–49.
16.
CohenStephen F.2001. Failed Crusade: America and the Tragedy of Post-Communist Russia. New York: W.W. Norton.
17.
De MeloMarthaDenizerCevdetGelbAlan. 1996. From Plan to Market: Patterns of Transition. Washington, DC: World Bank.
18.
De MeloMarthaDenizerCevdetGelbAlanTenevStoyan. 2001. “Circumstances and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies.” The World Bank Economic Review15:1–31.
19.
De MeloMarthaGelbAlan. 1996. “A Comparative Analysis of Twenty-Eight Transition Economies in Europe and Asia.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics37:265–85.
20.
DjankovSimeonMurrellPeter. 2002. “Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature40:739–92.
21.
EllermanDavid. 1998. “Voucher Privatization with Investment Funds: An Institutional Analysis.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1924.
22.
EllermanDavid. 2003. “On the Russian Privatization Debate.” Challenge46:6–28.
23.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). 1994–2011. Transition Report, various editions. London: EBRD.
24.
EvansPeter B.1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
EvansPeter B.RauchJames E.1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review64:748–65.
26.
EyalGilSzelényiIvanTownsleyEleanor. 1998. Making Capitalism without Capitalists. New York: Verso.
27.
FischerStanleyGelbAlan. 1991. “The Process of Socialist Economic Transformation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives4:91–106.
28.
FishM. Steven. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
FligsteinNeil. 2001. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
FriedmanMilton. 2002. “Economic Freedom Behind the Scenes.” Pp. xvii–xxi in Economic Freedom of the World: 2002 Annual Report, edited by GwartneyJ.LawsonR.EdwardsC.ParkW.de RugyV.WaghS.Vancouver, Canada: Fraser Institute.
31.
FrydmanRomanGrayCherylRapaczynskiAndrzej. 1996. Corporate Governance in Central Europe and Russia. Budapest: Central European University Press.
32.
FrydmanRomanRapaczynskiAndrzejTurkowitzJoel. 1997. “Transition to a Private Property Regime in the Czech Republic and Hungary.” Pp. 41–102 in Economies in Transition: Comparing Asia and Eastern Europe, edited by WooW. ThyeParkerS.SachsJ. D.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
GanevVenelin I.2007. Preying on the State: The Transformation of Bulgaria after 1989. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
GuptaNandiniHamJhon C.SvejnarJan. 2008. “Priorities and Sequencing in Privatization: Evidence from Czech Firm Panel Data.” European Economic Review52:183–208.
36.
GutsuVladimir. 1996. “Note on Privatization in Moldova.” Pp. 344–53 in Economic Transition in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, edited by KaminskiB.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
37.
HanleyEricKingLawrence P.TóthJános István. 2002. “The State, International Agencies, and Property Transformation in Postcommunist Hungary.” American Journal of Sociology108:129–67.
38.
HanousekJanKočendaEvženSvejnarJan. 2007. “Origin and Concentration: Corporate Ownership, Control and Performance in Firms after Privatization.” Economics of Transition15:1–31.
39.
HeldKarlHillAudrey. 1989. From 1917 to Perestroika: The Victory of Morality over Socialism. Munich, Germany: Resultate Gesellschaft fuer Druck und Verlag.
40.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2000. World Economic Outlook, October 2000: Focus on Transition Economies. Washington, DC: IMF.
41.
JermakowiczWładysław W.PańkówJulian. 1995. “Privatization in the Kyrgyz Republic.” Russian and East European Finance and Trade31:31–72.
42.
KingLawrence P.2000. “Foreign Direct Investment and Transition.” European Journal of Sociology41:189–224.
43.
KingLawrence P.2001a. “Making Markets: A Comparative Study of Postcommunist Managerial Strategies in Central Europe.” Theory and Society30:494–538.
44.
KingLawrence P.2001b. The Basic Features of Post-Communist Capitalism: Firms in Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.
45.
KingLawrence P.2002. “Post-communist Divergence: A Comparative Analysis of Russian and Polish Capitalism.” Studies in Comparative International Development37:3–34.
46.
KingLawrence P.2003. “Shock Privatization: The Effects of Rapid Large Scale Privatization on Enterprise Restructuring.” Politics and Society31:3–34.
47.
KingLawrence P.SzelényiIván. 2005. “Post-Communist Economic Systems.” Pp. 206–229 in Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd ed., edited by SmelserN. J.SwedbergR.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
KingLawrenceP.SznajderAleksandra. 2006. “The State-Led Transition to Liberal Capitalism: Neoliberal, Organizational, World Systems and Social Structural Explanations of Poland’s Economic Success.” American Journal of Sociology12:751–801.
49.
KlebnikovPaul. 2000. Godfather of the Kremlin: The Decline of Russia in the Age of Gangster Capitalism. New York: Harcourt.
50.
KnackStephen. 2007. “Measuring Corruption: A Critique of Indicators in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.” Journal of Public Policy27:255–91.
51.
KogutBruceSpicerAndrew. 2002. “Capital Market Development and Mass Privatization Are Logical Contradictions: Lessons from the Czech Republic and Russia.” Industrial and Corporate Change11:1–37.
52.
KogutBruceSpicerAndrew. 2005. “Taking Account of Accountability: Academics, Transition Economics and Russia.” INSEAD Working Paper.
53.
KornaiJános. 1980. Economics of Shortage. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
54.
KornaiJános. 1990. The Road to a Free Economy: Shifting from a Socialist System. New York: W.W. Norton.
55.
KornaiJános. 1995. Highway and Byways: Studies on Reform and Post-Communist Transition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
KosolowskiRey. 1992. “Market Institutions, East European Reform, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Issues26:673–705.
57.
KurtzMarcus J.SchrankAndrew. 2007. “Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms.” Journal of Politics69:538–54.
58.
LiebermanIra W.1997. “Introduction: Mass Privatization in Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 1–15 in Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, edited by LiebermanI. W.NestorS. S.DesaiR. M.Washington, DC: World Bank.
59.
LiebermanIra W.KessidesJoannisGobboMario. 2008. “An Overview of Privatization in Transition Economies.” Pp. 9–80 in Privatization in Transition Economies: The Ongoing Story, edited by LiebermanI. W.KopfD. J.Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier.
60.
LiptonDavidSachsJeffrey. 1990a. “Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity1:75–133.
61.
LiptonDavidSachsJeffrey. 1990b. “Privatization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2:293–333.
62.
MannMichael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
McDermottGerald. 2002. Embedded Politics: Industrial Networks and Institution Building in Post-Communism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
64.
MedvedevRoy A.2000. Post-Soviet Russia: A Journey through the Yeltsin Era. New York: Columbia University Press.
65.
MooreBarringtonJr.1978. Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. White Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
66.
MurrellPeter. 1992. “Evolution in Economics and in the Economic Reform of the Centrally Planned Economies.” Pp. 35–53 in The Emergence of Market Economies in Eastern Europe, edited by ClagueC.RausserG. C.Cambridge: Blackwell.
67.
MygindNiels. 1999. “Privatization, Governance and Restructuring of Enterprises in the Baltics.” CEES Working Paper No. 30. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
68.
NeeVictor. 2000. “The Role of the State in Making a Market Economy.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics156:64–88.
69.
NellisJohn. 2008. “Leaps of Faith: Launching the Privatization Process in Transition.” Pp. 81–136 in Privatization in Transition Economies: The Ongoing Story, edited by LiebermanI. W.KopfD. J.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
70.
NureevR. M.RunovA. B.2002. “Rossiya: Neizbejna li deprivatizaciya.” Voprosi Economiki6:1–31.
PivovarskyAlexander. 2001. How Does Privatization Work? Ownership Concentration and Enterprise Performance in Ukraine. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
73.
PopovVladimir. 2000. “Shock Therapy Versus Gradualism: The End of the Debate (Explaining the Magnitude of Transformational Recession).” Comparative Economic Studies42:1–57.
74.
PopovVladimir. 2004. “The State in the New Russia (1992–2004): From Collapse to Gradual Revival?” PONARS Policy Memo 342.
75.
PopovVladimir. 2007. “Shock Therapy versus Gradualism Reconsidered: Lessons from Transition Economies After 15 Years of Reforms.” Comparative Economic Studies49:1–31.
76.
ReddawayPeterGlinskiDmitri. 2001. The Tragedy of Russia’s Reforms: Market Bolshevism against Democracy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
ShafikNemat. 1995. “Making a Market: Mass Privatization in the Czech and Slovak Republics.” World Development23:1143–56.
84.
ShenRaphael. 1997. The Restructuring of Romania’s Economy: A Paradigm of Flexibility and Adaptability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
85.
ShleiferAndreiVishnyRobert W.1998. The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
SpicerAndrewMcDermottGerald A.KogutBruce. 2000. “Entrepreneurship and Privatization in Central Europe: The Tenuous Balance between Destruction and Creation.” Academy of Management Review25:630–49.
87.
StarkDavid. 1992. “Path Dependence and Privatization Strategies in East Central Europe.” East European Politics and Societies6:17–51.
88.
StiglitzJoseph E.2000. “Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition.” Proceedings of the World Bank annual Conference on Development Economics (1999). Washington, DC: World Bank.
89.
StuartRobert C.PanayotopoulosChristina M.1999. “Decline and Recovery in Transition Economies: The Impact of Initial Conditions.” Post-Soviet Geography and Economics40:267–80.
90.
StucklerDavidKingLawrencePattonGreg. 2009. “The Social Construction of Successful Market Reforms.” Working Paper no. 199. Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
91.
SummersLawrence. 1994. “Comment.” Pp. 252–55 in The Transition in Eastern Europe. Vol. 1, Country Studies, edited by BlanchardO.FrootK.SachsJ.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
92.
SzelényiIvánBeckettKatherineKingLawrence P.1994. “The Socialist Economic System.” Pp. 234–51 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by SmelserN. J.SwedbergR.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
93.
SzelényiIvánWilkKatarzyna. 2010. “From Socialist Workfare to Capitalist Welfare State.” Pp. 565–86 in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, edited by MorganG.CampbellJ.CrouchC.PedersenO. K.WhitleyR.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94.
SzentpéteriÁdámTelegdyÁlmos. 2010. “Political Selection of Firms into Privatization Programs; Evidence from Romanian Comprehensive Data.” Economics and Politics22:298–328.
95.
TerterovMaratReuvidJonathan. 2005. Doing Business with Lithuania. London: GMB Publishing.
96.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1999. Transition 1999: Europe and CIS Human Development Report. New York: UNDP RBEC.
97.
WalderAndrew G.1995. “Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China’s Transitional Economy.” American Journal of Sociology101:263–301.
98.
WeberMax. 1958a. “Politics as Vocation.” Pp. 77–128 in For Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH.MillsC. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.
99.
WeberMax. 1958b. “Bureaucracy.” Pp. 196–244 in For Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH.MillsC. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.
100.
WeberMax. 1966. General Economic History. Translated by KnightF. H.New York: Collier Books.
101.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society. Edited by RothG.WittichC.Berkeley: University of California Press.
102.
WedelJanine R.2001. Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave.
103.
WoodruffDavid. 1999. Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
104.
World Bank. 1997. The State in a Changing World. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.
105.
World Bank. 2002. Building Institutions for Markets. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.
ZeitlinMaurice. 1984. The Civil Wars in Chile. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
110.
ZhandossovDamir.2011. “Privatization in Kazakhstan during the Transition to Capitalism.” M.Phil. Thesis, Department of Development Studies, University of Cambridge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
