This study explores time trends in public trust in science in the United States from 1974 to 2010. More precisely, I test Mooney’s (2005) claim that conservatives in the United States have become increasingly distrustful of science. Using data from the 1974 to 2010 General Social Survey, I examine group differences in trust in science and group-specific change in these attitudes over time. Results show that group differences in trust in science are largely stable over the period, except for respondents identifying as conservative. Conservatives began the period with the highest trust in science, relative to liberals and moderates, and ended the period with the lowest. The patterns for science are also unique when compared to public trust in other secular institutions. Results show enduring differences in trust in science by social class, ethnicity, gender, church attendance, and region. I explore the implications of these findings, specifically, the potential for political divisions to emerge over the cultural authority of science and the social role of experts in the formation of public policy.
AllisonPaul D.1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” Sociological Methods and Research28:186–208.
2.
AllumNickSturgisPatrickTabouraziDimitraBrunton-SmithIan. 2008. “Science Knowledge and Attitudes across Cultures: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Understanding of Science17:35–54.
3.
AnsellAmy E.1997. New Right, New Racism: Race and Reaction in the United States and Britain. New York: NYU Press.
4.
BakHee-Ja. 2001. “Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology.” Social Science Quarterly82:779–95.
5.
BarberBernard. 1952. Science and the Social Order. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
6.
BarberBernard. 1975. “Toward a New View of the Sociology of Knowledge.” Pp. 103–116 in The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert Merton, edited by CoserL. A.New York: Harcourt.
7.
BarberBernard. 1990. Social Studies of Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
8.
BarnesBarry. 1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
BauerMartin W.PetkovaKristaBoyadjievaPepka. 2000. “Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the ‘Science War.’” Science, Technology, and Human Values25:30–51.
10.
BeckUlrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, UK: Sage.
11.
BleeKathleen M.CreasapKimberly A.2010. “Conservative and Right-Wing Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology36:269–86.
12.
BloorDavid. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
13.
BurackCynthia. 2008. Sin, Sex, and Democracy: Antigay Rhetoric and the Christian Right. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
CozzensSusan E.WoodhouseEdward J.1995. “Science, Government, and the Politics of Knowledge.” Pp. 533–53 in The Handbook of Science and Technology, edited by JasanoffS.MarkleG. E.PetersenJ. C.PinchT.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
FrankThomas. 2004. What’s the Matter with Kansas. New York: Henry Holt.
17.
FrickelScottMooreKelly. 2005. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
18.
GamsonWilliam A.1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GauchatGordon. 2008. “A Test of Three Theories of Anti-Science Attitudes.” Sociological Focus41: 337–57.
20.
GauchatGordon. 2010. “The Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
21.
GauchatGordon. 2011. “The Cultural Authority of Science: Public Trust and Acceptance of Organized Science.” Public Understanding of Science20: 751–70.
22.
GiddensAnthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
GierynThomas F.1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
GrossNeilMedvetzThomasRusselRupert. 2011. “The Contemporary American Conservative Movement.” Annual Review of Sociology37:325–54.
25.
HayesBernadette C.TariqVicki. 2000. “Gender Differences in Scientific Knowledge and Attitudes toward Science: A Comparative Study of Four Anglo-American Nations.” Public Understanding of Science9:433–47.
26.
HilgartnerStephen. 1990. “The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.” Social Studies of Science20:519–39.
27.
HofstadterRichard. 1970. Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. New York: Random House.
28.
HoltonGerald. 1993. Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
HouseJames S.MasonWilliam M.1975. “Political Alienation in America, 1952–1968.” American Sociological Review40:123–47.
30.
InglehartRonald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
JacquesPeter J.DunlapRiley E.FreemanMark. 2008. “The Organization of Denial: Conservative Think Tanks and Environmental Skepticism.” Environmental Politics17:349–85.
32.
JasanoffSheila. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policy Makers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
JasanoffSheila. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Knowledge and Co-production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.
34.
JenkinsJ. CraigShumateTeri. 1985. “Cowboy Capitalists and the Rise of the ‘New Right’: An Analysis of Contributions to Conservative Policy Formation Organizations.” Social Problems33:130–45.
Knorr CetinaKarin. 1983. “Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science.” Social Studies of Science12:101–130.
37.
KrugmanPaul. 2009. The Conscience of a Liberal. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
38.
LatourBrunoWoolgarSteve. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
LaveRebeccaMirowskiPhilipRandallsSamuel. 2010. “Introduction: STS and Neoliberal Science.” Social Studies of Science40:659–75.
40.
LoftusJeni. 2001. “America’s Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998.” American Sociological Review66:762–82.
41.
LongJ. Scott. 2009. “Group Comparisons in Logit and Probit Using Predicted Probabilities.” Department of Sociology, University of Indiana. Unpublished manuscript.
42.
LuhmannNiklas. 1979. Trust and Power. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
43.
MartinJohn LeviDesmondMatthew. 2010. “Political Position and Social Knowledge.” Sociological Forum25:1–26.
44.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
McCrightAaron M.DunlapRiley E.2000. “Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement’s Counter-Claims.” Social Problems47:499–522.
46.
McCrightAaron M.DunlapRiley E.2003. “Defeating Kyoto: The Conservative Movement’s Impact on U.S. Climate Change Policy.” Social Problems50:348–73.
47.
MertonRobert K.1938. “Science and the Social Order.” Philosophy of Science5:321–37.
48.
MillerJon D.2004. “Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know.” Public Understanding of Science13:273–94.
49.
MooneyChris. 2005. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books.
50.
MooreKelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
NashGeorge H.1988. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America, Since 1945. New York: Basic Books.
OreskesNaomiConwayErik M.2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
57.
ParsonsTalcott. 1962. “The Institutionalization of Scientific Investigation.” Pp. 7–15 in The Sociology of Science, edited by BarberB.HirschW.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
58.
PaxtonPamela. 1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology105:88–127.
59.
PetersonBruce L.1981. “Confidence: Categories and Confusion.” Methodological Report. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
60.
PharrSusan J.PutnamRobert D.DaltonRussell J.2000. “Trouble in the Advanced Democracies? A Quarter-Century of Declining Confidence.” Journal of Democracy11:5–25.
61.
RafteryAdrian. 1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research (with Discussion).” Sociological Methodology25:111–96.
62.
ShapinSteve. 1994. A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
ShapinSteve. 2008. “Science and the Modern World.” Pp. 433–48 in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., edited by HackettE. J.AmsterdamskaO.LynchM.WajcmanJ.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
SmithAnn Marie. 2001. “Why Did Armey Apologize? Hegemony, Homophobia, and the Religious Right.” Pp. 148–72 in Unraveling the Right: The New Conservatism in American Thought and Politics, edited by AnsellA. E.New York: Westview.
65.
SmithTom W.1981. “Can We Have Confidence in Confidence.” Methodological Report. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
66.
SmithTom W.MarsdenPeterHoutMichaelKimJibum. 2011. General Social Surveys, 1972–2010[machine-readable data file]. Sponsored by National Science Foundation. NORC, Chicago: National Opinion Research Center [producer]; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributor].
67.
SturgisPatrickAllumNick. 2004. “Science in Society: Re-evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes.” Public Understanding of Science13:55–74.
68.
VaiseyStephen. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology114:1675–1715.
69.
WeakliemDavidBorchCasey. 2006. “Alienation in the United States: Uniform or Group-Specific Change?” Sociological Forum21:415–38.
70.
WhiteheadAlbert North. 1946. Science and the Modern World: Lowell Lectures. London: Scientific Book Club.
WynneBrian. 1995. “Public Understanding of Science.” Pp. 361–89 in The Handbook of Science and Technology, edited by JasanoffS.MarkleG. E.PetersenJ. C.PinchT.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
73.
YangYangLandKenneth C.2006. “A Mixed Models Approach to the Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross-Section Surveys, with an Application to Data on Trends in Verbal Test Scores.” Sociological Methodology36:75–97.
74.
YangYangLandKenneth C.2008. “Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Repeated Cross-Section Surveys: Fixed or Random Effects?” Sociological Methods & Research36:297–326.
75.
YearleySteven. 1994. “Understanding Science from the Perspective of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: An Overview.” Public Understanding of Science3:245–58.
76.
YearleySteven. 2000. “Making Systematic Sense of Public Discontents with Expert Knowledge: Two Analytical Approaches and a Case Study.” Public Understanding of Science9:105–122.
77.
YearleySteven. 2005. Making Sense of Science. London: Sage.
78.
ZehrStephen C.2000. “Public Representations of Scientific Uncertainty about Global Climate Change.” Public Understanding of Science9:85–103.
79.
ZmerliSonjaNewtonKen. 2008. “Social Trust and Attitudes toward Democracy.” Public Opinion Quarterly72:706–724.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
