Emotions are essential but little understood components of research; they catalyze and sustain creative scientific work and fuel the scientific and intellectual social movements (SIMs) that propel scientific change. Adopting a micro-sociological focus, we examine how emotions shape two intellectual processes central to all scientific work: conceiving creative ideas and managing skepticism. We illustrate these processes through a longitudinal study of the Resilience Alliance, a tightly networked coherent group collaborating at the center of a burgeoning scientific social movement in the environmental sciences. We show how emotions structured and were structured by the group’s growth and development, and how socio-emotive processes facilitated the rapid production of highly creative science and helped overcome skepticism by outsiders. Hot spots and hot moments—that is, brief but intense periods of collaboration undertaken in remote and isolated settings—fueled the group’s scientific performance and drove the SIM. Paradoxically, however, the same socio-emotive processes that ignited and sustained creative scientific research also made skepticism more likely to occur and more difficult to manage. Similarly, emotions and social bonding were essential for the group’s growth and development, but increased size and diversity have the potential to erode the affective culture that generated initial successes.
ArthurMikaila Mariel Lemonik. 2009. “Thinking Outside the Master’s House: New Knowledge Movements and the Emergence of Academic Disciplines.” Social Movements Studies8:73–87.
2.
BarbaletJack. 2002. “Science and Emotions.” Pp. 132–50 in Emotions and Sociology, edited by BarbaletJ.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
3.
BlochCharlotte. 2002. “Managing the Emotions of Competition and Recognition in Academia.” Pp. 113–31 in Emotions and Sociology, edited by BarbaletJ.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
4.
CarpenterStephen R.BrockWilliam A.2008. “Adaptive Capacity and Traps.” Ecology and Society13(2):40.
5.
ChubinDarylHackettEdward J.1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6.
CollinsHarry M.1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
CollinsRandall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CollinsRandall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiMihaly. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
10.
De MeyMarc. 1992. The Cognitive Paradigm: An Integrated Understanding of Scientific Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
DurkheimEmile. [1915] 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.
12.
FarrellMichael P.2001. Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
FarrellMichael P.SchmittMadeline H.HeinemannGloria D.2001. “Informal Roles and the Stages of Interdisciplinary Team Development.” Journal of Interprofessional Care15:281–95.
14.
FleckLudwik. [1935] 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
FolkeCarl. 2006. “Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analysis.” Global Environmental Change16:253–67.
16.
FrickelScottGrossNeil. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review70:204–232.
17.
GierynThomas F.1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
GitlinTodd. 1993. The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage. New York: Bantam.
19.
GoldenGloria Y.1994. “On the Way to Jupiter: Psychological Dimensions of the Galileo Mission.” Social Studies of Science24:463–511.
20.
GoodwinJeffJasperJames M.2003. Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning and Emotion. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
21.
GoodwinJeffJasperJames M.PollettaFrancesca. 2000. “The Return of the Repressed: The Rise and Fall of Emotions in Social Movement Theory.” Mobilization5:65–83.
22.
GriffithBelverMullinsNicholas C.1972. “Coherent Groups in Scientific Change: ‘Invisible Colleges’ May be Consistent throughout Science.” Science177:959–64.
23.
GundersonLance H.2000. “Ecological Resilience: In Theory and Application.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics31:425–39.
24.
GundersonLanceHollingC. S.2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
25.
HackettEdward J.2005. “Essential Tensions: Identity, Risk, and Control in Scientific Collaboration.” Social Studies of Science35:787–826.
26.
HackettEdward J.ParkerJohn N.2011. “Leadership of Scientific Groups.” Pp. 165–75 in Leadership in Science and Technology, edited by BainbridgeW.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
HackettEdward J.ParkerJohn N.ConzDavidRhotenDianaParkerAndrew. 2008. “Ecology Transformed: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis and the Changing Patterns of Ecological Research.” Pp. 277–96 in Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, edited by OlsonG.ZimmermanA.BoasN.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
HagstromWarren. 1965. The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.
29.
HermanowiczJoseph. 1998. The Stars are Not Enough: Scientists—Their Passions and Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
HermanowiczJoseph. 2003. “Scientists and Satisfaction.” Social Studies of Science33:45–73.
31.
HollingC. S.1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4:1–23.
32.
HookErnest B.2002. Prematurity in Scientific Discovery: On Resistance and Neglect. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
33.
IsaacLarry. 2008. “Movement of Movements: Culture Moves in the Long Civil Rights Struggle.” Social Forces87:33–63.
34.
JanisIrving L.1972. Victims of Group Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
35.
JasperJames M.2004. “A Strategic Approach to Collective Action: Looking for Agency in Social-Movement Choices.” Mobilization9:1–16.
36.
JohnsonJohn M.1975. Doing Field Research. New York: The Free Press.
37.
KellerEvelyn Fox. 1983. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: Freeman.
38.
Knorr CetinaKaren. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
KuhnThomas. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
LamontMichele. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
LorimerJamie. 2008. “Counting Corncrakes.” Social Studies of Science38:377–405.
42.
McCammonHolly J.HewittLyndiSmithSandy. 2004. “‘No Weapon Save Argument’: Strategic Frame Amplification in the U.S. Woman Suffrage Movements.” Sociological Quarterly45:529–56.
43.
MertonRobert K.[1937] 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
44.
MertonRobert K.[1938] 1970. Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Harper.
45.
MertonRobert K.[1942] 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
MitroffIan I.1974. “Norms and Counter-norms in a Selected Group of Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study in the Ambivalence of Scientists.” American Sociological Review39:579–95.
47.
MullinsNicholas. 1972. “The Development of a Scientific Specialty: Phage Group and the Origins of Molecular Biology.” Minerva10:51–82.
48.
MullinsNicholas. 1973a. “The Development of Specialties in Social Science: The Case of Ethnomethodology.” Science Studies3:245–73.
49.
MullinsNicholas. 1973b. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper.
50.
OliverPamela E.JohnstonHank. 2000. “What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research.” Mobilization5:37–54.
51.
OlsonGary M.ZimmermanAnnBosNathan. 2008. Scientific Collaboration on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
ParkerJohn N.2010. “Integrating the Social into the Ecological: Organizational and Research Group Challenges.” Pp. 85–109 in Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, edited by ParkerJ. N.VermeulenN.PendersB.London: Ashgate.
53.
ParkerJohn N.VermeulenNikiPendersBart. 2010. Collaboration in the New Life Sciences. London: Ashgate.
54.
PetitRemy. sixteen others. 2003. “Glacial Refugia: Hotspots But Not Melting Pots of Genetic Diversity.” Science300:1563–65.
55.
PickettSteward T. A.OstfeldRichard. 1995. “The Shifting Paradigm in Ecology.” Pp. 261–78 in A New Century for Natural Resources Management, edited by KnightR.BatesS.Washington, DC: Island Press.
56.
RochonThomas R.1998. Culture Moves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
RutwickMartin. 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
SawyerKeith. 2007. Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
59.
ScheffThomas J.1988. “Shame and Conformity: The Deference-Emotion System.” American Sociological Review53:395–406.
60.
ScheffThomas. 1995. “Academic Gangs.” Crime, Law and Society23:157–62.
61.
SchefferMartinCarpenterSteveFoleyJonathan A.FolkeCarlWalkerBrian. 2001. “Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems.” Nature413:591–96.
62.
SchurmanRachelMunroWilliam. 2006. “Ideas, Thinkers, and Social Networks: The Process of Grievance Construction in the Anti-Genetic Engineering Movement.” Theory and Society35:1–38.
63.
ShapinSteven. 2008. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
SimmelGeorg. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: The Free Press.
65.
StahlFrank. 2001. “Alfred Day Hershey.” Biographical Memoirs, National Academy of Sciences80:142–59.
66.
ThagardPaul. 2006. Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67.
TuckmanBruce W.1965. “Developmental Sequence in Small Groups.” Psychological Bulletin63:384–99.
68.
WeberMax. [1918] 1946. “Science as a Vocation.” Pp. 129–58 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH.MillsC.W.New York: Oxford.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
