Social psychological research on gendered persistence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professions is dominated by two explanations: women leave because they perceive their family plans to be at odds with demands of STEM careers, and women leave due to low self-assessment of their skills in STEM’s intellectual tasks, net of their performance. This study uses original panel data to examine behavioral and intentional persistence among students who enter an engineering major in college. Surprisingly, family plans do not contribute to women’s attrition during college but are negatively associated with men’s intentions to pursue an engineering career. Additionally, math self-assessment does not predict behavioral or intentional persistence once students enroll in a STEM major. This study introduces professional role confidence—individuals’ confidence in their ability to successfully fulfill the roles, competencies, and identity features of a profession—and argues that women’s lack of this confidence, compared to men, reduces their likelihood of remaining in engineering majors and careers. We find that professional role confidence predicts behavioral and intentional persistence, and that women’s relative lack of this confidence contributes to their attrition.
BeckerGary S.1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, 3rd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BeckerHowardStraussAnselmHughesEverettGreerBlanche. 1961. Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BetzNancy E.HackettGail. 1983. “The Relationship of Mathematics Self-Efficacy Expectations to the Selection of Science-Based College Majors.” Journal of Vocational Behavior23:329–45.
4.
BoulisAnn K.JacobsJerry A.2008. The Changing Face of Medicine: Women Doctors and the Evolution of Health Care in America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5.
BurgeStephanie Woodham. 2006. “Gendered Pathways in Higher Education: Change and Stability in the Pursuit of a Science Degree.” PhD Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
6.
BurkePeter J.2004. “Identities and Social Structure: The 2003 Cooley-Mead Award Address.” Social Psychology Quarterly67:5–15.
7.
CahillSpencer E.1999. “Emotional Capital and Professional Socialization: The Case of Mortuary Science Students (and Me).” Social Psychology Quarterly62:101–116.
8.
CastAlicia D.BurkePeter J.2002. “A Theory of Self-Esteem.” Social Forces80:1041–68.
9.
CechErin A.2007. “Dilbert in Stilettos: The Character of Deterrents Facing Women in Engineering.” Pp. 33–50 in Gender and Engineering: Strategies and Possibilities, edited by WelpeI.ReschkaB.LarkinJ.Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang Press.
10.
CeciStephen J.WilliamsWendy. 2011. “Understanding Current Causes of Women’s Underrepresentation in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014871108.
11.
CeruloKaren A.1997. “Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions.” Annual Review of Sociology23:385–409.
12.
CharlesMariaBradleyKaren. 2009. “Indulging our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries.” American Journal of Sociology114:924–76.
13.
CooleyCharles H.1902. Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner.
14.
CorrellShelley J.2001. “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessment.” American Journal of Sociology106:1691–1730.
15.
CorrellShelley J.2004. “Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations.” American Sociological Review69:93–113.
16.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48:148–60.
17.
DryburghHeather. 1999. “Work Hard, Play Hard: Women and Professionalization in Engineering: Adapting to the Culture.” Gender & Society13:664–82.
18.
EcclesJacquelynne S.1987. “Gender Roles and Women’s Achievement-Related Decisions.” Psychology of Women Quarterly11:135–72.
19.
EcclesJacquelynne S.1994. “Understanding Women’s Educational and Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices.” Psychology of Women Quarterly18:585–609.
20.
EcclesJacquelynne S.AdlerTerryMeeceJudith L.1984. “Sex Differences in Achievement: A Test of Alternate Theories.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46:26–43.
21.
EglashRon. 2002. “Race, Sex, and Nerds: From Black Geeks to Asian American Hipsters.” Social Text20:49–64.
22.
EnglandPaula. 1984. “Wage Appreciation and Depreciation: A Test of Neoclassical Economic Explanations of Occupational Sex Segregation.” Social Forces62:726–49.
23.
EpsteinCynthia F.SeronCarrollOglenskyBonnieSautéRobert. 1999. The Part-Time Paradox. New York: Routledge.
24.
FarmerHelen S.1997. “Women’s Motivation Related to Mastery, Career Salience and Career Aspiration: A Multivariate Model Focusing on the Effects of Sex Role Socialization.” Journal of Career Assessment5:355–81.
25.
FaulknerWendy. 2000. “Dualism, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering.” Social Studies of Science30:759–79.
26.
FaulknerWendy. 2009. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. II. Gender In/authenticity and the In/visibility Paradox.” Engineering Studies1:169–90.
27.
FeatherN. T.1988. “Values, Valences and Course Enrollment: Testing the Role of Personal Values within an Expectancy-Valence Framework.” Journal of Educational Psychology80:381–91.
28.
FiorentineRobert. 1987. “Men, Women, and the Premed Persistence Gap: A Normative Alternatives Approach.” American Journal of Sociology92:1118–39.
29.
FiorentineRobert. 1988. “Increasing Similarity in the Values and Life Plans of Male and Female College Students? Evidence and Implications.” Sex Roles18:143–58.
30.
FoxRenée C.1957. “Training for Uncertainty.” Pp. 207–241 in The Student-Physician, edited by MertonR. K.ReaderG.KendallP. L.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
FrehillLisa M.1997. “Education and Occupational Sex Segregation: The Decision to Major in Engineering.” Sociological Quarterly38:225–49.
32.
FromePamela M.AlfeldCorinne J.EcclesJacquelynne S.BarberBonnie L.2006. “Why Don’t They Want a Male-Dominated Job? An Investigation of Young Women Who Changed Their Occupational Aspirations.” Educational Research12:359–72.
33.
FromePamela M.AlfeldCorinne J.EcclesJacquelynne S.BarberBonnie L.2008. “Is the Desire for a Family-Flexible Job Keeping Young Women Out of Male-Dominated Occupations?” Pp. 195–214 in Gender and Occupational Outcomes: Longitudinal Assessments of Individual, Social, and Cultural Influences, edited by WattH. M. G.EcclesJ.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
GersonKathleen. 2010. The Unfinished Revolution: How a New Generation Is Reshaping Family, Work and Gender in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
GranfieldRobert. 1992. Making Elite Lawyers: Visions of Law at Harvard and Beyond. New York: Routledge.
36.
HaasJackShaffirWilliam. 1991. Becoming Doctors: The Adoption of a Cloak of Confidence. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37.
HowardJudith A.2000. “Social Psychology of Identities.” Annual Review of Sociology26:367–93.
38.
HuntingtonMary Jean. 1957. “The Development of a Professional Self-Image.” Pp. 179–94 in The Student-Physician, edited by MertonR. K.ReaderG.KendallP. L.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
HughesEverett C.1971. The Sociological Eye: Selected Papers on Work, Self, and the Study of Society. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
40.
HydeJanet ShibleyFennemaElizabethRyanMarilynFrostLaurie A.HoppCarolyn. 1990. “Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychology of Women Quarterly14:299–324.
41.
IbarraHerminia. 1999. “Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation.” Administrative Science Quarterly44:764–91.
JacobsJerry. 1989. Revolving Doors: Sex Segregation and Women’s Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
KelloggKatherine C.2009. “Operating Room: Relational Spaces and Microinstitutional Change in Surgery.” American Journal of Sociology115:657–711.
45.
KilbourneBarbara StanekEnglandPaulaFarkasGeorgeBeronKurtWeirDorothea. 1994. “Returns to Skill, Compensating Differentials, and Gender Bias: Effects of Occupational Characteristics on Wages of White Men and Women.” American Journal of Sociology100:689–719.
46.
LeslieLarry L.McClureGregory T.OaxacaRonald L.1998. “Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering: A Life-Sequence Analysis.” Journal of Higher Education69:239–76.
47.
LichtensteinGaryLoshbaughHeidi G.ClaarBrittanyChenHelen L.JacksonKristynSheppardSheri D.2009. “An Engineering Major Does Not (Necessarily) an Engineer Make: Career Decision Making among Undergraduate Engineering Majors.” Journal of Engineering Education98:224–34.
48.
LightDonaldJr.1979. “Uncertainty and Control in Professional Training.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior20:310–22.
49.
MaYingyi. 2009. “Family Socioeconomic Status, Parental Involvement, and College Major Choices: Gender, Race/Ethnic, and Nativity Patterns.” Sociological Perspectives52:211–34.
50.
MaXinJohnsonWillis. 2008. “Mathematics as the Critical Filter: Curricular Effects on Gendered Career Choices.” Pp. 55–83 in Gender and Occupational Outcomes: Longitudinal Assessments of Individual, Social, and Cultural Influences, edited by WattH. M. G.EcclesJ.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
51.
MarkusHazelCraneMarieBernsteinStanSiladiMichael. 1982. “Self-Schemas and Gender.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42:38–50.
52.
McIlweeJudith S.RobinsonJ. Gregg1992. Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
53.
MertonRobert. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
54.
MertonRobert K.RosenblattAaronGierynThomas F.1982. Social Research and the Practicing Professions. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
55.
MillerGloria E.2003. “Frontier Masculinity in the Oil Industry: The Experience of Women Engineers.” Gender, Work & Organization11:47–73.
56.
National Science Foundation. 2009. Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2009, NSF 09-305. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics.
57.
OwensTimothy J.RobinsonDawn T.Smith-LovinLynn. 2010. “Three Faces of Identity.” Annual Review of Sociology36:1–23.
58.
PresserHarriet B.1994. “Employment Schedules among Dual-Earner Spouses and the Division of Household Labor by Gender.” American Sociological Review59:348–64.
59.
ReskinBarbara. 2003. “Including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality.” American Sociological Review68:1–21.
60.
RidgewayCecilia L.1997. “Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment.” American Sociological Review62:218–35.
61.
RidgewayCecilia L.2009. “Framed Before We Know It: How Gender Shapes Social Relations.” Gender and Society23:145–60.
62.
RobinsonCecilSchumackerRandall E.2009. “Interaction Effects: Centering, Variance Inflation Factor, and Interpretation Issues.” Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints35:6–11.
63.
RosenbergMorrisSchoolerCarmiSchoenbachCarrieRosenbergFlorence. 1995. “Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Esteem: Different Concepts, Different Outcomes.” American Sociological Review60:141–56.
64.
RosenthalLisaLondonBonitaLerySheri RobinLobelMarci. Forthcoming. “The Roles of Perceived Identity Compatibility and Social Support for Women in a Single-Sex STEM Program at a Co-educational University.” Sex Roles.
65.
RubineauBrian. 2007. “Gendering Engineering: Professional Identity Formation and Peer Effects.” Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 2007.
66.
RubineauBrianCechErinSeronCarrollSilbeySusan. 2008. “When Does Alma Mater Matter? The Contingency of Identity for Institutional Effects.” Presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston, MA.
67.
SandlerBernice ResnickSilverbergLisa A.HallRoberta M.1996. The Chilly Classroom Climate: A Guide to Improve the Education of Women. Washington, DC: The National Association for Women in Education.
68.
SauderMichaelEspelandWendy Nelson. 2009. “The Discipline of Rankings: Right Coupling and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review74:63–82.
69.
SchleefDebra J.2006. Managing Elites: Professional Socialization in Law and Business Schools. Oxford, UK: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
70.
SchoonIngrid. 2001. “Teenage Job Aspirations and Career Attainment in Adulthood: A 17-Year Follow-Up Study of Teenagers Who Aspire to Become Scientists, Health Professionals, or Engineers.” International Journal of Behavioral Development25:124–32.
71.
SeegersGerardBoekaertsMonique. 1996. “Gender-Related Differences in Self-Referenced Cognitions in Relation to Mathematics.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education27:215–40.
72.
SeronCarroll. 1996. The Business of Practicing Law: The Work Lives of Solo and Small-Firm Attorneys. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
73.
SeronCarrollCechErinSilbeySusanRubineauBrian. 2011. “The Gendered Process of Professional Role Confidence Development.” Working Paper, University of California, Irvine.
74.
SeronCarrollSilbeySusan. 2009. “The Dialectic between Expertise Knowledge and Professional Discretion: Accreditation, Social Control and the Limits of Instrumental Logic.” Engineering Studies1:107–127.
75.
SeymourElaineHewittNancy M.1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
76.
SpencerSteven J.SteeleClaude M.QuinnDiane M.1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology35:4–28.
77.
SteeleClaude M.1997. “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance.” American Psychologist52:613–29.
78.
SullivanWilliamColbyAnneWegnerJudith WelchBondLloydSchulmanLee S.2007. Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
79.
TriceHarrison Miller. 1993. Occupational Subcultures in the Workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
80.
TurcoCatherine J.2010. “The Cultural Foundations of Tokenism: Evidence from the Leveraged Buyout Industry.” American Sociological Review75:894–913.
81.
WareNorma C.LeeValerie E.1988. “Sex Differences in Choice of College Science Majors.” American Educational Research Journal25:593–614.
82.
WattHelen M. G.2008. “What Motivates Females and Males to Pursue Sex-Stereotyped Careers?” Pp. 87–113 in Gender and Occupational Outcomes: Longitudinal Assessments of Individual, Social, and Cultural Influences, edited by WattH. M. G.EcclesJ.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83.
XieYuShaumanKimberlee. 2003. Women in Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
