This study explores how firms shape labor markets and career paths using employee non-compete agreements. The sociology of work has overlooked non-competes, but data indicate that nearly half of technical professionals in the United States are asked to sign such employment contracts. Fearing loss of investments in talent and trade secrets, firms use non-competes to “strike back” against technical professionals’ increased mobility following the decline of internal labor markets. In-depth interviews with 52 randomly sampled patent holders in a single industry, coupled with a survey of 1,029 engineers across a variety of industries, reveal that ex-employees subject to non-competes are more likely to take career detours—that is, they involuntarily leave their technical field to avoid a potential lawsuit. Moreover, firms strategically manage the process of getting workers to sign such contracts, waiting for workers’ bargaining position to weaken. These findings inform our understanding of the social organization of work in the knowledge economy.
ArthurMichaelRousseauDenise. 1996. The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
ArundelAnthony. 2001. “The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation.” Research Policy30:611–24.
3.
BarleyStephenKundaGideon. 2004. Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BeckerGary. 1962. “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy70:9–49.
5.
BidwellMatthewBriscoeForrest. 2010. “The Dynamics of Interorganizational Careers.” Organization Science21:1034–1053.
6.
CappelliPeter. 1999. The New Deal at Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
7.
CohenJacob. 1968. “Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement with Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit.” Psychological Bulletin70:213–20.
8.
CohenWesleyNelsonRichardWalshJohn. 2000. “Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not).” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. W7552.
9.
DeckerKurt. 1993. Covenants Not to Compete. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
DiPreteThomas. 2007. “What Has Sociology to Contribute to the Study of Inequality Trends? A Historical and Comparative Perspective.” American Behavioral Scientist50:603–619.
11.
DworkinTerryCallahanElletta. 1998. “Buying Silence.” American Business Law Journal36:151–92.
12.
EisenhardtKathleen. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review14:532–50.
13.
FallickBruce. 1996. “A Review of the Recent Empirical Literature on Displaced Workers.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review50:5–14.
14.
FallickBruceFleischmanCharlesRebitzerJames. 2006. “Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Micro-Foundations of a High Technology Cluster.” Review of Economics and Statistics88:472–81.
15.
FernandezRoberto. 1985. “Worker Power, Firm Power, and the Structure of Labor Markets.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago.
16.
FligsteinNeilFernandezRoberto. 1988. “Worker Power, Firm Power, and the Structure of Labor Markets.” Sociological Quarterly29:5–28.
17.
FriedmanDavidLandesWilliamPosnerRichard. 1991. “Some Economics of Trade Secret Law.” Journal of Economic Perspectives5:61–72.
18.
GarmaiseMark. 2011. “Ties That Truly Bind: Non-competition Agreements, Executive Compensation, and Firm Investment.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization27:376–425.
19.
GilsonRonald. 1999. “The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete.” New York University Law Review74:575–629.
20.
GreenhalghLeonardRosenblattZehava. 1984. “Job Insecurity: Toward Conceptual Clarity.” Academy of Management Review9:438–48.
21.
HolenArlene. 1965. “Effects of Professional Licensing Arrangements on Interstate Labor Mobility and Resource Allocation.” Journal of Political Economy73:492–98.
22.
HydeAlan. 2003. Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
23.
KallebergArne. 2009. “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition.” American Sociological Review74:1–22.
24.
KallebergArneReynoldsJeremyMarsdenPeter. 2003. “Externalizing Employment: Flexible Staffing Arrangements in US organizations.” Social Science Research32:525–52.
25.
KaplanStevenStrombergPer. 2001. “Venture Capitalists as Principals: Contracting, Screening, and Monitoring.” American Economic Review91:426–30.
26.
KohJay. 1998. “From Hoops to Hard Drives: An Accession Law Approach to the Inevitable Misappropriation of Trade Secrets.” American University Law Review48:271–358.
27.
LernerJosh. 1995. “Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors.” Journal of Law and Economics38:463–95.
28.
LevinRichard C.KlevorickAlvin K.NelsonRichard R.WinterSidney G.GilbertRichardGrilichesZvi. 1987. “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity3:783–831.
29.
MalsbergerBruce. 1996. Covenants Not to Compete: A State-by-State Survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
30.
MarxMatt. 2010. “Good Work If You Can Get It. . . Again: Non-competes and Ex-employees.” Paper presented at the Eastern Sociological Society Annual Meeting, March 2010.
31.
MarxMattSinghJasjitFlemingLee. 2010. “Regional Disadvantage? Non-compete Agreements and Brain Drain.” Paper presented at the National Bureau of Economic Research Summer Institute, July 2010.
32.
MarxMattStrumskyDeborahFlemingLee. 2009. “Mobility, Skills, and the Michigan Non-compete Experiment.” Management Science55:875–89.
MishelLawrenceBernsteinJaredShierholzHeidi. 2007. The State of Working America 2006/2007. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
MorrisMartinaWesternBruce. 1999. “Inequality in Earnings at the Close of the 20th Century.” Annual Review of Sociology25:623–57.
36.
MottaMassimoRoendeThomas. 2002. “Trade Secret Laws, Labour Mobility, and Innovations.” Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 3615.
37.
OstermanPaul. 2004. “Labor Market Intermediaries in the Modern Labor Market.” Pp. 155–69 in Workforce Intermediaries for the 21st Century, edited by R. Gilorth. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
38.
PfefferJeffreyBaronJames. 1988. “Taking the Workers Back Out: Recent Trends in the Structuring of Employment.” Research in Organizational Behavior10:257–303.
39.
RosenSherwin. 1983. “Specialization and Human Capital.” Journal of Labor Economics1:43–49.
40.
SaxenianAnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
SaxenianAnnaLee. 1996. “Beyond Boundaries: Open Labor Markets and Learning in Silicon Valley.” Pp. 23–39 in The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era, edited by ArthurM.RousseauD.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
SennettRichard. 1998. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: Norton.
43.
SørensenAage B. 1996. “The Structural Basis of Social Inequality.” American Journal of Sociology101:1333–65.
44.
SorensenJesper. 2007. “Bureaucracy and Entrepreneurship.” Administrative Science Quarterly52:387–412.
45.
StraussAnselmCorbinJuliet. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
StuartTobySorensonOlav. 2003. “Liquidity Events and the Geographic Distribution of Entrepreneurial Activity.” Administrative Science Quarterly48: 175–201.
47.
SummersClyde. 1997. “Contingent Employment in the United States.” Comparative Labor Law Journal18:503–522.
48.
ValiulisAnthony. 1985. Covenants Not to Compete: Forms, Tactics, and the Law. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
49.
WeissRobert. 1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press.
50.
ZuckermanEzraKimTai-YoungUkanwaKalindavon RittmanJames. 2003. “Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature-Film Labor Market.” American Journal of Sociology108:1018–1074.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
