This article examines why and how environmental activists, despite considerable political weakness and disproportionally few resources, won substantive negotiating concessions that far outstripped labor achievements during NAFTA's negotiation. Despite a trade policy arena hostile to their demands, environmentalists gained official recognition for the legitimacy of their claims, obtained a seat at the negotiating table, turned a previously technocratic concern into a highly visible populist issue, and won an environmental side agreement stronger than its labor counterpart. We argue that this unexpected outcome is best explained by environmentalists' strategic use of mechanisms available at the intersection of multiple fields. While field theory mainly focuses on interactions within a particular field, we suggest that the structure of overlap between fields—the architecture of field overlap—creates unique points of leverage that render particular targets more vulnerable and certain strategies more effective for activists. We outline the mechanisms associated with the structure of field overlap—alliance brokerage, rulemaking, resource brokerage, and frame adaptation-that enable activists to strategically leverage advantages across fields to transform the political landscape.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AFL-CIO Executive Council.1993a. Report to the 1993 Convention.
2.
AFL-CIO Executive Council..1993b. “Statement by the AFL-CIO Executive Council on The North American Free Trade Agreement.” February 17.
3.
AndersonMark.1993. “NAFTA Campaign.” Letter to Thomas Donahue, June 24.
4.
AppleR. W.1993. “The Free Trade Accord: News Analysis; A High-Stakes Gamble Paid Off.”The New York Times, November 18, p. A1.
5.
ArmstrongElizabeth A.2002. Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950-1994. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6.
AudleyJohn.1997. Green Politics and Global Trade: NAFTA and the Future of Environmental Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
7.
AuerbachStuart.1991. “Factions Dig In Positions Against Mexico Trade Pact; Opposition Fears Loss of Jobs, Factories.”The Washington Post, February 8, p. F1.
8.
AyresJeffrey M.1998. Defying Conventional Wisdom: Political Movements and Popular Contention Against North American Free Trade. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
9.
BourdieuPierre.1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Bourdieu.1996. State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
11.
BourdieuPierreWacquantLoïc J. D..1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BurekDeborah.1991. Encyclopedia of Associations. Detroit, MI: Gale Research Inc.
13.
BurkholderRichard.1991. “Americans and Mexicans Support North American Free Trade Zone, Canadians Opposed.”The Gallup Organization, April 4.
14.
BushGeorge.1991. Letter to Chairman Lloyd Bentsen. Washington, DC, May 1.
15.
ButtelFrederick.1992. “Environmentalization: Origins, Processes, and Implications for Rural Social Change.”Rural Sociology57 (1): 1–27.
16.
CameronMaxwellTomlinBrian.2000. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
ClemensElisabeth S.1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women's Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890-1920.”American Journal of Sociology98: 755–98.
18.
CrawleyJames.1991. “Border Waste Plan is Vague, Critics Charge.”The San Diego Union-Tribune, September 24, pp. AA-1.
19.
DavisGerald F.McAdamDougRichard ScottW.ZaldMayer N..2005. Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W..1991. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields Pp. 63–82 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
DreilingMichael C.2001. Solidarity and Contention: The Politics of Security and Sustainability in the NAFTA Conflict. New York: Garland Pub.
22.
DuinaFrancesco.2006. The Social Construction of Free Trade: The European Union, NAFTA, and MERCOSUR. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
DuncanCameron.1991. “Re: More on the USMexico-Canada FTA.”Memo to Tani, Sergio, Marcie, February 13.
24.
DunneNancy.1991. “Fears Over US-Mexico Free Trade Pact.”Financial Times (London), January 30, p. 4.
25.
EvansRhonda.2002. The Rise of Ethical Trade Advocacy: NAFTA and the New Politics of Trade. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
26.
FligsteinNeil.2001. “Social Skill and the Theory of Fields.”Sociological Theory19: 105–25.
27.
Friends of the Earth.1991. “Protect the Environment: Reject ‘Fast Track.’”Press release, May 10.
28.
GamsonWilliam A.MeyerDavid S..1996. Framing Political Opportunity Pp. 275–90 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GephardtRichard.1991. Letter to President Bush. March 27, reported in Inside U.S. Trade, March 29, p. S-1.
30.
GoodwinJeffJasperJames M..1999. “Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory.”Sociological Forum14: 27–54.
31.
GugliottaGuy.1991. “House Votes Backs on Trade; President Seeking ‘Fast Track’ for Pact with Mexico.”The Washington Post, May 24, p. A1.
32.
Inside U.S. Trade.1990. “Citizen Groups to Press for Inclusion of Social Issues in U.S.-Mexico Trade Accord.” November 23, p. 19.
33.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991a. “Official Warns of Mandatory Adjustment Aid in Trade Pact with Mexico, Canada.” January 11, pp. 1–2.
34.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991b. “Chamber Officials See Easing of Investment Rules as a Priority in Mexico FTA.” January 18, p.14.
35.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991c. “Industries, Environmental Groups Urge Alterations to Mexico Trade Pact.” February 22, pp. 9–10.
36.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991d. “House Members Tie Fast-Track Support to Inclusion of Environment in FTA.” February 22, p. 5.
37.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991e. “Hills Tells Panel USTR Willing to Consult on Drugs, Environment and Labor.” February 22, pp. 1, 19.
38.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991f. “Environment Group Said to Inform USTR of Principles for Mexico Talks.” April 5, p. 8.
39.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991g. “Riegle Vows to Lead Senate Fight to Defeat Fast-Track Authority for Mexico.” April 12, pp. 15–16.
40.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991h. “Gephardt Supports Fast-Track, but Leaves Door Open for Future Amendments.” May 10, pp. 1, 18–19.
41.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991i. “Fast Track Clears Committee Hurdles; Floor Vote Expected Next Week.” May 17, pp. 1, 15–16.
42.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991j. “Administration Wins Fast Track in House; Senate Approval Expected by Today.” May 24, pp. 1, 18–19.
43.
Inside U.S. Trade.1991k. “White House Said to Approve All But One Nominee for Environment Advisor Posts.” July 19, pp. 1, 19.
44.
Inside U.S. Trade.1992. “Political Opposition to North American Trade Pact Mounts in Canada.” August 21, p. 5.
45.
Inside U.S. Trade.1993a. “Transition Trade Official Says NAFTA Might Take Back Seat to Domestic Agenda.” January 15, p. 1.
46.
Inside U.S. Trade.1993b. “Clinton Says U.S., Mexico Must Examine New Models to Ensure Beneficial NAFTA.” January 15, p. 6.
47.
Inside U.S. Trade.1993c. “Initial U.S. Presentation on NAFTA Labor Accord is Silent on Trade Sanctions.” April 2, p. 19.
48.
Inside U.S. Trade.1993d. “Yerxa Casts Doubt on Border Tax to Fund NAFTA Environment, Worker Initiatives.” April 30, p. 1.
49.
Inside U.S. Trade.1993e. “Environmental Groups Offer to Support NAFTA if Demands Are Met.” May 7, pp. 1–2.
50.
Inside U.S. Trade.1993f. “U.S. Chamber Backs Limited Role for NAFTA Environment, Labor Commissions.” May 14, special report, p. S7.
51.
Inside U.S. Trade.1993g. “Pro-NAFTA Republicans Criticize Business Lobbying For Trade Pact.” October 29, p. 11.
52.
KampDick.1991. “Statement of Dick Kamp.”Border Ecology Project, May 15.
53.
KayTamara.2004. “NAFTA and the Politics of Labor Transnationalism.” Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley.
54.
Kay.2005. “Labor Transnationalism and Global Governance: The Impact of NAFTA on Transnational Labor Relationships in North America.”American Journal of Sociology111: 715–56.
55.
KingdonJohn W.1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies.New York: HarperCollins.
56.
LaumannEdwardKnokeDavid.1987. The Organizational State. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
57.
LindquistDiane.1991. “Border Pollution Plans Hit; Ecology, Business and Government Objections Heard.”The San Diego Union-Tribune, September 24, p. A3.
58.
LounsburyMichael.2007. “A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds.”Academy of Management Journal50: 289–307.
59.
MacArthurJohn.2000. The Selling of Free Trade: NAFTA, Washington, and the Subversion of American Democracy. New York: Hill and Wang.
60.
MaggsJohn.1991. “US Labor Fights Mexico Trade Pact.”Journal of Commerce, February 6, p. 1A.
61.
MartinJohn Levi.2003. “What Is Field Theory?”American Journal of Sociology109: 1–49.
62.
McAdamDougRichard ScottW..2005. Organizations and Social Movements Pp. 4–40 in Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by DavisG. F.McAdamD.Richard ScottW.ZaldM. N.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
McCloskeyMichael.1991.
Letter to U.S. House of Representatives. Sierra Club, May 13.
64.
McDonnellPatrick.1991. “Environmental Fears Voiced on Free-Trade Plan; Border: Critics Say Proposals to Protect the Border Environment After a U.S.-Mexico Free-Trade Accord Are a Farce.” Los Angeles Times, September 24, p. B1.
65.
McQueenRod.1991. “Mexico Scares U.S. Senators: Carla Hills Gets a Grilling about New Trade Negotiations.”The Financial Post (Toronto), February 7, section 1, p. 3.
66.
MerrileesCraigWeinerDon.1992. “Re: Advisor Update #1.” Memo to Bob Kingsley, June.
67.
MeyerJohn W.ScottRichard W..1983. Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
68.
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).1991. “Environmentalists Discuss North American Free Trade Agreement with President Bush.” May 8.
69.
NBC News.1993. “Poll Results.” April 20.
70.
O'BrienRobert.1998. Shallow Foundations: Labour and the Selective Regulation of Free Trade Pp. 105–24 in The Economics and Politics of International Trade: Freedom and Trade: Volume II, edited by CookG.. London, UK: Routledge.
71.
RupertM.1995. “(Re) Politicizing the Global Economy: Liberal Common Sense and Ideological Struggle in the US NAFTA Debate.”Review of International Political Economy2: 658–92.
72.
RuefMartin.2000. “The Emergence of Organizational Forms: A Community Ecology Approach.”American Journal of Sociology106: 658–714.
73.
Schneiberg, Marc and Michael Lounsbury. Forthcoming. “Social Movements and Neo-Institutional Theory: Analyzing Path Creation and Change.” In Handbook of Institutional Theory, edited by GreenwoodR.OliverC.Sahlin-AnderssonS.SuddabyR.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
SchneibergMarcSouleSarah.2005. Institutionalization as a Contested, Multilevel Process: The Case of Rate Regulation in American Fire Insurance Pp. 122–60 in Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by DavisG. F.McAdamD.ScottW. R.ZaldM. N.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Richard ScottW.RuefMartinMendelPeterCaronnaCarol.2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76.
SwedbergRichard.2006. The Toolkit of Economic Sociology Pp. 937–50 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by WittmanD.WeingastB.. New York: Oxford University Press.
77.
ThorpLynn.1993. “Subject: Stuff You'll be Glad You Know.” Memo to Sierra Garrett, August 19.
78.
USA∗NAFTA.1993. “USA∗NAFTA Statement on Judge Richey's District Court Decision.” June 30.
79.
WastlerAllen.1992. “Inside Talk-This All-Star Game Had a Different Type of Trading.”Journal of Commerce, July 21, p. 5A.
80.
WorkmanWillard.1993. “Letter to USTR Kantor.” April 29. Full text cited in Inside U.S. Trade, May 14, 1993, pp. S7–S8.
81.
WydenRonVentoBruceBilbrayJamesRavenelArthurJr.DurbinRichardGlickmanDanHenryPaulEckartDennisPelosiNancyDorganByronSandersBernard.1991. “Letter to the President.” February 22. Reprinted in Inside U.S. Trade, “House Letter to Bush on Mexico FTA,” February 22, p. 6.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
