Using network-based measures of unions' centrality among civic associations, this article builds and tests a theoretical framework that highlights labor unions' central role in enhancing governance. I first construct three measures to capture the connectedness and power of representative voluntary civic associations, membership density, degree centrality (comemberships), and power centrality, based on the affiliation network matrices for 54 countries, using the latest World Values Survey. I then test the key argument that unions' power centrality has significant positive effects on governance, controlling for general socioeconomic and international factors. The findings from standard statistical analyses, as well as from comparative case studies of affiliation networks, support my claims that union-centered or union-linked civic mobilization achieves a balance of class power not only in civil society, but also within state institutions, strengthening reformist parties and policy makers. This article also suggests that this power shift in the state power structure leads to better governance. I highlight the role of labor-based organizations in making governments effective and responsible, and I bring the bottom-up process of civic mobilization and social accountability back into the discussion of social capital and governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlesinaAlbertoDevleeschauwerArnaudEasterlyWilliamKurlatSergioWacziargRomain.2003. “Fractionalization.”Journal of Economic Growth8: 155–94.
2.
BermanSheri.1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.”World Politics49: 401–29.
3.
BonacichPhillip.1987. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.”American Journal of Sociology92: 1170–82.
4.
BorgattiStephen P.EverettMartin G..1997. “Network Analysis of 2-Mode Data.”Social Networks19: 243–69.
5.
BorgattiStephenEverettMartin G.FreemanLinton C..2002. UCINET6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis.Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6.
ClarkeSimonFairbrotherPeterBorisovVadim.1995. The Workers' Movement in Russia.Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
7.
CollierRuth Berins.1999. Paths Toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America.New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CookLinda J.1997. Labor and Liberalization: Trade Unions in the New Russia.New York: The Twentieth Century Fund Press.
9.
CornwellBenjaminHarrisonJill Ann.2004. “Union Members and Voluntary Associations: Membership Overlap as a Case of Organizational Embeddedness.”American Sociological Review69: 862–81.
10.
Cutright, Philips.1963. “National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis.”American Sociological Review28: 253–64.
11.
DiamondLarryPlattnerMarc F.SchedlerAndreas.1999. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–10 in The Self-Restraining State, edited by DiamondL.PlattnerM. F.SchedlerA.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
12.
DianiMario.1995. Green Networks: A Structural Analysis of the Italian Environmental Movement.Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
13.
DianiMario.2003. “‘Leaders’ or Brokers? Positions and Influence in Social Movement Networks.” Pp. 77–104 in Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by DianiM.McAdamD.. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
DixonMarcRoscignoVincent J.HodsonRandy.2004. “Unions, Solidarity, and Striking.”Social Forces83: 3–33.
15.
EimerStuart.1999. “From ‘Business Unionism’ to ‘Social Movement Unionism’: The Case of the AFL-CIO Milwaukee County Labor Council.”Labor Studies Journal24: 63–81.
16.
Esping-AndersenG⊘sta.1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
EunSoo-Mi.2005. “Yonkyolmang Chopkunul Tonghaeso Bon Sahoeundongjok Nodongun-dongui Kanungsong.” (Possibility of Social Movement Unionism in Korean Labor Movement). Nodong Chongchaek Yonku5: 43–73.
18.
European Values Study Group & World Values Survey Association.2004. European and World Values Surveys Integrated Data File, 1999–2002, Release I. Second ICPSR version. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Ann Arbor, Michigan. Retrieved September 2005 (www.icpsr.umich.edu).
19.
EvansPeterRauchJames E..1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.”American Sociological Review64: 748–65.
20.
FantasiaRick.1988. Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers.Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
21.
FantasiaRickStepan-NorrisJudith.2004. “The Labor Movement in Motion.” Pp. 555–75 in The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriestiH.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
22.
FantasiaRickVossKim.2004. Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
FaustKatherine.1997. “Centrality in Affiliation Networks.”Social Networks19: 157–91.
24.
GarretGeoffrey.1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy.New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
GerhardsJurgenRuchtDieter.1992. “Mesomobilization.”American Journal of Sociology98: 555–95.
26.
GouldRoger V.1991. “Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871.”American Sociological Review56: 716–29.
27.
GouldRoger V.1995. Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
28.
GramsciAntonio.1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks.New York: International Publishers.
29.
GranovetterMark.1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology91: 481–510.
30.
GulatiRanjayGargiuloMartin.1999. “Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?”American Journal of Sociology104: 1439–93.
31.
HausmanJerry.1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.”Econometrica46: 1251–71.
32.
HelmkeGretchen.2005. “Enduring Uncertainty: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina During the 1990s and Beyond.” Pp. 115–138 in Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness, edited by LevitskyS.MurilloM. V.. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
33.
HicksAlexanderKenworthyLane.1998. “Cooperation and Political Economic Performance in Affluent Democratic Capitalism.”American Journal of Sociology103: 1631–72.
34.
IsaacLarryChristiansenLars.2002. “How the Civil Rights Movement Revitalized Labor Militancy.”American Sociological Review67: 722–46.
35.
JaggersKeithGurrTed Robert.1995. “Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data.”Journal of Peace Research32: 469–82.
36.
KaufmannDanielKraayAartMastruzziMassimo.2004. “Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996–2002.” Revised April 5, 2004. Unpublished Manuscript. World Bank. Data retrieved in 2006 (http://info.worldbank.org/governance/kkz2002/).
37.
KaufmannDanielKraayAartMastruzziMassimo.2005. “Measuring Governance Using Cross-Country Perceptions Data.” Unpublished Manuscript. World Bank (http://info.worldbank.org/governance/kkz2002/).
38.
KimeldorfHoward.1999. Battling for American Labor: Wobblies, Craft Workers, and the Making of the Union Movement.Berkeley and LA, CA: University of California Press.
39.
KnackStephenKeeferPhilip.1997. “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff?: A Cross-Country Investigation.”Quarterly Journal of Economics112: 1251–88.
40.
KnokeDavidPappiFranz UrbanBroadbentJeffreyTsujinakaYutaka.1996. Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan.New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KooHagen.2001. Korean Workers: The Culture and Politics of Class Formation.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42.
KorpiWalterShalevMichael.1980. “Strikes, Power and Politics in the Western Nations, 1900–1976.” Pp. 301–34 in Political Power and Social Theory, vol. I, edited by ZeitlinM.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
43.
KurtzMarcus J.SchrankAndrew.2007. “Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms.” Forthcoming in Journal of Politics..
44.
LaumannEdward O.KnokeDavidKimYong-Hak.1985. “An Organizational Approach to State Policy Formation: A Comparative Study of Energy and Health Domains.”American Sociological Review50: 1–19.
45.
LeeCheol-Sung.2005a. “Income Inequality, Democracy, and Public Sector Size.”American Sociological Review70: 158–81.
46.
LeeCheol-Sung.2005b. “International Migration, Deindustrialization, and Union Decline in 16 Affluent OECD Countries, 1962–1997.”Social Forces84: 71–88.
47.
LipsetSeymour Martin.1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
48.
LongJ. ScottErvinLaurie H..2000. “Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model.”The American Statistician54: 217–24.
49.
MaravallJose MariaPrzeworskiAdam.2003. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–18 in Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by MaravallJ. M.PrzeworskiA.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
MarksGary.1989. Unions in Politics: Britain, Germany, and the United States in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
MarshallMonty G.JaggersKeith.2004. “Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003.”Data and Data Users Manual.Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, College Park. Retrieved 2005 (http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/inscr/polity).
52.
MartinNathan D.BradyDavid.2007. “Workers of the Less Developed World Unite? A Multi-level Analysis of Unionization in Less Developed Countries.”American Sociological Review72: 562–84.
53.
McGuireJames W.1997. Peronism Without Peron: Unions, Parties, and Democracy in Argentina.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54.
MeyerDavid S.WhittierNancy.1994. “Social Movement Spillover.”Social Problems41: 277–98.
55.
MeyerJohnBoliJohnThomasGeorgeRamirezFrancisco.1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.”American Journal of Sociology103: 144–81.
56.
O'DonnellGuillermo.1999. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Pp. 29–51 in The Self-Restraining State, edited by SchedlerA.DiamondL.PlattnerM. F.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
57.
OlzakSusanNoah UhrigS. C..2001. “The Ecology of Tactical Overlap.”American Sociological Review66: 694–717.
58.
Pattillo-McCoyMary.1998. “Church Culture as a Strategy of Action in the Black Community.”American Sociological Review63: 767–84.
59.
PaxtonPamela.2002. “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship.”American Sociological Review67: 254–77.
60.
PeruzzottiEnriqueSmulovitzCatalina.2006. “Social Accountability: An Introduction.” Pp. 3–33 in Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies, edited by PeruzzottiE.SmulovitzC.. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
61.
PrzeworskiAdam.2006. “Social Accountability in Latin America and Beyond.” Pp. 323–33 in Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies, edited by PeruzzottiE.SmulovitzC.. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
62.
PutnamRobert.1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
PutnamRobert.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York: Simon and Schuster.
64.
RileyDylan.2005. “Civic Associations and Authoritarian Regimes in Interwar Europe: Italy and Spain in Comparative Perspective.”American Sociological Review70: 288–310.
65.
RoscignoVincent J.DanaherWilliam F..2001. “Media and Mobilization: The Case of Radio and Southern Textile Worker Insurgency, 1929–1934.”American Sociological Review66: 21–48.
66.
RoseFred.2000. Coalitions Across the Class Divide: Lessons from the Labor, Peace, and Environmental Movements.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
67.
RosenthalNaomiFingrutdMerylEthierMicheleKarantRobertaMcDonaldDavid.1985. “Social Movements and Network Analysis: A Case Study of Nineteenth-Century Women's Reform in New York State.”American Journal of Sociology90: 1022–54.
68.
RothsteinBo.2002. “Sweden: Social Capital in the Social Democratic State.” Pp. 289–332 in Democracy in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, edited by PutnamR. D.. New York: Oxford University Press.
69.
RueschemeyerDietrichStephensEvelyne HuberStephensJohn D..1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
SandholtzWayneKoetzleWilliam.2000. “Accounting for Corruption: Economic Structure, Democracy, and Trade.”International Studies Quarterly44: 31–50.
71.
SouthworthCalebStepan-NorrisJudith.2003. “The Geography of Class in an Industrial American City: Connections Between Workplace and Neighborhood Politics.”Social Problems50: 319–47.
72.
SuchmanMark.1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.”Academy of Management Review20: 571–610.
73.
TocquevilleAlexis.1988. Democracy in America.New York: Perennial.
74.
Union of International Associations (UIA).2000–2001. Yearbook of International Organizations.37th ed.München, Germany: KG Saur.
75.
VossKimShermanRachel.2000. “Breaking the Iron Law of Oligarchy: Union Revitalization in the American Labor Movement.”American Journal of Sociology106: 303–49.
76.
WaismanCarlos H.1999. “Argentina: Capitalism and Democracy.” Pp. 71–130 in Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, edited by DiamondL.HartlynJ.LinzJ. J.LipsetS. M.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
77.
WejnertBarbara.2005. “Diffusion, Development, and Democracy, 1800–1999.”American Sociological Review70: 53–81.
78.
WesternBruce.1997. Between Class and Market.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
WoodGeoffrey.2002. “Organizing Unionism and the Possibilities for Perpetuating a Social Movement Role: Representativity, Politics, and the Congress of South African Trade Unions.”Labor Studies Journal26: 29–49.
80.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
81.
BankWorld.2002. World Development Indicators [CD ROM]Washington, DC: World Bank.
82.
WuthnowRobert.2002. “Bridging the Privileged and the Marginalized?” Pp. 59–102 in Democracy in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, edited by PutnamR. D.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
