In this article, we return to Max Weber's distinction between class and status as related but different forms of social stratification. We argue that this distinction is not only conceptually cogent, but empirically important as well. Indeed, class and status do have distinct explanatory power when it comes to studying varying areas of social life. Consistent with Weber's assertions, we show that economic security and prospects are stratified more by class than by status, while the opposite is true for outcomes in the domain of cultural consumption. Within politics, class rather than status predicts Conservative versus Labour Party voting in British general elections and also Left-Right political attitudes. But it is status rather than class that predicts Libertarian-Authoritarian attitudes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartleyMel.2004. Health Inequality: An Introduction to Theories, Concepts and Methods.Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2.
BeckUlrich.1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London, UK: Sage.
3.
BerlyneDaniel, ed.1974. Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation.Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
4.
BirkelundGunn E.GoodmanLeo A.RoseDavid.1996. “The Latent Structure of Job Characteristics of Men and Women.”American Journal of Sociology102: 80–113.
5.
BlossfeldHans-PeterMillsMelindaBernardiFabrizio, eds.2006. Globalization, Uncertainty and Men's Careers: An International Comparison.Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
6.
BourdieuPierre.1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste.London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7.
BreenRichard, ed.2004. Social Mobility in Europe.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
BreenRichard, ed.2005. “Foundations of Class Analysis in the Weberian Tradition.” Pp. 31–50 in Approaches to Class Analysis, edited by WrightE. O.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrooksClemNieuwbeertaPaulManzaJeff.2006. “Cleavage-Based Voting Behavior in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence from Six Postwar Democracies.”Social Science Research35: 88–128.
10.
ChanTak WingGoldthorpeJohn H..2004. “Is There a Status Order in Contemporary British Society? Evidence from the Occupational Structure of Friendship.”European Sociological Review20: 383–401.
11.
ChanTak WingGoldthorpeJohn H..2005. “The Social Stratification of Theatre, Dance and Cinema Attendance.”Cultural Trends14: 193–212.
12.
ChanTak WingGoldthorpeJohn H..2007a. “Social Status and Newspaper Readership.”American Journal of Sociology112: 1095–1134.
13.
ChanTak WingGoldthorpeJohn H..2007b. “Social Stratification and Cultural Consumption: Music in England.”European Sociological Review23: 1–19.
14.
ChanTak WingGoldthorpeJohn H..2007c. “Social Stratification and Cultural Consumption: The Visual Arts in England.”Poetics. In press.
15.
DahrendorfRalf.1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Societies.London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
16.
DeversonJaneLindsayKatharine.1975. Voices from the Middle Classes: A Study of Families in Two London Suburbs.London, UK: Hutchinson.
17.
DiMaggioPaul.1987. “Classification in Art.”American Sociological Review52: 440–55.
18.
DiMaggioPaul.1996. “Are Art-Museum Visitors Different from Other People? The Relationship Between Attendance and Social and Political Attitudes in the United States.”Poetics24: 161–80.
19.
DuncanOtis Dudley.1961. “A Socioeconomic Index for all Occupations.” Pp. 109–38 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by ReissA.. New York: Free Press.
20.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H..1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
21.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.PortocareroLucienne.1979. “Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western European Countries.”British Journal of Sociology30: 415–41.
22.
EvansGeoff.1992. “Testing the Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema.”European Sociological Review8: 211–32.
23.
EvansGeoff.1993. “Class, Prospects and the Life-Cycle: Explaining the Association Between Class Position and Political Preferences.”Acta Sociologica36: 263–76.
24.
EvansGeoff. ed.1999. The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
EvansGeoffHeathAnthonyLalljeeManusur.1996. “Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoritarian Values in the British Electorate.”British Journal of Sociology47: 93–112.
26.
EvansGeoffMillsColin.1998. “Identifying Class Structure: A Latent Class Analysis of the Criterion-Related and Construct Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema.”European Sociological Review14: 87–106.
27.
EvansGeoffMillsColin.2000. “In Search of the Wage-Labourer/Service Contract: New Evidence on the Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema.”British Journal of Sociology51: 641–61.
28.
GallieDuncanWhiteMichaelChengYuanTomlinsonMark.1998. Restructuring the Employment Relationship.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
GiddensAnthony.1973. The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies.London, UK: Hutchinson.
30.
GiddensAnthony.1994. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics.Cambridge, UK: Polity.
31.
GoldthorpeJohn H.2007. On Sociology.Vol. 2, 2d ed.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
GoldthorpeJohn H.HopeKeith.1974. The Social Grading of Occupations: A New Approach and Scale.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
33.
GoldthorpeJohn H.McKnightAbigail.2006. “The Economic Basis of Social Class.” Pp. 109–36 in Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research from Sociology and Economics, edited by MorganS.GruskyD. B.FieldsG. S.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
GruskyDavid B.2005. “Foundations of a Neo-Durkheimian Class Analysis.” Pp. 51–81 in Approaches to Class Analysis, edited by WrightE. O.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35.
GruskyDavid B.S⊘rensenJesper B..1998. “Can Class Analysis be Salvaged?”American Journal of Sociology103: 1187–1234.
36.
GruskyDavid B.WeedenKim A..2001. “Decomposition Without Death: A Research Agenda for the New Class Analysis.”Acta Sociologica44: 203–18.
37.
HeathAnthonyJowellRogerCurticeJohn, eds.1994. Labour's Last Chance: The 1992 Election and Beyond.Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
38.
HechterMichael.2004. “From Class to Culture.”American Journal of Sociology110: 400–45.
39.
JassoGuillermina.2001. “Studying Status: An Integrated Framework.”American Sociological Review66: 96–124.
40.
KingstonPaul W.2000. The Classless Society.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
KohnMelvin L.1977. Class and Conformity: A Study in Values.2d ed.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
42.
KorpiWalter.1983. The Democratic Class Struggle.London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
43.
LaumannEdward O.1966. Prestige and Association in an Urban Community.Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
44.
LaumannEdward O.1973. Bonds of Pluralism.New York: Wiley.
45.
LipsetSeymour M.1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics.London, UK: Heinemann.
46.
LipsetSeymour M.BendixReinhard.1959. Social Mobility in Industrial Society.London, UK: Heinemann.
47.
LockwoodDavid.1958. The Blackcoated Worker: A Study in Class Consciousness.London, UK: Allen and Unwin.
48.
LockwoodDavid.1992. Solidarity and Schism: The Problem of Disorder in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
49.
MarshallThomas H.1950. Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
McKibbinRoss.1998. Classes and Cultures: England 1918–1951.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
MolesAbraham A.1971. Sociodynamique de la Culture.Paris: Mouton.
52.
Office for National Statistics.2005. The National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification: User Manual.Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
53.
PakulskiJanWatersMalcolm.1996. The Death of Class.London, UK: Sage.
54.
ParkAlisonSurridgePaula.2003. “Charting Change in British Values.” Pp. 131–59 in British Social Attitudes: The 20th Report, edited by ParkA.CurticeJ.ThomsonK.JarvisL.BromleyC.. London, UK: Sage.
55.
PetersonRichard A.1997. “The Rise and Fall of Highbrow Snobbery as a Status Marker.”Poetics25: 75–92.
56.
PetersonRichard A.KernRoger M..1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.”American Sociological Review61: 900–07.
57.
PetersonRichard A.SimkusAlbert.1992. “How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups.” Pp. 152–86 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, edited by LamontM.FournierM.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
RoseDavidPevalinDavid J., eds.2003. A Researcher's Guide to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification.London, UK: Sage.
59.
RoseDavidPevalinDavid J.O'ReillyKaren.2005. The NS-SEC: Origins, Development and Use. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
RuncimanWalter G.1997. A Treatise on Social Theory. Vol. 3, Applied Social Theory.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
ShavitYossiArumRichardGamoranAdam, eds.2006. Expansion, Differentiation and Inequality of Access in Higher Education: A Comparative Study.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
62.
ShavitYossiMüllerWalter, eds.1998. From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations.Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
63.
ShilsEdward. [1962] 1975. “Class.” Pp. 249–55 in Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64.
SkeltonAdrienneBridgwoodAnnDuckworthKathrynHuttonLucyFennClareCreaserClaireBabbidgeAdrian.2002. Arts in England: Attendance, Participation and Attitudes in 2001. Research report 27 London, UK: The Arts Council of England.
65.
WeakliemDavid L.HeathAnthony F..1994. “Rational Choice and Class Voting.”Rationality and Society6: 243–70.
66.
WeberMax. [1922] 1968. Economy and Society.Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
67.
WeedenKim A.GruskyDavid B..2005. “The Case for a New Class Map.”American Journal of Sociology111: 141–212.
68.
WeiningerElliot B.2005. “Pierre Bourdieu on Social Class and Symbolic Violence.” Pp. 116–65 in Approaches to Class Analysis, edited by WrightE. O.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
WrightErik Olin.1997. Class Counts: Comparative Studies in Class Analysis.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
