In a few short decades, the gender gap in college completion has reversed from favoring men to favoring women. This study, which is the first to assess broadly the causes of the growing female advantage in college completion, considers the impact of family resources as well as gender differences in academic performance and in the pathways to college completion on the rising gender gap. Analyses of General Social Survey data indicate that the female-favorable trend in college completion emerged unevenly by family status of origin to the disadvantage of sons in families with a low-educated or absent father. Additional analyses of National Educational Longitudinal Survey (NELS) data indicate that women's superior academic performance plays a large role in producing the gender gap in college completion, but that this effect remains latent until after the transition to college. For NELS cohorts, who were born in the mid-1970s, the female advantage in college completion remains largest in families with a low-educated or absent father, but currently extends to all family types. In conjunction with women's growing incentives to attain higher education, gender differences in resources related to family background and academic performance largely explain the growing female advantage in college completion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC.DanielB.BerkovitsI.2003. Postsecondary Attainment, Attendance, Curriculum and Performance. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2.
AlexanderKarl L.EcklandBruce E.1974. “Sex Differences in the Educational Attainment Process.”American Sociological Review39: 668–82.
3.
AlexanderKarl L.McDillEdward1976. “Selection and Allocation within Schools: Some Causes and Consequences of Curriculum Placement.”American Sociological Review41: 963–80.
4.
AlwinDuaneBraunMichaelScottJacqueline1992. “The Separation of Work and Family: Attitudes towards Women's Labor Force Participation in Germany, Great Britain, and the United States.”European Sociological Review8: 13–37.
5.
AxinnWilliam G.ThorntonArland2000. “The Transformation in the Meaning of Marriage.” Pp. 147–65 in The Ties that Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, edited by WaiteLindaBachrachChristineHindinM.ThompsonE.ThorntonA.. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
6.
BaeYupinChoySusanGeddesClaireSableJenniferSnyderThomas2000. Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7.
BeckerGary S.1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education.New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
BeckerGary S.1991. A Treatise on the Family.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BeckerGary S.TomesNigel1979. “An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribution of Household Income and Intergenerational Mobility.”Journal of Political Economy84: S279–88.
BernhardtAnnetteMorrisMartinaHandcockMark S.1995. “Women's Gains or Men's Losses: A Closer Look at the Shrinking Gender Gap in Earnings.”American Journal of Sociology101: 302–28.
BlauPeter M.DuncanOtis D.1967. The American Occupation Structure.New York: John Wiley.
14.
BrewsterKarinPadavicIrene2000. “Change in Gender Ideology, 1977–1996: The Contributions of Intracohort Change and Population Turnover.”Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 477–87.
15.
CancianMariaReedDeborah2001. “Changes in Family Structure and Implications for Poverty and Related Policy.” Pp. 69–161 in Understanding Poverty, edited by DanzigerSheldon H.HavemanRobert H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University and Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
CharlesMariaBradleyKaren2002. “Equal but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education.”American Sociological Review67: 573–99.
17.
CherlinAndrewWaltersPamela Barnhouse1981. “Trends in United States Men's and Women's Sex-Role Attitudes: 1972–1978.”American Sociological Review46: 453–60.
18.
CrossTheodore, ed.1999. “Special Report: College Degree Awards: The Ominous Gender Gap in African American Higher Education.”Journal of Blacks in Higher Education23: 6–9.
19.
DiPreteThomas A.BuchmannClaudia2006. “Gender-Specific Trends in the Value of Education and the Emerging Gender Gap in College Completion.”Demography43: 1–24.
20.
DowneyDouglas B.PowellBrian1993. “Do Children in Single-Parent Households Fare Better Living with Same-Sex Parents?”Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 55–71.
21.
DowneyDouglas B.Vogt YuanAnastasia S.2005“Sex Differences in School Performance during High School: Puzzling Patterns and Possible Explanations.”Sociological Quarterly46: 299–321.
22.
DrylerHelen1998. “Parental Role Models, Gender, and Educational Choice.”The British Journal of Sociology49: 375–98.
23.
EpsteinCynthia Fuchs.1970. Women's Place: Options and Limits in Professional Careers.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
Eurostat2002. The Life of Women and Men in Europe: A Statistical Portrait.Luxembourg: Eurostat.
25.
FeathermanDavid L.1971. “The Socioeconomic Achievement of White Religio-Ethnic Subgroups: Social and Psychological Explanations.”American Sociological Review36: 207–22.
26.
FoxMary Frank.2001. “Women, Science, and Academia: Graduate Education and Careers.”Gender and Society15: 654–66.
27.
GoldinClaudia1992. “The Meaning of College in the Lives of American Women: The Past 100 Years.” Working Paper No. 4099, National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago, IL.
28.
GoldinClaudia1995. “Career and Family: College Women look to the Past.” Working Paper No. 5188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago, IL.
29.
GoseB.1997. “Liberal-Arts Colleges Ask: Where Have the Men Gone?”Chronicle of Higher Education, June 6, pp. A35.
30.
GreeneHowardGreeneMatthew2004. “The Widening Gender Gap: Shifting Student Demographics Will Have Significant Impact on College Admissions.”University Business7: 27–9.
31.
HauserRobert M.KuoDaphne H.1997. “How Does Size of Sibship Matter: Family Configuration and Family Effects on Educational Attainment.”Social Science Research26: 69–94.
32.
HedgesLarry V.NowellAmy1995. “Sex Differences in Mental Test Scores, Variability, and Numbers of High Scoring Individuals.”Science269: 41–5.
33.
HessBeth B.Marx FerreeMyra eds.1988. Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
HirschmanCharles1983. “America's Melting Pot Reconsidered.”Annual Review of Sociology9: 397–423.
35.
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.2003. About GSS: Introduction to the GSS. Retrieved January 31, 2003 (http://www.icpsr.umich.edu:8080/GSS/about/gss/about.htm).
36.
JacobBrian A.2002. “Where the Boys Aren't: Noncognitive skills, Returns to School, and the Gender Gap in Higher Education.”Economics of Education Review21: 589–98.
37.
JacobsJerry A.1995. “Gender and Academic Specialties: Trends among College Degree Recipients in the 1980s.”Sociology of Education68: 81–98.
38.
JacobsJerry A.1996. “Gender Inequality and Higher Education.”Annual Review of Sociology22: 153–85.
39.
JacobsJerry A.1999. “Gender and the Stratification of Colleges.”Journal of Higher Education70: 161–87.
40.
JencksChristopher1972. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America.New York: Basic.
41.
KalmijnMatthijs1994. “Mother's Occupational Status and Children's Schooling.”American Sociological Review59: 257–75.
42.
KaoGraceThompsonJennifer S.2003. “Racial and Ethnic Stratification in Educational Attainment and Achievement”Annual Review of Sociology29: 417–42.
43.
KoruppSylviaGanzeboomHarry B. G.Van Der LippeTanja2002. “Do Mothers Matter? A Comparison of Models of the Influence of Mothers' and Fathers' Educational and Occupational Status on Children's Educational Attainment.”Quality and Quantity36: 17–42.
44.
KreinSheila FitzgeraldBellerAndrea H.1988. “Educational Attainment of Children from Single-Parent Families: Differences by Exposure, Gender, and Race.”Demography25: 221–34.
45.
LewisSusan K.OppenheimerValerie K.2000. “Educational Assortative Mating across Marriage Markets: Non-Hispanic Whites in the United States.”Demography37: 29–40.
46.
LongJ. Scott.2001. From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47.
LopezNancy2003. Hopeful Girls, Troubled Boys: Race and Gender Disparity in Urban Education.New York: Routledge.
48.
McHughMaureen C.FriezeIrene Hanson1997. “The Measurement of Gender-Role Attitudes: A Review and Commentary.”Psychology of Women Quarterly21: 1–16.
49.
McManusPatriciaDiPreteThomas A.2001. “Losers and Winners: The Financial Consequences of Divorce for Men.”American Sociological Review66: 246–68.
50.
MickelsonRoslyn Arlin.1989. “Why Does Jane Read and Write So Well? The Anomaly of Women's Achievement.”Sociology of Education62: 47–63.
51.
National Opinion Research Center [NORC].2003. General Social Survey: GSS Study Description. Retrieved January 31, 2003 (http://www.norc.uchicago.edu/projects/gensoc1.asp).
52.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD].2004. Education at a Glance 2004. Retrieved March 30, 2006 (http://www.oecd.org/document/7/0,2340,en_2649_201185_33712135_1_1_1_1,00.html).
53.
PapanekHanna1985. “Class and Gender in Education-Employment Linkages.”Comparative Education Review29: 317–46.
54.
PowellBrianDowneyDouglas B.1997. “Living in Single-Parent Households: An Investigation of the Same-Sex Hypothesis.”American Sociological Review62: 521–39.
55.
PowellMary AnnParcelToby L.1997. “Effects of Family Structure on the Earnings Attainment Process: Differences by Gender.”Journal of Marriage and the Family59: 419–33.
56.
RosenBernard C.1959. “Race, Ethnicity, and the Achievement Syndrome.”American Sociological Review24: 47–60.
57.
RosenBernard C.AneshenselCarol S.1978. “Sex Differences in the Educational-Occupational Expectation Process.”Social Forces57: 164–86.
58.
RosenzweigMark TSchultzT. Paul1982. “Market Opportunities, Genetic Endowments, and Intrafamily Resource Distribution: Child Survival in Rural India.”American Economic Review72: 803–15.
59.
SewellWilliam H.HallerA. O.PortesAlejandro1969. “The Educational and Early Occupational Attainment Process.”American Sociological Review34: 82–92.
60.
SommersChristina H.2000. The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming our Young Men.New York: Touchstone.
61.
ThomasGail E.AlexanderKarl L.EcklandBruce K.1979. “Access to Higher Education: The Importance of Race, Sex, Social Class, and Academic Credentials.”The School Review87: 133–56.
62.
ThompsonS.2003. “Male Student's College Achievement Gap Brings Concern.”The Washington Post, August 31, p. A12.
63.
ThorntonArlandAlwinDuane F.CamburnDonald1983. “Causes and Consequences of Sex-Role Attitudes and Attitude Change.”American Sociological Review48: 211–27.
64.
ThorntonArlandFreedmanDeborah1979. “Changes in the Sex-Role Attitudes of Women, 1962-1977: Evidence from a Panel Study.”American Sociological Review44: 831–42.
65.
TurnerSarah E.BowenWilliam G.1999. “Choice of Major: The Changing (Unchanging) Gender Gap.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review52: 289–313.
66.
TwengeJean M.1997. “Attitudes toward Women, 1970–1995: A Meta-Analysis.”Psychology of Women Quarterly21: 35–51.
67.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.2004. Digest of Education Statistics 2004.Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
68.
WalbySylvia1986. Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchal and Capitalist Relations in Employment.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
69.
XieYuShaumanKimberlee A.2003. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
