Do mass policy preferences influence the policy output of welfare states in developed democracies? This is an important issue for welfare state theory and research, and this article presents an analysis that builds from analytical innovations developed in the emerging literature on linkages between mass opinion and public policy. The authors analyze a new dataset combining a measure of social policy preferences with data on welfare state spending, alongside controls for established causal factors behind social policy-making. The analysis provides evidence that policy preferences exert a significant influence over welfare state output. Guided also by statistical tests for endogeneity, the authors find that cross-national differences in the level of policy preferences help to account for a portion of the differences among social, Christian, and liberal welfare state regimes. The results have implications for developing fruitful connections between welfare state scholarship, comparative opinion research, and recent opinion/policy studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanJamesScruggsLyle.2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.”American Journal of Political Science48: 496–512.
2.
AlvarezMichaelBowlerShaunNaglerJonathan.2000. “Issues, Economics and the Dynamics of Multi-Party Elections: The British 1987 General Election.”American Political Science Review94: 131–50.
3.
AmentaEdwinBonastiaChrisCarenNeal.2001. “U.S. Social Policy in Comparative and Historical Perspective: Concepts, Images, Arguments, and Research Strategies.”Annual Review of Sociology27: 213–34.
4.
AmentaEdwinCarenNealOlaskySheera Joy.2005. “Age for Leisure? Political Mediation and the Impact of the Pension Movement on U.S. Old-Age Policy.”American Sociological Review70: 516–38.
5.
AndersenJorgen GoulPettersenPer ArntSvallforsStefanUusitaloHannu.1999. “The Legitimacy of the Nordic Welfare States: Trends, Variations and Cleavages.” Pp. 235–61 in Nordic Social Policy: Changing Welfare States, edited by KauttoMikko. New York: Routledge.
6.
AndreßHans-JurgenHeienThorstein.2001. “Four Worlds of Welfare State Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States.”European Sociological Review17: 337–56.
7.
ArtsWilGelissenJohn.2002. “Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-the-Art Report.”Journal of European Social Policy12: 137–58.
8.
BeckNathanielKatzJonathan.1995. “What To Do (and Not To Do) with Time-Series Cross- Section Data.”American Political Science Review89: 634–47.
9.
Beck.2001. “Throwing Out the Baby with the Bathwater: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon.”International Organization55: 487–95.
10.
BerryWilliamRingquistEvanFordingRichardHansonRussell.1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993.”American Journal of Political Science42: 327–48.
11.
BlekesauneMartinQuadagnoJill.2003. “Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations.”European Sociological Review19: 415–27.
12.
BourdieuPierre.1979. “Public Opinion Does Not Exist.” Pp. 124–30 in Communication and Class Struggle: An Anthology in 2 Volumes, edited by MattelartArmandSiegelauSeth. New York: International General.
13.
BradyDavid.2003. “Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty.”Social Forces81: 715–52.
14.
BrintStevenKelleySusan.1993. “The Social Bases of Political Beliefs in the United States: Interests, Cultures, and Normative Pressures in Comparative-Historical Perspective.”Research in Political Sociology6: 277–317.
15.
BrooksClem. Forthcoming. “Voters, Satisficing, and Policymaking: Recent Directions in the Study of Electoral Politics.”Annual Review of Sociology32.
16.
BrooksJoel.1990. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in Germany.”Public Opinion Quarterly54: 508–29.
17.
BursteinPaul.1998. “Bringing the Public Back In: Should Sociologists Consider the Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy?”Social Forces77: 27–62.
18.
Burstein.1999. “Social Movements and Public Policy.” Pp. 3–21 in How Social Movements Matter, edited by GiugniMarcoMcAdamDougTillyCharles. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
Burstein.2003. “The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.”Political Research Quarterly56: 29–40.
20.
CoughlinRichard.1980. Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare PolicyBerkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.
21.
DaltonRussell.1996. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 2d ed.Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.
22.
DavidsonRussellMacKinnonJames.1993. Estimation and Inference in EconometricsNew York: Oxford University Press.
23.
EbbinghausBernhardVisserJelle.2000. The Societies of Europe: Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945New York: Grove's Dictionaries.
24.
EriksonRobertMacKuenMichaelStimsonJames.2002. The Macro PolityNew York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
EriksonRobertTedinKent.1995. American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact. 5th ed.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
26.
Esping-AndersenG⊘sta.1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare CapitalismPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Esping-Andersen.1996. “Positive-Sum Solutions in a World of Trade-Offs?” Pp. 256–67 in Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, edited by Esping-AndersenGsta. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28.
Esping-Andersen.2000. “The Sustainability of Welfare States into the Twenty-First Century.”International Journal of Health Services30: 1–12.
29.
Esping-Andersen.2003. “Why No Socialism Anywhere? A Reply to Alex Hicks and Lane Kenworthy.”Socio-Economic Review1: 63–70.
30.
FennoRichard.1978. Home Style: House Members in Their DistrictsBoston, MA: Little, Brown.
31.
FuchsDieterKlingemannHans-Dieter.1990. “The Left-Right Schema.” Pp. 203–34 in Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, edited by Kent JenningsM.. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
32.
GarrettGeoffrey.1998. Partisan Politics in the Global EconomyNew York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HallPeterSoskiceDavid eds.2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative AdvantageNew York: Oxford University Press.
34.
HansenJohn.1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
HausmanJerry.1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.”Econometrica46: 1251–70.
36.
HerbstSusan.1998. Reading Public Opinion: Political Actors View the Democratic ProcessChicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
HicksAlexander.1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security PoliticsIthaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
HicksAlexanderKenworthyLane.2003. “Varieties of Welfare Capitalism.”Socio-Economic Review1: 27–61.
39.
HillKim Q.LeighleyJan E.AngelaHinton-Andersson.1995. “Lower-Class Policy Mobilization and Policy Linkage in the United States.”American Journal of Political Science39: 75–86.
40.
HsiaoCheng.1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
HuberEvelyneRaginCharlesStephensJohn D..1993. “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State.”American Journal of Sociology99: 711–49.
42.
HuberEvelyneRaginCharlesStephensJohn D.BradyDavidieldJason Beckf.2004. Comparative Welfare States Dataset. [Machinereadable data files and codebooks.] Chapel Hill, NC: Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina.
43.
HuberEvelyneStephensJohn.2000. “Partisan Governance, Women's Employment, and the Social Democratic Service State.”American Sociological Review65: 323–42.
44.
Huber.2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
ImmergutEllen.1998. “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism.”Politics & Society26: 5–34.
46.
InglehartRonaldBakerWayne.2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.”American Sociological Review65: 19–51.
47.
International Social Survey Program (ISSP).1988. Role of Government I, 1985-1986. [Machine-readable data files and codebooks]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
48.
International Social Survey Program (ISSP).1993. Role of Government II, 1990. [Machine-readable data files and codebooks]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
49.
International Social Survey Program (ISSP).1994. Religion I, 1991. [Machine-readable data files and codebooks.]Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
50.
International Social Survey Program (ISSP).1999. Role of Government III, 1996. [Machine-readable data files and codebooks.]Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
51.
International Social Survey Program (ISSP).2001. Religion II, 1998. [Machine-readable data files and codebooks.]Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
52.
JacobsLawrenceShapiroRobert.2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kenworthy.2004. Egalitarian Capitalism: Jobs, Incomes, and Growth in Affluent CountriesNew York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55.
KluegelJamesMiyanoMasaru.1995. “Justice Beliefs and Support for the Welfare State in Advanced Capitalism.” Pp. 81–105 in Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, edited by KluegelJamesMasonDavidWegenerBernd. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
56.
KnutsenOddbjorn.1995. “Party Choice.” Pp. 460–503 in The Impact of Values, edited by van DethJanScarbroughElinor. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
KorpiWalter.1989. “Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights during Sickness in Eighteen OECD Countries since 1930.”American Sociological Review54: 309–28.
58.
KorpiWalterPalmeJoakim.1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries.”American Sociological Review63: 661–87.
59.
Korpi.2003. “New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975-95.”American Political Science Review97: 425–46.
60.
LijphartArend.1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six CountriesNew Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
61.
LipsetSeymour Martin.1963. The First New Nation: The United States in Historical and Comparative Perspective. New York: Basic.
62.
Lipset.1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: Norton.
63.
ManzaJeffCookFay Lomax.2002. “A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness in the United States.”American Politics Quarterly30: 630–67.
64.
MartinussenWilly.1993. “Welfare-State Support in Achievement-Oriented Hearts: The Case of Norway.” Pp. 49–60 in Welfare Trends in the Scandinavian Countries, edited by HansenErikRingenSteinUusitaloHannuEriksonRobert. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
65.
McCloskyHerbertZallerJohn.1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and DemocracyCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
MisraJoyaHicksAlexander.1994. “Catholicism and Unionization in Affluent Postwar Democracies: Catholicism, Culture, Party, and Unionization.”American Sociological Review59: 304–26.
67.
MollerStephanieBradleyDavidHuberEvelyneNielsenFrançoisStephensJohn.2003. “Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Capitalist Democracies.”American Sociological Review68: 22–51.
68.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).2003a. Historical Statistics [various years]. July 21, 2004, Paris, France (www.oecd.org).
69.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).2003b. Labour Force Statistics [various years]. July 21, 2004, Paris, France (www.oecd.org).
70.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).2003c. Main Economic Indicators [various years]. July 21, 2004, Paris, France (www.oecd.org).
71.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).2003d. National Accounts [various years]. July 21, 2004, Paris, France (www.oecd.org).
72.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).2005. Social Expenditures Database [1980-2001]. July 21, 2004, Paris, France (www.sourceoecd.org).
73.
OrloffAnn Shola.1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.”American Sociological Review58: 303–28.
74.
PageBenjaminShapiroRobert.1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.”American Political Science Review77: 175–90.
75.
PageBenjamin.1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans'Policy PreferenceChicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76.
PampelFredWilliamsonJohn.1988. “Welfare Spending in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1950-1980.”American Journal of Sociology93: 1424–56.
77.
PaxtonPamelaKunovichSheri.2003. “Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.”Social Forces82: 87114.
78.
PetryFrançois.1999. “The Opinion-Policy Relationship in Canada.”Journal of Politics61: 540–50.
79.
PiersonPaul.1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of RetrenchmentNew York: Cambridge University Press.
80.
PiersonPaul.1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.”World Politics48: 143–79.
81.
PiersonPaul.2001. “Investigating the Welfare State at Century's End.” Pp. 1–14 in The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by PiersonPaul. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
82.
PowellG. Binham.2000. Elections as Instruments of DemocracyNew Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
83.
RafteryAdrian.1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Sociology.”Sociological Methodology25: 111–63.
84.
RimlingerGaston.1971. Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America, and RussiaNew York: Wiley.
85.
RogersWilliam.1993. “sg17: Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.”Stata Technical Bulletin13: 19–23.
86.
RothsteinBo.1998. Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare StateNew York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
RothsteinBoSteinmoSven.2002. “Restructuring Politics: Institutional Analysis and the Challenges of Modern Welfare States.” Pp. 1–19 in Restructuring the Welfare State: Political Institutions and Policy Change, edited by RothsteinBoSteinmoSven. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
88.
SchumanHowardSteehCharlotteBoboLawrenceKrysanMaria.1997. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Rev. ed.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89.
SherkatDarrenEllisonChristopher.1999. “Recent Developments and Current Controversies in the Sociology of Religion.”Annual Review of Sociology25: 363–94.
90.
SkocpolTheda.1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United StatesCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91.
SmithTom W.1987. “The Polls—A Report: The Welfare State in Cross-National Perspective.”Public Opinion Quarterly51: 404–21.
92.
SmithTom W.1990. “Social Inequality in Cross-National Perspective.” Pp. 21–31 in Attitudes to Inequality and the Role of Government, edited by BeckerJ. W.DavisJames A.EsterPeterMohlerPeter P.. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Social and Cultural Planning Office.
93.
SorokaStuartWlezienChristopher.2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.”Canadian Journal of Political Science37: 531–559.
94.
SorokaStuartWlezienChristopher.2005. “Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.”British Journal of Political Science35: 665–689.
95.
SteinmoSven.1994. “American Exceptionalism Reconsidered: Culture or Institutions?” Pp. 106–31 in The Dynamics of American Politics, edited by DoddLawrenceJillsonCalvin. Boulder, CO: Westview.
96.
StimsonJames A.MackuenMichael B.EriksonRobert S..1995. “Dynamic Representation.”American Political Science Review89: 543–65.
97.
StephensJohn.1979. The Transition from Capitalism to SocialismLondon: Macmillan.
98.
SvallforsStefan.1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.”European Sociological Review13: 283–304.
99.
SvallforsStefan.1999. “The Middle Class and Welfare State Retrenchment: Attitudes to Swedish Welfare Policies.” Pp. 34–51 in The End of the Welfare State? Responses to State Retrenchment, edited by SvallforsStefanTaylor-GoobyPeter. London, England, and New York: Routledge.
100.
SwankDuane H.2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in the Developed Welfare States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
101.
Taylor-GoobyPeter.1993. “What Citizens Want from the State.” Pp. 82–101 in International Social Attitudes: The 10th BSA Report, edited by JowellRogerBrookLindsayDowdsLizanne. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing.
102.
WeirMargaretOrloffAnnSkocpolTheda.1988. “Introduction: Understanding American Social Politics.” Pp. 3–27 in The Politics of Social Policy in the United States, edited by WeirMargaretOrloffAnneSkocpolTheda. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
103.
WilenskyHarold.1975. The Welfare State and EqualityBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.
104.
WlezienChristopher.1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.”American Journal of Political Science39: 981–1000.
105.
WooldridgeJeffrey.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel DataCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
