Are American attitudes toward economic inequality different from those in other countries? One tradition in sociology suggests American “exceptionalism,” while another argues for convergence across nations in social norms, such as attitudes toward inequality. This article uses International Social Survey Program (ISSP) microdata to compare attitudes in different countries toward what individuals in specific occupations “do earn” and what they “should earn,” and to distinguish value preferences for more egalitarian outcomes from other confounding attitudes and perceptions. The authors suggest a method for summarizing individual preferences for the leveling of earnings and use kernel density estimates to describe and compare the distribution of individual preferences over time and cross-nationally. They find that subjective estimates of inequality in pay diverge substantially from actual data, and that although Americans do not, on the average, have different preferences for aggregate (in)equality, there is evidence for:
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlesinaAlbertoAngeletosGeorge-Marios.2005. “Fairness and Redistribution.”American Economic Review95: 960–80.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoFerraraEliana La.2001. “Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities.” Working Paper No. 8267, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoTellaRafael DiMacCullochRobert.2001. “Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?” Working Paper No. 8198, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
4.
AlwinDuane F.1987. “Distributive Justice and Satisfaction with Material Well-Being.”American Sociological Review52: 83–95.
5.
AtkinsonAnthony B.1970. “On the Measurement of Inequality.”Journal of Economic Theory2: 244–63.
6.
BénabouRolandTiroleJean. Forthcoming. “Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics.”Quarterly Journal of Economics.
7.
BjörklundAndersJänttiMarkus.2000. “Intergenerational Mobility of Socioeconomic Status in Comparative Perspective.”Nordic Journal of Political Economy26: 3–32.
8.
BreenRichardJonssonJan O..2005. “Inequality of Opportunity in Comparative Perspective”Annual Review of Sociology31: 223–43.
9.
BurtlessGaryJencksChristopher.2003. “American Inequality and Its Consequences.” Pp. 61–108 in Agenda for the Nation, edited by AaronHenryLindsayJames M.NivolaPietro. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
10.
CorakMiles ed.2004. Generational Income Mobility in North America and EuropeCambridge: UK Cambridge University Press.
11.
EntorfHorstMinoiuNicoleta.2004. “PISA Results: What a Difference Immigration Law Makes.”IZA Discussion Paper No. 1021, Institut zur Zukunst der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn, Germany.
12.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H..1985. “Are American Rates of Social Mobility Exceptionally High? New Evidence on an Old Issue.”European Sociological Review1: 1–22.
13.
Erikson.1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial SocietiesOxford, England: Clarendon Press.
14.
Erikson.2002. “Intergenerational Inequality: A Sociological Perspective.”Journal of Economic Perspectives16: 31–44.
15.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.JacksonMichelleYaishMeirCoxD. R..2005. “On Class Differentials in Educational Attainment.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102: 9730–733.
16.
Esping-AndersenG⊘sta.1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare CapitalismCambridge, UK: Polity Press.
17.
EvansMariah D. R.KelleyJonathan2004. “Subjective Social Location: Data from 21 Nations.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research16: 3–38.
18.
FörsterMichaelMira d'ErcoleMarco.2005. “Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s.” Working Paper No. 22, OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) Social, Employment and Migration, Paris, France.
19.
GlaeserEdward L.2005. “Inequality.” Working Paper No. 11511, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
20.
GlaeserEdward L.PonzettoGiacomo A. M.ShapiroJesse M..2004. “Strategic Extremism: Why Republicans and Democrats Divide on Religious Values.” Working Paper No. 10835, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
21.
GottschalkPeterSmeedingTimothy M..1997. “Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality.”Journal of Economic Literature35: 633–87.
22.
Gottschalk.2000. “Empirical Evidence on Income Inequality in Industrialized Countries.” Pp. 261–308 in Handbook of Income Distribution, Vol. 1, edited by AtkinsonAnthony B.BourguignonFrançois. Amsterdam, Holland: North-Holland.
23.
GreeneWilliam.2002. Econometric Analysis. Fifth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
24.
GruskyDavid B.HauserRobert M..1984. “Comparative Social Mobility Revisited: Models of Convergence and Divergence in 16 Countries.”American Sociological Review49: 19–38.
25.
HauserRobert M.WarrenJohn R..1997. “Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update and Critique.”Sociological Methodology27: 177–298.
26.
HelliwellJohn F.2003. “Do Borders Matter for Social Capital? Economic Growth and Civic Culture in U.S. States and Canadian Provinces.” Pp. 19–42 in The Economic Implications of Social Cohesion, edited by OsbergLars. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
27.
InkelesAlex.1998. One World Emerging? Convergence and Divergence in Industrial SocietiesBoulder, CO: Westview Press.
28.
IversenTorbenSoskiceDavid.2005. “Electoral Institutions, Parties, and the Politics of Class: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” Working Paper 2005-50, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
29.
JänttiMarkusBratsbergBerntR⊘LedKnutRaaumOddbj⊘rnNaylorRobinÖsterbackaEvaBjörklundAndersErikssonTor.2005. “American Exceptionalism in a New Light: A Comparison of Intergenerational Earnings Mobility in the Nordic Countries, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” Memorandum No 34/2005, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
30.
JänttiMarkusDanzigerSheldon H..2000. “Income Poverty in Advanced Countries.” Pp. 309–78 in Handbook of Income Distribution, edited by BourguignonA. B.AtikinsonF.. New York: Elsevier Science.
31.
JassoGuillermina.1978. “On the Justice of Earnings: A New Specification of the Justice Evaluation Function.”The American Journal of Sociology83: 1398–419.
32.
Jasso.1980. “A New Theory of Distributive Justice.”American Sociological Review45: 3–32.
33.
KelleyJonathanEvansMariah D. R..1993. “The Legitimation of Inequality: Occupational Earnings in Nine Nations.”The American Journal of Sociology99: 75–125.
34.
KerrV. Clark.1983. The Future of Industrial Societies: Convergence or Continuing Diversity?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
KluegelJames R.CsepeliGyorgyKolosiTamasOrkenyAntalNemenyiMaria.1995a. “Accounting for the Rich and the Poor: Existential Justice in Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 179–207 in Social Justice and Political Change, Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, edited by KluegelJames R.MasonDavid S.WegenerBernd. Berlin, Germany, and New York: De Gruyter.
36.
KluegelJames R.MasonDavid S.WegenerBernd eds.1995b. Social Justice and Political Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post- Communist States. Berlin, Germany, and New York: De Gruyter.
37.
KoschmannJ. Victor.1997. “Review Essay: The Nationalism of Cultural Uniqueness.”The American Historical Review102: 758–68.
38.
LipsetS. Martin.1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged SwordNew York: W.W. Norton.
39.
LipsetS. MartinBendixReinhard.1959. Social Mobility in Industrial SocietyBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
MolmLinda D.TakahashiNobuyukiPetersonGretchen.2003. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Procedural Justice in Social Exchange.”American Sociological Review68: 128–52.
41.
NellesH. V.“American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword (Review Essay)” (review of American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, by Seymour Martin Lipset). The American Historical Review, Vol. 102,
No. 3. (Jun., 1997), 749–757.
42.
NolanMary (1997) “Against Exceptionalisms” (review of American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, by Seymour Martin Lipset). The American Historical Review, Vol. 102,
No. 3. (Jun., 1997) pp. 769–774
43.
OsbergLarsSmeedingTimothy M..2006. “Social Values for Equality and Preferences for State Intervention in the USA and Europe” Forthcoming in Welfare State Reform in the United States and the European Union—Policy Choices and the Constitution of the New Welfare Society, edited by ToftChristianCordesJoseph. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
OsbergLarsSmeedingTimothy M.SchwabishJonthan.2004. “Income Distribution and Public Social Expenditure: Theories, Effects and Evidence.” Pages 823–862 in Social Inequality, edited by NeckermanKathryn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
45.
ParsonsTalcott.1960. Structure and Process in Modern SocietiesGlencoe, IL: The Free Press.
46.
PikettyThomas.1995. “Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics.”Quarterly Journal of Economics110: 551–84.
47.
RoseDavidPevalinDavid J..2003. A Researcher's Guide to the National Statistics Socio-Economic ClassificationLondon, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd.
48.
SchwabishJonathanOsbergLarsSmeedingTimothy M.EriksenMichaelMarchandJoseph. Forthcoming. “Income Distribution and Social Expenditures: A Cross-National Perspective.” In The Distributional Effects of Government Spending and Taxation, edited by PapadimitriouDimitri B.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
ShepelakNorma J.AlwinDuane F..1986. “Beliefs about Inequality and Perceptions of Distributive Justice.”American Sociological Review51: 30–46.
50.
SmeedingTimothy M.2005. “Public Policy and Economic Inequality: The United States in Comparative Perspective.”Social Science Quarterly86: 955–83.
51.
SmithAdam. [1776] 1961. An Inequiry into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations, Fifth edition, edited by CannanEdwin. Reprint, London, UK: Methuen and Company.
52.
SolonG.2002. “Cross-Country Differences in Intergenerational Earnings Mobility”Journal of Economic Perspectives16: 59–66.
53.
SuhrckeMarc.2001. “Preferences for Inequality: East vs West.” Innocenti Working Paper No. 89, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence, Italy.
54.
SvallforsStefan.1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.”European Sociological Review13: 283–304.
55.
SzirmaiAdam.1991. “Explaining Variation in Attitudes toward Income Inequality.” Pp. 229–68 in Social Justice in Human Relations, edited by SteensmaHermanVermuntRiël. New York and London, UK: Plenum Press.
56.
WegenerBerndSteinmannSusanne.1995. “Justice Psychophysics in the Real World: Comparing Income Justice and Income Satisfaction in East and West Germany.” Pp. 151–75 in Social Justice and Political Change, Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, edited by KluegelJames R.MasonDavid S.WegenerBernd. Berlin, Germany, and New York: De Gruyter.
57.
WilenskyHarold L.2002. Rich Democracies: Political Economy, Public Policy, and PerformanceBerkeley, CA: University of California Press.
58.
WoessmannLudger.2004. “How Equal Are Educational Opportunities? Family Background and Student Achievement in Europe and the United States.” Discussion Paper No. 1284, Institut zur Zukunst der Arbeit (IZA) Bonn, Germany.
59.
YountsC. WesleyMuellerCharles W..2001. “Justice Processes: Specifying the Mediating Role of Perceptions of Distributive Justice.”American Sociological Review66: 125–45.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
