The study examines change over time in sentiments toward out-group populations in European societies. For this purpose data were compiled from four waves of the Eurobarometer surveys for 12 countries that provided detailed and comparable information on attitudes toward foreigners between 1988 and 2000. A series of multilevel hierarchical linear models were estimated to examine change in the effects of individual- and country-level sources of threat on anti-foreigner sentiment. The analysis shows a substantial rise in antiforeigner sentiment between 1988 and 2000 in all 12 countries. The rise in anti-foreigner sentiment was steep in the early period (between 1988 and 1994), then leveled off after that. Although anti-foreigner sentiment tends to be more pronounced in places with a large proportion of foreign populations and where economic conditions are less prosperous, the effects of both factors on anti-foreigner sentiment have not changed over time. The analysis also shows that anti-foreigner sentiment is more pronounced in places with greater support for right-wing extreme parties. The impact of individual-level socioeconomic characteristics such as education has remained stable over the years, but the effect of political ideology has increased. The meaning and significance of the findings are discussed within the context of European societies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldwin-EdwardsMartinSchainMartin A..1994. “The Politics of Immigration: Introduction.” Pp. 1–16 in The Politics of Immigration in Western Europe, edited by SchainM.Baldwin-EdwardsM. A.. Essex, UK: Frank Class & Co.
2.
BaumgartlBerndFavellAdrian eds.1995. New Xenophobia in EuropeLondon, UK: Kluwer Law International.
3.
BlalockHubert M.Jr.1967. Toward a Theory of Minority-Group RelationsNew York: John Wiley and Sons.
4.
BlumerHerbert.1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Relation.”Pacific Sociological Review1: 3–7.
5.
BoboLawrenceHutchingsVincent L..1996. “Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer's Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context.”American Sociological Review61: 951–72.
6.
BoboLawrence D.1988. “Group Conflict, Prejudice, and the Paradox of Contemporary Racial Attitudes.” Pp. 85–114 in Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy, edited by TaylorP. A.KatzD. A.. New York: Plenum Press.
7.
BrykAnthony S.RaudenbushStephen W..1992. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis MethodsNewbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
8.
CaseCharles E.GreeleyAndrew M.FuchsStephan.1989. “Social Determinants of Racial Prejudice.”Sociological Perspectives32: 469–83.
9.
CastlesStephenKosackGodula.1985. Immigrant Workers and Class Structure in Western EuropeLondon, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
CastlesStephenMillerMark J..1993. The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern WorldNew York: Guilford Press.
11.
CoendersMarcelGijsbertsMéroveScheepersPeer.2004a. “Resistance to the Presence of Immigrants and Refugees in 22 Countries.” Pp. 97–120 in Nationalism and Exclusion of Migrants: Cross-National Comparisons, edited by GijsbertsM.ScheepersL.HagendoornP.. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
12.
CoendersMarcelLubbersMarcelScheepersPeer.2004b. “Majorities' Attitudes towards Minorities in Western and Eastern European Societies: Results from European Social Survey 2002-2003.” Report 4, European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia, Vienna, Austria.
13.
EspenshadeThomas J.HempsteadKatherine.1996. “Contemporary American Attitudes toward U.S. Migration.”International Migration Review30: 535–70.
14.
EssesVictoria M.DovidioJohn F.JacksonLynne M.ArmstrongTamara L..2001. “The Immigrants Dilemma: The Role of Perceived Group Competition, Ethnic Prejudice, and Nationality Identity.”Journal of Social Issues53: 389–412.
15.
EvansGeoffreyNeedAriana.2002. “Explaining Ethnic Polarization over Attitudes toward Minority Rights in Eastern Europe: A Multilevel Analysis.”Social Science Research31: 653–80.
16.
MartinEvans.1996. “Languages of Racism within Contemporary Europe.” Pp. 33–53 in Nation and Identity in Contemporary Europe, edited by SofosB.JenkinsS. A.. London, UK: Routledge.
17.
Eurostat.1989. Demographic Statistics 1989. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
18.
Eurostat.1990. Demographic Statistics 1990Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
19.
Eurostat.1994. Demographic Statistics 1994Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
20.
Eurostat.1995. Demographic Statistics 1995Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
21.
European Communities.1996. Eurostat Yearbook 1996Luxembourg: Off ice for Official Publications of the European Communities.
22.
European Communities.2003. Eurostat Yearbook 2003Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
23.
FaistThomas.1994. “How to Define a Foreigner? The Symbolic Politics of Immigration in German Partisan Discourse, 1978-1992.” Pp. 50–71 in The Politics of Immigration in Western Europe, edited by SchainM.Baldwin-EdwardsM. A.. Essex, UK: Frank Class & Co.
24.
FetzerJoel S.2000. Public Attitudes toward Invigoration in the United States, France, and GermanyNew York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
FossettMark A.Jill KiecoltK..1989. “The Relative Size of Minority Populations and White Racial Attitudes.”Social Science Quarterly70: 820–35.
26.
GaasholtOysteinTogebyLise.1995. “Interethnic Tolerance, Education, and Political Orientation: Evidence from Denmark.”Political Behavior17: 265–83.
27.
GijsbertsMéroveScheepersPeerCoendersMarcel.2004. “Exclusion of Legal Migrants in Western Europe.” Pp. 121–42 in Nationalism and Exclusion of Migrants: Cross-National Comparisons, edited by GijsbertsM.ScheepersL.HagendoornP.. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
28.
GolderMatt.2003. “Explaining Variation in the Electoral Success of Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe.”Comparative Political Studies36: 432–66.
29.
HartungHalard.2002. Eurobarometer 53: Racism, Information Society, General Services, and Food Labeling, April-May 2000 [computer file]. 3rd. ICPSR version. Brussels, Belgium: INRA (Europe) [producer], 2000. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors].
30.
AlanHestonSummersRobertAtenBenitta.2002. Penn World Table Version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP). Retrieved January 9, 2004 (http://datacentre2.chass.utoronto.ca/pwt/).
31.
HollifieldJames F.1992. Immigrants, Markets, and States: The Political Economy of Postwar EuropeCambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press.
32.
KinderDonald R.SandersLynn M..1996Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
KinlochGraham.1974. The Dynamic of Race Relations: A Sociological Analysis.New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
KniggePia.1998. “‘The Ecological Correlates of Right-Wing Extremism in Western Europe’.”European Journal of Political Research34: 249–79.
35.
KunovichRobert M.2004. “Social Structural Position and Prejudice: An Exploration of Cross-National Differenced in Regression Slopes.”Social Science Research33: 20–44.
36.
LahavGalliya.2004. Immigration and Politics in the New Europe: Reinventing BordersCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
LubbersMarcelGijsbertsMéroveScheepersPeer.2002. “ ‘Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe.’”European Journal of Political Research41: 345–78.
38.
MelichAnna.2000. Eurobarometer 47.1: Images of Switzerland, Education throughout Life, Racism, and Patterns of Family Planning and Work Status, March-April 1997 [computer file]. Conducted by INRA (Europe) Brussels. 2nd ZA ed.Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung [producer], 2000. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung/Ann Arbor, M: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors].
39.
OlzakSusan.1992. The Dynamic of Ethnic Competition and ConflictStanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
PettigrewThomas F.1980. “Prejudice.” Pp. 820–29 in The Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups, edited by ThemstromS.HandlinA.OrlovO.. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
41.
PettigrewThomas F.1998. “Reaction toward the new Minorities of Western Europe.”Annual Review of Sociology24: 77–103.
42.
QuillianLincoln.1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.”American Sociological Review60: 586–611.
43.
QuillianLincoln.1996. “Group Threat and Regional Changes in Attitudes toward African Americans.”American Journal of Sociology102: 816–60.
44.
RaijmanRebeccaSemyonovMoshe.2004. “Perceived Threat and Exclusionary Attitudes toward Foreign Workers in Israel.”Ethnic and Racial Studies27: 780–99.
45.
RaijmanRebeccaSemyonovMosheSchmidtPeter.2003. “Do Foreigners Deserve Rights? Determinants of Public Opinion Views toward Foreigners in Germany and Israel.”European Sociological Review19: 379–92.
46.
ReifKarlheinzMarlierEric.1998. Eurobarometer 41.1: Post-European Election, June-July 1994 [computer file]. 2nd ZA ed. Conducted by INRA (Europe) Brussels. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung [producer], 1995. Cologne, Germany: Zentralarchiv fur Empirische Sozialforschung/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors].
47.
ReifKarlheinzMelichAnna.1992. Eurobarometer 30: Immigrants and Out-Groups in Western Europe, October-November 1988 [Computer File]. Conducted by Fairs et Opinions, Paris. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].
48.
ScheepersPeerGijbertsMeroveCoendersMarcel.2002. “Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries: Public Oppositions to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Threat.”European Sociological Review18: 17–34.
49.
SchisselBernardWannerRichardFrideresJames S..1989. “Social and Economic Context and Attitudes toward Immigrants in Canadian Cities.”International Migration Review23: 289–308.
50.
SchnapperDominique.1994. “The Debate on Immigration and the Crisis of National Identity.” Pp. 127–39 in The Politics of Immigration in Western Europe, edited by SchainM.Balwin-EdwardsM.. Essex, UK: Frank Cass & Co.
51.
SemyonovMosheHaberfeldYitchakCohenYinonNoahLewin-Epstein.2000. “Racial Composition and Occupational Segregation and Inequality across American Cities.”Social Science Research29: 175–87.
52.
SemyonovMosheRaijmanRebecaAnatYom-Tov.2002“Labor Market Competition, Perceived Threat, and Endorsement of Economic Discrimination against Foreign Workers in Israel.”Social Problems49: 416–31.
53.
SemyonovMosheRaijmanRebeccaYom-TovAnatSchmidtPeter.2004. “Population Size, Perceived Threat, and Exclusion: A Multiple-Indicators Analysis of Attitudes toward Foreigners in Germany.”Social Science Research33: 681–701.
54.
SoysalYasemin N.1994. Limits of Citizenship. Migrants and Postnational Membership in EuropeChicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
55.
TaylorMarylee C.1998. “How White Attitudes Vary within the Racial Composition of Local Population: Numbers Count.”American Sociological Review63: 512–35.
56.
TienhaaraNancy.1974. Canadian Views on Immigration and Population: An Analysis of Post- War Gallup Polls. Ottawa, Canada: Information Canada.
57.
Van TubergenFrankMaasInekeFlapHenk.2004. “The Economic Incorporation of Immigrants in 18 Western Societies: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects.”American Sociological Review69: 704–27.
58.
WilcoxJerryRoofWade C..1978. “Percent Black and Black-White Status Inequality: Southern versus Nonsouthern Patterns.”Social Science Quarterly59: 421–34.
59.
WimmerAndreas.1997. “Explaining Xenophobia and Racism: A Critical Review of Current Researches Approach.”Ethnic and Racial Studies20: 17–41.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
