This study assesses whether civic association activity has declined in four Western democracies: Canada, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Influential accounts of decreasing civic engagement in the United States lead to the expectation of similar patterns in the other three nations. The authors test this hypothesis using data from time-use surveys of adult national samples for the mid-1960s to the late 1990s. One major finding is a clear decline in association activity in the United States, especially after 1975, but relative stability in the other three countries. Equally important are further results indicating that the American decline pertains only to women. Findings are sustained even after controlling for social background characteristics and four other activities (television watching, paid work, childcare, and physical activity). The analysis casts doubt on the theory that declining civic association activity in the United States reflects generational differences. Possible explanations for the reduced activity among American women, including lower levels of state support, are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaerDouglasCurtisJamesGrabbEdward.2001. “Has Voluntary Association Activity Declined? Cross-National Analyses for Fifteen Countries.”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology38: 249–74.
2.
BaumgartnerFrankWalkerJack L..1988. “Survey Research and Membership in Voluntary Associations.”American Journal of Political. Science32: 908–27.
3.
BreenRichard.1996. Regression Models: Censored, Sample-Selected, or Truncated Data. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-11. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
CurtisJamesBaerDouglasGrabbEdward.2001. “Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association Membership in Democratic Societies.”American Sociological Review66: 783–805.
5.
CurtisJamesBaerDouglasGrabbEdwardPerksThomas.2003. “Estimation des tendances de l'engagement dans les associations volontaires au cours des dernières décennies au Québec et au Canada anglais.”Sociologie et Société35: 115–42.
6.
CurtisJamesGrabbEdwardBaerDouglas.1992. “Voluntary Association Membership in Fifteen Countries: A Comparative Analysis.”American Sociological Review57: 139–52.
7.
FisherKimberly.2004. Technical Details of Time Use Studies. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, England. Released May 15, 2004; available at
http://iserwww.essex.ac.uk/mtus/index.php.
8.
ForsterMichaeld'ErcoleMarco Mira.2005. Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990sParis, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
9.
FoxJohn.1987. “Effect Displays for Generalized Linear Models.”Sociological Methodology17: 347–61.
10.
GershunyJonathon.2000. Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial SocietyOxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
GlatzerWolfgangHauserRichard.2003. “The Distribution of Income and Wealth in European and North American Societies.” Pp. 187–217 in Changing Structures of Inequality: A Comparative Perspective, edited by NollY.LemelH.-H.. Montreal and Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.
12.
GornickJanet C.MeyersMarcia K..2003. Families That Work. Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and EmploymentNew York: Russell Sage.
13.
HallMichaelMcKeownLarryRobertsKaren.2001. Caring Canadians, Involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2000 National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada, Cat. NO. 71-542-XPE.
14.
HallMichael.2003. The Capacity to Serve: A Qualitative Study of the Challenges Facing Canada's Nonprofit and Voluntary Organizations. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
15.
HallMichaelBarrCathyEaswaramoorthyM.Wojciech SokolowskiS.SalamonLester M..2005. The Canadian Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector in Comparative PerspectiveToronto, Canada: Imagine Canada.
16.
HallPeter A.2002. “Great Britain: The Role of Government and the Distribution of Social Capital.” Pp. 21–57 in Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, edited by PutnamR.. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
HalpernDavid.2005. Social CapitalCambridge, England: Polity Press.
18.
InglehartRonald.1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 SocietiesPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
InglehartRonaldBakerWayne.2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.”American Sociological Review65: 19–51.
20.
JacobsJerry A.GersonKathleen.2004. The Time Divide.Work, Family, and Gender InequalityCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
JacobsJerry A.GornickJanet C..2002. “Hours of Paid Work in Dual-Earner Couples: The U.S. in Cross-National Perspective.”Sociological Focus35: 169–87.
22.
JanoskiThomas.1998. Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional, and Social Democratic RegimesCambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23.
KaldorMaryAnheierHelmutGlasiusMarlies eds.2003. Global Civil Society 2003Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24.
KaufmanJason.1999. “Three Views of Associationalism in 19th-Century America: An Empirical Examination.”American Journal of Sociology104: 1296–345.
25.
KramerRalphLorentzenHakonMeliefWilliamPasquinelliSergio.1993. Privatization in Four European Countries. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
26.
LipsetSeymour Martin.1990. Continental Divide. The Values and Institutions of the United States and CanadaNew York: Routledge.
27.
McCullaghPeterNelderJ. A..1989. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed.London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
28.
O'ConnorJuliaOrloffAnnShaverSheila.1999. States, Markets, Families. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
OlsenGregg.2002. The Politics of the Welfare StateToronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
30.
PancerS. MarkPrattMichael.1999. “Social and Family Determinants of Community Service Involvement in Canadian Youth.” Pp. 32–55 in Roots of Civic Identity, edited by YatesMirandaYounissJames. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31.
PaxtonPamela.1999. “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple-Indicator Assessment.”American Journal of Sociology105: 88–127.
32.
PutnamRobert.1995. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.”Journal of Democracy6: 65–78.
33.
PutnamRobert.1996. “The Strange Disappearance of Civic America.”American Prospect7: 34–48.
34.
PutnamRobert.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American CommunityNew York: Simon and Schuster.
35.
PutnamRobert ed.2002. Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary SocietyNew York: Oxford University Press.
36.
RobinsonJohn P.GodbeyGeoffrey.1999. Time for Life. The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. 2nd ed.University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
37.
RotoloThomas.1999. “Trends in Voluntary Association Participation.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly28: 199–212.
38.
RotoloThomasWilsonJohn.2004. “What Happened to the ‘Long Civic Generation?’ Explaining Cohort Differences in Volunteerism.”Social Forces82: 1091–121.
39.
Saint-ArnaudSebastienBernardPaul.2003. “Convergence or Resilience? A Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of the Welfare Regimes in Advanced Countries.”Current Sociology51: 499–528.
40.
SalamonLesterWojciech SokolowskiS..2003. “Institutional Roots of Volunteering.” Pp. 71–90 in The Values of Volunteering: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, edited by HalmanP.DekkerL.. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
41.
SardonJean-Paul.2004. “Recent Demographic Trends in the Developed Countries.”Population-E59: 263–314.
42.
SayerLiana.2005. “Gender, Time and Inequality: Trends in Women's and Men's Paid Work, Unpaid Work and Free Time.”Social Forces84: 285–303.
43.
SchoferEvanMarionFourcade-Gourinchas.2001. “The Structural Contexts of Civic Engagement: Voluntary Association Membership in Comparative Perspective.”American Sociological Review66: 805–28.
44.
SimmelGeorg. [1903] 1950. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” Pp. 499–524 in The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited and translated by WolffK. H.. New York: Free Press.
45.
SkocpolTheda.1996. “Unravelling from Above.”The American Prospect25: 20–25.
46.
SkocpolTheda.1999. “How Americans Became Civic.” Pp. 27–80 in Civic Engagement in American Democracy, edited by FiorinaT.SkocpolM. P.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47.
SkocpolTheda.2002. “Will 9/11 and the War on Terror Revitalize American Civic Democracy?”PS: Political Science and Politics35: 537–40.
48.
SkocpolTheda.2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic LifeNorman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
49.
SkocpolTheda.2004. “The Narrowing of Civic Life.”The American Prospect15: A5–A7.
50.
SmeedingThomas.2001. The Gap Between Rich and Poor: A Cross-National Perspective for Why Inequality Matters and What Policy Can Do to Alleviate ItTokyo, Japan: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research.
51.
SmithDavid Horton.1972. “Modernization and the Emergence of Voluntary Organizations.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology13: 113–34.
52.
SmithDavid Horton.1975. “Voluntary Action and Voluntary Groups.”Annual Review of Sociology1: 247–70.
53.
TiehenLaura.2000. “Has Working More Caused Married Women to Volunteer Less? Evidence from Time Diary Data, 1965 to 1993.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly29: 505–29.
54.
ToenniesFerdinand. [1887] 1940. Fundamental Concepts of Society. Translated by LoomisC. P.. New York: American Books.
55.
United Nations Development Program.1999. Human Development Report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
United Nations Development Program.2004. Human Development Report 2004New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
van den BroekAndriesBreedveldKoen eds.2004. Trends in Time: The Use and Organization of Time in the Netherlands, 1975-2000The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office.
58.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E..1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American PoliticsCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
WilsonJohn.2000. “Volunteering.”Annual Review of Sociology26: 215–40.
60.
WuthnowRobert.1991. “Tocqueville's Question Reconsidered: Volunteerism and Public Discourse in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Pp. 288–308 in Between States and Markets: The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective, edited by WuthnowR.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
WuthnowRobert.2002. “The United States: Bridging the Privileged and the Marginalized?” Pp. 59–102 in Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, edited by PutnamR.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
