Sociological researchers have studied the consequences of strong categorical boundaries, but have devoted little attention to the causes and consequences of boundary erosion. This study analyzes the erosion of categorical boundaries in the case of opposing category pairs. The authors propose that categorical boundaries weaken when the borrowing of elements from a rival category by high-status actors triggers emulation such that the mean number of elements borrowed by others increases and the variance in the number of elements borrowed declines. It is suggested that penalties to borrowing in the form of downgraded evaluations by critics exist, but decline as the number of peers who borrow increases. The research setting is French gastronomy during the period from 1970 to 1997, when classical and nouvelle cuisines were rival categories competing for the allegiance of chefs. The results broadly support the authors' hypotheses, indicating that chefs redrew the boundaries of culinary categories, which critics eventually recognized. Implications for research on blending and segregating processes are outlined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichHoward.1979. Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
AxelrodRobertCohenMichael2000. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: Free Press.
3.
BarnettWilliam P.GlennR Carroll.1995. “Modelling Organizational Change.”Annual Review of Sociology21: 217–36.
4.
BaronJames N.2004. “Employing Identities in Organizational Ecology.”Industrial and Corporate Change13: 3–32.
5.
BarthFrederick.1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
6.
BeaugéBénédict.1999. Aventures de la cuisine française, cinquante ans d'histoire du goÛt. Paris, France: Nil Editions.
7.
BeckerHoward.1978. “Arts and Crafts.”American Journal of Sociology83: 863–89.
8.
BeckerHoward.1991. “Art World Revisited.”Sociological Forum5: 497–502.
9.
BenjaminBeth A.PodolnyJoel M.1999. “Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry, 1981–1991.”Administrative Science Quarterly44 (3): 563–89.
10.
BluteMarion.1979. “Sociocultural Evolutionism: An Untried Theory.”Behavioral Science24: 46–59.
11.
BrewerM. B.1991. “The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17: 475–82.
12.
BrysonBethany.1996. “Anything but Heavy Metal: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes.”American Sociological Review61 (5): 881–96.
13.
CampbellJohn L.2005. “Where Do We Stand? Common Mechanisms in Organizations and Social Movements Research.” Pp. 41–72 in Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by DavisGerald F.McAdamDougScottW. RichardZaldMayer N.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CarrollGlennHannanMichael T.2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
CarrollGlennSwaminathanAnand2000. “Why the Microbrewery Movement? Organizational Dynamics of Resource Partitioning in the American Brewing Industry after Prohibition.”American Journal of Sociology106: 715–62.
16.
ClemensElisabethCookJames1999. “Politics and Institutionalism, Explaining Durability and Change.”Annual Review of Sociology25: 441–66.
17.
DiMaggioPaul.1987. “Classification in Art.”American Sociological Review52: 440–55.
18.
DiMaggioPaul.1991. “Constructing an Organizational Field as Professional Project.” Pp. 267–92 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
DiMaggioPaul.1997. “Culture and Cognition.”Annual Review of Sociology23: 263–87.
20.
DouglasM.1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
GutiérrezD. G.1999. “Migration, Emergent Ethnicity, and the 'Third Space': the Shifting Politics of Nationalism in Greater Mexico.”Journal of American History86 (2): 481–518.
27.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
HaunschildP. R.MinerA. S.1997. “Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty.”Administrative Science Quarterly42: 472–500.
29.
HedstromPeter.1994. “Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions.”American Journal of Sociology99: 1157–79.
30.
HirschPaul.1972. “Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization Set Analysis of Culture Industry Systems.”American Journal of Sociology77: 639–59.
31.
JassoGuillermina.2001. “Studying Status: An Integrated Perspective.”American Sociological Review66: 96–124.
32.
LamontMicheleMolnarVirag2002. “The Study of Boundaries Across the Social Sciences.”Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–95.
33.
LiebersonStanleyDumaisSusanBaumannShyon2000. “The Instability of Androgynous Names: The Symbolic Maintenance of Gender Boundaries.”American Journal of Sociology105: 1249–87.
34.
MertonRobert A.1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
35.
MohrJohn W.DuquenneVincent1997. “The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1888–1917.”Theory and Society26: 305–56.
36.
NeirinckEdmondPoulainJean-Pierre1997Histoire de la Cuisine et des Cuisiniers: Techniques Culinaires et Pratiques de la Table. Paris, France: Editions Jacques Lanore.
37.
PetersonR. A.1997. Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
PetersonRichard A.KernRoger M.1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.”American Sociological Review61: 900–7.
39.
PhillipsDamonZuckermanEzra2001. “Middle Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Evidence from Two Markets.”American Journal of Sociology107: 379–429.
40.
PodolnyJoel.1993. “A Status-Based Model of Market Competition.”American Journal of Sociology98: 829–72.
41.
PolosLaszloHannanMichaelCarrollGlenn2002. “Foundations of a Theory of Social Forms.”Industrial and Corporate Change11: 85–115.
42.
RaoHayagreevaMoninPhilippeDurandRodolphe2003. “Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy.”American Journal of Sociology108 (4): 795–843.
43.
RosaJosé AntonioPoracJoseph F.JelenaRunser-SpanjolSaxonMichael S.1999. “Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market.”Journal of Marketing63 (December): 64–77.
44.
RosenfeldMichaelKimByung-Soo2005. “The Independence of Young Adults and the Rise of Interracial and Same Sex Unions.”American Sociological Review70: 541–62.
45.
ScottW. R.2001. Institutions and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Sage.
46.
SteinA.1997. Sex and Sensibility: Stories of a Lesbian Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
47.
StrangDavidSouleSarah1998. “Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills.”Annual Review of Sociology24: 265–90.
48.
SwidlerAnn.1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.”American Sociological Review51: 273–86.
49.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn C.1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” Pp. 7–24 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relation, edited by AustinW. G.WorchelS.. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
50.
WeissAllen.2001. “Tractatus Logico-Gastronomicus.” Pp. 229–41 in French Food: On the Table, on the Page, and in French Culture, edited by SchehrL.WeissA. S.. London: Routledge.
51.
WhiteHarrison.1992. Identity and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
WhiteHarrisonWhiteCynthia1993. Careers and Canves: Institutional Change in the French Painting World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53.
WilliamsonOliver E.1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
54.
ZerubavelE.1997. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
ZuckermanEzra W.1999. “The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount.”American Journal of Sociology104: 1398–1438.
56.
ZuckermanEzra W.KimTai-Young2003. “The Critical Trade-Off: Identity Assignment and Box Office Success in the Feature Film Industry.”Industrial and Corporate Change12: 27–67.
57.
ZuckermanEzra W.KimTai-YoungUkanwaKalindaVon RitterJames2003. “Robust Identities or Nonentities: Type-Casting in the Feature Film Labor Market.”American Journal of Sociology108: 1018–75.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
