This article examines the clash between stakeholder- and shareholder-based business systems resulting from an increase in foreign portfolio investment in the Japanese economy during the 1990s. An analysis of 1,108 firms between 1991 and 2000 shows that as foreign institutional investors, who were more interested in investment returns than in long-term relationships, replaced domestic shareholders, one fundamental pillar of Japan's stakeholder capitalism began to crack. Japanese firms began to adopt downsizing and asset divestiture, practices more characteristic of Anglo-American shareholder economies. The influence of foreigners, however, was weaker in firms more deeply embedded in the local system through close ties to domestic financial institutions and corporate groups. Thus, foreign investors were influential primarily in firms less embedded in the existing stakeholder system. This research contributes to debates on globalization and convergence of business systems, institutional change, and corporate governance systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbegglenJames C.StalkGeorgeJr.1985. Kaisha: The Japanese Corporation.New York: Basic Books.
2.
AbrahamsonEricRosenkopfLori.1993. “Institutional and Competitive Bandwagons: Using Mathematical Modeling as a Tool to Explore Innovation Diffusion.”Academy of Management Review18: 487–517.
3.
AguileraRuth V.JacksonGregory.2003. “The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants.”Academy of Management Review28: 447–65.
4.
AhmadjianChristina L.RobinsonPatricia.2001. “Safety in Numbers: Downsizing and the Deinstitutionalization of Permanent Employment in Japan.”Administrative Science Quarterly46: 622–54.
5.
AlbertMichel.1993. Capitalism vs. Capitalism: How America's Obsession with Individual Achievement and Short-term Profit Has Led It to the Brink of Collapse.New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
6.
AllisonPaul D.1984. Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Data.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
American Chamber of Commerce in Japan.2003. From Goals to Reality: FDI Policy in Japan. Tokyo, Japan.
8.
AokiMasahiko.1990. “Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm.”Journal of Economic Literature28: 1–27.
9.
Aoki.2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.
BebchukLucian A.RoeMark J..1999. “A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Governance and Ownership.”Stanford Law Review52: 127–70.
11.
BellDaniel.1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting.New York: Basic Books.
12.
BiggartNicole WoolseyGuillenMauro F..1999. “The Automobile Industry in Four Countries.”American Sociological Review64: 722–47.
13.
BudrosArt.1997. “The New Capitalism and Organizational Rationality: The Adoption of Downsizing Programs, 1979-1994.”Social Forces76: 229–50.
14.
CalPERS.1998. “Japan Market Principles.” Retrieved September 22, 1999 (http://www.calpersgovernance.org/principles/international/japan/page03 (Accessed September 22, 1999).
15.
CoffeeJohn C.Jr.2000. “The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications.”Northwestern University Law Review93: 641–708.
16.
ColeRobert E.1979. Work, Mobility, and Participation: A Comparative Study of American and Japanese Industry.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
DavisGerald F.DiekmannKristinaTinsleyCatherine.1994. “The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form.”American Sociological Review59: 547–70.
18.
DavisGerald F.ThompsonTracy A..1994. “A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate Control.”Administrative Science Quarterly39: 141–73.
19.
DiMaggioPaulPowellWalter W..1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review48: 147–60.
20.
DobbinFrank.1994. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
DoreRonald.1973. British Factory Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
Economist.2001. “Governing the Modern Corporation.” May 3. Retrieved July 22, 2002 (http://www.economist.com).
FligsteinNeil.1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
FligsteinNeil.2001. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
GerlachMichael L.1992. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
GilsonRonald J.RoeMark J..1993. “Understanding Keiretsu Overlaps.”The Yale Law Journal102: 871–906.
28.
GordonAndrew1985. The Evolution of Labor Relations in Japan.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
GuillenMauro F.2001a. The Limits of Convergence: Globalization and Organizational Change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Guillen.2001b. “Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Six Key Debates in the Social Science Literature.”Annual Review of Sociology27: 235–60.
31.
HallPeter A.SoskiceDavid.2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” Pp. 1–70 in Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by HallP. A.SoskiceD.. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
HamiltonGary G.BiggartNicole Woolsey.1988. “Market, Culture, and Authority: A Comparative Analysis of Management and Organization in the Far East.”American Journal of Sociology94: S52–S94.
33.
HaunschildPamela R.MinerAnne S..1997. “Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty.”Administrative Science Quarterly42: 472–500.
34.
HollingsworthJ. RogersSchmitterPhillipe C.StreeckWolfgang.1994. Governing Capitalist Economies.New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
HoshiTakeoKashyapAnil.2001. Corporate Financing and Governance in Japan: The Road to the Future.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36.
HuntingtonSamuel.1993. “The Clash of Civilizations?”Foreign Affairs3: 22–49.
37.
JacksonGregory.2002. “Corporate Governance in Germany and Japan: Liberalization Pressures and Responses during the 1990s.” Pp. 261–305 in The End of Diversity? Prospects for German and Japanese Capitalism, edited by StreeckW.YamamuraK.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
Japan Investment Council.1996. On the Preparation of M&A Environment in Japan: Aiming for the Promotion of Investment in Japan through M&A. Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved July 7, 2003 (www.meti.go.jp/english/report/data/cFDI105e.html).
39.
JETRO.1998. “Japanese and Foreign Firms Increasingly Tying the M&A Knot.”Focus Japan July/August. Retrieved July 7, 2003 (www.dec.ctu.edu.vn/ebooks/jetro/98_78_1.htm).
40.
KangJun-KooShivdasaniAnil.1997. “Corporate Restructuring During Performance Declines in Japan.”Journal of Financial Economics46: 29–65.
41.
KaplanSteven N.1994. “Top Executive Rewards and Firm Performance: A Comparison of Japan and the United States.”Journal of Political Economy102: 510–46.
42.
KerrClarkDunlopJohn T.HarbisonFrederickMeyersCharles A..1964. Industrialism and Industrial Man.New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
KumeIkuo.1998. Disparaged Success: Labor Politics in Postwar Japan.Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
44.
PortaLaRafaelFlorencia Lopez-de-SilanesShleiferAndreiVishnyRobert W..1998. “Law and Finance.”Journal of Political Economy106: 1113–55.
45.
LearmountSimon.2002. Corporate Governance: What Can Be Learned from Japan?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
LincolnJames R.GerlachMichael L..2004. Structure and Change in Japan's Network Economy: The Form and Consequences of Business Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
LincolnJames R.GerlachMichael. L.AhmadjianChristina L..1996. “Interfirm Networks and Corporate Performance in Japan.”American Sociological Review61: 67–88.
48.
McKinsey Global Institute.2000. Why the Japanese Economy Is Not Growing: Micro Barriers to Productivity Growth. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 7, 2003 (http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/publications/japan).
49.
NakataniIwao.1984. “The Economic Role of Financial Corporate Grouping.” Pp. 227–58 in The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm, edited by AmsterdamM. Aoki.. The Netherlands: North Holland.
50.
Nikkei Weekly.2002. “Institutions Threaten Corporate Governance.” July 22.
51.
NorthDouglas.1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance.New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
OkabeMitsuaki.2002. Cross Shareholdings in Japan: A New Unified Perspective of the Economic System.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
53.
RajanRaghuram G.ZingalesLuigi.2003. Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity.New York: Crown Business.
Shirota, June 2002. Nippon no kabunushi shijyo- to gaikokujin to-shika (Foreign Investors in the Japanese Stock Market). Tokyo, Japan: Toyo Keizai Shimpo-sha.
56.
ShirouzuNorihiko.1999. “Toyota is Tightening Control of Key Suppliers in Bid to Clock Encroachment by Foreign Firms.”Wall Street Journal, August 3, A18.
57.
SingerJason.2002. “Japanese Company Defeats Challenge from Shareholder.”Wall Street Journal, May 4. Retrieved July 22, 2002 (http://www.wsj.com).
58.
SteinmetzGreg.1999. “Rising U.S. Investment in European Equities Galvanizes Old World.”Wall Street Journal, August 4, p. 1.
59.
StreeckWolfgangYamamuraKozo.2001. The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
60.
TakahashiRyoko.2000. “Kigyo- risutora no genjyo- to tenbo- ni tsuite” (Present situation and future prospects of corporate restructuring). Tokyo, Japan: Bank of Japan.
61.
TakahashiRyokoOyamaTsuyoshi.2000. “Insights into a Recent Increase in Foreign Direct Investment in Japan.”Tokyo, Japan: Bank of Japan. Retrieved July 7, 2003 (http://www.boj.or.jp/en/ronbun/ronbun_f.htm).
62.
ThelenKathleenSteinmoSven.1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Pp. 1–32 in Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by SteinmoSvenThelenKathleenLongstrethFrank. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
TiberghienYves.2002. “State Mediation of Global Economic Forces: Different Paths of Structural Reforms in Japan and South Korea.”Journal of East Asian Studies2: 103–41.
64.
Tokyo Stock Exchange2002. 2002 Shareownership Survey. Retrieved July 11, 2003 (http://www.tse.or.jp/english/data/research/english2002.pdf).
65.
UseemMichael.1996. Investor Capitalism: How Money Managers are Changing the Face of Corporate America.New York: Basic Books/HarperCollins.
66.
Useem.1998. “Corporate Leadership in a Globalizing Equity Market.”Academy of Management Executive12: 43–59.
67.
UsuiChikakoColignonRichard.1996. “Corporate Restructuring: Converging World Pattern or Societally Specific Embeddedness?”Sociological Quarterly4: 351–78.
68.
Wharton Center for Leadership and Change Management.2004. Downsizing the Organization. Retrieved November 26, 2004 (http://leadership.wharton.upenn.edu/structure/tools_for_design_and_change/downsizing_the_organization).
69.
WhiteHalbert.1980. “A Heteroskedasticity- Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.”Econometrica48: 817–30.
70.
WhitleyRichard.1992. Business Systems in East Asia.London, UK: Sage.
71.
YamaguchiKazuo.1991. Event History Analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
