Despite growing academic interest in political and cultural globalization, sociologists have failed to systematically account for the factors that favor cross-national convergence or divergence in the form or content of public political debates in news media. This article uses two original data sets on American and French news reporting on immigration and sexual harassment to test the effects of four factors potentially relevant to such convergence or divergence: 1) cultural repertoires, 2) legal constraints, 3) journalistic field relations to the state and market and competition among journalistic outlets, and 4) global position of nation-states. Differences in dominant national cultural repertoires correlate with persistent cross-national variations in media frames. Legal reform related to the two issues offers a strong explanation of shifts in framing over time. Lesser news media autonomy vis-à-vis the state is associated with fewer journalistic enterprise stories on immigration and less reporting on sexual harassment scandals, while greater competition may make sensationalized reporting on immigration more likely. America's dominant position in the global political economy correlates with substantially greater visibility of U.S. policies and personalities in France, than vice versa. There is some evidence for greater cross-national divergence in issue frames over time, as U.S. global visibility and influence have increased.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BadinterElisabeth1994. “Ici, en droit, nous avons tout obtenu.”Le Nouvel Observateur, May 19, pp. 102–5.
2.
BagdikianBen H.2000. The Media Monopoly.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
3.
BakerC. Edwin1994. Advertising and a Democratic Press.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
BantonMichael1994. “Effective Implementation of the UN Racial Convention.”New Community20: 475–87.
5.
BarberBenjamin J.1995. Jihad vs. McWorld.New York: Ballantine Books.
6.
BarnhurstKevin G.NeroneJohn2001. The Form of News: A History.New York: The Guilford Press.
7.
BeckettKatherine1996. “Culture and the Politicsof Signification: The Case of Child Sexual Abuse.”Social Problems43: 57–76.
8.
BennettW. Lance1983. News : The Politics of Illusion.New York: Longman.
9.
BensonRodney1999.. “Field Theory in Comparative Context: A New Paradigm for Media Studies.”Theory and Society29: 463–498.
10.
BensonRodney2000. Shaping the Public Sphere: Journalistic Fields and Immigration Debates in the United States and France, 1973-1994. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
11.
BensonRodney2004. “Bringing the Sociology of Media Back In.”Political Communication, 21: 275–92.
12.
BensonRodney2005. “Mapping Field Variation: Journalism in France and the United States.” In BensonR.NeveuE., Eds. Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field.Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
13.
BernardPhilippe1991. “Harkis: au nom des pères.”Le Monde, July 10 p. 1.
14.
BestJoel2001. “The Diffusion of Social Problems.” In BestJ., Ed., How Claims Spread: Cross-National Diffusion of Social Problems.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
15.
BlattDavid Stuart1996. Immigration Politics and Immigrant Collective Action in France, 1968-1993. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
16.
BleichErik2001. “The French Model: Color-Blind Integration.” In SkrentnyJ. D., Ed., Color Lines: Affirmative Action, Immigration and Civil Rights for America.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
BobinFrederic1992. “Le projet de loi de Mme Neiertz au Palais du Luxembourg les sénateurs approuvent la lutte contre le harcèlement sexuel et l'étendent à la fonction publique.”Le Monde, May 23.
18.
Body-GendrotSophieSchainMartin A.1992. “National and Local Politics and the Development of Immigration Policy in the United States and France: A Comparative Analysis.” In HorowitzD.L.NoirielG., Eds., Immigrants in Two Democracies: French and American Experience.New York: New York University Press.
19.
BoltanskiLuc1987. The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society.Cambridge, England/ Paris: Cambridge University Press and Maison des Sciences de L'Homme.
20.
BonnafousSimone1991. L'Immigration Prise aux Mots: Les immigrés dans la presse au tournant des années 80.Paris, France: éditions Kimé.
21.
BornsteinStephen E.1990. “The Politics of Scandal.” In HallPeter A.HaywardJackMachinHoward, Eds., Developments in French Politics.London, England: MacMillan.
22.
BourdieuPierre1993. The Field of Cultural Production.New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
BourdieuPierre1998. On Television and Journalism.London, England: Pluto Press.
24.
BrinkleyJoel1994. “At Immigration, Disarray and Defeat; Chaos at the Gates—First of five articles,”The New York Times, September 11 p. 1.
25.
BrubakerRogers1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
CalavitaKitty1996. “The New Politics of Immigration: ‘Balanced-Budget Conservativism’ and the Symbolism of Proposition 187.”Social Problems43: 284–305.
27.
CastellsManuel1997. The Power of Identity; Volume II: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
28.
Caton1983. “Caton: 'A l'heure des urnes, il n'y a plus d'hommes politiques, mais des comptables'.”Libération, September 13 p. 5.
29.
ChampagnePatrick2005. “The ‘Double Dependency’: The Journalistic Field Between Politics and Markets.” In BensonR.NeveuE., Eds., Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field.Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
30.
ClarkPriscilla Parkhurst1987. Literary France: The Making of a Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
ColsonMarie-LaureFauvet-MyciaChristine1991. “Bianco: ‘Chirac a un culot d'acier’.”Libération, June 21.
32.
CorneliusWayne A.MartinPhilip L.HollifieldJames F.1995. “Introduction: The Ambivalent Quest for Immigration Control.” In Cornelius, Eds., Controlling Immigration.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
CostePhilippe1995. “L'Amérique sexuellement correct.”L'Express, Histoires, February 9 p. 58.
34.
CourtoisGérard, “En France, par convention, la vie privée des hommes politiques est respectée,”Le Monde, September 17,1998p. 7.
35.
de PisanAnnieTristanAnne1977. Histoires Du MLF. Preface by de BeauvoirSimone. Paris, France: Calmann-Lévy.
36.
de TarléAntoine1980. “The Press and the State in France.” In SmithA., Ed., Newspapers and Democracy.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
DesrosièresAlainThévenotLaurent1988. Les Catégories Socio-Professionelles.Paris, France: La Découverte.
38.
DerieuxEmmanuel2001. Droit des Médias.Paris, France: Dalloz.
39.
DeuzeMark2002. “National News Cultures: A Comparison of Dutch, German, British, Australian, and U.S. Journalists.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly79(1):134–149.
40.
DevillardValérieLafosseMarie-FrançoiseLeteinturierChristineRieffelRémy2001. Les journalistes français à l'aube de l'an 2000: Profils et parcours.Paris, France: Panthéon-Assas.
41.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1991. “The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” In PowellW.W.DiMaggioP.J., Eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
DubetFrancois1989. Immigrations: Qu'en savons nous? Un bilan des Connaissances. Paris, France: La Documentation Française.
43.
EngelbergStephen1994. “In Immigration Labyrinth, Corruption Comes Easily.”The New York Times. September 12 p. 1.
44.
EntmanRobert M.1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.”Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
45.
EsserFrank1998. “Editorial Structures and Work Principles in British and German Newsrooms.”European Journal of Communication13(3):375–405.
46.
EsserFrank1999. “‘Tabloidization’ of News: A Contemporary Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism.”European Journal of Communication14(3):291–324.
47.
EvenoPatrick1996. Le Monde 1944-1995: Histoire d'une enterprise de presse.Paris, France: Le Monde-éditions.
48.
FantasiaRick1995. “Fast Food in France.”Theory and Society24: 201–43.
49.
FassinEric1999. “‘Good to Think’: The American Reference in French Discourses of Immigration and Ethnicity.” In JoppkeC.LukesS., Eds., Multicultural Questions.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
50.
FaureChristineBishopTom Eds.1992. L'Amerique des Francais.Paris, France: Editions Francois Bourin.
51.
FavellAdrian2001. Philosophies of Integration : Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
FavereauEric1983. “Le dernier must de tout-Etat: ‘Beur is beautiful’.”Libération, December 1 p. 14.
53.
MarxFerree, MyraGamsonWilliam AnthonyGerhardsJürgenRuchtDieter2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54.
FetzerJoel S.2000. Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55.
FrappatBruno1991. “Trop.” [sub-title underneath: “La polémique sur l'immigration; Mme Cresson dénounce les propos de M. Chirac”]. Le Monde. June 21 p. 1.
56.
FreibergJ.W.1981. French Press: Class, State, and Ideology.New York: Praeger Publishers.
57.
FriedlandRogerAlfordRobert R.1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” In DiMaggioP. J.PowellW.W., Eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
GamsonWilliamModiglianiAndre1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.”American Journal of Sociology95: 1–37.
59.
GansHerbert J.1995. The War Against the Poor.New York: Basic Books.
60.
GastautYvan1995. “Les mutations du thème de l'immigration dans le journal Le Monde (1958-1992); Etude d'un corpus d'articles.”Migrations-Sociètè:40–51.
61.
GauthierUrsula1999. “Suède: La fin des filles publiques.”Le Nouvel Observateur, January 14, Notre Epoque p. 86.
62.
GiesbertFranz Olivier1991. “La tyrannie des autruches.”Le Figaro, July 9 p. 1.
63.
GilensMartin1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64.
GilsonMartine1989. “Le retour du droit du cuissage.”Le Nouvel Observateur, March 2.
65.
GiroudFrançoise1997. “Sexuellement incorrect. …”Le Nouvel Observateur, Television, 19 September p. 5.
66.
GordonPhilip H.MeunierSophie2001. The French Challenge: Adapting to Globalization.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
67.
GuillénMauro F2001. “Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature.”Annual Review of Sociology27: 235–60.
68.
GurevitchMichaelLevyMark R.RoehItzhak1991. “The Global Newsroom: Convergences and Diversities in the Globalization of Television News.” In DahlgrenP.SparksC., Eds., Communication and Citizenship.London, England: Routledge.
69.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo1984. “Speaking of the President: Political Structure and Representational Form in U.S. and Italian Television News.”Theory and Society13: 829–50.
70.
HallinDaniel C.ManciniPaolo2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
71.
HargreavesAlec1995. Immigration, ‘Race’ and Ethnicity in Contemporary France.London, England and New York: Routledge.
72.
HarrisLouis1991. Le harcèlement sexuel: Enquête des français: perceptions, opinions et évaluation du phénomène. Published by the European Union.
73.
HermanEdward S.McChesneyRobert W.1997. The Global Media.London, England and New York: Continuum.
JenkinsPhilip1992. Intimate Enemies: Moral Panics in Contemporary Great Britain.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
76.
KuhnRaymond1995. The Media in France.London, England and New York: Routledge.
77.
KuiselRichard1993. Seducing the French: The Dilemma of Americanization.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
78.
LamontMichèle1987. “How to Become a Dominant French Philosopher: The Case of Jacques Derrida.”American Journal of Sociology93: 584–622.
79.
LamontMichèle2000. The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
LamontMichèleThévenotLaurent Eds.2000. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
81.
LeeEllie2001. “Reinventing Abortion as a Social Problem: ‘Postabortion Syndrome’ in the United States and Britain.” In BestJ., Ed., How Claims Spread.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
82.
FigaroLe1991. “Giscard: ‘Ouvrir les yeux et réfléchir’.” September 23 p. 6.
83.
Le Monde staff writer.1998. “HARCELEMENT: André Labarrère est accusé de harcèlement sexuel par un ancien employé de la société béarnaise d'économie mixte pour l'habitat (SBEMH).”Le Monde, April 27.
84.
McQuailDenis1994. Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction.London, England: Sage.
85.
MirEdouard1991. “Editorial: La Logique du Ghetto.”Libération, March 28 p. 3.
86.
MolotchHarveyLesterMarilyn1974. “News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals.”American Sociological Review39: 101–12.
87.
Newspaper Association of America.2001. 2001 Circulation Facts, Figures and Logic. (accessed via internet, April 2004).
88.
NoirielGérard1996. The French Melting Pot: Immigration, Citizenship and National Identity. Translated by de LaforcadeGeoffroy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
89.
NormandJean-Michel1991. “L'example de la Goutte-d'Or ou les mauvais comptes du maire de Paris.”Le Monde, June 22 p. 9.
90.
O'ConnorJulia SShola OrloffAnnShaverSheila1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
91.
PadioleauJean G.1985. Le Monde et le Washington Post.Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
92.
PandraudRobert1991. Quotation in “Les réactions.”Libération, June 11 p. 35.
93.
PattersonThomas E.DonsbachWolfgang1996. “News Decisions: Journalists as Partisan Actors.”Political Communication13: 455–468.
94.
PeyrefitteAlain1991. “Penser l'immigration : les trois solutions.”Le Figaro, September 26 p. 8.
95.
PicqFrançoise1993. Libération des femmes: les années-mouvement.Paris, France: Seuil.
96.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRubén G.1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
97.
ReinholdRobert1986. “Flow of 3d World Immigrants Alters Weave of U.S. Society.”The New York Times, June 30, p. A-1.
98.
RivaudFrancine1990. “Canapé Sans Promotion.”Le Nouvel Observateur, December 6.
99.
RyanCharlotte1991. Prime Time Activism.Boston, MA: South End Press.
100.
SaccoVincent F.IsmailiKarim2001. “Social Problems Claims and the Undefended Border: The Case of Canada and the United States.” In BestJ., Ed., How Claims Spread.Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
101.
SaguyAbigail C.2000. “Employment Discrimination or Sexual Violence?: Defining Sexual Harassment in American and French Law.”Law and Society Review34(4).
102.
SaguyAbigail C.2002. “Sexual Harassment in the News: The United States and France.”The Communication Review5(2):109–41.
103.
SaguyAbigail C.2003. What Is Sexual Harassment? From Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne.Berkeley: University of California Press.
104.
SarangaKaren1995. “En France, Il Faut Des Preuves.”L'Express, February 9 p. 59.
105.
SchifresAlain1985. “Touche Pas a Ma P … Te.”Le Nouvel Observateur, October 1 p. 48.
106.
SchudsonMichael1995. The Power of News.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107.
ScottJoan W.1997. “‘La Querelle Des Femmes’ in the Late Twentieth Century.”New Left Review (226):3–19.
108.
ShoemakerPamela J.ReeseStephen D.1991. Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content.New York: Longman.
109.
SkrentnyJohn David Ed.2001. Color Lines: Affirmative Action, Immigration, and Civil Rights Options for America.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
110.
SoléRobert1991. “La politique de la ville et la violence dans les banlieues; Les députés examinent la loi ‘anti-ghettos.’”Le Monde, May 29 p. 1.
111.
SoléRobert2002. “Plainte et chuchotements.”Le Monde, Analyses & Forum, February 17.
112.
SontagDeborahEngelbergStephen1994. “Insider's View of the INS: ‘Cold, Rude and Insensitive’.”The New York Times, September 15 p. 1.
113.
Sreberny-MohammadiAnnabelle2000. “The Global and Local in International Communications.” In CurranJ.GurevitchM., eds., Mass Media and Society, 3rd edition. London, England: Arnold.
114.
SteinbergStephen1981. The Ethnic Myth: Race, Ethnicity, and Class in America.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
115.
SwidlerAnne2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
116.
ThogmartinClyde1998. The National Daily Press of France.Birmingham, AL: Summa Publications.
117.
ThompsonJohn B.2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age.Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
118.
Tibon-CornillotMichel1983. “Le défi de l'immigration maghrébine: Une amnésie ordinaire.”Le Monde, August 23 p. 1.
119.
TillyCharles1986. The Contentious French.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120.
TribalatMichèle1995. Faire France.Paris, France: La Découverte/Essais.
121.
TunstallJeremy1977. The Media are American.London, England: Constable.
122.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.1981. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workforce: Is It a Problem?Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
123.
VerhovekSam Howe1994. “Stop Benefits for Aliens? It Wouldn't Be That Easy.”The New York Times, June 8, p. A-1.
124.
VichniacJudith E.1991. “French Socialists and Droit à la Différence: A Changing Dynamic.”French Politics & Society9: 40–56.
125.
VictorJeffrey S.1998. “Moral Panics and the Social Construction of Deviant Behavior: A Theory and Application to the Case of Ritual Child Abuse.”Sociological Perspectives41: 541–65.
126.
WaisbordSilvio2000. Watchdog Journalism in South America: News, Accountability, and Democracy.New York: Columbia University Press.
127.
WeaverDavid H. Ed.1998. The Global Journalist: News People Around the World.Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
