The histories of all modern scientific and intellectual fields are marked by dynamism. Yet, despite a welter of case study data, sociologists of ideas have been slow to develop general theories for explaining why and how disciplines, subfields, theory groups, bandwagons, actor networks, and other kindred formations arise to alter the intellectual landscape. To fill this lacuna, this article presents a general theory of scientific/intellectual movements (SIMs). The theory synthesizes work in the sociology of ideas, social studies of science, and the literature on social movements to explain the dynamics of SIMs, which the authors take to be central mechanisms for change in the world of knowledge and ideas. Illustrating their arguments with a diverse sampling of positive and negative cases, they define SIMs, identify a set of theoretical presuppositions, and offer four general propositions for explaining the social conditions under which SIMs are most likely to emerge, gain prestige, and achieve some level of institutional stability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottAndrew1999. Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbbottAndrew2001. Chaos of Disciplines.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AbelRichard E.NewlinLyman W2002. Scholarly Publishing: Books, Journals, Publishers, and Libraries in the Twentieth Century.New York: Wiley.
4.
Abir-AmPnina1987. “The Biotheoretical Gathering, Trans-Disciplinary Authority and the Incipient Legitimation of Molecular Biology in the 1930s: New Perspective on the Historical Sociology of Science.”History of Science25: 1–69.
5.
AdamsMark1990. “Eugenics in Russia, 1900-1940.” Pp. 153–216 in The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia, edited by AdamsM.. New York and Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
AggerBen2000. Public Sociology: From Social Facts to Literary Acts.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
7.
AlexanderJeffrey C.1995. Fin de Siècle Social Theory: Relativism, Reduction, and the Problem of Reason.London, England and New York: Verso.
8.
AllenBarbara2003. Uneasy Alchemy: Citizens and Experts in Louisiana's Chemical Corridor Disputes.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
AmsterdamskaOlga1987. “Intellectuals in Social Movements: The Experts of Solidarity.” Pp. 213–45 in The Social Direction of the Public Sciences: Causes and Consequences of Co-Operation Between Scientists and Non-Scientific Groups, edited by BlumeS.BundersJ.LeydesdorffL.WhitleyR.. Dordrecht, Holland and Boston, MA: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
10.
ApterMichael J.1972. “Cybernetics: A Case Study of a Scientific Subject Complex.” Pp. 93–116 in Sociology of Science, vol. 18, Sociological Review Monograph, edited by HalmosP.. Keele, England: University of Keele.
11.
BabbSarah1996. “‘A True American System of Finance’: Frame Resonance in the U.S. Labor Movement, 1866 to 1886.”American Sociological Review61: 1033–52.
12.
BarnesBarry1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge.Boston, MA and London, England: Routledge & K. Paul.
13.
Ben-DavidJoseph1971. The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Ben-DavidJosephCollinsRandall1966. “Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science: The Case of Psychology.”American Sociological Review31: 451–65.
15.
BloomAllan David1987. The Closing of the American Mind.New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
BloorDavid1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery, second ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
BourdieuPierre1988. Homo Academicus, translated by CollierPeter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
BourdieuPierre2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity, translated by NiceRichard. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
BucherRue1962. “Pathology: A Study of Social Movements Within a Profession.”Social Problems10: 40–51.
20.
BucherRueStraussAnselm1961. “Professions in Process.”American Journal of Sociology66: 325–34.
21.
CamicCharles1983. Experience and Enlightenment: Socialization for Cultural Change in Eighteenth-Century Scotland.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
CamicCharles1995. “Three Departments in Search of a Discipline: Localism and Interdisciplinary Interaction in American Sociology, 1890-1940.”Social Research62: 1003–33.
23.
CamicCharlesGrossNeil2001. “The New Sociology of Ideas.” Pp. 236–49 in The Blackwell Companion to Sociology, edited by BlauJ.. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
24.
CareyJames T.1975. Sociology and Public Affairs: The Chicago School.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
ChamakBrigitte1999. “The Emergence of Cognitive Science in France: A Comparison With the USA.”Social Studies of Science29: 643–84.
26.
ClarkTerry N.1973. Prophets and Patrons: The French University and the Emergence of the Social Sciences.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
ColeJonathan R.1989. “The Paradox of Individual Particularism and Institutional Universalism.”Social Science Information28: 51–76.
28.
ColeStephen ed.2001. What's Wrong With Sociology?New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
29.
CollinsH. M.1974. “The TEA-Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks.”Science Studies4: 165–86.
30.
CollinsRandall1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
31.
CoserLewis A.1965. Men of Ideas: A Sociologist's View.New York: Free Press.
32.
CrononWilliam ed.1996. Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature.New York: W. W. Norton.
33.
CussetFrançois2003. French Theory: Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze & Cie et les mutations de la vie intellectuelle aux Etats-Unis.Paris, France: Découverte.
34.
D'AndradeRoy G1995. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology.Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
D'ArmsJohn H1997. “Funding Trends in the Academic Humanities, 1970-1995: Reflections on the Stability of the System.” Pp. 32–60 in What's Happened to the Humanities? edited by KernanA.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
DiMaggioPaul J.1997. “Culture and Cognition.”Annual Review of Sociology23: 263–87.
37.
EagletonTerry2003. After Theory.New York: Basic Books.
38.
EdgeDavid O.MulkayMichael J.1976. Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain.New York: Wiley.
39.
EpsteinSteven1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge.Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
40.
FarisRobert E. L1967. Chicago Sociology, 1920-1932.San Francisco, CA: Chandler Pub. Co.
41.
FarrellMichael P.2001. Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
FineGary Alan ed.1995. A Second Chicago School? The Development of a Postwar American Sociology.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43.
FisherCharles S.1966. “The Death of a Mathematical Theory: A Study in the Sociology of Knowledge.”Archive for the History of Exact Sciences3: 137–159.
44.
FoucaultMichel1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge, translated by Sheridan SmithA.M.. New York: Pantheon.
45.
Fourcade-GourinchasMarion2001. “Politics, Institutional Structures, and the Rise of Economics.”Theory and Society30: 397–447.
46.
FrickelScott2004a. “Building an Interdiscipline: Collective Action Framing and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology.”Social Problems51: 269–87.
47.
FrickelScott2004b. Chemical Consequences: Environmental Mutagens, Scientist Activism, and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
48.
FuchsStephanPlassPeggy S.1999. “Sociology and Social Movements.”Contemporary Sociology28: 271–77.
49.
FujimuraJoan H.1996. Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
FullerSteve2000. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
GamsonWilliam A.MeyerDavid S.1996. “Framing Political Opportunity.” Pp. 275–90 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movementsk, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.. Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
GazianoEmanuel1996. “Ecological Metaphor as Scientific Boundary-Work: Innovation and Authority in Interwar Sociology and Biology.”American Journal of Sociology101: 874–907.
53.
GierynThomas F.1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.”American Sociological Review48: 781–95.
54.
GierynThomas F.1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line.Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
55.
GoffmanErving1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
GouldnerAlvin Ward1965. Enter Plato: Classical Greece and the Origins of Social Theory.New York: Basic Books.
57.
GraffGerald1987. Professing Literature: An Institutional History.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
GrahamLorenLepeniesWolfWeingartPeter eds.1983. Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories.Boston, MA and Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
59.
GreenbergDaniel S.2001. Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60.
GreenhalghSusan1996. “The Social Construction of Population Science: An Intellectual, Institutional, and Political History of Twentieth-Century Demography.”Comparative Studies in Society and History38: 26–66.
61.
GrossNeil2002. “Becoming a Pragmatist Philosopher: Status, Self-Concept, and Intellectual Choice.”American Sociological Review67: 52–76.
62.
GrossNeil2003. “Richard Rorty's Pragmatism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Ideas.”Theory and Society32: 93–148.
63.
GrossNeil2005. “Theorizing the Pragmatist Revival.”Coss Dialogues Lecture, annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy, Bakersfield, CA.
64.
GuetzkowJoshLamontMichèleMallardGrégoire2004. “What Is Originality in the Social Sciences and the Humanities?”American Sociological Review69: 190–212.
65.
GurrTed Robert1970. Why Men Rebel.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
HargensLowell L.Kelly-WilsonLisa1994. “Determinants of Disciplinary Discontent.”Social Forces72: 1177–95.
67.
HarwoodJonathan1993. Styles of Scientific Thought: The German Genetics Community, 1900-1933.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
HayCynthia1982. “Advice from a Scientific Establishment: The National Academy of Sciences.” Pp. 111–119 in Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, edited by EliasN.MartinsH.WhitleyR.. Dordrect, Holland, Boston, MA, and London, England: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
69.
HeritageJohn1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology.Cambridge, England and New York: Polity Press in association with B. Blackwell.
70.
HoffmanLily M.1989. The Politics of Knowledge: Activist Movements in Medicine and Planning.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
71.
HorowitzIrving Louis2001. “Toward a Natural History of Holocaust Studies.”Human Rights Review2: 77–87.
72.
JacobsJerry2005. “Further Reflections on ASR's Greatest Hits.” On-line research note. <http://asanet.org/journals/asr/>.
73.
JacobyRussell1987. The Last Intellectuals: American Culture in the Age of Academe.New York: Basic Books.
74.
JumonvilleNeil1991. Critical Crossings: The New York Intellectuals in Postwar America.Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
KayLily E.1997. “Rethinking Institutions: Philanthropy as an Historiographic Problem of Knowledge and Power.”Minerva35: 283–93.
77.
KennedyMichael1990. “The Constitution of Critical Intellectuals: Polish Physicians, Peace Activists and Democratic Civil Society.”Studies in Comparative Communism23: 281–304.
78.
KevlesDaniel J.1978. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America.New York: Knopf.
79.
KimmelmanBarbara Ann1987. A Progressive Era Discipline: Genetics at American Agricultural Colleges and Experiment Stations, 1900-1920. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
80.
KitscheltHerbert P.1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-War Movements in Four Democracies.”British Journal of Political Science16: 57–85.
81.
KleinmanDaniel Lee2003. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
82.
Knorr-CetinaKarin1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
83.
KohlerRobert E.1982. From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry: The Making of a Biomedical Discipline.Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
84.
KohlerRobert E.1991. Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900–1945. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
KohlerRobert E.1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
86.
KrohnWolfgangSchäferWolf1976. “The Origins and Structure of Agricultural Chemistry.” Pp. 27–52 in Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, edited by LemaineG.MacLeodR.MulkayM.WeingartP.. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
87.
KuhnThomas S. [1962]1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
88.
KuklickBruce2001. A History of Philosophy in America, 1720–2000. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
89.
KuschMartin1995. Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge.London, England and New York: Routledge.
90.
LamontMichèle1987. “How to Become a Dominant French Philosopher: The Case of Jacques Derrida.”American Journal of Sociology93: 584–622.
91.
LamontMichèle2001. “Three Big Questions for a Big Book: Collins's The Sociology of Philosophies.”Sociological Theory19: 86–91.
92.
LarañaEnriqueJohnstonHankGusfieldJoseph R. eds.1994. New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
93.
LatourBruno1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94.
LatourBruno1988. The Pasteurization of France, translated by SheridanAlanLawJohn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
95.
LenoirTimothy1997. Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
96.
LeslieStuart W.1993. The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford.New York: Columbia University Press.
97.
MannheimKarl [1936]1991. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, translated by WirthLouisShilsEdward. London, England and New York: Routledge.
98.
MarcuseHerbert1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
99.
MarksJonathan2002. What It Means to be 98% Chimpanzee: Apes, People, and Their Genes.Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
100.
MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich [1848]1998. The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition, translated by MooreSamuel. London, England and New York: Verso.
101.
McAdamDougMcCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N.1988. “Social Movements.” Pp. 695–737 in Handbook of Sociology, edited by SmelserNeil J.. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
102.
McAdamDougMcCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N. eds.1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings.Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
103.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles2001. Dynamics of Contention.Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
104.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N.1973. The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization.Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
105.
McCarthyJohn D.ZaldMayer N.1977. “Resource Mobilization in Social Movements: A Partial Theory.”American Journal of Sociology82: 1212–41.
106.
McCloskeyDeirdre N.1985. The Rhetoric of Economics.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
107.
McGintyStephen1999. Gatekeepers of Knowledge: Journal Editors in the Sciences and the Social Sciences.Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
108.
McLaughlinNeil G.1998. “Why Do Schools of Thought Fail? Neo-Freudianism as a Case Study in the Sociology of Knowledge.”Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences34: 113–34.
109.
MertonRobert K. [1949]1968. Social Theory and Social Structure.New York: Free Press.
110.
Messer-DavidowEllen2002. Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
111.
MeyerDavid S.StaggenborgSuzanne1996. “Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity.”American Journal of Sociology101: 1628–60.
112.
MeyerDavid S.WhittierNancy1994. “Social Movement Spillover.”Social Problems41: 277–98.
113.
MillsC. Wright1940. “Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motives.”American Sociological Review5: 904–13.
114.
MillsC. Wright1964. Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America.New York: Paine- Whitman Publishers.
115.
MooreKellyHalaNicole2002. “Organizing Identity: The Creation of Science for the People.” Pp. 309–35 in Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, vol. 19, edited by LounsburyM.VentrescaM. J.. Amsterdam, Holland: JAI Press.
116.
MulkayMichael J.1979. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge.London, England and Boston, MA: G. Allen & Unwin.
117.
MulkayMichael J.EdgeDavid O.1976. “Cognitive, Technical, and Social Factors in the Growth of Radio Astronomy.” Pp. 153–86 in Perspectives in the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, edited by LemaineG.MacLeodR.MulkayM.WeingartP.. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
118.
MullinsNicholas C.MullinsCarolyn J.1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology.New York: Harper and Row.
119.
MyersGreg1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
120.
NyhartLynn K.1995. Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
121.
OliverPamela E.JohnstonHank2000. “What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research.”Mobilization5: 37–54.
122.
ParsonsTalcott1951. The Social System.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
123.
PaulDiane B.1995. Controlling Human Heredity, 1865 to the Present.Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
124.
PaulyPhilip J.1984. “The Appearance of Academic Biology in Late Nineteenth-Century America.”Journal of the History of Biology17: 369–97.
125.
PeirceCharles S. [1877]1986. “The Fixation of Belief.” Pp. 242–57 in The Writings of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 3, edited by KloeselC. J. W.. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
126.
PorterTheodore M.1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
127.
PowellWalter1985. Getting into Print: The Decision-Making Process in Scholarly Publishing.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
128.
PrestonJulian R.HoffmanGeorge R.2001. “Genetic Toxicology.” Pp. 321–50 in Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, edited by KlaassenC. D.. New York: McGraw-Hill.
129.
PriceDerek J. de Solla1963. Little Science, Big Science.New York: Columbia University Press.
130.
RabinowPaul1996. Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
131.
RingerFritz1990. “The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge.”Theory and Society19: 269–94.
132.
RortyRichard1982. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
133.
RosenbergCharles E.1967. “Factors in the Development of Genetics in the United States: Some Suggestions.”Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences22: 27–46.
134.
RossRobert J.S1976. “The Impact of Social Movements on a Profession in Process.”Sociology of Work and Occupations3: 429–454.
135.
SchoferEvan2003. “The Global Institutionalization of Geological Science, 1800 to 1990.”American Sociological Review68: 730–59.
136.
SchurmanRachelMunroWilliam2004. “Intellectuals, Ideology, and Social Networks: The Process of Grievance Construction in the Antigenetic Engineering Movement.” Manuscript. Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
ShapinSteven1982. “History of Science and Its Sociological Reconstructions.”History of Science20: 157–211.
139.
ShapinSteven1992. “Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science as Seen through the Externalism-Internalism Debate.”History of Science30: 333–69.
140.
ShapinSteven1994. A Social History of Truth.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
141.
ShapinSteven1995. “Here and Everywhere: Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.”Annual Review of Sociology21: 289–321.
142.
ShapinStevenSchafferSimon1985. Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life.Princeton: Princeton University Press, NJ.
143.
SmallMario L.1999. “Departmental Conditions and the Emergence of New Disciplines: Two Cases in the Legitimation of African American Studies.”Theory and Society28: 659–707.
144.
SnowDavid A.BenfordRobert D.1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.”International Social Movement Research1: 197–217.
145.
SnowDavid A.RochfordE. BurkeJr.WordenSteven K.BenfordRobert D.1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation.”American Sociological Review51: 464–81.
146.
SperberIrwin1990. Fashions in Science: Opinion Leaders and Collective Behavior in the Social Sciences.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
147.
StewartJohn A.1990. Drifting Continents and Colliding Paradigms: Perspectives on the Geoscience Revolution.Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.
148.
StrickJames E.2004. “Creating a Cosmic Discipline: The Crystallization and Consolidation of Exobiology, 1957–1973.”Journal of the History of Biology37: 131–80.
149.
TarrowSidney1991. Struggle, Politics, and Reform: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Cycles of Protest.Ithaca, NY: Center for International Studies, Cornell University.
150.
TarrowSidney1996. “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements.” Pp. 41–61 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N.. Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
151.
TarrowSidney1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics.Cambridge, England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
152.
ThackrayArnoldMertonRobert K.1972. “On Discipline Building: The Paradoxes of George Sarton.”Isis63: 473–95.
153.
TillyCharles1978. From Mobilization to Revolution.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
154.
TomlinsChristopher2000. “Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters: A Historical Narrative.”Law and Society Review34: 911–72.
155.
TraweekSharon1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
156.
TurnerStephen P.2002. Brains/Practices/Relativism: Social Theory after Cognitive Science.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
157.
WeberMax [1919]1946. “Politics as a Vocation.” Pp. 77–128 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH. H.MillsC. W.. New York: Oxford University Press.
158.
WhiteHayden V.1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
159.
WhitleyRichard1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences.Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
160.
WilliamsRhys H.KubalTimothy J.1999. “Movement Frames and the Cultural Environment: Resonance, Failure, and the Boundaries of the Legitimate.”Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change21: 225–48.
161.
WuthnowRobert1989. Communities of Discourse: Ideology and Social Structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European Socialism.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
162.
YamaneDavid2001. Student Movements for Multiculturalism: Challenging the Curricular Color Line in Higher Education.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
163.
ZaldMayer N.BergerMichael A.1978. “Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d'etat, Insurgency, and Mass Movements.”American Journal of Sociology83: 823–61.
164.
ZammitoJohn H.2004. A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
165.
ZirkleConway1951. “Gregor Mendel and His Precursors.”Isis42: 97–104.
