This article uses new data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing study to examine the reasons why white, Mexican American, and other Hispanic parents are approximately 2.5 times more likely than African American parents to marry within the 30 months after a nonmarital birth. Combining Fragile Families microdata with 2000 U.S. Census data shows that marriage market conditions exert a large influence on marriage decisions, even among couples that already have formed a romantic relationship and had a child together. The findings also show that an undersupply of employed African American men can explain a large portion of the racial and ethnic differences in marriage after a nonmarital birth. The current findings support the theory that marriage markets are influential not only during the search for romantic partners but also in determining whether romantic relationships, once formed, will lead to marriage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonPaul D.2001. Missing Data: Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications.
2.
AndersonElijah.1990. Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BianchiSuzanne.1999. “Feminization and Juvenilization of Poverty: Trends, Relative Risks, Causes, and Consequences.”Annual Review of Sociology25: 307–33.
4.
BrowneIrene.1999. Latinas and African American Women at Work: Race, Gender, and Economic Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BulcroftRichard A.BulcroftKris A.1993. “Race Differences in Attitudinal and Motivational Factors in the Decision to Marry.”Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 338–56.
6.
Carlson, Marcia and Frank Furstenberg.2003. “Complex Families: Documenting the Prevalence and Correlates of Multi-Partnered Fertility in the United States.” Working Paper No. 2003-14-FF, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
7.
Carlson, MarciaSara McLanahanEnglandPaula2004. “Union formation in Fragile Families.”Demography. 41: 237–62.
8.
CherlinAndrew.1992. Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
CoxOliver C.1940. “Sex Ratio and Marital Status among Negroes”American Sociological Review. 5: 937–47.
10.
Da VanzoJulieOmar RahmanM.1993. “American Families: Trends and Correlates.”Population Index59: 350–86.
11.
EdinKathryn.2000. “How Low-Income Single Mothers Talk About Marriage.”Social Problems. 47: 112–33.
12.
FossettMark A.Jill KiecoltK.1993. “Mate Availability and Family Structure among African Americans in U.S. Metropolitan Areas.”Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 288–302.
13.
FrazierFranklin.1939. The Negro Family in the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
Garfinkel, Irwin and Sara McLanahan.2003. “Strengthening Fragile Families.” Pp. 76–92 in One Percent for the Kids: New Policies, Brighter Futures for America's Children, edited by SawhillIsabel. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
15.
Gibson, ChristinaKathryn EdinMcLanahanSara2003. “High Hopes but Even Higher Expectations: The Retreat from Marriage among Low-Income Couples.” Working Paper No. 2003-06-FF, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
16.
GoldscheiderFrances K.BuresR. M.2003. “The Racial Crossover in Family Complexity.”Demography40: 569–87.
17.
GuttentagMarciaSecordPaul F.1983. Too Many Women? The Sex Ratio Question. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
18.
Hatchett, ShirleyJoseph VeroffDouvanElizabeth1995. “Marital Instability among Black and White Couples in Early Marriage.” Pp. 177–218 in The Decline in Marriage among African Americans, edited by Belinda TuckerM.Mitchell-KernanClaudia. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
KiecoltK.Jill FossettMark A.1995. “Mate Availability and Marriage among African Americans: Aggregate- and Individual-Level Analyses.” Pp. 121–35 in The Decline in Marriage among African Americans: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Implications, edited by Belinda TuckerM.Mitchell-KernanClaudia. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
LichterDanielMcLaughlinDiane K.GeorgeKephartLandryDavid J.1992. “Race and the Retreat from Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?”American Sociological Review57: 781–99.
21.
LichterDaniel T.LeClereFelicia B.McLaughlinDiane K.1991. “Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women.”American Journal of Sociology96: 843–67.
22.
MareRobert D.WinshipChristopher1991. “Socioeconomic Change and the Decline of Marriage for Blacks and Whites.” Pp. 175–202 in The Urban Underclass, edited by JencksChristopherPetersonPaul E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
23.
MartinJoyce AHamiltonBrady E.VenturaStephanie J.MenackerFayParkMelissa M.2002. Births: Final Data for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 50, No. 5. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
24.
McAdooHarriette Pipes.1997. Black Families: Third Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
25.
McLanahanSara.1985. “Family Structure and the Reproduction of Poverty.”American Journal of Sociology90: 873–901.
26.
McLanahanSara.2003. “Fragile Families and the Marriage Agenda.” Working Paper No. 03-16-FF, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
27.
McLanahanSaraCasperLynne1995. “Growing Diversity and Inequality in the American Family.” Pp.1–45 in State of the Union: America in the 1990s, Edited by FarleyReynolds. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
McLanahanSaraSandefurGary1994. Growing up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
McLoydVonnie M.Ana Mari CauceDavid TakeuchiWilsonLeon2000. “Marital Processes and Parental Socialization in Families of Color: A Decade Review of Research.”Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 1070–93.
30.
MincyRonald.2002. “Who Should Marry Whom?” Working Paper 2002-03-FF, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
31.
MorganS.PhilipAntonioMcDanielAndrew T. MillerPrestonSamuel H.1993. “Racial Differences in Household and Family Structure at the Turn of the Century.”American Journal of Sociology98: 799–828.
32.
OropesaR. S.1996. “Normative Beliefs about Marriage and Cohabitation: A Comparison of Non-Latino Whites, Mexican Americans, and Puerto Ricans.”Journal of Marriage and the Family58: 49–62.
33.
OropesaR. S.LichterDaniel T.AndersonRobert N.1994. “Marriage Markets and the Paradox of Mexican American Nuptiality.”Journal of Marriage and the Family56: 889–907.
34.
PattersonOrlando.1998. Rituals of Blood. Washington, DC: Civitas Counterpoint.
35.
RaleyR. Kelly.1996. “A Shortage of Marriageable Men? A Note on the Role of Cohabitation in Black-White Differences in Marriage Rates.”American Sociological Review61: 973–83.
36.
RosenfeldMichael J.2002. “Measures of Assimilation in the Marriage Market: Mexican Americans 1970-1990.”Journal of Marriage and the Family64: 152–62.
37.
RugglesSteve.1994. “The Origins of African-American Family Structure.”American Sociological Review59: 136–51.
38.
SchoenRobert.1995. “The Widening Gap between Black and White Marriage Rates: Context and Implications.” Pp. 103–16 in The Decline in Marriage among African Americans: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Implications, edited by Belinda TuckerM.Mitchell-KernanClaudia. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
SchoenRobertKluegelJames R.1988. “The Widening Gap in Black and White Marriage Rates.”American Sociological Review. 53: 895–907.
40.
SecordPaulGheeK1986. “Implications of the Black Marriage Market for Marital Conflict.”Journal of Family Issues7: 21–30.
41.
SouthScott J.1992. “For Love or Money? Sociodemographic Determinants of the Expected Benefits from Marriage.” Pp.171–94 in The Changing American Family: Sociological and Demographic Perspectives, edited by SouthScottTolnayStewart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
42.
SouthScott J.1993. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Desire to Marry.”Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 357–70.
43.
SouthScott J.LloydKim M.1992. “Marriage Opportunities and Family Formation: Further Implications of Imbalanced Sex Ratios.”Journal of Marriage and the Family54: 440–51.
44.
SouthScott J.TrentKatherineShenYang2001. “Changing Partners: Toward a Macrostructural-Opportunity Theory of Marital Dissolution.”Journal of Marriage and the Family63: 743–54.
45.
SpainDaphneBianchiSuzanne M.1996. A Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment among American Women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
SweeneyMegan.2002. “Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage.”American Sociological Review67: 132–47.
47.
TiendaMartaAngelRonald1982. “Headship and Household Composition among Blacks, Hispanics, and Other Whites.”Social Forces61: 508–31.
48.
TreasJudithGiesenDeirdre2000. “Sexual Inf idelity among Married and Cohabiting Americans.”Journal of Marriage and the Family62: 48–60.
49.
TuckerM. Belinda.2000. “Marital Values and Expectations in Context: Results from a 21-City Survey.” Pp.166–187 in The Ties that Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, edited by WaiteLinda J.. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
50.
TuckerM. BelindaMitchell-KernanClaudia1995. “Marital Behavior and Expectations: Ethnic Comparisons of Attitudinal and Structural Correlates.” Pp. 145–75 in The Decline in Marriage among African Americans: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Implications, edited by Belinda TuckerM.Mitchell-KernanClaudia. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
WilliamsNorma.1990. The Mexican American Family: Tradition and Change. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
54.
WilsonWilliam Julius.1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
WilsonWilliam Julius.1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
