The determination of prices is a key function of markets, yet sociologists are just beginning to study it. Most theorists view prices as a consequence of economic processes. By contrast, we consider how social structure shapes prices. Building on embeddedness arguments and original fieldwork at large law firms, we propose that a firm's embedded relationships influence prices by prompting private-information flows and informal governance arrangements that add unique value to goods and services. We test our arguments with a separate longitudinal dataset on the pricing of legal services by law firms that represent corporate America. We find that embeddedness can significantly increase and decrease prices net of standard variables and in markets for both complex and routine legal services. Moreover, results show that three forms of embeddedness—embedded ties, board memberships, and status—affect prices in different directions and have different magnitudes of effects that depend on the complexity of the legal service.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Corporate Counsel Association.2001. 2001 ACCA Partnering with Outside Counsel Survey. Washington, DC: American Corporate Counsel Association.
2.
ArrowKenneth J.1998. “What Has Economics to Say about Racial Discrimination?”Journal of Economic Perspectives12: 91–100.
3.
BakerWayne E.1984. “The Social Structure of a National Securities Market.”American Journal of Sociology89: 775–811.
4.
BakerWayne E.1990. “Market Networks and Corporate Behavior.”American Journal of Sociology6: 589–625.
5.
BeckmanChristine M.HaunschildPam R..2002. “Network Learning: The Effects of Heterogeneity of Partners' Experience on Corporate Acquisitions.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 92–124.
6.
BenjaminBeth A.PodolnyJoel.1999. “Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 563-89.
7.
BlauPeter M.1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
8.
BlinderAlan S.CanettiElie R.LebowDavid E.JeremyB. Rudd.1998. Asking about Prices: A New Approach to Understanding Price Stickiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
9.
BurtRonald S.1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Casadesus-MasanellRamonSpulberDaniel2000. “The Fable of Fisher Body.”Journal of Law and Economics43: 67–104.
11.
DanielsRonald J.1992. “The Law Firm as an Efficient Community.”McGill Law Journal37: 801-34.
12.
DavisGerald F.GreveHenrich.1997. “Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s.”American Journal of Sociology, 103: 1–37.
13.
DiMaggioPaulLouchHugh.1998. “Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks?”American Sociological Review63: 619-37.
14.
DuttaShantanuZbarackiMarkBergenMark.2002. “Pricing Process as a Capability: A Resource Based Perspective.”Strategic Management Journal, 54: 615-30.
15.
FernandezRobertoGouldRoger1994. “A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain.”American Journal of Sociology, 99: 1455-91.
16.
FligsteinNeil.2001. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of 21st Century Capitalist Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
GalanterMarcPalayThomas M..1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GilsonRonald J.MnookinRobert H.1985. “Sharing among the Human Capitalists: An Economic Inquiry into the Corporate Law Firm and How Partners Split Profits.”Stanford Law Review41: 567-95.
20.
GranovetterMark.1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology91: 481–510.
21.
GreeneWilliam.2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed.Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
22.
HaganJohnZatzMarjorieArnoldBruceKayFiona1991. “Cultural Capital, Gender, and the Structural Transformation of Legal Practice.”Law & Society Review25: 239-62.
23.
HaganJohnKayFiona.1995. Gender in Practice: A Study of Lawyers' Lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
HaunschildPamela R.1994. “How Much Is that Company Worth?: Interorganizational Relationships, Uncertainty, and Acquisition Premiums.”Administrative Science Quarterly39: 391–411.
26.
HeimerCarol A.2001. “Solving the Problem of Trust.” In Trust in Society, edited by CookKaren S.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
HeinzJohnLaumannEdward1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
28.
HeinzJohn P.NelsonRobert L.LaumannEdward. O..2001. “The Scale of Justice: Observations on the Transformation of Urban Law Practice.”Annual Review of Sociology27: 337-62.
29.
HirschmanAlbert.1982. “Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble?”Journal of Economic Literature20 (4): 1463-84.
30.
HittMichael A.BiermanLeonardShimizuKatsuhikoKochharRahul.2001. “Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-Based Perspective.”Academy of Management Journal44: 13–18.
31.
IngramPaulPeterW. Roberts.2000. “Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry.”American Journal of Sociology106: 387–423.
32.
JudeRebecca.1994. “What Are Reasonable Fees and Expenses for Legal Services?”CPA Journal64: 82–83.
33.
KeisterLisa A.2002. “Financial Markets, Money, and Banking.”Annual Review of Sociology28: 39–61.
34.
KritzerHerbert M.1994. “Lawyers' Fees and the Holy Grail: Where Should Clients Search for Value?”Judicature77: 187-90.
35.
KummelWilliam.1996. “A Market Approach to Law Firm Economics: A New Model for Pricing, Billing, Compensating, and Ownership in Corporate Legal Services.”Columbia Law Review1996: 379–421.
36.
LazegaEmmanuel.2001. The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Cooperation among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37.
MacneilIan.1980. The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
MarchJ. G.1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Free Press.
MintzBethSchwartzMichael1985. The Power Structure of American Business. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
MizruchiMark S.1996. “What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates.”Annual Review of Sociology22: 271-98.
42.
NelsonRobert.1988. Partners with Power: The Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
NelsonRobertNielsenLaura Beth.2000. “Cops, Counsel, and Entrepreneurs: Constructing the Role of Inside Counsel in Large Companies.”Law and Society Review4: 457-94.
44.
PetersenMitchell A.RajanRaghuram.1994. “The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data.”Journal of Finance49: 3–37.
45.
PfefferJeffreySalancikGerald.1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
46.
PhilipsDamon J.2001. “The Promotion Paradox: Organizational Mortality and Employee Promotion Chances in Silicon Valley Law Firms, 1946-1996.”American Journal of Sociology106: 1058-98.
47.
PhilipsDamon J.ZuckermanEzra.2001. “Middle Status Conformity.”American Journal of Sociology107: 379–429.
48.
PodolnyJoel.1993. “A Status-based Model of Competition.”American Journal of Sociology98: 829-72.
49.
PodolnyJoel.1994. “Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange.”Administrative Science Quarterly39: 458-83.
50.
PortesAlejandroSensenbrennerJulia.1993. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action.”American Journal of Sociology98 (6): 1320-50.
51.
PowellWalter.1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.”Research in Organizational Behavior12: 295–336.
52.
ReisingerSue.2003. “The General Counsel's Guide to Cost Cutting.”National Law Journal (March 10): A18–A19.
53.
RomoFrankSchwartzMichael.1995. “The Structural Embeddedness of Business Decisions: The Migration of Manufacturing Plants in New York State, 1960 to 1985.”American Sociological Review60: 874–907.
54.
SandefurRebecca L.2001. “Work and Honor in the Law: Prestige and the Division of Lawyer's Labor.”American Sociological Review66: 382–403.
55.
ShererPeterLeeKyungmook.2002. “Institutional Change in Large Law Firms: A Resource Dependency and Institutional Perspective.”Academy of Management Journal45: 102-19.
56.
S⊘rensonJesper B.StuartToby.2000. “Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation.”Administrative Science Quarterly45: 81–112.
57.
SpenceMichael A.1974. Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
StiglitzJoseph E.1987. “The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price.”Journal of Economic Literature, 25: 1–48.
59.
StuartToby H.1998. “Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry.”Administrative Science Quarterly43: 668-98.
60.
SuchmanMark C.1998. “Working without a Net: The Sociology of Legal Ethnics in Corporate Litigation.”Fordham Law Review67: 837-74.
61.
SwedbergRichard.1994. “Markets as Social Structures.” Pp. 255-82 in Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by SmelserNeilSwedbergRichard. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
UzziBrian.1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Interf irm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.”Administrative Science Quarterly42: 35–67.
63.
UzziBrian.1999. “Social Embeddedness in the Creation of Financial Capital.”American Sociological Review64: 481–505.
64.
UzziBrianGillespieJames.2002. “Knowledge Spillover in Corporate Financing Networks: Embeddedness and the Firm's Debt Performance.”Strategic Management Journal23: 595–618.
65.
UzziBrianLancasterRyon.2003. “Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients.”Management Science49: 383–99.
66.
VeblenThorstein.1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. London: Unwin.
67.
WassermanStanleyFaustKatherine.1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
68.
WeberMax. [1922] 1968. Economy and Society. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster.
69.
WhiteH.1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heterskedasticity.”Econometrica48: 817-30.
70.
WhiteHarrison C.2002. Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
71.
ZbarackiMark J.RitsonMarkLevyDanielDuttaShantanuBergenMark. Forthcoming. “The Managerial and Customer Costs of Price Adjustment: Direct Evidence from Industrial Markets.”Journal of Economic Statistics.
72.
ZelizerViviana A.2000. “The Purchase of Intimacy.”Law and Society Inquiry25: 817-48.
73.
ZellnerArnold.1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.”Journal of the American Statistical Association57: 348-68.
74.
ZuckermanEzra.1999. “The Categorical Imperative.”American Journal of Sociology104: 1398-438.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
