Drawing on recent insights from the study of legal consciousness and gender relations, the authors test the generality of Catharine MacKinnon's theory of the sexual harassment of adult women. Survey and interview data from the Youth Development Study and the General Social Survey are analyzed to identify a behavioral syndrome of sexual harassment for males and females during adolescence and young adulthood and to compare the syndrome against subjective reports of sexual harassment. A clear harassment syndrome is found for all age and sex groups and MacKinnon's predictions about the influence of workplace power and gender relations are generally supported. Financially vulnerable men as well as women are most likely to experience harassing behaviors, and men pursuing more egalitarian gender relationships are most likely to identify such behaviors as sexual harassment. Nevertheless, adult women remain the most frequent targets of classic sexual harassment markers, such as unwanted touching and invasion of personal space.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsKathryn.1998. “The New Jurisprudence of Sexual Harassment.”Cornell Law Review83: 1169–230.
2.
AckerJoan.1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.”Gender & Society4: 139–58.
3.
American Association of University Women (AAUW).2001. Hostile Hallways: The AAUW Survey on Sexual Harassment in America's Schools. Washington: AAUW Educational Foundation.
4.
AndersonEric.2002. “Openly Gay Athletes: Contesting Hegemonic Masculinity in a Homophobic Environment.”Gender & Society16: 860–77.
5.
ArveyRichard D.CavanaughMarcie A..1995. “Using Surveys to Assess the Prevalence of Sexual Harassment: Some Methodological Problems.”Journal of Social Issues51: 39–52.
6.
BarrPaula A.1993. “Perceptions of Sexual Harassment.”Sociological Inquiry63: 460–70.
7.
BensonDonna J.ThomsonGregg E..1982. “Sexual Harassment on a University Campus: The Confluence of Authority Relations, Sexual Interest and Gender Stratification.”Social Problems29: 236–51.
8.
BerdahlJennifer L.MagleyVicki J.WaldoCraig R..1996. “The Sexual Harassment of Men?: Exploring the Concept with Theory and Data.”Psychology of Women Quarterly20: 527–47.
9.
BirdSharon R.1996. “Welcome to the Men's Club: Homosociality and the Maintenance of Hegemonic Masculinity.”Gender & Society10: 120–32.
10.
BurtMartha R.EstepRhoda E..1981. “Apprehension and Fear: Learning a Sense of Sexual Vulnerability.”Sex Roles7: 511–22.
11.
ButlerJudith.1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
12.
CahillMia L.2001. The Social Construction of Sexual Harassment Law. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
13.
ClevelandJeanette N.KerstMelinda E..1993. “Sexual Harassment and Perceptions of Power: An Under-Articulated Relationship.”Journal of Vocational Behavior42: 49–67.
14.
Committee on the Health and Safety Implications of Child Labor (CHSICL).1998. Protecting Youth at Work: Health, Safety, and Development of Working Children and Adolescents in the United States. Washington: National Academy Press.
15.
ConnellR.W.1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16.
ConnellR.W.1992. “A Very Straight Gay: Masculinity, Homosexual Experience, and the Dynamics of Gender.”American Sociological Review57: 735–51.
17.
ConnellR.W.1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
ConnellR.W.2000. The Men and the Boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
ConnellR.W.2002. Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
DavisJames A.SmithTom W.MarsdenPeter V..2003. General Social Surveys, 1972–2002: [Computer File]. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors].
21.
DaytonMitchellC..1998. Latent Class Scaling Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
DeCosterStacyEstesSarah BethMuellerCharles W..1999. “Routine Activities and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace.”Work and Occupations26: 21–49.
23.
DellingerKirstenWilliamsChristine L..2002. “The Locker Room v. the Dorm Room: The Cultural Context of Sexual Harassment in Two Magazine Publishing Organizations,”Social Problems49: 242–57.
24.
DemetriouDemetrakis Z.2001. “Connell's Concept of Hegemonic Masculinity: A Critique.”Theory and Society30: 337–61.
25.
Doe v. Belleville, 119 F.3d 563 (7th Cir. 1997).
26.
DonaldsonMike.1993. “What is Hegemonic Masculinity?”Theory and Society22: 643–57.
27.
DonovanBrian.1998. “Political Consequences of Private Authority: Promise Keepers and the Transformation of Hegemonic Masculinity.”Theory and Society27: 817–43.
28.
EhrenreichRosa.1999. “Dignity and Discrimination: Toward a Pluralistic Understanding of Workplace Harassment.”Georgetown Law Journal88: 1–64.
29.
EliasonScott.1997. The Categorical Data Analysis System. Version 4.0 of MLLSA.
30.
Ellison v. Brady, 924 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1991).
31.
EstrichSusan.1987. Real Rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
EwickPatriciaSilbeySusan S..1998. The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
FinchMichaelShanahanMichael J.MortimerJeylan T.RyuSeongryeol.1991. “Work Experience and Control Orientation in Adolescence.”American Sociological Review56: 597–611.
34.
FineranSusan.2002. “Adolescents at Work: Gender Issues and Sexual Harassment.”Violence Against Women8: 953–67.
35.
FitzgeraldLouise F.ShullmanSandra L..1993. “Sexual Harassment: A Research Analysis and Agenda for the 1990s.”Journal of Vocational Behavior42: 5–27.
36.
FitzgeraldLouise F.ShullmanSandra L.BaileyNancyRichardsMargaretSweckerJaniceGoldYaelOrmerodMimiWeitzmanLauren.1988. “The Incidence and Dimensions of Sexual Harassment in Academia and the Workplace.”Journal of Vocational Behavior32: 152–75.
37.
FolgeroIngebjorg S.FjeldstadIngrid H..1995. “On Duty-Off Guard: Cultural Norms and Sexual Harassment in Service Organizations.”Organization Studies16: 299–313.
FranckeKatherine.1997. “What's Wrong with Sexual Harassment?”Stanford Law Review49: 691–772.
40.
GallagherSally K.SmithChristian.1999. “Symbolic Traditionalism and Pragmatic Egalitarianism: Contemporary Evangelicals, Families, and Gender.”Gender & Society13: 211–33.
41.
GelfandMichele J.FitzgeraldLouise F.DrasgowFritz.1995. “The Structure of Sexual Harassment: A Confirmatory Analysis across Cultures and Settings.”Journal of Vocational Behavior47: 164–77.
42.
GillespieDair L.LefflerAnn.1987. “The Politics of Research Methodology in Claims-Making Activities: Social Science and Sexual Harassment.”Social Problems34: 490–501.
43.
GiuffrePatti A.WilliamsChristine L..1994. “Boundary Lines: Labeling Sexual Harassment in Restaurants.”Gender & Society8: 378–401.
44.
GruberJames.1992. “A Typology of Personal and Environmental Sexual Harassment: Research and Policy Implications for the 1990s.”Sex Roles26: 447–64.
45.
GruberJames.1998. “The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women's Experiences of Sexual Harassment.”Gender & Society12: 301–20.
46.
GutekBarbara A.CohenAaron Groff.1987. “Sex Ratios, Sex Role Spillover, and Sex at Work: A Comparison of Men's and Women's Experiences.”Human Relations40: 97–115.
47.
GutekBarbara A.CohenAaron GroffKonradAlison M..1990. “Predicting Social-Sexual Behavior at Work: A Contact Hypothesis.”Academy of Management Journal33: 560–77.
48.
HallSteve.2002. “ Daubing the Drudges of Fury: Men, Violence and the Piety of the 'Hegemonic Masculinity' Thesis.”Theoretical Criminology6: 35–61.
49.
Hall v. Gus Construction, 842 F.2d 1010 (8th Cir. 1988).
50.
HalleyJanet.2002. “Sexuality Harassment.” Pp. 80–104 in Left Legalism/Left Critique, edited by BrownW.HalleyJ.. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
51.
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993).
52.
HindelangMichael J.HirschiTravisWeisJoseph G..1981. Measuring Delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53.
HorneyJulieMarshallIneke Haen.1991. “Measuring Lambda Through Self-Reports.”Criminology29: 471–95.
54.
JaschikMollieFretzBruce R..1991. “Women's Perceptions and Labeling of Sexual Harassment.”Sex Roles25: 19–23.
KalofLindaEbyKimberly L.MathesonJennifer L.KroskaRob J..2001. “The Influence of Race and Gender on Student Self-Reports of Sexual Harassment by College Professors.”Gender & Society15: 282–302.
57.
KatzRoger C.HannonRoseannWhittenLeslie.1996. “Effects of Gender and Situation on the Perception of Sexual Harassment.”Sex Roles34: 35–42.
58.
KeashlyLoraleigh.2001. “Interpersonal and Systemic Aspects of Emotional Abuse at Work: The Target's Perspective.”Violence and Victims16: 233–68.
59.
KimmelMichael S.1994. “Masculinity as Homophobia: Fear, Shame, and Silence in the Construction of Gender Identity.” Pp. 119-41 in Theorizing Masculinities, edited by BrodH.KaufmanM.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
KohlmanMarla H.2003. “The Demographics of Sexual Harassment.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Law and Society Association, June 5, Pittsburgh, PA.
MacKinnonCatharine.1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven: Yale University Press.
65.
MacKinnonCatharine.1987. “Sexual Harassment: Its First Decade in Court,” Pp. 103-16 in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
66.
MacKinnonCatharine.1997. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., No. 96–568, Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioner,UCLA Women's Law Journal8: 9–44.
67.
MacKinnonCatharine.2002. “The Logic of Experience: Reflections on the Development of Sexual Harassment Law.”Georgetown Law Journal90: 813–33.
68.
MarshallAnna-Maria.1998. “Closing the Gaps: Plaintiffs in Pivotal Sexual Harassment Cases.”Law and Social Inquiry23: 761–93.
69.
MartinPatricia Yancey.1998. “Why Can't a Man Be More Like a Woman? Reflections on Connell's. Masculinities.”Gender & Society12: 469–77.
70.
McCutcheonAllan L.1987. Latent Class Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
McGuffeyShawnC.Lindsay RichB..1999. “Playing in the Gender Transgression Zone: Race, Class, and Hegemonic Masculinity in Middle Childhood.”Gender & Society13: 608–27.
72.
Meritor v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986).
73.
MerrySally Engle.1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74.
MillerRowland S.JohnsonJames A.JohnsonJudy K..1991. “Assessing the Prevalence of Unwanted Childhood Sexual Experiences.”Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality4: 43–54.
75.
MorganPhoebe A.1999. “Risking Relationships: Understanding the Litigation Choices of Sexually Harassed Women.”The Law and Society Review33: 201–26.
76.
MortimerJeylan.2003. Working and Growing Up in America. Cambridge: Harvard. University Press.
77.
MuellerCharles W.DeCosterStacyEstesSarah Beth.2001. “Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Unanticipated Consequences of Modern Social Control in Organizations.”Work and Occupations28: 411–46.
78.
NelsonAndreaOliverPamela.1998. “Gender and the Construction of Consent in Child-Adult Sexual Contact: Beyond Gender Neutrality and Male Monopoly.”Gender & Society12: 554–77.
79.
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998).
80.
PadavicIreneOrcuttJames D..1997. “Perceptions of Sexual Harassment in the Florida Legal System: A Comparison of Dominance and Spillover Explanations.”Gender & Society11: 682–98.
81.
PataiDaphne.1998. Heterophobia: Sexual Harassment and the Future of Feminism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
82.
QuinnBeth A.2002. “Sexual Harassment and Masculinity: The Power and Meaning of 'Girl Watching.'”Gender & Society16: 386–402.
83.
RaginsBelle RoseScanduraTerri A..1995. “Antecedents and Work-Related Correlates of Reported Sexual Harassment: An Empirical Investigation of Competing Hypotheses.”Sex Roles32: 429–55.
84.
ReiterEster.1991. Making Fast Food: From the Frying Pan into the Fryer. Montreal: McGill Queen's University Press.
85.
RichmanJudith A.RospendaKathleen M.NawynStephanie J.FlahertyJoseph A.FendrichMichaelDrumMelinda L.JohnsonTimothy P..1999. “Sexual Harassment and Generalized Workplace Abuse.”American Journal of Public Health89: 358–63.
86.
RogersJackie KrasasHensonKevin D..1997. “‘Hey, Why Don't You Wear a Shorter Skirt?' Structural Vulnerability and the Organization of Sexual Harassment in Temporary Clerical Employment.”Gender & Society11: 215–37.
87.
RospendaKathleen M.RichmanJudith A.NawynStephanie J..1998. “Doing Power: The Confluence of Gender, Race, and Class in Contrapower Sexual Harassment.”Gender & Society12: 40–60.
88.
SaguyAbigail.2003. What is Sexual Harassment? From Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne. Berkeley: University of California Press.
89.
SchultzVicki.1998. “Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment.”Yale Law Journal107: 1683–32.
90.
SchultzVicki.2001. “Talking About Harassment.”Journal of Law and Policy9: 417–33.
91.
SchultzVicki.2003. “The Sanitized Workplace.” In Press. Yale Law Journal.
92.
SeverAysan.1996. “Mainstream Neglect of Sexual Harassment as a Social Problem.”The Canadian Journal of Sociology21: 185–202.
93.
SeverAysan.1999. “Sexual Harassment: Where We Were, Where We Are and Prospects for the New Millennium.”The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology36: 469–97.
94.
SmithMichael D.1994. “Enhancing the Quality of Survey Data on Violence Against Women: A Feminist Approach.”Gender & Society8: 109–27.
95.
StambaughPhoebe Morgan.1997. “The Power of Law and the Sexual Harassment Complaints of Women.”National Women's Studies Association Journal9: 23–42.
96.
SteinbergLaurenceGreenbergerEllenJacobiMaryannGarduqueLaurie.1981. “Early Work Experience: A Partial Antidote for Adolescent Egocentrism.”Journal of Youth and Adolescence10: 141–57.
97.
TalbotMargaret.2002. “Men Behaving Badly.”New York Times Magazine, October 13, pp. 52–57, 82, 84, 95.
98.
TangriSandra S.BurtMartha R.JohnsonLeanor B..1982. “Sexual Harassment at Work: Three Explanatory Models.”Journal of Social Issues38: 33–54.
99.
ThackerRebecca A.1996. “A Descriptive Study of Situational and Individual Influences upon Individuals' Responses to Sexual Harassment.”Human Relations49: 1105–122.
100.
ThorneBarrie.1993. Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
101.
U.S. Census Bureau.2000. Labor Force, Employment, and Earnings. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
102.
U.S. Department of Justice.2002. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
103.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.2003. Sexual Harassment Charges EEOC & FEPAs Combined. Retrieved June 15, 2003 (http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/harass.html).
104.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.1988. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Government. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
105.
VauxAlan.1993. “Paradigmatic Assumptions in Sexual Harassment Research: Being Guided Without Being Misled.”Journal of Vocational Behavior42: 116–35.
106.
VentoCarol Schultz.2001. “When is Work Environment Intimidating, Hostile or Offensive, so as to Constitute Sexual Harassment under State Law?”American Law Reports 5th93: 47–107.
107.
WelshSandy.1999. “Gender and Sexual Harassment.”Annual Review of Sociology25: 169–90.
108.
WelshSandy.2000. “The Multidimensional Nature of Sexual Harassment: An Empirical Analysis of Women's Sexual Harassment Complaints.”Violence Against Women6: 118–41.
109.
WelshSandyNierobiszAnnette.1997. “How Prevalent is Sexual Harassment: A Research Note on Measuring Sexual Harassment in Canada.”Canadian Journal of Sociology22: 505–22.
WilliamsChristine L.GiuffrePatti A.DellingerKirsten.1999. “Sexuality in the Workplace: Organizational Control, Sexual Harassment, and the Pursuit of Pleasure.”Annual Review of Sociology25: 73–93.
