The mechanisms governing the composition of formal social groups (e.g., task groups, organizational founding teams) remain poorly understood, owing to (1) a lack of representative sampling from groups found in the general population, (2) a “success” bias among researchers that leads them to consider only those groups that actually emerge and survive, and (3) a restrictive focus on some theorized mechanisms of group composition (e.g., homophily) to the exclusion of others. These shortcomings are addressed by analyzing a unique, representative data set of organizational founding teams sampled from the U.S. population. Rather than simply considering the properties of those founding teams that are empirically observed, a novel quantitative methodology generates the distribution of all possible teams, based on combinations of individual and relational characteristics. This methodology permits the exploration of five mechanisms of group composition—those based on homophily, functionality, status expectations, network constraint, and ecological constraint. Findings suggest that homophily and network constraints based on strong ties have the most pronounced effect on group composition. Social isolation (i.e., exclusion from a group) is more likely to occur as a result of ecological constraints on the availability of similar alters in a locality than as a result of status-varying membership choices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichHoward E.1989. “Networking among Women Entrepreneurs.” Pp. 103–32 in Women-Owned Businesses, edited by HaganO., RivchunC., and SextonD.. New York: Praeger.
AldrichHoward E. Forthcoming. “Entrepreneurship.” In Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2d ed., edited by SwedbergR. and SmelserN.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
AldrichHoward E., CarterNancy, and RuefMartin. Forthcoming. “With Very Little Help from Their Friends: Gender and Relational Composition of Nascent Entrepreneurs' Startup Teams.” In Frontiers of Entrepreneur-ship Research 2002, edited by ReynoldsP., . Wellesley, MA: Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College.
5.
AldrichHoward E., ElamAmanda, and ReesePat Ray. 1996. “Strong Ties, Weak Ties, and Strangers: Do Women Business Owners Differ from Men in Their Use of Networking to Obtain Assistance?” Pp. 1–25 in Entrepreneur-ship in a Global Context, edited by BirleyS. and MacMillanI.. London, England: Routledge.
6.
AldrichHoward E. and FiolMarlene C.. 1994. “Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation.”Academy of Management Review19:645–70.
7.
AldrichHoward E. and WaldingerRoger. 1990. “Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship.”Annual Review of Sociology16:111–35.
8.
AnconaDeborah and CaldwellDavid. 1992. “Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance.”Organization Science3:321–41.
9.
ArrowHolly, McGrathJoseph, and BerdahlJennifer. 2000. Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
BalesRobert. 1953. “The Equilibrium Problem in Small Groups.” Pp. 111–61 in Working Papers in the Theory of Action, edited by ParsonsT., BalesR., and ShilsE.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
11.
BatesTimothy. 1997. Race, Self-Employment, and Upward Mobility: An Illusive American Dream.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
BergerJoseph, Hamit FisekM., NormanRobert Z., and ZelditchMorris. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach.New York: Elsevier.
13.
BirchDavid. 1997. Small Business Research Summary. RS Number 183.Washington, DC: U.S. Small Business Administration.
BurkeWilliam and ZaloomBasil. 1970. Blueprint for Professional Service Corporations.New York: Dun and Bradstreet.
19.
BurtRonald. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
CarrollGlenn and HannanMichael. 2000. The Demography of Corporations and Industries.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
CarrollGlenn and MosakowskiElaine. 1987. “The Career Dynamics of Self-Employment.”Administrative Science Quarterly32:570–89.
22.
CarterNancy. 1994. “Reducing Barriers between Genders: Differences in New Firm Startups.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, August, Dallas, TX.
23.
ColemanJames and JamesJohn. 1961. “The Equilibrium Size Distribution of Freely-Forming Groups.”Sociometry24:36–45.
24.
CooperArnold C. and DailyCatherine M.. 1997. “Entrepreneurial Teams.” Pp. 127–50 in Entrepreneurship 2000, edited by SextonD. and SmilorR.. Chicago, IL: Upstart Publishing.
25.
DiMaggioPaul and LouchHugh. 1998. “Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks?”American Sociological Review63:619–37.
26.
DurkheimEmile. [1893] 1949. Division of Labor in Society. Reprint, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
27.
EisenhardtKathleen and SchoonhovenClaudia Bird. 1990. “Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978–1988.”Administrative Science Quarterly35:504–29.
28.
FisekM. Hamit, BergerJoseph, and NormanRobert Z.. 1991. “Participation in Heterogeneous Groups: A Theoretical Integration.”American Journal of Sociology97:114–42.
29.
FreidsonEliot. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Professional Knowledge.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
GartnerWilliam. 1985. “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation.”Academy of Management Review10:696–706.
31.
GoffmanErving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
32.
GoodmanLeo. 1964. “Mathematical Methods for the Study of Systems of Groups.”American Journal of Sociology70:170–92.
33.
GranovetterMark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology78: 1360–80.
34.
GranovetterMark. 1992. “Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology.” Pp. 25–56 in Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, edited by NohriaN. and EcclesR.. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
35.
HavemanHeather A. and CohenLisa E.. 1994. “The Ecological Dynamics of Careers: The Impact of Organizational Founding, Dissolution, and Merger on Job Mobility.”American Journal of Sociology100:104–52.
36.
HawleyAmos. 1950. Human Ecology.New York: Ronald.
37.
IbarraHerminia. 1997. “Paving an Alternative Route: Gender Differences in Managerial Networks.”Social Psychology Quarterly60:91–102.
38.
JamesJohn. 1953. “The Distribution of Free-Forming Small Group Size.”American Sociological Review18:569–70.
39.
JussimLee and Wayne OsgoodD.. 1989. “Influence and Similarity among Friends: An Integrative Model Applied to Incarcerated Adolescents.”Social Psychology Quarterly52:98–112.
40.
KallebergArne, KnokeDavid, MarsdenPeter, and SpaethJoe. 1996. Organizations in America: Analyzing Their Structures and Human Resource Practices.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
KammJudy B. and NurikAaron J.. 1993. “The Stages of Team Venture Formation: A Decision Making Model.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice17:17–27.
42.
KeisterLisa A. and MollerStephanie. 2000. “Wealth Inequality in the United States.”Annual Review of Sociology26:63–81.
43.
LazarsfeldPaul and MertonRobert K.. 1954. “Friendship as Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis.” Pp. 18–66 in Freedom and Control in Modern Society, edited by BergerM., AbelT., and PageC.. New York: Octagon Books.
44.
LechlerThomas. 2001. “Social Interaction: A Determinant of Entrepreneurial Team Venture Success.”Small Business Economics16:263–78.
45.
MannixElizabeth, GoinsSheila, and CarrollSusan. 2002. “Starting at the Beginning: Team Formation, Composition, and Performance,” Working Paper. Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
46.
MarsdenPeter. 1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.”American Sociological Review52:122–31.
47.
MayhewBruce, Miller McPhersonJ., RotoloThomas, and Smith-LovinLynn. 1995. “Sex and Race Homogeneity in Naturally Occurring Groups.”Social Forces74:15–52.
48.
McPhersonJ. Miller and Smith-LovinLynn. 1987. “Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face to Face Groups.”American Sociological Review52:370–9.
49.
McPhersonMiller, Smith-LovinLynn, and CookJames. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.”Annual Review of Sociology27:415–44.
50.
NeeVictor and SandersJimy M.. 1985. “The Road to Parity: Determinants of the Socioeconomic Achievements of Asian Americans.”Ethnic and Racial Studies8:75–93.
51.
ReskinBarbara. 1999. “The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition.”Annual Review of Sociology25:335–61.
52.
ReynoldsPaul D.2000. “National Panel Study of U.S. Business Start-Ups: Background and Methodology.” Pp. 153–227 in Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, vol. 4, edited by KatzJ.. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
53.
RuefMartin. 2000. “The Emergence of Organizational Forms: A Community Ecology Approach.”American Journal of Sociology106: 658–714.
54.
RuefMartin. 2002a. “A Structural Event Approach to the Analysis of Group Composition.”Social Networks24:135–60.
55.
RuefMartin. 2002b. “Strong Ties, Weak Ties, and Islands: Structural and Cultural Predictors of Organizational Innovation.”Industrial and Corporate Change11:427–49.
56.
SchofeldJ. W.1995. “Review of Research on School Desegregation's Impact on Elementary and Secondary School Students.” Pp. 597–616 in Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, edited by BanksJ. and McGeeC.. New York: Macmillan.
57.
ShannonClaude and WeaverWarren. [1949] 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication.Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
58.
ShaverKelly G., CarterNancy M., GartnerWilliam, and ReynoldsPaul. 2001. “Who Is a Nascent Entrepreneur? Decision Rules for Identifying and Selecting Entrepreneurs in the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED).” Technical Paper. Jonköping International School of Business. Jonköping, Sweden.
SingerEleanor, Van HoewykJohn, and MaherMary P.. 2000. “Experiments With Incentives in Telephone Surveys.”Public Opinion Quarterly64:171–88.
61.
SkvoretzJohn and FararoThomas. 1996. “Status and Participation in Task Groups: A Dynamic Network Model.”American Journal of Sociology101:1366–1414.
62.
SlaterPhilip. 1955. “Role Differentiation in Small Groups.”American Sociological Review20:300–10.
63.
StinchcombeArthur L.1965. “Social Structure and Organizations.” Pp. 142–93 in Handbook of Organizations, edited by MarchJ. G.. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
64.
U.S. Department of Commerce.1996. Economic Census: Survey of Women-Owned Businesses.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
65.
VesperKarl. 1990. New Venture Strategies.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
66.
WassermanStanley and FaustKatherine. 1994Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications.New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
WeberMax. [1904–1905] 1992. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Reprint, London: Routledge.
68.
WhiteHarrison. 1962. “Chance Models of Systems of Casual Groups.”Sociometry25:153–72.
69.
WilsonKenneth and Allen MartinW.. 1982. “Ethnic Enclaves: A Comparison of the Cuban and Black Economies in Miami.”American Journal of Sociology88:135–60.
70.
ZelizerViviana A.1994. The Social Meaning of Money.New York: Basic.
