Using relative poverty measures based on micro-level data from the Luxembourg Income Study, in conjunction with pooled time-series data for 14 advanced capitalist democracies between 1970 and 1997, the authors analyze separately the rate of pretax/transfer poverty and the reduction in poverty achieved by systems of taxes and transfers. Socioeconomic factors, including de-industrialization and unemployment, largely explain pre-tax/transfer poverty rates of the working-age population in these advanced capitalist democracies. The extent of redistribution (measured as poverty reduction via taxes and transfers) is explained directly by welfare state generosity and constitutional structure (number of veto points) and the strength of the political left, both in unions and in government.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ÅbergRune. 1989. “Distributive Mechanisms of the Welfare State—A Formal Analysis and Empirical Application.” European Sociological Review5:167–82.
2.
AldersonArthur S.1999. “Explaining De-industrialization: Globalization, Failure, or Success?”American Sociological Review64:701–21.
3.
AldersonArthur S. and NielsenFrançois. 2002. “Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries.” American Journal of Sociology107:1244–99.
4.
AtkinsonA.B. and MogensenGunnar Viby. 1993. Welfare and Work Incentives: A North European Perspective.Oxford, England: Clarendon.
5.
BeckNathaniel and KatzJonathan N.. 1995. “What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review89:634–47.
6.
BeckerGary S.1993. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BlankRebecca M. and BlinderAlan S.. 1986. “Macroeconomics, Income Distribution, and Poverty.” Pp. 180–208 in Fighting Poverty: What Works and What Doesn't, edited by DanzigerS. H. and WeinbergD. H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BluestoneBarry and HarrisonBennett. 1982. The De-industrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry.New York: Basic.
9.
BonoliGiuliano and MachAndré. 2000. “Switzerland: Adjustment Politics with Institutional Constraints.” Pp. 131–74 in Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 2, Diverse Responses to Common Challenges, edited by ScharpfF. W. and SchmidtV. A.. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.
BorjasGeorge J.1994. “The Economics of Immigration.” Journal of Economic Literature32:1667–1717.
11.
BorjasGeorge J., FreemanRichard B., and KatzLawrence F.. 1992. “On the Labor Market Impacts of Immigration and Trade.” Pp. 213–44 in Immigration and the Work Force: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas, edited by BorjasG. J. and FreemanR. B.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BradleyDavid, HuberEvelyne, MollerStephanie, NielsenFrançois, and StephensJohn. Forthcoming. “Distribution and Redistribution in Post-industrial Democracies.” World Politics55.
13.
BurtlessGary, RainwaterLee, and SmeedingTimothy M.. 2001. “United States Poverty in a Cross-National Context.” Pp. 27–68 in Understanding Poverty, edited by DanzigerS. H. and HavemanR. H.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
CancianMaria, DanzigerSheldon, and GottschalkPeter. 1993. “Working Wives and Family Income Inequality among Married Couples.” Pp. 195–221 in Uneven Tides: Rising Inequality in America, edited by DanzigerS. and GottschalkP.. New York: Russell Sage.
15.
CasperLynne M., McLanahanSara S., and GarfinkelIrwin. 1994. “The Gender-Poverty Gap: What We Can Learn from Other Countries.” American Sociological Review59:594–605.
16.
CutlerDavid M. and KatzLawrence F.. 1991. “Macroeconomic Performance and the Disadvantaged.” Pp. 1–61 in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2, edited by BrainardW. C. and PerryG. L.. Washington, DC: Brookings.
17.
DanzigerSheldon H. and GottschalkPeter. 1995. America Unequal.New York: Russell Sage.
18.
EbbinghausBernhard and VisserJelle. 1992. “European Trade Unions in Figures.” Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20.
Estevez-AbeMargarita, IversenTorben, and SoskiceDavid. 2001. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” Pp. 145–83 in Varieties of Capitalism, edited by HallP. and SoskiceD.. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
FiginiPaolo. 1998. “Inequality Measures, Equivalence Scales, and Adjustment of Household Size and Composition.” Working Paper No. 185, Luxembourg Income Study, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. Retrieved January 22, 2003 (http://www.lisproject.org/publications/wpapers.htm).
22.
GoodinRobert E., HeadeyBruce, MuffelsRuud, and DirvenHenk-Jan. 1999. The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
GornickJanet C, MeyersMarcia K., and RossKatherin E.. 1997. “Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation across Fourteen Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy7:45–70.
24.
GottschalkPeter and JoyceMary. 1995. “The Impact of Technological Change, De-industrialization, and Internationalization of Trade on Earnings Inequality: An International Perspective.” Pp. 197–230 in Poverty, Inequality, and the Future of Social Policy, edited by McFateK., LawsonR. and WilsonW.J.. New York: Russell Sage.
25.
GottschalkPeter and SmeedingTimothy M.. 1997. “Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality.” Journal of Economic Literature35:633–87.
26.
GramlichEdward M. and LarenDeborah S.. 1984. “How Widespread are Income Losses in a Recession?” Pp. 157–80 in The Social Contract Revisited: Aims and Outcomes of President Reagan's Social Welfare Policy, edited by BawdenD. L.. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
GustafssonBjorn and JohanssonMats. 1999. “In Search of Smoking Guns: What Makes Income Inequality Vary Over Time in Different Countries?”American Sociological Review64:585–605.
29.
HarrisonBennett and BluestoneBarry. 1988. The Great U-Turn: Corporate Restructuring and the Polarizing of America.New York: Basic.
30.
HicksAlexander. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Policies.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
HuberEvelyne, RaginCharles, and StephensJohn D.. 1993. “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State.” American Journal of Sociology99:711–49.
32.
HuberEvelyne, RaginCharles, and StephensJohn D.. 1997. “Comparative Welfare States Data Set.” Northwestern University, Evanston, IL and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC [distributors]. Retrieved January 22, 2003 (http://www.lisproject.org/publications/welfaredata/welfareaccess.htm).
33.
HuberEvelyne and StephensJohn D.. 2000. “Partisan Governance, Women's Employment, and the Social Democratic Service State.” American Sociological Review65:323–42.
34.
HuberEvelyne and StephensJohn D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
HuberPeter J.1967. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimation under Nonstandard Conditions.” Pp. 221–33 in Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability1, edited by LeCamL. M. and NeymanJ.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
36.
InglehartRonald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 1995. “Women in Parliaments, 1945–95: A World Statistical Survey.” Geneva, Switzerland: IPU.
38.
IversenTorben. 1996. “Power, Flexibility, and the Breakdown of Centralized Wage Bargaining: The Cases of Denmark and Sweden in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics.28:399–436.
39.
IversenTorben. 1998. “Wage Bargaining, Central Bank Independence, and the Real Effects of Money.” International Organization52:469–504.
40.
IversenTorben and CusackThomas R.. 2000. “The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?”World Politics52:313–49.
41.
IversenTorben and SoskiceDavid. 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preference.” American Political Science Review95:875–910.
42.
KamermanSheila B.1984. “Women, Children, and Poverty: Public Policies and Female-headed Families in Industrialized Countries.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society10:249–71.
43.
KenworthyLane. 1999. “Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment.” Social Forces77:1119–39.
44.
KenworthyLane. 2001. “Wage-Setting Measures: A Survey and Assessment.” World Politics54:57–98.
45.
KilkeyMajella and BradshawJonathan. 1999. “Lone Mothers, Economic Weil-Being, and Policies.” Pp. 147–84 in Gender and Welfare State Regimes, edited by SainsburyD.. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
46.
KimHwanjoon. 2000. “Anti-Poverty Effectiveness of Taxes and Income Transfers in Welfare States.” International Social Security Review53:105–29.
47.
KingDesmond and WoodStewart. 1999. “The Political Economy of Neo-Liberalism.” Pp. 371–97 in Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by KitscheltH., LangeP., MarksG., and StephensJ. D.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
KorpiWalter and PalmeJoakim. 1998. “The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in Western Countries.” American Sociological Review63:661–87.
49.
KuznetsSimon. 1955. “Economic Growth and Income Inequality.” American Economic Review45:1–28.
50.
LecaillonJacques, PaukertFelix, MorrissonChristian, and GermidisDimitri. 1984. Income Distribution and Economic Development: An Analytical Survey.Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
51.
LindertPeter H. and WilliamsonJeffrey G.. 1985. “Growth, Equality, and History.” Explorations in Economic History22:341–77.
52.
LongJ. Scott and ErvinLaurie H.. 2000. “Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model.” The American Statistician54:217–24.
53.
MacKinnonJames G. and WhiteHalbert. 1985. “Some Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimators with Improved Finite Sample Properties.” Journal of Econometrics29:53–7.
54.
MäkinenTiina. 1999. “Structural Pressures, Social Policy, and Poverty.” International Social Security Review52:3–24.
55.
McFateKatherine. 1995. “Introduction: Western States in the New World Order.” Pp. 367–86 in Poverty, Inequality, and the Future of Social Policy, edited by McFateK., LawsonR., and WilsonW. J.. New York: Russell Sage.
56.
McFateKatherine, SmeedingTimothy, and RainwaterLee. 1995. “Markets and States: Poverty Trends and Transfer System Effectiveness in the 1980s.” Pp. 29–68 in Poverty, Inequality, and the Future of Social Policy, edited by McFateK., LawsonR., and WilsonW. J.. New York: Russell Sage.
57.
MisraJoya. 1998. “Mothers or Workers? The Value of Women's Labor: Women and the Emergence of Family Allowance Policy.” Gender and Society12:376–99.
58.
NielsenFrançois. 1994. “Income Inequality and Industrial Development: Dualism Revisited.” American Sociological Review59:654–77.
59.
NielsenFrançois and AldersonArthur S.. 1995. “Income Inequality, Development, and Dualism: Results from an Unbalanced Cross-National Panel.” American Sociological Review60:674–701.
60.
NielsenFrançois and AldersonArthur S.. 1997. “The Kuznets Curve and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality in U.S. Counties, 1970 to 1990.” American Sociological Review62:12–33.
61.
NielsenFrançois and AldersonArthur S.. 2001. “Trends in Income Inequality in the United States.” Pp. 355–85 in Sourcebook on Labor Markets: Evolving Structures and Processes, edited by BergI. and KallebergA. L.. New York: Plenum.
62.
NolanPatrick and LenskiGerhard. 1999. Human Societies.8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
63.
O'ConnorJulia S.1999. “Employment Equality Strategies in Liberal Welfare States.” Pp. 47–74 in Gender and Welfare State Regimes, edited by SainsburyD.. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
64.
O'ConnorJulia S., OrloffAnn Shola, and ShaverSheila. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
65.
OrloffAnn S.1996. “Gender in the Welfare State.” Annual Review of Sociology22:51–78.
66.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).1995. “Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study.” Social Policy Studies No. 18, Paris, France.
67.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Various years (a). National Accounts.Paris, France: OECD.
68.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Various years (b). Foreign Trade by Commodities.Paris, France: OECD.
69.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC). 2000. Literacy in the Information Age: Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey.Paris, France: OECD/HRDC.
70.
PontussonJonas, RuedaDavid, and WayChristopher. 2002. “Comparative Political Economy of Wage Distribution: The Role of Partisanship and Labor Market Institutions.” British Journal of Political Science32:281–303.
71.
RogersWilliam H.1993. “sg17: Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin13:19–23. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints 3:88–94.
72.
RowthornRobert and RamaswamyRamana. 1998. “Growth, Trade, and Deindustrialization.” Working Paper No. 98/60. Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund.
73.
RuedaDavid and PontussonJonas. 2000. “Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism.” World Politics52:350–83.
74.
SainsburyDiane, ed. 1999. Gender and Welfare State Regimes.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
75.
ScharpfFritz W.2000. “Economic Changes, Vulnerabilities, and Institutional Capabilities.” Pp. 125–228 in Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, vol. 1, From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, edited by ScharpfF. W. and SchmidtV. A.. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
76.
SimpsonMiles. 1990. “Political Rights and Income Inequality: A Cross-National Test.” American Sociological Review55:682–93.
77.
SkocpolTheda and AmentaEdwin. 1986. “States and Social Policies.” Annual Review of Sociology12:131–57.
78.
SmeedingTimothy M.1989. “Poverty, Affluence, and the Income Costs of Children: Cross-National Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS).” Pp. 98–114 in Macroeconomic Problems and Policies of Income Distribution: Functional, Personal, International, edited by DavidsonP. and KregelJ.. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
79.
SmeedingTimothy, TorreyBarbara Boyle, and ReinMartin. 1988. “Patterns of Income and Poverty: The Economic Status of Children and the Elderly in Eight Countries.” Pp. 89–119 in The Vulnerable, edited by PalmerJ. L., SmeedingT., and TorreyB. B.. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
80.
SoskiceDavid. 1999. “Divergent Production Regimes: Coordinated and Uncoordinated Market Economies in the 1980s and 1990s.” Pp. 101–34 in Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by KitscheltH., LangeP., MarksG., and StephensJ.D.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
SribneyWilliam. 1998. “Comparison of Standard Errors for Robust, Cluster, and Standard Estimators.” Stata FAQ Statistics, Stata Corporation. Retrieved January 21, 2003 (http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/cluster.html).
82.
StataCorp. 1999. Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. User's Guide.College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
83.
StephensJohn. 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism.Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
84.
StephensJohn. 1995. “Preserving the Social Democratic Welfare State.” Nordic Journal of Political Economy22:143–61.
85.
StimsonJames A.1985. Regression in Time and Space: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science29:914–47.
86.
SwankDuane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
87.
ThurowLester C.1987. “A Surge in Inequality.” Scientific American, vol. 256, no. 5, pp. 30–37.
88.
TiltonTim. 1990. The Political Theory of Swedish Social Democracy: Through the Welfare State to Socialism.Oxford, England: Clarendon.
89.
TiendaMarta and LiangZai. 1994. “Poverty and Immigration in Policy Perspective.” Pp. 330–64 in Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change, edited by DanzigerS.H., SandefurG. D., and WeinbergD. H. New York: Russell Sage.
90.
TinbergenJan. 1975. Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.
91.
TobinJames. 1994. “Poverty in Relation to Macroeconomic Trends, Cycles, and Policies.” Pp. 147–67 in Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change, edited by DanzigerS., SandefurG. D., and WeinbergD. H.. New York: Russell Sage.
92.
Van KersbergenKees. 1995. Social Capitalism.London, England: Routledge.
93.
WallersteinMichael. 1999. “Wage Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science43:649–80.
94.
WennemoIrene. 1994. Sharing the Costs of Children.Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Institute for Social Research.
95.
WhiteHalbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedastic-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica48:817–38.
96.
WilenskyHarold. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
97.
WoodAdrian. 1994. North-South Trade, Employment, and Inequality.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
98.
World Bank. Various years. World Development Indicators [MRDF]. Washington, DC: World Bank [producer/distributor].
