The contours and correlates of sex segregation in higher education are explored using data from twelve advanced industrialized countries. Tertiary sex segregation is examined across two dimensions: field of study (horizontal segregation) and tertiary level (vertical segregation). The authors argue that the different aspects of female status in higher education (e.g., overall enrollments, representation at the postgraduate level, and representation in traditionally male-dominated fields of study) do not covary because each variable is affected in distinct ways by structural and cultural features commonly associated with “modernity. “ In particular, (1) ideals of universalism do more to undermine vertical segregation than horizontal segregation, and (2) some modern structural features may actually exacerbate specific forms of sex segregation. Consistent with these arguments, results suggest strongly integrative effects of gender-egalitarian cultural attitudes on distributions across tertiary levels, and weaker, less uniform cultural effects on distributions across fields of study (one notable exception being a strong positive effect on women's representation in engineering programs). Two modern structural features—diversified tertiary systems and high rates of female employment—show segregative effects in some fields and institutional sectors. Overall, few across-the-board integrative or segregative effects can be discerned that would lend support to evolutionary conceptualizations of gender stratification. Modern cultural and structural pressures are manifested unevenly and in contextually contingent ways.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerDavid P. and JonesDeborah Perkins. 1993. “Creating Gender Equality: Cross-National Gender Stratification and Mathematical Performance.”Sociology of Education66:91–103.
2.
BeckerGary S.1991. A Treatise on the Family.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BlumbergRae Lesser. 1984. “A General Theory of Gender Stratification.”Sociological Theory2:23–101.
4.
BourqueJill Ker and ConwaySusan C.. 1993. The Politics of women's Education.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5.
BradleyKaren. 2000. “The Incorporation of Women into Higher Education: Paradoxical Outcomes?”Sociology of Education73:1–18.
6.
BradleyKaren and CharlesMaria. 2002. “Women in Higher Education: Understanding Cross-National Similarities and Differences.” Working paper, Department of Sociology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA.
7.
BradleyKaren and KhorDiana. 1993. “Toward an Integration of Theory and Research on the Status of Women.”Gender and Society7:347–78.
8.
BradleyKaren and RamirezFrancisco O.. 1996. “World Polity and Gender Parity: Women's Share of Higher Education, 1965–1985.”Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization11:63–91.
9.
ChangMariko Lin. 2000. “The Evolution of Sex Segregation Regimes.”American Journal of Sociology105:1658–1701.
10.
CharlesMaria. 1992. “Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation.”American Sociological Review57:483–502.
11.
CharlesMaria. 1998. “Structure, Culture, and Sex Segregation in Europe.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility16:89–116.
12.
CharlesMaria and GruskyDavid B.. 1995. “Modeling Cross-National Variability in Occupational Sex Segregation.”American Journal of Sociology100:931–71.
13.
CharlesMaria and GruskyDavid B.. Forthcoming. Sex Segregation in Comparative Perspective.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
ClarkBurton. 1960. “The ‘Cooling-Out’ Function in Higher Education.”American Journal of Sociology65:569–76.
15.
CollierPeter J.2000. “The Effects of Completing a Capstone Course on Student Identity.”Sociology of Education73:285–99.
16.
CollinsRandall, ChafetzJanet Saltzman, BlumbergRae Lesser, ColtraneScott, and TurnerJonathan H.. 1993. “Toward an Integrated Theory of Gender Stratification.”Sociological Perspectives36:185–216.
17.
CorrellShelly J.2001. “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments.”American Journal of Sociology106:1691–1730.
18.
DaviesScott and GuppyNeil. 1997. “Fields of Study, College Selectivity, and Student Inequalities in Higher Education.”Social Forces75:1417–38.
19.
DavisKingsley. 1984. “Wives and Work: The Sex Role Revolution and Its Consequences.”Population and Development Review10:397–417.
20.
FaveDelia, RichardL.. 1980. “The Meek Shall Not Inherit the Earth: Self-Evaluation and the Legitimacy of Social Stratification.”American Sociological Review45:955–71.
21.
FinleyMerrilee Krysa. 1992. “The Educational Contest for Middle- and Working-Class Women: The Reproduction of Inequality.” Pp. 225–47 in Education and Gender Equality, edited by WrigleyJ.. Washington, DC: Falmer.
22.
FlorentineRobert. 1987. “Men, Women, and the Premed Persistence Gap: A Normative Alternatives Approach.”American Journal of Sociology92:1118–39.
23.
Fujimura-FanselowKumiko. 1985. “Women's Participation in Higher Education in Japan.”Comparative Education Review29:471–89.
24.
FullerRex and SchoenbergerRichard. 1991. “The Salary Gender Gap: Do Academic Achievement, Internship Experience, and College Major Make a Difference?”Social Science Quarterly72:715–26.
25.
GecasViktor. 1991. “The Self-Concept as a Basis for a Theory of Motivation.” Pp. 171–87 in The Self-Society Dynamic: Cognition, Emotion, and Action, edited by HowardJ. A. and CalleroP. L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GoodeWilliam J.1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns.New York: Free Press.
27.
GruskyDavid B. and CharlesMaria. 1998. “The Past, Present, and Future of Sex Segregation Methodology.”Demography35:497–504.
28.
GruskyDavid B. and HauserRobert M.. 1984. “Comparative Mobility Revisited: Models of Convergence and Divergence in 16 Countries.”American Sociological Review49:19–38.
29.
HakimCatherine. 1996. Key Issues in Women's Work: Female Heterogeneity and the Polarisation of Women's Employment.London, England: Athlone.
30.
HansonSandra L., SchaubMaryellen, and BakerDavid. 1996. “Gender Stratification in the Science Pipeline: A Comparative Analysis of Seven Countries.”Gender and Society10:271–90.
31.
HartmannHeidi I.1987. “Changes in Women's Economic and Family Roles in Post-World War II United States.” Pp. 33–64 in Women, Households, and the Economy, edited by BeneriaL. and StimpsonC. R.. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
32.
HuberJoan. 1988. “A Theory of Family, Economy, and Gender.”Journal of Family Issues9:9–26.
33.
InkelesAlex and SmithDavid H.. 1974. Becoming Modern: Individual Change in Six Developing Countries.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
JacksonRobert Max. 1998. Destined for Equality: The Inevitable Rise of Women's Status.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
JacobsJerry A.1995. “Gender and Academic Specialties: Trends among Recipients of College Degrees in the 1980s.”Sociology of Education68:81–98.
36.
JacobsJerry A.1996. “Gender Inequality and Higher Education.”Annual Review of Sociology22:153–85.
37.
JonssonJan O.1999. “Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice: An Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model.”European Sociological Review15:391–404.
38.
KellyGail P., ed. 1989. International Handbook of Women's Education.New York: Greenwood.
39.
KellyGail P. and SlaughterShelia. 1991. Women's Higher Education in Comparative Perspective.Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
40.
KingstonPaul William and SmartJohn C.. 1990. “The Economic Pay-off of Prestigious Colleges.” Pp. 147–74 in The High Status Tract-Studies of Elite Schools and Stratification, edited by KingstonP. W. and LewisL. S.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
41.
LamontMichele and ThivenotLaurent. 2000. “Introduction: Toward a Renewed Comparative Cultural Sociology.” Pp. 1–22 in Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, edited by LamontM. and ThévenotL.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MeekV. Lynn and GoedegebuureLeo, eds. 1996. The Mockers and the Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence, and Diversity in Higher Education.Paris, France: IAU Press.
43.
MeyerJohn W.2001. “The Evolution of Modern Stratification Systems.” Pp. 881–90 in Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, 2d ed., edited by GruskyD.. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
National Science Foundation (NSF). 2000. Science and Education Indicators.Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
45.
OppenheimerValerie K.1973. “Demographic Influence on Female Employment and the Status of Women.”American Journal of Sociology78:946–61.
46.
PersellCaroline Hodges, JamesCarrie, KangTrivina, and SnyderKarrie. 1999. “Gender and Education in Global Perspective.” Pp. 407–40 in Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by Saltzman ChafetzJ.. New York: Kluwer.
47.
PolachekSolomon W.1978. “Sex Differences in College Major.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review31:498–508.
48.
RamirezFrancisco O.1987. “Global Changes, World Myths, and the Demise of Cultural Gender: Implications for the United States.” Pp. 257–73 in America's Changing Role in the World System, edited by BoswellT. and BergesenA.. New York: Praeger.
49.
RamirezFrancisco O. Forthcoming. “Progress, Justice, and Gender Equity: World Models and Cross-National Trends.” In Bending the Bars of the Iron Cage: Institutional Dynamics and Processes, edited by PowellW. and JonesD.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
RamirezFrancisco O. and McEneaneyElizabeth H.. 1997. “From Women's Suffrage to Reproduction Rights? Cross-National Considerations.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology38:6–24.
51.
RamirezFrancisco O. and WeissJane. 1979. “The Political Incorporation of Women.” Pp. 238–49 in National Development and the World System: Educational, Economic, and Political Change, 1950–1970, edited by MeyerJ. W. and HannanM.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
52.
RamirezFrancisco O. and WotipkaChristine Min. 2001. “Slowly but Surely? The Global Expansion of Women's Participation in Science and Engineering Fields of Study, 1972–92.”Sociology of Education74:231–51.
53.
ReskinBarbara F.1993. “Sex Segregation in the Workplace.”Annual Review of Sociology19: 241–70.
54.
ReskinBarbara F. and RoosPatricia A.. 1990. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
55.
RosenbergRosalind. 1988. “The Limits of Access: The History of Coeducation in America.” Pp. 107–29 in Women and Higher Education in American History, edited by FaragherJ. M. and HoweF.. New York: Norton.
56.
ScottJoan W.1988. “Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference: Or, the Uses of Post-structuralist Theory for Feminism.”Feminist Studies14:33–50.
57.
SeagerJoni. 1997. The Status of Women in the World Atlas.London, England: Penguin.
58.
SerpeRichard T.1991. “The Cerebral Self: Thinking and Planning about Identity-Relevant Activity.” Pp. 55–73 in The Self-Society Dynamic: Cognition, Emotion, and Action, edited by HowardJ. A. and CalleroP. L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SiaroffAlan. 1994. “Work, Welfare, and Gender Equality: A New Typology.” Pp. 82–100 in Gendering Welfare States, edited by SainsburyD.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
SirowyLarry and BenavotAaron. 1986. “Higher Education in an Era of Equality: A Cross-National Study of Institutional Differentiation on the Tertiary Level.”Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization6:1–44.
61.
Stolte-HeiskanenVeronica, ed. 1991. Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality?New York: St. Martin's.
62.
StrykerSheldon. 1991. “Exploring the Relevance of Social Cognition for the Relationship of Self and Society: Linking the Cognitive Perspective and Identity Theory.” Pp. 19–41 in The Self-Society Dynamic: Cognition, Emotion, and Action, edited by HowardJ. A. and CalleroP. L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63.
United Nations.1991. The World's Women, 1970–1990: Trends and Statistics.New York: United Nations.
64.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). Various years. Statistical Yearbook.Paris, France: UNESCO.
65.
WaiteLinda J. and BerrymanSue E.. 1985. Women in Nontraditional Occupations: Choice and Turnover.Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
66.
WeissJane A., RamirezFrancisco O., and TracyTerry. 1976. “Female Participation in the Occupational System: A Comparative Institutional Analysis.”Social Problems28:593–608.
67.
WindolfPaul. 1997. Expansion and Cultural Change: Higher Education in Germany, the United States, and Japan, 1870–1990.Boulder, CO: Westview.
68.
WuthnowRobert. 1989. Communities of Discourse: Ideology and Social Structure in the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and European Socialism.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
YoungGaye, FortLucia, and DannerMona. 1994. “Moving from ‘The Status of Women’ to ‘Gender Inequality’: Conceptualisation, Social Indicators, and an Empirical Application.”International Sociology9:55–85.
70.
Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung. 1994. International Social Service Program (ISSP).Cologne, Germany: University of Cologne.
