Sociologists frequently study changes across cohorts in the consequences of family background, gender, education, and cognitive ability for occupational outcomes. This study focuses, however, on how the consequences of these variables change within the course of individuals’ lives. To appropriately estimate changes across the life course in the determinants of occupational standing, corrections are made for measurement errors in variables, and data on siblings are used to account for all aspects (measured and unmeasured) of family background. The analyses use data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, which provides multiple measures of siblings’ occupational standing at four points in their lives. Models of sibling resemblance show that the effects of family background on occupational standing operate entirely through their effects on education and cognitive ability. The effects of education decline across the life course, while the effects of ability remain small but persistent. In comparing men and women, substantial differences are found in career trajectories and in life course changes in occupational returns to schooling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonPaul D.1987. “Estimation of Linear Models with Incomplete Data.”Sociological Methodology17:71–103.
2.
AllisonPaul D. and HauserRobert M.. 1991. “Reducing Bias in Estimates of Linear Models by Remeasurement of a Random Subsample.”Sociological Methods and Research19:466–92.
3.
BergIvan. 1970. Education and Jobs.New York: Praeger.
4.
BielbyWilliam T.1982. “Arbitrary Metrics in Multiple Indicator Models of Latent Variables.”Department of Sociology, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA. Unpublished essay.
5.
BielbyWilliam T., HauserRobert M., and FeathermanDavid L.. 1977a. “Response Errors of Black and Nonblack Males in Models of the Intergenerational Transmission of Socioeconomic Status.”American Journal of Sociology82:1242–88.
6.
BielbyWilliam T., HauserRobert M., and FeathermanDavid L.. 1977b. “Response Errors of Nonblack Males in Models of the Stratification Process.”Journal of the American Statistical Association72:723–35.
7.
BillsDavid B.1988. “Educational Credentials and Hiring Decisions: What Employers Look for in New Employees.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility7:71–97.
8.
BlauPeter M. and DuncanOtis Dudley. 1967. The American Occupational Structure.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
9.
BowlesSamuel. 1972. “Schooling and Inequality from Generation to Generation.”Journal of Political Economy80:S219–51.
10.
BowlesSamuel and GintisHerbert. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America.New York: Basic Books.
11.
BowlesSamuel and NelsonValerie. 1974. “The Inheritance of IQ and the Intergenerational Reproduction of Economic Inequality.”Review of Economics and Statistics56:39–51.
12.
CollinsRandall. 1979. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification.New York: Academic.
13.
DiPreteThomas A. and GruskyDavid B.. 1990. “Structure and Trend in the Process of Stratification for American Men and Women.”American Journal of Sociology96:107–43.
14.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1961. “A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations.” Pp. 109–38 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by ReissA. J.Jr. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
15.
ElderGlen H.Jr. 1974. Children of the Great Depression.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
ElderGlen H.Jr. 1987. “War Mobilization and the Life Course: A Cohort of World War II Veterans.”Sociological Forum2:449–72.
17.
FeathermanDavid L.1971. “A Research Note: A Social Structural Model for the Socioeconomic Career.”American Journal of Sociology77:293–304.
18.
FeathermanDavid L.1973. “Comments on Models for the Socioeconomic Career.”American Sociological Review38:785–91.
19.
FeathermanDavid L. and HauserRobert M.. 1978. Opportunity and Change.New York: Academic.
20.
FeathermanDavid Lee and StevensGillian. 1982. “A Revised Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status: Application in Analysis of Sex Differences in Attainment.” Pp. 83–128 in AAAS Selected Symposium 81 Measures of Socioeconomic Status: Current Issues, edited by PowersM. G.. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
FischerClaude S., HoutMichael, JankowskiMartin Sanchez, LucasSamuel R., SwindlerAnn, and VossKim. 1996. Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
FonerAnne. 1979. “Ascribed and Achieved Bases of Stratification.”Annual Review of Sociology5:219–42.
23.
GrilichesZvi. 1979. “Sibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginnings of a Survey.”Journal of Political Economy87:S37–64.
24.
HauserRobert M. and GoldbergerArthur S.. 1971. “The Treatment of Unobservable Variables in Path Analysis.”Sociological Methodology1:81–117.
25.
HauserRobert M. and MosselPeter A.. 1985. “Fraternal Resemblance in Educational Attainment and Occupational Status.”American Journal of Sociology91:650–73.
26.
HauserRobert M., SewellWilliam H., and WarrenJohn Robert. 1994. “Education, Occupation, and Earnings in the Long Run: Men and Women from Adolescence to Midlife.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 8, Los Angeles, CA.
27.
HauserRobert M., SheridanJennifer T., and WarrenJohn Robert. 1999. “Socioeconomic Achievements of Siblings in the Life Course: New Findings from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.”Research on Aging21:338–78.
28.
HauserRobert M., TsaiShu-Ling, and SewellWilliam H.. 1983. “A Model of Stratification with Response Error in Social and Psychological Variables.”Sociology of Education56:20–46.
29.
HauserRobert M. and WarrenJohn Robert. 1997. “Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status: A Review, Update, and Critique.”Sociological Methodology27:177–298.
30.
HerrnsteinRichard J. and MurrayCharles. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.New York: Free Press.
31.
HoutMichael. 1988. “More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s.”American Journal of Sociology93:1358–400.
32.
HoutMichael. 1996. “Speed Bumps on the Road to Meritocracy: Occupational Mobility of Women and Men in the United States, 1972-1994.” Working paper, Survey Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
33.
JencksChristopher, SmithMarshall, AclandHenry, BaneMary Jo, CohenDavid, GintisHerbert, HeynsBarbara, and MichelsonStephan. 1972. Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America.New York: Basic Books.
34.
JoreskogKarl G. and GoldbergerArthur S.. 1975. “Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable.”Journal of the American Statistical Association70:631–39.
35.
JöreskogKarl G. and SörbomDag. 1989. LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications.2d ed. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
36.
KelleyJohn. 1973a. “Causal Chain Models for the Socioeconomic Career.”American Sociological Review38:481–93.
37.
KelleyJohn. 1973b. “History, Causal Chains and Careers: A Reply.”American Sociological Review38:791–96.
38.
KerckhoffAlan C.1993. Diverging Pathways: Social Structure and Career Deflections.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39.
KohnMelvin L. and SchoolerCarmi. 1983. Work and Personality: An Inquiry Into the Impact of Social Stratification.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40.
KorenmanSanders and WinshipChristopher. 1995. “A Reanalysis of The Bell Curve.” Working Paper No. 5230, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
41.
MasonWilliam, HauserRobert M., KerckhoffAlan C., PossSharon S., and MantonKenneth. 1976. “Models of Response Error in Student Reports of Parental Socioeconomic Characteristics.” Pp. 443–519 in Schooling and Achievement in American Society, edited by SewellW. H., HauserR. M., and FeathermanD. L.. New York: Academic.
42.
MostellerFrederick and TukeyJohn W.. 1977. Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43.
O'RandAngela M.1996a. “The Cumulative Stratification of the Life Course.” Pp. 188–207 in Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, edited by BinstockR. H. and GeorgeL. K.. New York: Academic.
44.
O'RandAngela M.1996b. “The Precious and the Precocious: Understanding Cumulative Disadvantage and Cumulative Advantage over the Life Course.”The Gerontologist36:230–38.
45.
OlneckMichael R.1977. “On the Use of Sibling Data to Estimate the Effects of Family Background, Cognitive Skills, and Schooling: Results from the Kalamazoo Brothers Study.” Pp. 125–62 in Kinometrics: Determinants of Socioeconomic Success within and between Families, edited by TaubmanP.. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.
46.
PavalkoEliza K. and ElderGlen H.Jr. 1990. “World War II and Divorce: A Life-Course Perspective.”American Journal of Sociology95:1213–34.
47.
RafteryAdrian E.1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.”Sociological Methodology25:111–63.
48.
RileyMatilda White. 1987. “On the Significance of Age in Sociology.”American Sociological Review52:1–14.
49.
SampsonRobert J. and LaubJohn H.. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
SampsonRobert J. and LaubJohn H.. 1996. “Socioeconomic Achievement in the Life Course of Disadvantaged Men: Military Service as a Turning Point, Circa 1940-1965.”American Sociological Review61:347–67.
51.
SewellWilliam H. and HauserRobert M.. 1975. Education, Occupation, and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career.New York: Academic.
52.
SewellWilliam H. and HauserRobert M.. 1977. “On the Effects of Families and Family Structure on Achievements.” Pp. 255–83 in Kinometrics: The Determinants of Educational Attainment, Mental Ability, and Occupational Success within and between Families, edited by TaubmanP. J.. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland.
53.
SewellWilliam H., HauserRobert M., and WolfWendy C.. 1980. “Sex, Schooling, and Occupational Status.”American Journal of Sociology86:551–83.
54.
SørensenAage B.2001. “The Basic Concepts of Stratification Research: Class, Status, and Power.” Pp. 287–300 in Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, 2d ed, edited by GruskyD. B.. Boulder, CO: Westview.
55.
WarrenJohn Robert. 2001. “Changes with Age in the Process of Occupational Stratification.”Social Science Research30:264–88.
56.
WarrenJohn Robert, SheridanJennifer T., and HauserRobert M.. 1998. “Choosing a Measure of Occupational Standing: How Useful Are Composite Measures in Analyses of Gender Inequality in Occupational Attainment?”Sociological Methods and Research27:3–76.
