Has the relationship between economic prospects and marriage formation in the United States changed in recent decades? To answer this question, a discrete-time event-history analysis was conducted using data from multiple cohorts of the National Longitudinal Surveys of Labor Market Experience. Among women, results indicate growth in the importance of earnings for marriage formation between the early baby-boom cohort (born between 1950 and 1954) and late baby-boom cohort (born between 1961 and 1965). Evidence of cohort change in the relationship between men's economic prospects and marriage, however, is limited. Despite important racial differences in the economic and attitudinal context of marriage, key results are generally similar for whites and for African Americans. Taken together, these findings imply that men and women are growing to resemble one another with respect to the relationship between economic prospects and marriage, although this convergence is driven primarily by changing patterns of marriage among women. These results are largely supportive of Oppenheimer's career-entry theory of marriage and suggest that Becker's specialization and trading model of marriage may be outdated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonPaul D.1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide.Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
2.
BarichRachel R. and BielbyDenise D.. 1996. “Rethinking Marriage: Change and Stability in Expectations, 1967–1994.”Journal of Family Issues17:139–69.
3.
BeckerGary S. [1981] 1992. A Treatise on the Family. Reprint, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BernhardtAnnette, MorrisMartina, HandcockMark S., and ScottMarc A.. 1999. “Trends in Job Instability and Wages for Young Adult Men.”Journal of Labor Economics17(supp.): S65–S90.
5.
BulcroftRichard A. and BulcroftKris A.. 1993. “Race Differences in Attitudinal and Motivational Factors in the Decision to Marry.”Journal of Marriage and the Family55:338–55.
6.
BumpassLarry L.1990. “What's Happening to the Family? Interactions between Demographic and Institutional Change.”Demography27:483–95.
7.
BumpassLarry L. and SweetJames A.. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.”Demography26:615–25.
8.
CancianMaria M., DanzigerSheldon, and GottschalkPeter. 1993. “The Changing Contributions of Men and Women to the Level and Distribution of Family Income, 1968–1988.” Pp. 317–53 in Poverty and Prosperity in the United States of America in the Late Twentieth Century, edited by PapadimitriouD. and WolffE.. New York: St. Martin's.
9.
CarterWendy Y.1993. “Attitudes toward Premarital Sex, Non-Marital Childbearing, Cohabitation, and Marriage among Blacks and Whites.” NSFH Working Paper No. 61, University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology, Madison, WI.
10.
CasperLynne M.1995. “What Does It Cost to Mind Our Preschoolers?”Current Population Report (P70–52). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
11.
Center for Human Resource Research. 1997. NLS Handbook 1997.Columbus, OH: Center for Human Resource Research, Ohio State University.
12.
CherlinAndrew J.1980. “Postponing Marriage: The Influence of Young Women's Work Expectations.”Journal of Marriage and the Family42:355–65.
ClarkbergMarin. 1999. “The Price of Partnering: The Role of Economic Well-Being in Young Adults' First Union Experiences.”Social Forces77:945–68.
15.
CooneyTeresa M. and HoganDennis P.. 1991. “Marriage in an Institutionalized Life Course: First Marriage among American Men in the Twentieth Century.”Journal of Marriage and the Family53:178–90.
16.
CreadyCynthia M., FossettMark A., and Jill KiecoltK.. 1991. “Mate Availability and African American Family Structure in the U.S. Non-metropolitan South, 1960–1990.”Journal of Marriage and the Family59:192–203.
17.
DixonRuth B.1971. “Explaining Cross-Cultural Variations in Age at Marriage and Proportions Never Marrying.”Population Studies25:215–33.
18.
DuncanGreg J., BoisjolyJohanne, and SmeedingTimothy. 1996. “Economic Mobility of Young Workers in the 1970s and 1980s.”Demography33:497–509.
19.
EasterlinRichard. 1980. Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare.New York: Basic Books.
20.
EnglandPaula and FolbreNancy. 1999. “Who Should Pay for the Kids?”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science563:194–207.
21.
GoldinClaudia. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
GoldscheiderFrances K. and WaiteLinda J.. 1986. “Sex Differences in the Entry into Marriage.”American Journal of Sociology92:91–109.
23.
GoldscheiderFrances K. and WaiteLinda J.. 1991. New Families, No Families? The Transformation of the American Home.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
GoldsteinJoshua R. and KenneyCatherine T.. 2001. “Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. Women.”American Sociological Review66:506–19.
25.
HajnalJ.1965. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective.” Pp. 101–43 in Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography, edited by GlassD. V. and EversleyD. E. C.. London, England: E. Arnold.
26.
JonesLandon Y.1980. Great Expectations: America and the Baby Boom Generation.New York: Coward, McCann, and Geoghegan.
27.
KoballHeather. 1998. “Have African American Men Become Less Committed to Marriage? Explaining the Twentieth Century Racial Cross-Over in Men's Marriage Timing.”Demography35:251–58.
28.
LichterDaniel T., LeClereFelicia B., and McLaughlinDiane K.. 1991. “Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women.”American Journal of Sociology96:843–67.
29.
LichterDaniel T., McLaughlinDiane K., KephartGeorge, and LandryDavid J.. 1992. “Race and the Retreat from Marriage: A Shortage of Marriageable Men?”American Sociological Review57:781–99.
30.
LloydKim M. and SouthScott J.. 1996. “Contextual Influences on Young Men's Transition to First Marriage.”Social Forces74:1097–119.
31.
MalthusThomas Robert. [1798] 1988. Population: The First Essay. Reprint, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
32.
MareRobert D.1995. “Changes in Educational Attainment and School Enrollment.” Pp. 155–213 in State of the Union, America in the 1990s, vol. 1, Economic Trends, edited by FarleyR.. New York: Russell Sage.
33.
MareRobert D. and WinshipChristopher. 1991. “Socioeconomic Change and the Decline of Marriage for Blacks and Whites.” Pp. 175–202 in The Urban Underclass, edited by JencksC. and PetersonP.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
34.
McLanahanSara and CasperLynne. 1995. “Growing Diversity and Inequality in the American Family.” Pp. 1–45 in State of the Union: America in the 1990s, vol. 2, Social Trends, edited by FarleyR.. New York: Russell Sage.
35.
MichaelRobert T. and TumaNancy Brandon. 1985. “Entry into Marriage and Parenthood by Young Men and Women: The Influence of Family Background.”Demography22:515–44.
36.
ModellJohn. 1999. “When History Is Omitted.” Pp. 226–33 in Transitions to Adulthood in a Changing Economy: No Work, No Family, No Future?, edited by BoothA., CrouterA. C., and ShanahanM. J.. Westport, CT: Praeger.
37.
MorrisMartina and WesternBruce. 1999. “Inequality in Earnings at the Close of the Twentieth Century.”Annual Review of Sociology25:623–57.
38.
NockSteven L.1998. Marriage in Men's Lives.New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
OppenheimerValerie Kincade. 1988. “A Theory of Marriage Timing.”American Journal of Sociology94:563–91.
40.
OppenheimerValerie Kincade. 1997. “Women's Employment and the Gains to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model.”Annual Review of Sociology23:431–53.
41.
OppenheimerValerie Kincade, KalmijnMatthijs, and LimNelson. 1997. “Men's Career Development and Marriage Timing During a Period of Rising Inequality.”Demography34:311–30.
42.
OppenheimerValerie Kincade and LewVivian. 1995. “Marriage Formation in the Eighties: How Important Was Women's Economic Independence?” Pp. 105–38 in Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries, edited by MasonK. O. and JensenA.. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
43.
OppenheimerValerie Kincade and LewinAlisa. 1999. “Career Development and Marriage Formation in a Period of Rising Inequality: Who Is at Risk? What Are Their Prospects?” Pp. 189–225 in Transitions to Adulthood in a Changing Economy: No Work, No Family, No Future?, edited by BoothA., CrouterA. C., and ShanahanM. J.. Westport, CT: Praeger.
44.
PrestonSamuel H. and RichardsAlan T.. 1975. “The Influence of Women's Work Opportunities on Marriage Rates.”Demography12:209–22.
45.
QianZhenchao and PrestonSamuel H.. 1993. “Changes in American Marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and Forces of Attraction by Age and Education.”American Sociological Review58:482–95.
46.
RyderNorman B.1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.”American Sociological Review30:843–61.
47.
SassierSharon and SchoenRobert. 1999. “The Effect of Attitudes and Economic Activity on Marriage.”Journal of Marriage and the Family61:147–59.
48.
SayerLiana C. and BianchiSuzanne M.. 2000. “Women's Economic Independence and the Probability of Divorce.”Journal of Family Issues21:906–43.
49.
SeltzerJudith A.2000. “Families Formed Outside of Marriage.”Journal of Marriage and the Family62:1247–68.
50.
SmockPamela J.2000. “Cohabitation in the United States: An Appraisal of Research Themes, Findings, and Implications.”Annual Review of Sociology26:1–20.
51.
SmockPamela J. and ManningWendy D.. 1997. “Cohabiting Partners' Economic Circumstances and Marriage.”Demography34:331–41.
52.
SouthScott J.1991. “Sociodemographic Differentials in Mate Selection Preferences.”Journal of Marriage and the Family53:928–40.
53.
TestaMark and KroghMarilyn. 1995. “The Effect of Employment on Marriage among Black Males in Inner-City Chicago.” Pp. 59–95 in The Decline in Marriage among African Americans, edited by TuckerM. B. and Mitchell-KernanC.. New York: Russell Sage.
54.
ThorntonArland. 1989. “Changing Attitudes toward Family Issues in the United States.”Journal of Marriage and the Family51:873–93.
55.
ThorntonArland, AxinnWilliam, and TeachmanJay. 1995. “The Influence of School Enrollment and Accumulation on Cohabitation and Marriage in Early Adulthood.”American Sociological Review60:762–74.
56.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1984. “Money Income of Households, Families, and Persons in the United States: 1982.”Current Population Reports (Series P–60, No. 142). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
57.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1991. “Money Income of Households, Families, and Persons in the United States: 1990.”Current Population Reports (Series P-60, No. 174). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
58.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1994. “Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1993.”Current Population Reports (Series P20–478). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
59.
WaiteLinda J. and SpitzeGlenna D.. 1981. “Young Women's Transition to Marriage.”Demography18:681–94.
60.
WetzelJames. 1995. “Labor Force, Unemployment, and Earnings.” Pp. 59–105 in State of the Union: America in the 1990s, vol. 1, Economic Trends, edited by FarleyR.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
61.
WhiteLynn K.1981. “A Note on Racial Differences in the Effect of Female Economic Opportunity on Marriage Rates.”Demography18:349–54.
62.
WhiteLynn K. and RogersStacy J.. 2000. “Economic Circumstances and Family Outcomes: A Review of the 1990s.”Journal of Marriage and the Family62:1035–51.
63.
WilsonWilliam Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
